Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

bio-ontology-mapper-1生物本体映射器 1

Agent Skill

bio-ontology-mapper-1 用于补充开发相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接开发相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,688

周安装

112

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

896
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:bio-ontology-mapper-1(生物本体映射器 1)
来源仓库:https://github.com/aipoch-ai/bio-ontology-mapper-1
安装命令:
openclaw skills install bio-ontology-mapper-1
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install bio-ontology-mapper-1

简介

bio-ontology-mapper-1 用于将非结构化生物医学文本映射到标准化本体(如 SNOMED CT),适用于 OpenClaw 环境。

  • 它支持开发相关任务,帮助 Agent 理解并处理生物医学术语的标准化表达。
  • 通过 openclaw skills install bio-ontology-mapper-1 命令安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

name
bio-ontology-mapper
description
Map unstructured biomedical text to standardized ontologies (SNOMED CT.
license
MIT
skill-author
AIPOCH

Bio-Ontology Mapper

When to Use

  • Use this skill when the task is to Map unstructured biomedical text to standardized ontologies (SNOMED CT.
  • Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
  • Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.

Key Features

  • Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Map unstructured biomedical text to standardized ontologies (SNOMED CT.
  • Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py.
  • Reference material available in references/ for task-specific guidance.
  • Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

  • Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
  • dataclasses: unspecified. Declared in requirements.txt.
  • difflib: unspecified. Declared in requirements.txt.

Example Usage

cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Evidence Insight/bio-ontology-mapper"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help

Example run plan:

  1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
  2. Edit the in-file CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
  3. Run python scripts/main.py with the validated inputs.
  4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

Implementation Details

See ## Workflow above for related details.

  • Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
  • Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
  • Primary implementation surface: scripts/main.py.
  • Reference guidance: references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
  • Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
  • Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Quick Check

Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.

python -m py_compile scripts/main.py

Audit-Ready Commands

Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.

python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help

Workflow

  1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
  2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
  3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
  4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
  5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.

Overview

Biomedical terminology normalization tool that maps free-text clinical and scientific concepts to standardized ontologies for semantic interoperability and data harmonization.

Key Capabilities:

  • Multi-Ontology Support: SNOMED CT, MeSH, ICD-10, LOINC, RxNorm
  • Entity Extraction: NER for diseases, symptoms, procedures, drugs
  • Fuzzy Matching: Handle typos, abbreviations, and synonyms
  • Confidence Scoring: Reliability metrics for each mapping
  • Batch Processing: Normalize large datasets efficiently
  • Cross-Mapping: Translate between ontology systems

Core Capabilities

1. Entity Recognition and Mapping

Extract and map biomedical entities to ontologies:

from scripts.mapper import BioOntologyMapper

mapper = BioOntologyMapper()

# Map clinical text
result = mapper.map_text(
    text="Patient has diabetes and hypertension, taking metformin",
    ontologies=["snomed", "mesh", "rxnorm"],
    confidence_threshold=0.7
)

for entity in result.entities:
    print(f"{entity.text} → {entity.concept_id} ({entity.ontology})")
    print(f"  Preferred: {entity.preferred_term}")
    print(f"  Confidence: {entity.confidence:.2f}")

Supported Ontologies:

OntologyDomainUse Case
SNOMED CTClinicalEHR interoperability
MeSHLiteraturePubMed indexing
ICD-10BillingDiagnosis codes
LOINCLabsTest result standardization
RxNormDrugsMedication normalization
HGNCGenesGene name standardization

2. Cross-Ontology Translation

Map concepts between different ontologies:


# Cross-map SNOMED to ICD-10
translation = mapper.cross_map(
    source_id="22298006",  # SNOMED: Myocardial infarction
    source_ontology="snomed",
    target_ontology="icd10"
)

print(f"ICD-10: {translation.target_id} - {translation.target_term}")

# Output: I21.9 - Acute myocardial infarction, unspecified

Cross-Mapping Coverage:

  • SNOMED CT ↔ ICD-10-CM (clinical modifications)
  • MeSH ↔ SNOMED CT (literature to clinical)
  • RxNorm ↔ ATC (drug classifications)
  • LOINC ↔ SNOMED (lab to clinical)

3. Batch Normalization

Process large datasets:


# Batch process CSV
results = mapper.batch_map(
    input_file="clinical_terms.csv",
    text_column="diagnosis_description",
    ontologies=["snomed", "icd10"],
    output_format="csv",
    max_workers=4
)

# Results include:

# - Original term

# - Mapped concept ID

# - Confidence score

# - Alternative mappings (if ambiguous)

Performance:

  • ~100 terms/second (with caching)
  • ~20 terms/second (API lookup)
  • Parallel processing for large datasets

4. Confidence Scoring and Validation

Assess mapping reliability:

scoring = mapper.score_mapping(
    term="heart attack",
    candidate="22298006",  # Myocardial infarction
    factors=["string_similarity", "context_match", "frequency"]
)

print(f"Overall confidence: {scoring.confidence:.2f}")
print(f"Breakdown: {scoring.factors}")

Scoring Factors:

  • String similarity: Levenshtein distance, n-grams
  • Context match: Surrounding words alignment
  • Frequency: Common usage in corpus
  • Semantic similarity: Vector embeddings

Quality Checklist

Pre-Mapping:

  • [ ] Text preprocessed (lowercase, punctuation handled)
  • [ ] Abbreviations expanded where possible
  • [ ] Language identified (multilingual support)

During Mapping:

  • [ ] Confidence threshold appropriate (>0.7 for clinical)
  • [ ] Multiple candidates considered for ambiguous terms
  • [ ] Context used for disambiguation

Post-Mapping:

  • [ ] Low-confidence mappings flagged for review
  • [ ] Unmapped terms logged
  • [ ] CRITICAL: Clinical expert validation for high-stakes use

Before Production:

  • [ ] Mapping accuracy validated on gold standard
  • [ ] False positive rate acceptable (<5%)
  • [ ] Recall acceptable for use case (>90%)
  • [ ] API rate limits respected

Common Pitfalls

Mapping Errors:

  • Abbreviation ambiguity → "MI" = Myocardial infarction OR Michigan

- ✅ Use context; flag for manual review

  • Outdated terms → Old terminology not in current ontology

- ✅ Use historical mappings; update terminology

  • False confidence → High score for wrong concept

- ✅ Always review top-3 candidates

Technical Issues:

  • API failures → No local fallback

- ✅ Implement caching; use local reference files

  • Version mismatches → Different ontology versions

- ✅ Track ontology version used

  • PHI exposure → Sending patient data to external APIs

- ✅ De-identify before API calls; use local processing when possible

References

Available in references/ directory:

  • snomed_ct_guide.md - SNOMED CT hierarchy and relationships
  • mesh_structure.md - MeSH tree structure and qualifiers
  • ontology_mappings.md - Crosswalks between systems
  • nlp_best_practices.md - Biomedical text processing
  • api_documentation.md - External service integration
  • validation_datasets.md - Gold standard test sets

Scripts

Located in scripts/ directory:

  • main.py - CLI interface for mapping
  • mapper.py - Core ontology mapping engine
  • extractor.py - Named entity recognition
  • cross_mapper.py - Ontology-to-ontology translation
  • scorer.py - Confidence calculation
  • batch_processor.py - Large dataset handling
  • validator.py - Mapping quality checks
  • caching.py - Local storage for frequent lookups

Limitations

  • Ambiguity: Many-to-many mappings common; context required
  • Coverage: Rare diseases and new concepts may not be in ontologies
  • Versioning: Ontology updates can change mappings over time
  • Language: Best support for English; other languages limited
  • Real-time: Not suitable for time-critical clinical applications
  • API Dependency: Requires internet for most lookups (caching helps)

⚠️ Critical: Ontology mapping is for research and data integration, not clinical decision-making. Always validate mappings with domain experts before use in patient care contexts. Never process PHI without appropriate de-identification and compliance measures.

Parameters

ParameterTypeDefaultDescription
--termstrRequiredSingle term to map
--inputstrRequiredInput file path
--outputstrRequiredOutput file path
--ontologystr'both'
--thresholdfloat0.7
--formatstr'json'
--use-apistrRequiredUse UMLS/MeSH APIs
--api-keystrRequired

Output Requirements

Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:

  • Objective or requested deliverable
  • Inputs used and assumptions introduced
  • Workflow or decision path
  • Core result, recommendation, or artifact
  • Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
  • Unresolved items and next-step checks

Error Handling

  • If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
  • If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
  • If scripts/main.py fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
  • Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.

Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of bio-ontology-mapper and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

bio-ontology-mapper only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

Response Template

Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:

  1. Objective
  2. Inputs Received
  3. Assumptions
  4. Workflow
  5. Deliverable
  6. Risks and Limits
  7. Next Checks

If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

83.19%
按下载量换算745

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills