Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

before-after-story-writer(故事作者之前之后)

before-after-story-writer 用于补充效率相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接效率相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

before-after-story-writer 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 20,532。

总安装 1,444周安装 59GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 463核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:before-after-story-writer(故事作者之前之后)
来源仓库:https://github.com/harrylabsj/before-after-story-writer
安装命令:
openclaw skills install before-after-story-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install before-after-story-writer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

before-after-story-writer 用于补充效率相关能力,支持基于事实的转型前后故事撰写。适用于企业营销场景,提供道德且非夸张的客户案例叙述模板。通过 clawhub 安装,命令为 openclaw skills install before-after-story-writer,需用户提供真实数据。

安装前建议确认数据来源权限,避免虚构客户信息造成法律风险。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install before-after-story-writer;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

before-after-story-writer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install before-after-story-writer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

before-after-story-writer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

before-after-story-writer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

before-after-story-writer 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

before-after-story-writer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,444 次,近一周安装 59 次,下载 463 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

before-after-story-writer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
before-after-story-writer

故事作者之前之后 · 本页

1,444—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Before After Story Writer

Purpose

This skill writes ethical before/after narratives and case-style stories without fabricating results. It specializes in transformation storytelling that respects truth — using only verified starting points, documented changes, honest timelines, and clear permission status. Built for landing pages, social content, email campaigns, and ads where brands need to show impact without crossing into fake testimonials, exaggerated claims, or misleading imagery.

Triggers

  • "Write a before/after story for this product"
  • "Create a transformation narrative"
  • "Turn customer feedback into a case story"
  • "Write a product journey story"
  • "Draft an ethical before/after for a landing page"
  • "Create a case-study-style story"

Workflow

  1. Evidence verification — Collect the verified starting point (what was the situation before), the documented change (what changed, with evidence), the timeframe, and the permission status (has the person given consent? Is this a real customer or a composite?).
  2. Narrative arc construction — Build a story arc that respects the facts: (a) starting situation with context, (b) the moment of change (what they tried or did differently), (c) the current state with honest description of results, (d) what's still in progress or not claimed. No fabricated drama, no invented quotes.
  3. Draft variants — Create short (social/ads, 50–100 words), medium (landing page, 150–300 words), and long (case study, 400–800 words) versions, each preserving factual accuracy while adapting to format.
  4. Evidence gap identification — Flag every claim that lacks documentation, every timeline that's approximate rather than precise, and every result that varies by individual. Suggest ethical edits — replacing implied guarantees with honest range-of-outcome language.
  5. Disclaimer generation — Write appropriate disclaimers based on content type: "individual results may vary," "this is a real customer who gave permission," "composite story based on typical customer experience," or "results not guaranteed."

Prompt Templates

1. Story Builder (story_build)

Purpose: Build a complete before/after narrative from verified facts.

Input:

  • ${starting_point} — Verified situation before product use (with source)
  • ${change_description} — What changed, with supporting evidence
  • ${timeframe} — How long the change took (exact or approximate)
  • ${permission_status} — Real customer with consent / composite from data / founder story / hypothetical (must not present as real)
  • ${tone} — Inspirational, factual, relatable, or technical
  • ${format} — Short (social), medium (landing page), or long (case study)

Output: Story arc with fact table, narrative draft, disclaimer, and evidence gap flags.

2. Fact-to-Story Mapper (fact_to_story)

Purpose: Turn a dry list of facts/outcomes into a narrative arc without inventing details.

Input:

  • ${facts} — Bulleted list of verified facts and outcomes
  • ${story_angle} — Individual journey, founder story, product creation, or typical customer composite
  • ${permission_status} — Real/composite/founder

Output: Narrative draft that adds only permissible connective tissue — the "how they felt" or "what they thought" is clearly marked as inferred, not stated as fact.

3. Ethical Story Auditor (story_audit)

Purpose: Review an existing before/after story for ethical issues and overclaims.

Input:

  • ${story_draft} — Existing story text
  • ${known_facts} — What's actually verified
  • ${category} — Product category (for risk assessment)

Output: Risk-scored audit: each claim marked as Verified / Inferred (acceptable with labeling) / Overclaimed (needs rewriting) / Fabricated (must remove). Rewriting suggestions for flagged items.

4. Disclaimer Generator (disclaimer_gen)

Purpose: Generate appropriate disclaimers for a before/after story.

Input:

  • ${story_type} — Real individual, composite, founder, or illustrative hypothetical
  • ${category} — Product category
  • ${jurisdiction} — (Optional) target market for regulatory requirements
  • ${claimed_outcomes} — What outcomes does the story describe?

Output: Appropriate disclaimer language for the story type, plus regulatory notes if applicable.

Output Format

## Before/After Story: [Product/Topic]
**Story Type:** [Real / Composite / Founder / Illustrative] | **Permission:** [Status]

### Fact Table
| Aspect | Before | After | Evidence | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Aspect 1] | [State] | [State] | [Source] | High / Medium / Low |
| [Aspect 2] | ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Story Arc
- **Starting Situation:** [Context — factual]
- **Moment of Change:** [What happened — factual]
- **Current State:** [Results — factual, with range/disclaimer]
- **Ongoing/Unclaimed:** [What's still in progress or not promised]

### Narrative Draft

**[Format: Short / Medium / Long]**

[Story text. Inferred emotional/experiential elements are marked with ^inferred.
Direct customer quotes are marked as "attributed to [name] with permission" or "representative of customer feedback."
Any result presented as a range uses "typically," "in this case," or "varies by individual."]

### Disclaimer
[Appropriate disclaimer based on story type and category]

### Evidence Gaps & Ethical Edits
- ⚠️ [Claim] — lacks documentation → suggested: [softer framing]
- ✅ [Claim] — verified, kept as-is
- 🛑 [Claim] — unsupportable → removed or rewritten as: [safe alternative]

Safety Rules

  • NEVER fabricate customer stories, screenshots, quotes, photos, results, or timelines — not even "for illustration"
  • NEVER present a composite or hypothetical story as if it were a real individual experience
  • ALWAYS require explicit permission to use a real customer's story — if permission status is unclear, default to "composite" or do not write it
  • NEVER imply guaranteed, typical, or expected results from a single story
  • ALWAYS include appropriate disclaimers, especially for health, fitness, finance, and beauty categories
  • NEVER write before/after stories for high-stakes categories (medical treatments, financial investments, legal outcomes, mental health cures) without extreme caution and appropriate qualified review
  • ALWAYS label inferred emotions, thoughts, or internal experiences as "inferred" or "representative," not as quoted statements

Examples

Example 1: Skincare Product (Real Customer with Permission, Landing Page)

Input: Starting Point="Customer Jamie had dull, uneven skin tone after years of sun exposure (documented via before photo and skincare consult notes)", Change="After 8 weeks of consistent vitamin C serum use, Jamie's skin tone appeared more even and brighter in follow-up photos (dermatologist-reviewed comparison photos available)", Timeframe="8 weeks", Permission="Jamie gave written consent for story and photos, reviewed draft", Format="medium (landing page, 200 words)"

Output: Fact table documenting before/after with evidence confidence ratings. Narrative arc: starting situation (Jamie's dullness concern), the change (what Jamie tried), current state (improvement described honestly, not as "perfect skin"). Disclaimer: "Individual results vary. Jamie is a real customer who gave permission to share her experience." No "erased years of sun damage" or "guaranteed results" language.

Example 2: Kitchen Gadget (Composite Story, Social)

Input: Starting Point="Based on customer feedback: many air fryer users report spending 5–10 minutes scrubbing after each use", Change="Using silicone liners reduced cleanup time to under 1 minute (based on customer survey data, n=200+)", Timeframe="Immediate — first use", Permission="Composite story from aggregated customer feedback — no single individual portrayed", Format="short (social, 80 words)"

Output: Composite story labeled clearly: "Based on what our customers tell us..." Narrative: "Before: scraping and scrubbing your air fryer basket. After: lift out the liner, quick rinse, done." Disclaimer: "Composite story based on aggregated customer feedback. Individual cleanup experience may vary." No fake name, no fabricated quotes, no "life-changing" hyperbole.

Related Skills

平台分布

OpenClaw

80.03%
按下载量换算371

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills