Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

bind-protocol-mcp(bind protocol MCP 搜索)

bind-protocol-mcp 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

bind-protocol-mcp 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 7,117。

总安装 19,921周安装 847GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 6,979核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:bind-protocol-mcp(bind protocol MCP 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jason-c-child/bind-protocol-mcp
安装命令:
openclaw skills install bind-protocol-mcp
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install bind-protocol-mcp

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

Bind Protocol MCP 服务器用于凭证验证、策略编写和零知识证明生成。适用于区块链、DeFi 和密码学项目中需要身份验证和隐私保护的开发任务。支持凭证管理和零知识证明逻辑的编写与验证。需确保网络连通性和密钥安全,注意协议兼容性与部署环境。

bind-protocol-mcp 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install bind-protocol-mcp;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

bind-protocol-mcp 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install bind-protocol-mcp。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

bind-protocol-mcp 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

bind-protocol-mcp 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

bind-protocol-mcp 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

bind-protocol-mcp 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 19,921 次,近一周安装 847 次,下载 6,979 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

bind-protocol-mcp 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
bind-protocol-mcp

bind protocol MCP 搜索 · 本页

19,921—接触敏感数据MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
bind-mcp
description
Bind Protocol MCP server for credential verification, policy authoring, and zero-knowledge proof generation.
version
2.0.0
metadata
openclaw
requires
env
bins
primaryEnv
BIND_API_KEY
homepage
https://docs.bindprotocol.xyz/mcp/overview
install
package
@bind-protocol/mcp-server
bins
[]

Bind MCP Server — Agent Skill Guide

You have access to the Bind Protocol MCP server. This document teaches you how to use it.

Prerequisites & Installation

Requirements

  • Node.js >= 18 — Required to run the server (npx handles package installation automatically)
  • Bind account — Required for API-backed tools. Create one at https://dashboard.bindprotocol.xyz
  • Agent key (idbr_agent_...) — Required for API-backed tools. Regular API keys (idbr_) are not supported for MCP.

Credential Setup

Bind uses agent keys for MCP authentication. Agent keys are scoped API keys that let org admins control exactly which tools are available, set daily rate limits, and get audit logs.

Key typeFormatMCP supported
Agent keyidbr_agent_<keyId>_<secret>Yes — required for API-backed tools
Regular API keyidbr_<keyId>_<secret>No — rejected by MCP server

To create an agent key:

  1. Sign in at https://dashboard.bindprotocol.xyz
  2. Navigate to Settings > Agent Keys
  3. Select which tool categories the key can access (e.g., credential verification only, or policy authoring + verification)
  4. Copy the key — it is shown only once

MCP Server Configuration

Add the server to your MCP client configuration. The exact file depends on your tool:

ToolConfig file
Claude Code.mcp.json in your project root, or ~/.claude/claude_desktop_config.json
Claude DesktopSettings > Developer > Edit Config
Cursor.cursor/mcp.json in your project root
WindsurfMCP settings

Configuration JSON:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bind": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["@bind-protocol/mcp-server"],
      "env": {
        "BIND_API_KEY": "${BIND_API_KEY}"
      }
    }
  }
}

The BIND_API_KEY environment variable must be set in your shell to your agent key before launching your AI tool. Never hardcode the key directly in config files — always use environment variable references to avoid accidental credential leakage in shared configs or repositories.

Environment variables:

VariableRequiredDefaultDescription
BIND_API_KEYFor API-backed tools—Agent key (idbr_agent_...). Without this, only local tools are available.
BIND_API_URLNohttps://api.bindprotocol.xyzBase URL for API calls
BIND_RECEIPTS_PATHNo~/.bind/receiptsDirectory for receipt chain data
LOG_LEVELNoinfoLogging verbosity (debug, info, warn, error)

Verifying the Setup

If you do not have bind tools available, prompt the user to complete the setup above. You can test connectivity by calling bind_whoami — if it returns org info, the agent key is authenticated. Without a BIND_API_KEY, only local tools (parse, verify, hash) are available.


Architecture & Data Flow

The server runs locally via npx and communicates with your AI tool over stdio. It provides both local tools (always available) and API-backed tools (require an agent key). You just call the tool by name — routing is handled automatically.

Tool typeAuthPurpose
Local toolsNoneParse, verify, and hash VC-JWTs on-device
API-backed toolsAgent key via BIND_API_KEYPolicies, proofs, issuers, revocation, and more

What stays local vs. what calls the API

This is critical for understanding the privacy model:

Local tools (credential data NEVER leaves the machine):

  • bind_parse_credential — Decodes the JWT entirely on your machine
  • bind_verify_credential — Fetches the issuer's public JWKS from the Bind API (public keys only), then verifies the signature locally. The credential itself is never sent.
  • bind_hash_credential — Computes a SHA-256 hash locally. Only the irreversible hash is used for revocation checks.

API-backed tools (send requests to api.bindprotocol.xyz):

  • bind_check_revocation — Sends only the credential hash (not the credential). The hash is not reversible.
  • bind_resolve_issuer — Fetches public keys for an org. No credential data involved.
  • bind_explain_policy, bind_list_policies, bind_list_circuits — Read-only public metadata. No credential data involved.
  • bind_submit_prove_job — Sends circuit inputs to the Bind proving service. These are the raw values being proven (e.g., income amount, mileage count).
  • bind_issue_credential — Requests the Bind API to sign and issue a VC-JWT from a completed proof.
  • bind_create_policy, bind_validate_policy — Sends policy spec JSON to Bind for validation/storage.
  • bind_share_proof — Shares a proof record with a verifier org via the Bind API.

In short: Raw credentials are local-only. Hashes, policy specs, proof inputs, and metadata go to the API.


Tool Inventory

Local Tools (no auth required, credential data stays on-machine)

ToolWhat it does
bind_parse_credentialDecode a VC-JWT into header + payload + signature without verification
bind_verify_credentialFull verification: parse, fetch issuer JWKS, verify ES256 signature, check expiration. Does NOT check revocation.
bind_hash_credentialSHA-256 hash a VC-JWT. Use the hash with bind_check_revocation.

API-Backed Tools (require agent key via BIND_API_KEY)

Discovery & Inspection

ToolWhat it does
bind_resolve_issuerFetch an org's public signing keys (JWKS) by org ID
bind_explain_policyGet the public spec for a policy by policy ID
bind_check_revocationCheck if a credential is revoked by its hash (hash only — not the credential)
bind_list_policiesList available policies (supports limit/offset pagination)
bind_list_circuitsList available ZK circuits

Proof Generation & Credential Issuance

ToolWhat it does
bind_submit_prove_jobSubmit a ZK proof generation job with circuit ID and inputs
bind_get_prove_jobPoll a prove job's status by job ID
bind_list_prove_jobsList prove jobs, optionally filtered by status
bind_issue_credentialIssue a verifiable credential from a completed prove job
bind_share_proofShare a completed proof with a verifier org
bind_list_shared_proofsList proofs shared with/by your org

Policy Authoring

ToolWhat it does
bind_whoamiGet authenticated org info, tier, policy limits, and agent key permissions
bind_validate_policyDry-run validation of a policy spec (catches errors before creation)
bind_create_policyCreate a new verification policy
bind_generate_circuitTrigger ZK circuit compilation for a saved policy
bind_get_circuit_statusPoll circuit compilation job status

Workflow 1: Full Credential Verification

When to use: A user gives you a VC-JWT string (starts with eyJ...) and wants to know if it's valid.

Steps:

  1. bind_parse_credential — Decode the JWT to inspect claims
  2. bind_verify_credential — Verify signature and expiration
  3. bind_hash_credential — Compute SHA-256 hash
  4. bind_check_revocation — Send the hash (not the credential) to check revocation

Steps 1 and 2 can be combined (verify includes parsing), but parsing first lets you show the user what the credential contains before the full check. Steps 1–3 run locally; step 4 sends only the hash to the API.

Important: bind_verify_credential does NOT check revocation. You must always follow up with hash + revocation check for a complete verification.

parse → verify → hash → check_revocation

Workflow 2: Investigate an Issuer

When to use: A user wants to know about an organization's keys or policies.

  1. bind_resolve_issuer(orgId) — Fetch their JWKS
  2. bind_list_policies or bind_explain_policy — Look up their policies

Workflow 3: Create a Policy

When to use: A user wants to define a new verification policy.

Steps:

  1. bind_whoami — Check org name, tier, and limits. You need the org name for the namespace.
  2. Build the policy spec (see Policy Spec Reference below)
  3. bind_validate_policy — Dry-run to catch errors before creation
  4. Fix any validation errors and re-validate
  5. bind_create_policy — Save the policy
  6. bind_generate_circuit — Queue ZK circuit compilation
  7. bind_get_circuit_status — Poll until status is completed or failed

Critical rules:

  • metadata.namespace MUST start with your org's slugified name (from bind_whoami). The namespaces bind and system are reserved.
  • The policy id MUST start with the namespace (e.g., acme.finance.creditCheck for namespace acme).
  • ALWAYS validate before creating. Fix all errors first.
  • String inputs MUST have an encoding block mapping values to numbers (ZK circuits only work with numbers).

Workflow 4: Generate a Proof and Issue a Credential

When to use: A user wants to generate a ZK proof and get a verifiable credential.

  1. bind_list_policies or bind_explain_policy — Find the right policy/circuit
  2. bind_submit_prove_job(circuitId, inputs) — Submit the proof job
  3. bind_get_prove_job(jobId) — Poll until status is completed
  4. bind_issue_credential(proveJobId) — Issue the VC from the completed proof
  5. Optionally: bind_share_proof(proveJobId, verifierOrgId) — Share with a verifier

Policy Spec Reference

A policy is a JSON object with this structure. All fields shown are required unless marked optional.

{
  "id": "<namespace>.<category>.<name>",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "metadata": {
    "title": "Human-readable title",
    "description": "What this policy verifies",
    "category": "finance|mobility|identity|demo",
    "namespace": "your-org-name"
  },
  "subject": {
    "type": "individual|organization|vehicle|device",
    "identifier": "wallet_address|did|vin|vehicleTokenId"
  },

  "inputs": [
    {
      "id": "input_name",
      "source": { "kind": "static|api", "api": "optional_api_name" },
      "signal": "input_name",
      "valueType": "number|boolean|string",
      "unit": "USD|count|months",
      "time": { "mode": "point|range|relative", "lookback": "30d" },
      "aggregation": { "op": "latest|sum|mean|count" },
      "encoding": {
        "type": "enum",
        "values": { "label1": 1, "label2": 2 }
      }
    }
  ],

  "rules": [
    {
      "id": "rule_name",
      "description": "Human-readable description",
      "assert": { /* expression — see below */ },
      "severity": "fail|warn|info"
    }
  ],

  "evaluation": {
    "kind": "PASS_FAIL|SCORE",
    "scoreRange": { "min": 0, "max": 100 },
    "baseline": 50,
    "contributions": [
      { "ruleId": "rule_name", "points": 30, "whenPasses": true }
    ]
  },

  "outputs": [
    {
      "name": "output_name",
      "type": "boolean|enum|number",
      "derive": {
        "kind": "PASS_FAIL|SCORE|BAND|CONST",
        "from": "SCORE|input_id",
        "bands": [
          { "label": "LOW", "minInclusive": 0, "maxExclusive": 40 },
          { "label": "HIGH", "minInclusive": 40, "maxExclusive": 101 }
        ],
        "value": 42
      },
      "disclosed": true
    }
  ],

  "validity": { "ttl": "P30D" },
  "disclosure": {
    "default": "SELECTIVE",
    "exposeClaims": ["output_name"]
  },

  "proving": {
    "circuitId": "<namespace>.<name>.v<version>",
    "inputTypes": { "input_name": "u32" },
    "outputType": "u8"
  }
}

Expression Types (used in rules[].assert)

TypeShapeExample
ref{ "type": "ref", "inputId": "<input_id>" }Reference an input value
const`{ "type": "const", "value": <number\boolean> }`Literal number or boolean (never strings)
cmp`{ "type": "cmp", "cmp": ">=\<=\>\<\==\!=", "left": <expr>, "right": <expr> }`Comparison
op`{ "type": "op", "op": "+\-\*\/", "args": [<expr>, ...] }`Arithmetic
and{ "type": "and", "args": [<expr>, ...] }Logical AND
or{ "type": "or", "args": [<expr>, ...] }Logical OR
not{ "type": "not", "arg": <expr> }Logical NOT

Field name gotchas:

  • Use "inputId" in ref expressions, NOT "path"
  • Use "cmp" for the comparison operator, NOT "operator"
  • Use "args" for operand lists, NOT "children"
  • Use "arg" (singular) for not, NOT "expr"
  • const values must be numbers or booleans, never strings

Evaluation Kinds

PASS_FAIL: All severity: "fail" rules must pass. No scoring.

SCORE: Starts at baseline, adds/subtracts points from rule contributions.

{
  "kind": "SCORE",
  "scoreRange": { "min": 0, "max": 100 },
  "baseline": 50,
  "contributions": [
    { "ruleId": "has_high_income", "points": 25, "whenPasses": true },
    { "ruleId": "has_delinquencies", "points": -20, "whenPasses": true }
  ]
}

Output Derive Kinds

KindUse forRequired fields
PASS_FAILBoolean pass/fail from evaluationNone
SCORERaw numeric scorefrom: "SCORE"
BANDMap score to labeled bandsfrom: "SCORE", bands array
CONSTFixed valuevalue

Working with String Inputs

ZK circuits only work with numbers. When a policy uses string inputs (employer names, country codes, etc.), you MUST include an encoding block:

{
  "id": "employer",
  "source": { "kind": "static" },
  "signal": "employer",
  "valueType": "string",
  "encoding": {
    "type": "enum",
    "values": {
      "Acme Corp": 1,
      "Globex Inc": 2,
      "Initech": 3
    }
  }
}

Proving Section

The proving section maps inputs to Noir types for the ZK circuit:

{
  "proving": {
    "circuitId": "acme.safe_driver.v0_1_0",
    "inputTypes": {
      "miles_driven": "u32",
      "hard_brake_pct": "u8",
      "is_commercial": "bool"
    },
    "outputType": "u8"
  }
}

Available Noir types: u8, u16, u32, u64, i8, i16, i32, i64, bool, Field


Tier Restrictions

Policy authoring is gated by organization tier. Always call bind_whoami first to check limits.

TierCan Create PoliciesNotes
BasicNoVerification only
PremiumYesLimited inputs/rules/outputs
ScaleYesExpanded limits, can create extractors
EnterpriseYesUnlimited
VerifierNoCannot create proofs or policies

Common Errors and Fixes

ErrorCauseFix
NAMESPACE_MISMATCHPolicy namespace doesn't match your orgUse your org name from bind_whoami as the namespace prefix
TIER_LIMIT_EXCEEDEDYour tier doesn't allow this operationCheck bind_whoami for limits
INVALID_EXPRESSIONMalformed rule assertionCheck expression field names (inputId, cmp, args, arg)
MISSING_ENCODINGString input without encodingAdd encoding.type: "enum" with values map
CIRCUIT_COMPILATION_FAILEDCircuit couldn't compileCheck the error in bind_get_circuit_status, fix the policy, recreate, and regenerate

Example: Complete Policy Creation

Here is a complete example of creating a credit score policy for org acme:

{
  "id": "acme.finance.credit-check",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "metadata": {
    "title": "Credit Eligibility Check",
    "description": "Evaluates creditworthiness based on income and debt ratio",
    "category": "finance",
    "namespace": "acme"
  },
  "subject": {
    "type": "individual",
    "identifier": "wallet_address"
  },
  "inputs": [
    {
      "id": "annual_income",
      "source": { "kind": "static" },
      "signal": "annual_income",
      "valueType": "number",
      "unit": "USD"
    },
    {
      "id": "debt_ratio",
      "source": { "kind": "static" },
      "signal": "debt_ratio",
      "valueType": "number",
      "unit": "percent"
    }
  ],
  "rules": [
    {
      "id": "min_income",
      "description": "Annual income must be at least $30,000",
      "assert": {
        "type": "cmp",
        "cmp": ">=",
        "left": { "type": "ref", "inputId": "annual_income" },
        "right": { "type": "const", "value": 30000 }
      },
      "severity": "fail"
    },
    {
      "id": "max_debt_ratio",
      "description": "Debt-to-income ratio must be under 40%",
      "assert": {
        "type": "cmp",
        "cmp": "<",
        "left": { "type": "ref", "inputId": "debt_ratio" },
        "right": { "type": "const", "value": 40 }
      },
      "severity": "fail"
    }
  ],
  "evaluation": {
    "kind": "PASS_FAIL"
  },
  "outputs": [
    {
      "name": "eligible",
      "type": "boolean",
      "derive": { "kind": "PASS_FAIL" },
      "disclosed": true
    }
  ],
  "validity": { "ttl": "P30D" },
  "disclosure": {
    "default": "SELECTIVE",
    "exposeClaims": ["eligible"]
  },
  "proving": {
    "circuitId": "acme.credit_check.v0_1_0",
    "inputTypes": {
      "annual_income": "u32",
      "debt_ratio": "u8"
    },
    "outputType": "u8"
  }
}

Agent workflow for this:

  1. bind_whoami — Confirm org is acme and tier allows policy creation
  2. bind_validate_policy(policy) — Dry-run validation
  3. bind_create_policy(policy) — Create the policy
  4. bind_generate_circuit("acme.finance.credit-check") — Compile the circuit
  5. bind_get_circuit_status(jobId) — Poll until complete

平台分布

OpenClaw

90.84%
按下载量换算6,340

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills