Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ban-type-assertions(BAN type assertions 搜索)

ban-type-assertions 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ban-type-assertions 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 42,758。

总安装 1,045周安装 44GitHub Stars 64下载 366核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ban-type-assertions(BAN type assertions 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/factory-ai/factory-plugins
仓库路径:skills/ban-type-assertions
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/factory-ai/factory-plugins --skill ban-type-assertions
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/factory-ai/factory-plugins --skill ban-type-assertions

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ban-type-assertions 强制 TypeScript 项目中禁用 'as' 类型断言,改用编译器可验证的模式。它集成 @typescript-eslint 规则,推荐使用类型守卫或窄化操作替代 unsafe cast。有助于提升类型安全性,减少运行时错误风险,适用于严格类型检查流水线。

使用前应评估现有代码中 as 使用的合理性,避免过度替换导致逻辑失真。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ban-type-assertions

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/factory-ai/factory-plugins --skill ban-type-as…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ban-type-assertions 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/factory-ai/factory-plugins --skill ban-type-assertions。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ban-type-assertions 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ban-type-assertions 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ban-type-assertions 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ban-type-assertions 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,045 次,近一周安装 44 次,下载 366 次,GitHub 64 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ban-type-assertions 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ban-type-assertions

BAN type assertions 搜索 · 本页

1,04564需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Ban Type Assertions

Enable @typescript-eslint/consistent-type-assertions with assertionStyle: 'never' in a package and replace all as X casts with patterns the compiler can verify.

Core Philosophy

Pick the strictly correct path, not the simpler one.

Every as assertion is a spot where the developer told the compiler "trust me." The goal is to make the compiler *verify* instead. If you replace as Foo with a type guard that is equally unverified, you have not improved anything -- you have just moved the assertion.

Quick Reference

  • Rule: @typescript-eslint/consistent-type-assertions
  • Config: {assertionStyle: 'never'}
  • Location: packages/<name>/.eslintrc.js

Workflow

1. Enable the Rule

Add to the package's .eslintrc.js:

rules: {
  '@typescript-eslint/consistent-type-assertions': ['error', { assertionStyle: 'never' }],
}

2. Enumerate Violations

cd packages/<name> && npm run lint 2>&1 | grep "consistent-type-assertions"

Group violations by file and pattern before fixing.

3. Research Before Fixing

Before writing any replacement code:

  1. Check for existing zod schemas -- grep for Schema alongside the type name in @factory/common and across the repo.
  2. Check if schemas exist but aren't exported -- if so, export them rather than creating new ones.
  3. Check for duplicate types/interfaces across packages -- consolidate into @factory/common if found.
  4. Understand the data flow -- is this a parse boundary (external data), a narrowing site (union type), or a library type gap?

4. Fix Violations Using the Pattern Hierarchy

Tier 1: Zod Parsing (for external data boundaries)

Use for any data entering the system from JSON, disk, network, IPC, etc. This gives runtime validation, not just a type annotation.

// BAD
const data = JSON.parse(raw) as MyType;

// GOOD
const data = MySchema.parse(JSON.parse(raw));

Use safeParse when you need to handle errors gracefully (e.g., returning an error response with context like a request id):

// BAD: throws before you can extract the request id
const request = RequestSchema.parse(JSON.parse(raw));

// GOOD: safeParse lets you return a proper error
const parsed = RequestSchema.safeParse(JSON.parse(raw));
if (!parsed.success) {
  return errorResponse(rawObj?.id ?? null, INVALID_PARAMS, parsed.error.message);
}
const request = parsed.data;
Tier 2: Control Flow Narrowing (for union types)

Use switch, in, instanceof, or discriminated unions:

// BAD
(error as NodeJS.ErrnoException).code

// GOOD
if (error instanceof Error && 'code' in error) {
  const code = error.code;
}
// BAD
if (METHODS.has(method as Method)) { ... }

// GOOD: switch narrows exhaustively
switch (method) {
  case 'foo':
  case 'bar':
    return handle(method); // narrowed
}
Tier 3: eslint-disable with Justification (last resort)

Only for genuinely unavoidable cases (library type gaps, generic parameters that can't be inferred). Always explain *why*:

// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/consistent-type-assertions -- ws library types require generic parameter
ws.on('message', handler);
Anti-Pattern: Type Guards That Are Disguised Assertions
// NOT an improvement -- checks shape but not content
function isDaemonRequest(x: unknown): x is DaemonRequest {
  return typeof x === 'object' && x !== null && 'method' in x;
}

A zod schema validates values. A type guard like this is an unverified assertion with extra steps. Only use type guards when the narrowing logic is truly sufficient.

5. Use Strict Schemas, Not Permissive Ones

When a schema exists (e.g., SessionSettingsSchema), use it strictly rather than z.record(z.unknown()). This ensures forward compatibility -- if fields are removed in a migration, stale data gets cleaned on read.

// BAD: accepts anything
const settings = z.record(z.unknown()).parse(raw);

// GOOD: validates against the real shape
const settings = SessionSettingsSchema.parse(raw);

6. Promote Shared Schemas to @factory/common

If you find duplicate interfaces, types, or schemas across packages, consolidate them:

  1. Create the schema in @factory/common/<domain>/<subdomain>/schema.ts
  2. Put any enums in a sibling enums.ts (required by factory/enum-file-organization)
  3. Export via a subpath (e.g., @factory/common/session/summary), not the barrel index.ts
  4. Delete all local duplicates
  5. Update all consumers to import from the common subpath
  6. Run npm run knip at repo root to catch unused barrel re-exports

7. Fix Test Mocks to Match Schemas

Once you replace as X with .parse(), test mocks that relied on the assertion will fail validation. Fix the mocks -- do not disable the rule in tests.

Create helper functions to centralize valid test fixtures:

function mockSessionSummary(
  overrides?: Partial<SessionSummaryEvent>,
): SessionSummaryEvent {
  return {
    type: 'session_start',
    id: 'test-id',
    title: 'Test Session',
    owner: 'test-owner',
    ...overrides,
  };
}

8. Parse at the Boundary, Inside Error Handling

Make sure parsing happens where failures produce proper error responses, not unhandled exceptions:

// BAD: parse outside try/catch -- if it throws, you lose context
const request = RequestSchema.parse(data);
try { handle(request); } catch { ... }

// GOOD: safeParse before try, handle error with context
const parsed = RequestSchema.safeParse(data);
if (!parsed.success) {
  return errorResponse(rawData?.id ?? null, INVALID_PARAMS, parsed.error.message);
}
try { handle(parsed.data); } catch { ... }

Verification

Run for all affected packages (a change in @factory/common can break downstream lint):

# Lint (all affected packages)
cd packages/<name> && npm run lint

# Typecheck
npm run typecheck

# Tests
npm run test

# Unused exports (repo root)
npm run knip

Reminders

  • factory/enum-file-organization requires TypeScript enums to live in files named enums.ts
  • no-barrel-files prevents re-exporting types from barrel files -- consumers must import from the subpath directly
  • When promoting types to common, add a package.json exports entry for the new subpath if one doesn't exist
  • Test overrides for the rule in .eslintrc.js may be needed if test files use assertion syntax in mock setup -- but prefer fixing mocks over disabling the rule

平台分布

Codex

33.18%
按下载量换算121

Claude

30.21%
按下载量换算111

Cursor

16.95%
按下载量换算62

Gemini CLI

9.66%
按下载量换算35

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills