Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

backend-go-error-handling(后端 Go 错误处理)

backend-go-error-handling 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

backend-go-error-handling 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 70,604。

总安装 210周安装 9GitHub Stars 4下载 73核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:backend-go-error-handling(后端 Go 错误处理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jimnguyendev/jimmy-skills
仓库路径:skills/backend-go-error-handling
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jimnguyendev/jimmy-skills --skill backend-go-error-handling
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jimnguyendev/jimmy-skills --skill backend-go-error-handling

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践。适用于需要长期优化 Agent 行为或积累领域经验的场景。通过结构化记录反馈与失败案例,提升后续任务的准确性和适应性。使用时需确保有写入权限,并注意隐私保护,避免记录敏感信息。

建议结合具体项目上下文调整记录格式和内容颗粒度。

来源仓库内路径:skills/backend-go-error-handling

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jimnguyendev/jimmy-skills --skill backend-go-e…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

backend-go-error-handling 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jimnguyendev/jimmy-skills --skill backend-go-error-handl…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

backend-go-error-handling 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

backend-go-error-handling 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

backend-go-error-handling 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

backend-go-error-handling 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 210 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 73 次,GitHub 4 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

backend-go-error-handling 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
backend-go-error-handling

后端 Go 错误处理 · 本页

2104需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Persona: You are a Go reliability engineer. You treat every error as an event that must either be handled or propagated with context — silent failures and duplicate logs are equally unacceptable.

Modes:

  • Coding mode — writing new error handling code. Follow the best practices sequentially; optionally launch a background sub-agent to grep for violations in adjacent code (swallowed errors, log-and-return pairs) without blocking the main implementation.
  • Review mode — reviewing a PR's error handling changes. Focus on the diff: check for swallowed errors, missing wrapping context, log-and-return pairs, and panic misuse. Sequential.
  • Audit mode — auditing existing error handling across a codebase. Use up to 5 parallel sub-agents, each targeting an independent category (creation, wrapping, single-handling rule, panic/recover, structured logging).
Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes jimmy-skills@backend-go-error-handling skill takes precedence.

Go Error Handling Best Practices

This skill guides the creation of robust, idiomatic error handling in Go applications. Follow these principles to write maintainable, debuggable, and production-ready error code.

This skill assumes the project's structured logger is prep-go-log — the team's internal library that wraps Zap behind a unified log.Logger interface with OpenTelemetry + Signoz integration. All logging calls use logger.Error(ctx, "message", "key", value) syntax. See jimmy-skills@backend-go-observability for full setup and usage guide.

Best Practices Summary

  1. nil error = usable value — if a function returns (T, error), nil error guarantees T is valid. NEVER return nil, nil
  2. Returned errors MUST always be checked — NEVER discard with _
  3. Errors MUST be wrapped with context using fmt.Errorf("{context}: %w", err)
  4. Error strings MUST be lowercase, without trailing punctuation
  5. Use %w internally, %v at system boundaries to control error chain exposure
  6. MUST use errors.Is and errors.As instead of direct comparison or type assertion
  7. SHOULD use errors.Join (Go 1.20+) to combine independent errors
  8. Errors MUST be either logged OR returned, NEVER both (single handling rule)
  9. Use sentinel errors for expected conditions (including "not found"), custom types for carrying data
  10. Translate low-level errors to domain terms at layer boundaries — map sql.ErrNoRows to ErrUserNotFound, but never hide real failures behind domain errors
  11. NEVER use panic for expected error conditions — not found is not a bug, a timeout is not a bug. Reserve panic for programmer mistakes
  12. MUST use prep-go-log for structured error logging — not fmt.Println, log.Printf, or raw zap
  13. Attach operational context as structured fields — request IDs, tenant IDs, and user IDs belong in logs, spans, or custom error types, not in ad-hoc string concatenation
  14. Log HTTP requests with structured middleware capturing method, path, status, and duration
  15. Use log levels to indicate error severity
  16. Never expose technical errors to users — translate internal errors to user-friendly messages, log technical details separately
  17. Keep error messages low-cardinality — don't interpolate variable data (IDs, paths, line numbers) into error strings; attach them as structured fields instead (via prep-go-log at the log site, spans, or custom error types) so APM/log aggregators (Signoz, Datadog, Loki, Sentry) can group errors properly

Detailed Reference

  • Error Creation — The (value, error) return contract (nil error = usable value), the nil,nil anti-pattern, sentinel errors for "not found", the three-return alternative, error string conventions, low-cardinality messages, custom error types, and the decision table for which strategy to use when.
  • Error Wrapping and Inspection — Why fmt.Errorf("{context}: %w", err) beats fmt.Errorf("{context}: %v", err) (chains vs concatenation). How to inspect chains with errors.Is/errors.As for type-safe error handling, and errors.Join for combining independent errors.
  • Error Handling Patterns and Logging — Error translation across layers (mapping sql.ErrNoRows to domain sentinels without hiding real failures), the single handling rule, panic/recover design, structured context at the logging boundary, and prep-go-log integration for APM tools.

HTTP Error Boundary Pattern: AppError

For HTTP APIs, use a typed AppError struct as the error boundary between domain logic and HTTP transport. This centralizes status code mapping and prevents scattered if-else chains in handlers.

The Pattern

repo: pgx.ErrNoRows → thingNotFound(id)         // wraps sentinel with context
service: returns sentinel errors                  // domain logic, no HTTP knowledge
handler: writeError(c, lgr, err)                  // one-line dispatch
  └→ toAppError(err)                              // maps sentinel → *AppError
     └→ httpresponse.WriteError(c, lgr, appErr)   // writes envelope, logs 5xx

AppError Type

type AppError struct {
    Status  int    // HTTP status code
    Code    string // machine-readable (e.g., "DECK_NOT_FOUND")
    Message string // user-safe message
    Cause   error  // underlying error for logging (never in response)
}

func (e *AppError) Error() string { ... }
func (e *AppError) Unwrap() error { return e.Cause }

// Constructors
NotFound(code, msg string, cause error) *AppError       // 404
BadRequest(code, msg string, cause error) *AppError     // 400
Unprocessable(code, msg string, cause error) *AppError  // 422
Conflict(code, msg string, cause error) *AppError       // 409

Per-Feature Mapping (errors.go)

Each feature maps its sentinels to AppError in a toAppError() switch:

func toAppError(err error) error {
    switch {
    case err == nil:
        return nil
    case errors.Is(err, ErrDeckNotFound):
        return httpresponse.NotFound("DECK_NOT_FOUND", "deck not found", err)
    case errors.Is(err, ErrQuotaExceeded):
        return httpresponse.Unprocessable("QUOTA_EXCEEDED", "quota exceeded", err)
    }
    return err // unmapped → WriteError treats as 500
}

func writeError(c *gin.Context, lgr errorLogger, err error) {
    httpresponse.WriteError(c, lgr, toAppError(err))
}

Rules

  • Each feature owns its own toAppError() — no global error registry
  • Unmapped errors automatically become 500 (no catch-all needed)
  • 5xx causes are logged by WriteError; 4xx are not logged (expected client errors)
  • Handlers never use errors.Is directly — always go through writeError

→ See jimmy-skills@myvocap-backend for the full error flow with code templates.

Parallelizing Error Handling Audits

When auditing error handling across a large codebase, use up to 5 parallel sub-agents (via the Agent tool) — each targets an independent error category:

  • Sub-agent 1: Error creation — validate errors.New/fmt.Errorf usage, low-cardinality messages, custom types
  • Sub-agent 2: Error wrapping — audit %w vs %v, verify errors.Is/errors.As patterns
  • Sub-agent 3: Single handling rule — find log-and-return violations, swallowed errors, discarded errors (_)
  • Sub-agent 4: Panic/recover — audit panic usage, verify recovery at goroutine boundaries
  • Sub-agent 5: Structured logging — verify prep-go-log usage at error sites, check for PII in error messages

Cross-References

  • → See jimmy-skills@myvocap-backend for the full 4-stage error pipeline (sentinel → toAppError → writeError → WriteError) with code templates
  • → See jimmy-skills@backend-go-observability for structured logging setup, log levels, and request logging middleware
  • → See jimmy-skills@backend-go-safety for nil interface trap and nil error comparison pitfalls
  • → See jimmy-skills@backend-go-naming for error naming conventions (ErrNotFound, PathError)

References

  • prep-go-log — team's internal logging library (wraps Zap + OTel + Signoz) → See jimmy-skills@backend-go-observability for full reference
  • zap package — underlying logger used by prep-go-log

平台分布

Codex

32.83%
按下载量换算24

Claude

28.76%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

20.25%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

8.81%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills