Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

beo-exploring(贝奥探索)

beo-exploring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

beo-exploring 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 56,028。

总安装 465周安装 19GitHub Stars 1下载 150核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:beo-exploring(贝奥探索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/minhtri2710/skills
仓库路径:skills/beo-exploring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/minhtri2710/skills --skill beo-exploring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/minhtri2710/skills --skill beo-exploring

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

将模糊请求转化为可规划的具体 CONTEXT.md 文档。通过分类与代码库扫描明确 scope 与潜在风险点。决定 feature 类型(SEE/CALL/RUN/READ/ORGANIZE)以指导后续行动。必须读取既有 context 与 learnings,避免重复劳动。

beo-exploring 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/beo-exploring

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/minhtri2710/skills --skill beo-exploring;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

beo-exploring 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/minhtri2710/skills --skill beo-exploring。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

beo-exploring 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

beo-exploring 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

beo-exploring 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

beo-exploring 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 465 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 150 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

beo-exploring 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
beo-exploring

贝奥探索 · 本页

4651只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Beo Exploring

Overview

Exploring is the decision-extraction phase. Use it to turn a partially formed request into a planning-usable CONTEXT.md.

See ../reference/references/shared-hard-gates.md § Shared References Convention.

Core principle: ask until planning can proceed without guessing.

CONTEXT.md becomes the source of truth for downstream planning, validation, execution, and review.

Hard Gates

Default Exploring Loop

  1. read any existing context and prior learnings
  2. classify the scope and likely gray areas
  3. classify the feature domain (SEE, CALL, RUN, READ, or ORGANIZE)
  4. run a codebase scout: use that domain classification to identify likely artifacts, protocols, templates, or entry points, then read 2-3 relevant files to ground gray areas in existing repo patterns
  5. repeat until all gray areas are resolved: a. ask one focused behavioral question b. wait for the user's response — do not continue until the user answers c. annotate gray areas with existing context when available d. lock decisions explicitly as they emerge
  6. write a sanitized CONTEXT.md
  7. self-check for planning readiness, then hand off to beo-planning

Use ../reference/references/learnings-read-protocol.md when you need the canonical prior-learnings read flow. Use ../reference/references/artifact-conventions.md#slug-lifecycle when updating the epic description safely.

Scope Classification

Classify the feature as Quick, Standard, or Deep and record that classification in the exploring output.

  • Quick uses the canonical definition in ../reference/references/pipeline-contracts.md.
  • Standard is the default path for normal feature work.
  • Deep applies when the work spans multiple systems or needs extra discovery depth.

Quick work still needs gray-area discovery, but it must still satisfy the canonical Quick definition from ../reference/references/pipeline-contracts.md and it skips self-review.

Read Existing Context First

Before asking new questions:

  • read existing CONTEXT.md when present
  • inspect the epic description
  • determine whether decisions are already locked

If CONTEXT.md already contains the needed locked decisions, verify it and continue toward planning. Do not re-ask settled questions just because the feature is being resumed.

Gray-Area Discovery

Look for uncertainties that would materially change planning or execution, such as:

  • failure behavior
  • edge cases and empty states
  • permissions and visibility
  • migration or compatibility behavior
  • latency or performance expectations
  • out-of-scope boundaries

Keep the exploration concrete and answerable. A good exploration question should be answerable in 1-2 sentences and should change downstream decisions.

Classify the feature domain (SEE, CALL, RUN, READ, or ORGANIZE) using the categories in references/gray-area-probes.md. Each round, review the candidate probes for the relevant category and ask exactly one question — the single most valuable probe for the current state of the conversation. After the user responds, reassess and ask the next most valuable probe if gaps remain. Never batch multiple probes into a single message.

Default-Proposal Pattern

If the user says "I don't know" or "whatever you think":

  1. state the uncertainty plainly
  2. propose one concrete default
  3. explain the consequence in behavioral terms
  4. ask for confirmation before locking it

Lock Decisions Explicitly

As answers emerge, assign stable IDs and confirm them.

Example shape:

  • D1: retry behavior after overnight failure
  • D2: empty-state behavior for first-time users
  • D3: permission rule for non-admin access

Do not treat an answer as locked until it has been explicitly confirmed or accepted as the default.

CONTEXT.md Requirements

Write CONTEXT.md using references/context-template.md. All 8 sections are required. If a section is empty, write N/A.

The goal is not to preserve the original conversation. The goal is to preserve the decisions that planning must trust.

Planning-Readiness Check

Before handoff, confirm all of these are true:

  • every material gray area has been resolved or scoped out
  • a planner could explain the feature using CONTEXT.md
  • no unanswered question would change the high-level plan

If any of these fail, keep exploring.

Self-Review

For Standard and Deep work, run one fresh-eyes self-review pass on the CONTEXT.md draft before handoff.

The reviewer checks:

  • all material gray areas are resolved or explicitly scoped out
  • no locked decisions contradict each other
  • D-IDs are assigned consistently
  • outstanding questions are split correctly between "Resolve Before Planning" and "Deferred to Planning"

Allow at most one retry iteration. If the draft still fails after that retry, flag the unresolved gray areas to the user and ask them to either resolve each flagged item or explicitly mark it as out-of-scope. Do not offer a "proceed anyway" option — the HARD-GATE requiring all material gray areas to be resolved or scoped out still applies.

Quick work is exempt from this self-review step.

Handoff

When exploring is complete:

  1. write CONTEXT.md
  2. update .beads/STATE.json
  3. report how many decisions were locked and what remains out of scope
  4. hand off to beo-planning

Exploring STATE.json uses the canonical 12-field schema from ../reference/references/state-and-handoff-protocol.md (see Example F). Set phase: "exploring", status: "planning-needs-approach", tasks: "none", next: "beo-planning", planning_mode: "unknown", and phase_name to a human-readable feature summary. Exploring does not create execution beads — its deliverable is decision clarity.

Context Budget

Follow ../reference/references/shared-hard-gates.md § Context Budget Protocol. Skill-specific checkpoint items: locked decisions and open questions.

Red Flags & Anti-Patterns

Red flags to catch early:

  • if you find fewer than 2 meaningful gray areas for non-trivial work, verify that you have not skipped edge cases or scope boundaries
  • do not spend excessive time circling a single unresolved question; lock what is known and mark the rest for planning only when the remaining uncertainty is truly planning-shaped
  • do not skip exploring for non-Quick feature work just because the request sounds simple; only work classified as Quick scope by beo-router (via new-quick-intake state) may bypass exploring

Read references/context-template.md when creating or updating CONTEXT.md to ensure correct structure and required fields. Read references/gray-area-probes.md when a user's answer is ambiguous or incomplete and you need targeted follow-up questions.

平台分布

Codex

36.97%
按下载量换算55

Claude

29.88%
按下载量换算45

Cursor

20.13%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

9.91%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills