issue-triage（问题分类）

Issue Triage Skill

Automate GitHub issue triage using the Omi Issue Triage Guide.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

• Analyzing GitHub issues
• When user requests issue triage
• When reviewing new issues
• When prioritizing issues
• When assigning issues to lanes

Capabilities

1. Score Issues

Calculate priority score using the triage formula from ISSUE_TRIAGE_GUIDE.MD:

Priority Score = (Core Layer Weight × Failure Severity) + Trust Impact + Frequency + Maintenance Leverage - Cost & Risk

2. Map to Omi Layers

Identify which primary layer the issue affects:

• Capture (Weight: 5): Audio recording, device pairing, permissions, battery
• Understand (Weight: 4): Speech-to-text, language detection, diarization
• Memory (Weight: 4): Memory creation, syncing, storage, metadata
• Intelligence (Weight: 3): Summaries, insights, action items
• Retrieval / Action (Weight: 3): Search, asking Omi, tasks, exports
• UX / Polish (Weight: 1): UI layout, animations, wording
• Docs / Tooling (Weight: 1): Documentation, examples, tooling

3. Evaluate Scoring Factors

Assess each factor (1-5 scale):

Failure Severity:

• 5: Completely broken
• 4: Frequently fails
• 3: Partially degraded
• 2: Minor annoyance
• 1: Cosmetic

Trust Impact:

• 5: Data loss or missing memories
• 4: Incorrect or corrupted memories
• 3: Inconsistent behavior
• 2: Confusing but recoverable
• 1: No trust impact

Frequency:

• 5: Happens daily
• 4: Weekly
• 3: Regular but situational
• 2: Rare
• 1: Edge case

Maintenance Leverage:

• 5: Eliminates a class of bugs
• 4: Improves observability or stability
• 3: Neutral
• 2: Adds complexity
• 1: Increases long-term maintenance burden

Cost & Risk (subtracted):

• 5: Cross-device + backend + firmware
• 4: Core pipeline change
• 3: Moderate
• 2: Small
• 1: Trivial

4. Assign Priority Levels

Based on score:

• >= 30: P0 - Existential / must fix immediately
• 22-29: P1 - Critical
• 14-21: P2 - Important
• < 14: P3 - Backlog

5. Suggest Lane Assignment

Assign to appropriate lane:

• Maintainer Now: High-risk, cross-system, or architectural changes
• Community Ready: Clear scope, safe changes, suitable for contributors
• Needs Info: Missing repro steps, logs, versions, or clarity
• Park: Out of scope or low leverage

Triage Rules

Follow these principles:

• Issues are signals, not commands
• Popularity does not determine urgency
• Data loss outranks feature requests
• Capture failures outrank intelligence improvements
• Memory-first principle: If Omi fails to capture or preserve memory, nothing else matters

Workflow

1. Read Issue: Analyze issue description, labels, comments
2. Map to Layer: Identify primary Omi layer affected
3. Evaluate Factors: Score each factor (1-5)
4. Calculate Score: Apply triage formula
5. Assign Priority: Map score to priority level (P0-P3)
6. Suggest Lane: Recommend lane assignment
7. Report: Provide triage summary with reasoning

Example Triage

Issue: Recording stops unexpectedly

Analysis:

• Layer: Capture (5)
• Severity: 5 (Completely broken)
• Trust Impact: 5 (Data loss - missing recordings)
• Frequency: 4 (Weekly)
• Leverage: 4 (Improves stability)
• Cost: 3 (Moderate)

Score: (5 × 5) + 5 + 4 + 4 - 3 = 35 → P0

Lane: Maintainer Now (high-risk, affects core functionality)

Related Resources

Documentation

• ISSUE_TRIAGE_GUIDE.MD - Complete triage guide and formula

Rules

• .cursor/rules/omi-specific-patterns.mdc - Omi architecture and priorities

Commands

• /auto-triage - Automatically triage an issue