Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

seoSEO 搜索

Agent Skill

seo 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,483

周安装

60

GitHub Stars

454

下载量

466
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:seo(SEO 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bhanunamikaze/agentic-seo-skill
仓库路径:skills/seo
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bhanunamikaze/agentic-seo-skill --skill seo
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bhanunamikaze/agentic-seo-skill --skill seo

简介

seo 提供 LLM 驱动的 SEO 分析与优化建议,覆盖网站、博客和 GitHub 仓库。

  • 适用于需要全面 SEO 审计或多维度关键词优化的智能代理场景。
  • 根据用户输入的 URL 自动执行完整页面审计,输出结构化改进清单。
  • 集成 16 项子技能与专用代理,需联网获取网页内容与搜索引擎数据。
  • seo 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

SEO Skill (Agentic / Claude / Codex)

LLM-first SEO analysis skill with 16 specialized sub-skills, 10 specialist agents, and 33 scripts for website, blog, and GitHub repository optimization.

Deterministic Trigger Mapping

For prompt reliability in Codex/agent IDEs, map common user wording to a fixed workflow:

  • If user says perform seo analysis on <url> (or similar generic SEO request with a URL), treat it as a single-URL full audit.
  • If no explicit sub-skill is specified, run the full/page audit path with LLM-first reasoning and script-backed evidence.
  • For full/page audits, always produce:

- FULL-AUDIT-REPORT.md (detailed findings) - ACTION-PLAN.md (prioritized fixes)

  • If generate_report.py is run, also return the saved HTML path (for example SEO-REPORT.html).

Available Commands

CommandSub-SkillDescription
seo audit <url>seo-auditFull website audit with scoring
seo page <url>seo-pageDeep single-page analysis
seo technical <url>seo-technicalTechnical SEO checks
seo content <url>seo-contentContent quality & E-E-A-T
seo schema <url>seo-schemaSchema detection/validation/generation
seo sitemap <url>seo-sitemapSitemap analysis & generation
seo images <url>seo-imagesImage optimization audit
seo geo <url>seo-geoAI search optimization (GEO)
seo programmatic <url>seo-programmaticProgrammatic SEO safeguards
seo competitors <url>seo-competitor-pagesComparison/alternatives pages
seo hreflang <url>seo-hreflangInternational SEO validation
seo plan <url>seo-planStrategic SEO planning
seo github <repo_or_url>seo-githubGitHub repository discoverability, README, topics, community health, and traffic archival
seo article <url>seo-articleArticle data extraction & LLM optimization
seo links <url>seo-linksExternal backlink profile & link health
seo aeo <url>seo-aeoAnswer Engine Optimization (Featured Snippets, PAA, Knowledge Panel)

Orchestration Logic

When the user requests SEO analysis, follow this routing:

Step 1 — Identify the Task

Parse the user's request to determine which sub-skill(s) to activate:

  • Full audit: Read resources/skills/seo-audit.md — crawl multiple pages, delegate to agents, score and report
  • Single page: Read resources/skills/seo-page.md — deep dive on one URL
  • Specific area: Read the matching resources/skills/seo-*.md file
  • Strategic plan: Read resources/skills/seo-plan.md and the matching resources/templates/*.md for the detected industry
  • GitHub repository SEO: Read resources/skills/seo-github.md and use GitHub scripts with --provider auto for API/gh fallback.
  • Generic perform seo analysis on <url> request: treat as single-page full audit, read resources/skills/seo-page.md, and generate FULL-AUDIT-REPORT.md + ACTION-PLAN.md.

Step 2 — Collect Evidence

Primary method (LLM-first) — use the built-in read_url_content tool first:

read_url_content(url)  →  returns parsed HTML content directly

Use this as the baseline evidence for reasoning.

Deterministic verification (recommended when script execution is available):

# Fetch/parse raw HTML for structured checks
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/fetch_page.py <url> --output /tmp/page.html
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/parse_html.py /tmp/page.html --url <url> --json

# Optional: generate shareable HTML dashboard artifact
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/generate_report.py <url> --output SEO-REPORT.html
Do not use third-party mirrors (e.g., r.jina.ai) as primary evidence when direct site fetch or bundled scripts are available. <SKILL_DIR> = absolute path to this skill directory (the folder containing this SKILL.md).

Step 3 — Perform LLM-First Analysis

Use the LLM as the primary SEO analyst:

  1. Synthesize evidence from page content, metadata, and optional script outputs.
  2. Produce findings with explicit proof:

- Finding - Evidence (specific element, metric, or snippet) - Impact (why it matters for ranking/indexing/UX) - Fix (clear implementation step)

  1. Prioritize by impact and implementation effort.
  2. Separate confirmed issues, likely issues, and unknowns (missing data).

Always read and apply resources/references/llm-audit-rubric.md to keep scoring, severity, confidence, and output structure consistent across audit types.

Step 4 — Run Baseline Verification Scripts (When execution is available)

For full/page audits, run baseline checks to avoid hypothesis-only reporting. Do not replace LLM reasoning with script-only scoring.

# Check robots.txt and AI crawler management
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/robots_checker.py <url>

# Check llms.txt for AI search readiness
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/llms_txt_checker.py <url>

# Get Core Web Vitals from PageSpeed Insights (free API, no key needed)
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/pagespeed.py <url> --strategy mobile

# Check security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.)
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/security_headers.py <url>

# Detect broken links on a page (404s, timeouts, connection errors)
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/broken_links.py <url> --workers 5

# Trace redirect chains, detect loops and mixed HTTP/HTTPS
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/redirect_checker.py <url>

# Analyze readability from fetched HTML (Flesch-Kincaid, grade level, sentence stats)
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/readability.py /tmp/page.html --json

# Validate Open Graph and Twitter Card meta tags
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/social_meta.py <url>

# Analyze internal link structure, find orphan pages
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/internal_links.py <url> --depth 1 --max-pages 20

# Extract article content and perform keyword research for LLM-driven optimization
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/article_seo.py <url> --keyword "<optional_target_keyword>" --json

# GitHub repository SEO (provider fallback: auto|api|gh)
# Auth setup (choose one):
# export GITHUB_TOKEN="ghp_xxx"   # or export GH_TOKEN="ghp_xxx"
# gh auth login -h github.com && gh auth status -h github.com
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/github_repo_audit.py --repo <owner/repo> --provider auto --json
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/github_readme_lint.py README.md --json
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/github_community_health.py --repo <owner/repo> --provider auto --json
# Benchmark/competitor inputs should be provided by LLM/web-search discovery when possible.
# If omitted, github_seo_report.py auto-derives repo-specific benchmark queries.
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/github_search_benchmark.py --repo <owner/repo> --query "<llm_or_web_query>" --provider auto --json
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/github_competitor_research.py --repo <owner/repo> --query "<llm_or_web_query>" --provider auto --top-n 6 --json
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/github_competitor_research.py --repo <owner/repo> --competitor <owner/repo> --competitor <owner/repo> --provider auto --json
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/github_traffic_archiver.py --repo <owner/repo> --provider auto --archive-dir .github-seo-data --json
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/github_seo_report.py --repo <owner/repo> --provider auto --markdown GITHUB-SEO-REPORT.md --action-plan GITHUB-ACTION-PLAN.md --json
# Optional: increase/reduce auto-derived query volume (default: 6)
# python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/github_seo_report.py --repo <owner/repo> --provider auto --auto-query-max 8 --markdown GITHUB-SEO-REPORT.md --action-plan GITHUB-ACTION-PLAN.md --json

If a check fails due network, DNS, permissions, or API rate limits:

  • Report it explicitly as an environment limitation, not a confirmed site issue.
  • Keep confidence as Hypothesis for impacted categories.
  • Continue with available evidence instead of stopping the audit.
  • Do not enter repeated fallback loops. Retry a failed source at most once, then finalize the audit.
  • Do not pivot into repeated web-search scraping loops for the same URL.

Visual analysis (requires Playwright — use conda activate pentest if available):

# Capture screenshots (desktop, laptop, tablet, mobile)
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/capture_screenshot.py <url> --all

# Analyze visual layout, above-the-fold, mobile responsiveness
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/analyze_visual.py <url> --json

HTML Report Generator — generates a self-contained interactive HTML dashboard:

# Generate full SEO report (runs scripts automatically, saves HTML to PWD)
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/generate_report.py <url>
python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/generate_report.py <url> --output custom-report.html

Step 5 — Delegate to Specialist Agents

For comprehensive audits, read the relevant agent file from resources/agents/ to adopt the specialist role:

AgentFileFocus Area
Technical SEOseo-technical.mdCrawlability, indexability, security, URLs, mobile, CWV, JS rendering
Content Qualityseo-content.mdE-E-A-T assessment, content metrics, AI content detection
Performanceseo-performance.mdCore Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS), optimization recommendations
Schema Markupseo-schema.mdDetection, validation, generation of JSON-LD structured data
Sitemapseo-sitemap.mdXML sitemap validation, generation, quality gates
Visual Analysisseo-visual.mdScreenshots, above-the-fold, responsiveness, layout
Verifier (global)seo-verifier.mdDeduplicate findings, suppress contradictions, and validate evidence relevance before final report

Step 6 — Apply Quality Gates

Reference the quality standards in resources/references/:

Step 6.5 — Verify Findings (All Workflows)

Before writing final reports, run verification:

python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/finding_verifier.py --findings-json <raw_findings.json> --json

Use verified output for final report tables, not raw findings.

Step 7 — Score and Report

Use numeric scores as guidance, not as a replacement for evidence quality and judgment.

Default Scoring Weights (Full Audit)

Canonical source of truth — These weights are defined here and in resources/skills/seo-audit.md. Do not modify weights in individual sub-skill files; update only these two locations to keep scores consistent.
CategoryWeight
Technical SEO25%
Content Quality20%
On-Page SEO15%
Schema / Structured Data15%
Performance (CWV)10%
Image Optimization10%
AI Search Readiness (GEO)5%
If using scripts/generate_report.py, the automated dashboard uses script-level category weights defined in that script. Keep the narrative audit LLM-first and evidence-first.

Step 8 — Mandatory Deliverables

For seo audit, seo page, and generic perform seo analysis on <url> flows:

  1. Create FULL-AUDIT-REPORT.md in the current working directory at the start of the audit, then update it as evidence is collected.
  2. Create ACTION-PLAN.md in the current working directory at the start of the audit, then update it with prioritized fixes.
  3. If HTML dashboard was generated, include its exact saved path (for example SEO-REPORT.html or an absolute path).
  4. In the final response, explicitly list generated artifacts and paths.
  5. If technical checks are blocked by environment limits, still write both markdown files and include an "Environment Limitations" section.

Score Interpretation

ScoreRating
90-100Excellent
70-89Good
50-69Needs Improvement
30-49Poor
0-29Critical

Industry Detection

When running seo plan, detect the business type and load the matching template:

IndustryTemplate File
SaaS / Softwaresaas.md
Local Service Businesslocal-service.md
E-commerce / Retailecommerce.md
Publisher / Mediapublisher.md
Agency / Consultancyagency.md
Other / Genericgeneric.md

Detection signals:

  • SaaS: pricing page, feature pages, /docs, /api, trial/demo CTAs
  • Local: address, phone, Google Business Profile, service area pages
  • E-commerce: product pages, cart, checkout, /collections, /categories
  • Publisher: article dates, author pages, /news, high content volume
  • Agency: case studies, /work, /portfolio, team pages, service offerings

Schema Templates

Pre-built JSON-LD templates are available in templates.json for:

  • Common: BlogPosting, Article, Organization, LocalBusiness, BreadcrumbList, WebSite (with SearchAction)
  • Video: VideoObject, BroadcastEvent, Clip, SeekToAction
  • E-commerce: ProductGroup (variants), OfferShippingDetails, Certification
  • Other: SoftwareSourceCode, ProfilePage (E-E-A-T author pages)

Validation Scripts

Two validation scripts are available for CI/CD integration:

Pre-commit SEO Check

bash <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/pre_commit_seo_check.sh

Checks staged HTML files for: placeholder text in schema, title tag length, missing alt text, deprecated schema types, FID references (should be INP), meta description length.

Schema Validator

python3 <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/validate_schema.py <file_path>

Validates JSON-LD blocks in HTML files: JSON syntax, @context/@type presence, placeholder text, deprecated/restricted types.


Output Format

All sub-skill reports should use consistent severity levels:

  • 🔴 Critical — Directly impacts rankings or indexing (fix immediately)
  • ⚠️ Warning — Optimization opportunity (fix within 1 month)
  • Pass — Meets or exceeds standards
  • ℹ️ Info — Not applicable or informational only

Structure reports as:

  1. Summary table with element, value, and severity
  2. Detailed findings grouped by category
  3. Actionable recommendations ordered by impact

Critical Rules

  1. INP not FID — FID was removed September 9, 2024. The sole interactivity metric is INP (Interaction to Next Paint). Never reference FID.
  2. FAQ schema is restricted — FAQPage schema is limited to government and healthcare authority sites only (August 2023). Do NOT recommend for commercial sites.
  3. HowTo schema is deprecated — Rich results fully removed September 2023. Never recommend.
  4. JSON-LD only — Always use <script type="application/ld+json">. Never recommend Microdata or RDFa.
  5. E-E-A-T everywhere — As of December 2025, E-E-A-T applies to ALL competitive queries, not just YMYL.
  6. Mobile-first is complete — 100% mobile-first indexing since July 5, 2024.
  7. Location page limits — Warning at 30+ pages, hard stop at 50+ pages. Enforce unique content requirements.
  8. AI crawler management — Check robots.txt for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Applebot-Extended, Google-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot.
  9. LLM-first, resilient pipeline — Start by reading the page with read_url_content, then always run relevant scripts for structured evidence. Scripts are the preferred evidence source — use them actively. However, if any script fails (timeout, network, parsing), the LLM MUST still produce a complete analysis using its own reasoning (confidence: Likely). Never block a report on a single script failure.
  10. Always produce file artifacts for audit flowsFULL-AUDIT-REPORT.md and ACTION-PLAN.md are required outputs for full/page audit requests.
  11. Bound evidence retries — Avoid long search/retry loops. If core checks fail due DNS/network, finalize promptly with confidence labels and file outputs.
  12. Avoid redundant web fallbacks — If direct fetch/scripts fail and one fallback also fails, stop retrying and finish the report with explicit limitations.
  13. Signal freshness tracking — Every reference file should contain a <!-- Updated: YYYY-MM-DD --> comment. Flag any reference file older than 90 days for review. When Google announces algorithm changes, verify affected reference files within 7 days. Key dates to track: core updates (quarterly), schema deprecations (schema-types.md), CWV threshold changes (cwv-thresholds.md).

Dependencies

Optional Script Dependencies

  • Python 3.8+
  • requests (for network analysis scripts)
  • beautifulsoup4 (for HTML parsing scripts)
  • Playwright (for capture_screenshot.py and analyze_visual.py) pip install playwright && playwright install chromium Or if using conda: conda activate pentest (if Playwright is pre-installed)

Install Script Dependencies

pip install requests beautifulsoup4

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.31%
按下载量换算160

Claude

30.56%
按下载量换算142

Cursor

20.38%
按下载量换算95

Gemini CLI

10.22%
按下载量换算48

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills