Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

benchmark-model-provider基准模型提供商

Agent Skill

benchmark-model-provider 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

4,990

周安装

210

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,747
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:benchmark-model-provider(基准模型提供商)
来源仓库:https://github.com/tankisstank/benchmark-model-provider
安装命令:
openclaw skills install benchmark-model-provider
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install benchmark-model-provider

简介

根据用户特定需求对主流 AI 模型提供商进行个性化基准排名。

  • 适用于选型推荐、成本效益分析和领域适配性比较等研究场景。
  • 内置动态提示套件以匹配不同用途(如写作、编程、推理)。benchmark-model-provider 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 使用时应明确指定应用领域和使用频率参数以获得精准结果。
  • 数据来源依赖公开基准,实际表现可能存在偏差需人工复核。

SKILL.md

name
benchmark-model-provider
description
Benchmark and rank AI providers/models against a user-specific prompt suite derived from the user's purpose, domain, and usage frequency. Use when users ask which model is smarter, cheaper, deeper, faster, worth using daily, better as local vs service, or when building repeatable benchmark specs, reranking old runs, generating markdown/HTML/PDF benchmark reports.
metadata
{"clawdbot":{"emoji":"📊","requires":{"bins":["python3"],"env":["BENCHMARK_API_KEY"]},"primaryEnv":"BENCHMARK_API_KEY"}}

Benchmark Model Provider

Use this skill to help users choose the most suitable model for their own workflow instead of giving generic “best model” advice.

Tiếng Việt Dùng skill này khi Boss muốn biết model nào thật sự đáng dùng cho workflow hằng ngày: model nào research tốt hơn, viết báo cáo ổn hơn, code ngon hơn, rẻ hơn, nhanh hơn, hay đáng dùng lâu dài hơn. Skill này không trả lời kiểu cảm tính, mà dựng benchmark theo đúng nhu cầu thực tế của người dùng rồi chấm, rerank và xuất report rõ ràng.

中文说明 当用户想知道“哪个模型更聪明、更便宜、更适合日常工作流、更适合研究/写报告/编程”时,使用这个技能。它不会给出泛泛而谈的“最佳模型”建议,而是根据用户自己的实际任务构建基准测试,保留原始结果、重新排序,并生成可审阅、可分享的报告。

Treat the benchmark as a personal decision framework:

  • derive the benchmark from the user's real work
  • keep the run auditable
  • preserve raw outputs for reranking
  • generate outputs that can be reviewed, shared, and published cleanly

What this skill is for

People often ask questions like:

  • Which model is smarter?
  • Which model is cheaper to run daily?
  • Which model is deeper or more useful for my job?
  • Should I use a local model or a service model?

This skill exists to answer those questions with a repeatable benchmark process, not with vague preferences.


Core operating flow

  1. Collect benchmark context

- purpose - domain - usage frequency

  1. Build or select a benchmark spec with 5–10 domain-specific questions
  2. List currently available providers/models from trusted local OpenClaw context when allowed
  3. Ask whether the user wants to use the current list or add more models
  4. Verify every user-supplied model before running; if the name does not match, ask again or suggest the closest valid model id
  5. Run each model independently on the same benchmark set
  6. Preserve raw outputs and metrics so the run can be audited and reranked later
  7. Score results across quality, depth, cost, and speed metrics
  8. Build reports in markdown / HTML / PDF
  9. Optionally suggest simple ways to publish the generated HTML report (Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare Pages, GitHub Pages) if the user wants a shareable link

Default decisions

AreaDefault
Benchmark modeprompt_only
Overall scoringquality + depth + cost
Speed handlingmeasured and reported, excluded from default overall
Execution strategysequential unless orchestration is needed
Web publish target(no built-in publish) — suggest Vercel / Netlify / Cloudflare Pages / GitHub Pages

Workflow rules

Benchmark input rules

  • Default to prompt_only unless the user explicitly wants agent_context.
  • In prompt_only, send only the raw prompt.
  • Do not inject extra context, memory, few-shot examples, or hidden scaffolding in prompt_only mode.
  • In agent_context, use one fixed shared system/context layer for all compared models and record it in metadata.

Execution rules

  • Support both sequential and subagent_orchestrated execution strategies.
  • Allow bounded parallel execution for subagents (for example --max-parallel 4) when the endpoint can tolerate it.
  • Treat rerank as a first-class operation; do not rerun models when only the scoring formula changes.
  • Report progress at every major step so the user never feels the process is hanging.
  • During batch execution, surface a clear update whenever one agent/model finishes.
  • Normalize model ids before calling the endpoint when the provider catalog exposes raw model ids but the user/runtime spec may contain provider-prefixed names.
  • If the endpoint returns naming/provider mismatch errors, explain the mismatch clearly instead of leaving only a raw 502/unknown-provider error.

Output rules

  • Mark every estimated metric clearly.
  • Rewrite reports/landing pages to the newest snapshot.
  • Do not append patch fragments to stale output.
  • Reports should include: ranking table, cost table, executive summary, overall assessment, recommended model selection, and full answer details.
  • Default the report language to the user's current conversation language.
  • Only switch the report language when the user explicitly asks for a different language or a bilingual output.
  • PDF output must use Unicode-capable fonts so Vietnamese, Chinese, and multilingual content render correctly.
  • Multilingual support means the renderer can display multiple languages correctly; it does not mean the skill should arbitrarily change the report language.
  • Ask before delivering externally via Vercel or other web publishing.

Safety and trust boundary

This skill may perform network I/O depending on how the benchmark spec is configured.

Safe-by-design intent

  • Example specs should use placeholder endpoints, not a private hardcoded runtime.
  • The user should supply only trusted API endpoints and credentials.
  • Publishing should happen only when the user explicitly wants delivery.

Important runtime notes

  • run_benchmark.py sends prompts to the base_url configured in the benchmark spec.
  • This skill does not publish to Vercel/Netlify/Cloudflare/GitHub automatically. It only generates local HTML/PDF artifacts.
  • If you want a shareable link, publish the generated HTML folder using one of these services: Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare Pages, or GitHub Pages.
  • Only run the skill with endpoints, tokens, and outputs you trust.

For detailed runtime assumptions, read:

  • references/runtime-safety.md
  • references/environment-vars.md
  • references/pricing-sources.md

What to read

Read only what you need:

  • references/initial-project-spec.md — authoritative design baseline
  • references/benchmark-schema.md — benchmark spec structure, run artifacts, file layout
  • references/scoring-rubric.md — scoring model, normalization rules, default weights
  • references/pricing-sources.md — pricing precedence and estimation policy
  • references/execution-modes.md — benchmark modes, execution strategies, operational modes
  • references/output-modes.md — delivery choices, publish rules, progress feedback rules
  • references/runtime-safety.md — trust boundaries, network behavior, safe usage guidance
  • references/environment-vars.md — expected environment variables and dependency notes
  • examples/*.yaml — benchmark context templates and ready-made examples in multiple languages

Scripts

ScriptPurpose
scripts/build_benchmark_spec.pyBuild a benchmark spec from benchmark context
scripts/run_benchmark.pyExecute benchmark runs and write raw outputs/metrics
scripts/estimate_tokens.pyEstimate token counts when provider usage is missing
scripts/resolve_pricing.pyResolve pricing sources and compute estimated/official pricing
scripts/score_models.pyCombine raw metrics and rubric scores into rankings
scripts/build_report.pyBuild markdown, HTML, and PDF report artifacts
scripts/publish_report.pyNo deployment automation. Export/copy PDF and print suggested static hosting options (Vercel/Netlify/Cloudflare Pages/GitHub Pages).

Output contract

Try to produce these artifacts whenever possible:

  • versioned benchmark spec
  • raw per-model answer files
  • raw metrics JSON
  • score breakdown JSON
  • markdown summary report
  • HTML landing page
  • PDF output when requested
  • publish result metadata when delivery occurs

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

71.5%
按下载量换算1,249

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills