Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

bio-ontology-mapper-1(生物本体映射器 1)

bio-ontology-mapper-1 用于补充开发相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接开发相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

bio-ontology-mapper-1 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 9,468。

总安装 2,688周安装 112GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 896核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:bio-ontology-mapper-1(生物本体映射器 1)
来源仓库:https://github.com/aipoch-ai/bio-ontology-mapper-1
安装命令:
openclaw skills install bio-ontology-mapper-1
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install bio-ontology-mapper-1

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

bio-ontology-mapper-1 用于将非结构化生物医学文本映射到标准化本体(如 SNOMED CT),适用于 OpenClaw 环境。它支持开发相关任务,帮助 Agent 理解并处理生物医学术语的标准化表达。

通过 openclaw skills install bio-ontology-mapper-1 命令安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install bio-ontology-mapper-1;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

bio-ontology-mapper-1 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install bio-ontology-mapper-1。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

bio-ontology-mapper-1 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

bio-ontology-mapper-1 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

bio-ontology-mapper-1 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

bio-ontology-mapper-1 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,688 次,近一周安装 112 次,下载 896 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

bio-ontology-mapper-1 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
bio-ontology-mapper-1

生物本体映射器 1 · 本页

2,688—需要联网MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
bio-ontology-mapper
description
Map unstructured biomedical text to standardized ontologies (SNOMED CT.
license
MIT
skill-author
AIPOCH

Bio-Ontology Mapper

When to Use

  • Use this skill when the task is to Map unstructured biomedical text to standardized ontologies (SNOMED CT.
  • Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format.
  • Use this skill when you need a documented fallback path for missing inputs, execution errors, or partial evidence.

Key Features

  • Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Map unstructured biomedical text to standardized ontologies (SNOMED CT.
  • Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py.
  • Reference material available in references/ for task-specific guidance.
  • Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

Dependencies

  • Python: 3.10+. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
  • dataclasses: unspecified. Declared in requirements.txt.
  • difflib: unspecified. Declared in requirements.txt.

Example Usage

cd "20260318/scientific-skills/Evidence Insight/bio-ontology-mapper"
python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help

Example run plan:

  1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
  2. Edit the in-file CONFIG block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
  3. Run python scripts/main.py with the validated inputs.
  4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

Implementation Details

See ## Workflow above for related details.

  • Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
  • Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
  • Primary implementation surface: scripts/main.py.
  • Reference guidance: references/ contains supporting rules, prompts, or checklists.
  • Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
  • Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

Quick Check

Use this command to verify that the packaged script entry point can be parsed before deeper execution.

python -m py_compile scripts/main.py

Audit-Ready Commands

Use these concrete commands for validation. They are intentionally self-contained and avoid placeholder paths.

python -m py_compile scripts/main.py
python scripts/main.py --help

Workflow

  1. Confirm the user objective, required inputs, and non-negotiable constraints before doing detailed work.
  2. Validate that the request matches the documented scope and stop early if the task would require unsupported assumptions.
  3. Use the packaged script path or the documented reasoning path with only the inputs that are actually available.
  4. Return a structured result that separates assumptions, deliverables, risks, and unresolved items.
  5. If execution fails or inputs are incomplete, switch to the fallback path and state exactly what blocked full completion.

Overview

Biomedical terminology normalization tool that maps free-text clinical and scientific concepts to standardized ontologies for semantic interoperability and data harmonization.

Key Capabilities:

  • Multi-Ontology Support: SNOMED CT, MeSH, ICD-10, LOINC, RxNorm
  • Entity Extraction: NER for diseases, symptoms, procedures, drugs
  • Fuzzy Matching: Handle typos, abbreviations, and synonyms
  • Confidence Scoring: Reliability metrics for each mapping
  • Batch Processing: Normalize large datasets efficiently
  • Cross-Mapping: Translate between ontology systems

Core Capabilities

1. Entity Recognition and Mapping

Extract and map biomedical entities to ontologies:

from scripts.mapper import BioOntologyMapper

mapper = BioOntologyMapper()

# Map clinical text
result = mapper.map_text(
    text="Patient has diabetes and hypertension, taking metformin",
    ontologies=["snomed", "mesh", "rxnorm"],
    confidence_threshold=0.7
)

for entity in result.entities:
    print(f"{entity.text} → {entity.concept_id} ({entity.ontology})")
    print(f"  Preferred: {entity.preferred_term}")
    print(f"  Confidence: {entity.confidence:.2f}")

Supported Ontologies:

OntologyDomainUse Case
SNOMED CTClinicalEHR interoperability
MeSHLiteraturePubMed indexing
ICD-10BillingDiagnosis codes
LOINCLabsTest result standardization
RxNormDrugsMedication normalization
HGNCGenesGene name standardization

2. Cross-Ontology Translation

Map concepts between different ontologies:


# Cross-map SNOMED to ICD-10
translation = mapper.cross_map(
    source_id="22298006",  # SNOMED: Myocardial infarction
    source_ontology="snomed",
    target_ontology="icd10"
)

print(f"ICD-10: {translation.target_id} - {translation.target_term}")

# Output: I21.9 - Acute myocardial infarction, unspecified

Cross-Mapping Coverage:

  • SNOMED CT ↔ ICD-10-CM (clinical modifications)
  • MeSH ↔ SNOMED CT (literature to clinical)
  • RxNorm ↔ ATC (drug classifications)
  • LOINC ↔ SNOMED (lab to clinical)

3. Batch Normalization

Process large datasets:


# Batch process CSV
results = mapper.batch_map(
    input_file="clinical_terms.csv",
    text_column="diagnosis_description",
    ontologies=["snomed", "icd10"],
    output_format="csv",
    max_workers=4
)

# Results include:

# - Original term

# - Mapped concept ID

# - Confidence score

# - Alternative mappings (if ambiguous)

Performance:

  • ~100 terms/second (with caching)
  • ~20 terms/second (API lookup)
  • Parallel processing for large datasets

4. Confidence Scoring and Validation

Assess mapping reliability:

scoring = mapper.score_mapping(
    term="heart attack",
    candidate="22298006",  # Myocardial infarction
    factors=["string_similarity", "context_match", "frequency"]
)

print(f"Overall confidence: {scoring.confidence:.2f}")
print(f"Breakdown: {scoring.factors}")

Scoring Factors:

  • String similarity: Levenshtein distance, n-grams
  • Context match: Surrounding words alignment
  • Frequency: Common usage in corpus
  • Semantic similarity: Vector embeddings

Quality Checklist

Pre-Mapping:

  • [ ] Text preprocessed (lowercase, punctuation handled)
  • [ ] Abbreviations expanded where possible
  • [ ] Language identified (multilingual support)

During Mapping:

  • [ ] Confidence threshold appropriate (>0.7 for clinical)
  • [ ] Multiple candidates considered for ambiguous terms
  • [ ] Context used for disambiguation

Post-Mapping:

  • [ ] Low-confidence mappings flagged for review
  • [ ] Unmapped terms logged
  • [ ] CRITICAL: Clinical expert validation for high-stakes use

Before Production:

  • [ ] Mapping accuracy validated on gold standard
  • [ ] False positive rate acceptable (<5%)
  • [ ] Recall acceptable for use case (>90%)
  • [ ] API rate limits respected

Common Pitfalls

Mapping Errors:

  • ❌ Abbreviation ambiguity → "MI" = Myocardial infarction OR Michigan

- ✅ Use context; flag for manual review

  • ❌ Outdated terms → Old terminology not in current ontology

- ✅ Use historical mappings; update terminology

  • ❌ False confidence → High score for wrong concept

- ✅ Always review top-3 candidates

Technical Issues:

  • ❌ API failures → No local fallback

- ✅ Implement caching; use local reference files

  • ❌ Version mismatches → Different ontology versions

- ✅ Track ontology version used

  • ❌ PHI exposure → Sending patient data to external APIs

- ✅ De-identify before API calls; use local processing when possible

References

Available in references/ directory:

  • snomed_ct_guide.md - SNOMED CT hierarchy and relationships
  • mesh_structure.md - MeSH tree structure and qualifiers
  • ontology_mappings.md - Crosswalks between systems
  • nlp_best_practices.md - Biomedical text processing
  • api_documentation.md - External service integration
  • validation_datasets.md - Gold standard test sets

Scripts

Located in scripts/ directory:

  • main.py - CLI interface for mapping
  • mapper.py - Core ontology mapping engine
  • extractor.py - Named entity recognition
  • cross_mapper.py - Ontology-to-ontology translation
  • scorer.py - Confidence calculation
  • batch_processor.py - Large dataset handling
  • validator.py - Mapping quality checks
  • caching.py - Local storage for frequent lookups

Limitations

  • Ambiguity: Many-to-many mappings common; context required
  • Coverage: Rare diseases and new concepts may not be in ontologies
  • Versioning: Ontology updates can change mappings over time
  • Language: Best support for English; other languages limited
  • Real-time: Not suitable for time-critical clinical applications
  • API Dependency: Requires internet for most lookups (caching helps)

⚠️ Critical: Ontology mapping is for research and data integration, not clinical decision-making. Always validate mappings with domain experts before use in patient care contexts. Never process PHI without appropriate de-identification and compliance measures.

Parameters

ParameterTypeDefaultDescription
--termstrRequiredSingle term to map
--inputstrRequiredInput file path
--outputstrRequiredOutput file path
--ontologystr'both'
--thresholdfloat0.7
--formatstr'json'
--use-apistrRequiredUse UMLS/MeSH APIs
--api-keystrRequired

Output Requirements

Every final response should make these items explicit when they are relevant:

  • Objective or requested deliverable
  • Inputs used and assumptions introduced
  • Workflow or decision path
  • Core result, recommendation, or artifact
  • Constraints, risks, caveats, or validation needs
  • Unresolved items and next-step checks

Error Handling

  • If required inputs are missing, state exactly which fields are missing and request only the minimum additional information.
  • If the task goes outside the documented scope, stop instead of guessing or silently widening the assignment.
  • If scripts/main.py fails, report the failure point, summarize what still can be completed safely, and provide a manual fallback.
  • Do not fabricate files, citations, data, search results, or execution outcomes.

Input Validation

This skill accepts requests that match the documented purpose of bio-ontology-mapper and include enough context to complete the workflow safely.

Do not continue the workflow when the request is out of scope, missing a critical input, or would require unsupported assumptions. Instead respond:

bio-ontology-mapper only handles its documented workflow. Please provide the missing required inputs or switch to a more suitable skill.

Response Template

Use the following fixed structure for non-trivial requests:

  1. Objective
  2. Inputs Received
  3. Assumptions
  4. Workflow
  5. Deliverable
  6. Risks and Limits
  7. Next Checks

If the request is simple, you may compress the structure, but still keep assumptions and limits explicit when they affect correctness.

平台分布

OpenClaw

83.19%
按下载量换算745

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills