Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

biz-4p-7p(商务 4p 7p)

biz-4p-7p 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

biz-4p-7p 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 6,841。

总安装 416周安装 17GitHub Stars 125下载 135核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:biz-4p-7p(商务 4p 7p)
来源仓库:https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills
仓库路径:skills/biz-4p-7p
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-4p-7p
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-4p-7p

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

biz-4p-7p 用于分析市场营销组合框架,涵盖产品、价格、渠道和推广要素。核心能力包括将传统 4P 扩展至服务领域的 7P(增加人员、流程和实体证据)。使用方式:在制定产品发布或市场进入策略时提供战术决策支持。安装方式:通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装。

适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等宿主环境。

来源仓库内路径:skills/biz-4p-7p

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-4p-7p;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

biz-4p-7p 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/asgard-ai-platform/skills --skill biz-4p-7p。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

biz-4p-7p 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

biz-4p-7p 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

biz-4p-7p 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

biz-4p-7p 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 416 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 135 次,GitHub 125 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

biz-4p-7p 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
biz-4p-7p

商务 4p 7p · 本页

416125只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Marketing Mix: 4P / 7P

Overview

The 4P (Product, Price, Place, Promotion) framework structures tactical marketing decisions. For services, extend to 7P by adding People, Process, and Physical Evidence. Unlike STP (strategic), the marketing mix is tactical — it answers "how do we execute?" after STP answers "for whom?"

When to Use

Trigger conditions:

  • User planning a product launch or go-to-market
  • User needs to audit or redesign their marketing mix
  • User asks "how should we price this?", "where should we sell?", or "how do we promote?"
  • User has completed STP and needs the next step

When NOT to use:

  • Before STP is done — mix without a target is unfocused
  • For strategic-level decisions → use STP, SWOT, or Ansoff
  • For brand identity work → use Brand Positioning

Framework

IRON LAW: All Ps Must Be Internally Consistent

The 4/7 Ps must reinforce each other. A luxury product (Product) at a
budget price (Price) sold in discount stores (Place) with mass-market
ads (Promotion) is contradictory. Every P must tell the same story.

Before finalizing, check: "Does the Price match the Product? Does the
Place match the Price? Does the Promotion match the Place?"
IRON LAW: Marketing Mix Follows STP

The mix must be designed FOR the target segment identified in STP.
Different segments require different mixes. A 4P designed without
a specific target segment is guesswork.

The 4Ps (Product and Service Businesses)

Product — What you sell

  • Core benefit, features, quality level, design, branding
  • Product line breadth and depth, packaging, warranty
  • Question: "What does the target segment need, and how does our product deliver it?"

Price — What customers pay

  • Pricing strategy: cost-plus, value-based, competitive, penetration, skimming
  • Discounts, payment terms, price sensitivity of target segment
  • Question: "What is the target segment willing to pay, and what does price signal about our positioning?"

Place — How customers get it

  • Distribution channels: direct, retail, online, wholesale, marketplace
  • Channel coverage: intensive, selective, exclusive
  • Logistics, inventory, geographic availability
  • Question: "Where does our target segment expect to buy, and how do we get the product there?"

Promotion — How customers learn about it

  • Advertising, sales promotion, PR, personal selling, digital marketing
  • Content marketing, social media, influencer partnerships
  • Question: "Where does our target segment get information, and what message resonates?"

The Extended 3Ps (Service Businesses)

People — Who delivers the service

  • Employee training, customer-facing attitude, recruitment standards
  • Customer's role in co-creating the service experience

Process — How the service is delivered

  • Service delivery steps, standardization vs customization, wait times
  • Technology enablement, self-service options

Physical Evidence — Tangible cues of service quality

  • Store design, website UX, uniforms, receipts, packaging
  • Anything the customer can see, touch, or experience that signals quality

Step-by-Step

  1. Confirm target segment (from STP)
  2. Design each P with the target in mind
  3. Check internal consistency across all Ps
  4. Identify gaps — which P is weakest?
  5. Prioritize actions — which P has the biggest impact on the target?

Output Format

# Marketing Mix: {Product/Service}

## Target Segment
{From STP — who is this mix designed for}

## 4P Analysis

### Product
- Core benefit: ...
- Key features: ...
- Differentiation: ...

### Price
- Strategy: {cost-plus / value-based / competitive / penetration / skimming}
- Price point: {$X}
- Rationale: ...

### Place
- Channels: ...
- Coverage: {intensive / selective / exclusive}
- Key channel: ...

### Promotion
- Primary channels: ...
- Key message: ...
- Budget allocation: ...

## Extended 3P (services only)

### People
...

### Process
...

### Physical Evidence
...

## Consistency Check
| P vs P | Consistent? | Notes |
|--------|------------|-------|
| Product ↔ Price | ✓/✗ | ... |
| Price ↔ Place | ✓/✗ | ... |
| Place ↔ Promotion | ✓/✗ | ... |
| Promotion ↔ Product | ✓/✗ | ... |

## Priority Actions
1. ...
2. ...

Examples

Correct Application

Scenario: 4P for a premium Taiwanese tea brand selling bottled tea in convenience stores

PDecisionRationale
ProductCold-brewed single-origin oolong, 350ml glass bottle, minimalist labelPremium positioning requires premium packaging and clear differentiation from PET bottle teas
PriceNT$65 (vs NT$25-35 for standard bottled tea)Value-based pricing; target segment (25-40 urban professionals) views tea as a small luxury, not a commodity
PlaceSelective distribution — 7-ELEVEN City Café section only, not general shelfExclusive placement reinforces premium positioning; City Café area signals "coffee-tier quality"
PromotionInstagram KOL partnerships + in-store tasting eventsTarget segment follows lifestyle KOLs; tasting events reduce trial barrier for premium price

Consistency check: Premium product ✓ → Premium price ✓ → Selective placement ✓ → Aspirational promotion ✓ — All Ps tell the same story.

Incorrect Application

What went wrong:

  • Premium glass-bottle tea (Product) sold at NT$25 (Price) in every store (Place) with price-cut promotions (Promotion) → Every P contradicts the premium positioning. Violates Iron Law: internal consistency.
  • Designed the mix without specifying a target segment → No basis for decisions. Violates Iron Law: mix follows STP.

Gotchas

  • Price is not just a number: Price communicates positioning. A NT$65 tea at 7-ELEVEN says "premium but accessible." At NT$25 it says "commodity." The number is a message.
  • Place decisions are hard to reverse: Entering discount channels erodes premium positioning permanently. Exiting a channel alienates existing customers. Choose carefully.
  • Digital changes Place and Promotion: For online businesses, Place = platform (Shopee vs own website vs LINE Shopping) and Promotion = content + ads + SEO. The framework still applies.
  • 7P for all service businesses: If there's a human delivering the service, you need People, Process, and Physical Evidence. A SaaS product with customer success is a service business.
  • Promotion ≠ advertising only: Promotion includes PR, events, sales, partnerships, content. Don't default to "run ads" — match the channel to where the target segment pays attention.

References

  • For detailed pricing strategy techniques, see references/pricing-strategies.md
  • For channel strategy frameworks, see references/distribution-channels.md

平台分布

Codex

34.9%
按下载量换算47

Claude

31.31%
按下载量换算42

Cursor

17.22%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

8.24%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills