Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

awt(奥特)

awt 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

awt 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,721。

总安装 242周安装 10GitHub Stars 1下载 79核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:awt(奥特)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ksgisang/awt-skill
仓库路径:skills/awt
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

为 AI 编码工具提供网页浏览与交互能力,支持点击、输入和截图操作。适用于端到端测试、回归验证和失败日志的根因定位。通过真实浏览器执行测试,依赖视觉匹配而非稳定 DOM 选择器。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt awt 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/awt

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

awt 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

awt 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

awt 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

awt 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

awt 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 242 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 79 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

awt 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
awt

奥特 · 本页

2421操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

AWT — Eyes and Hands for Your AI Coding Tool

AWT (AI Watch Tester) gives your AI coding tool the ability to see and interact with web applications. Your AI designs the test strategy; AWT executes it with a real browser — clicking, typing, taking screenshots, and reporting back.

When to Use This Skill

  • User wants to test a web application (E2E, QA, regression)
  • User says "test it", "check if it works", "verify the login"
  • User needs to detect bugs after code changes
  • User wants automated regression testing
  • E2E test failed and user wants to find the root cause in source code

When NOT to Use

  • Unit testing or API-only testing (AWT is for UI/E2E)
  • Performance/load testing (use k6, Artillery)
  • Mobile native app testing (web and desktop only)

⛔ CRITICAL RULES — READ BEFORE DOING ANYTHING

  1. NEVER use -y or --auto-approve — the user MUST approve before any test runs.
  2. NEVER use aat devqa — it runs the entire pipeline without user checkpoints. Always use the 4-step workflow below.
  3. NEVER run a test without showing the scenario to the user first and getting explicit approval (e.g. "진행해", "go ahead", "yes", "run it").
  4. NEVER auto-fix code or scenarios without user permission — always report failures and ask the user what to do.
  5. NEVER set headless: true — users MUST see the browser.
  6. NEVER guess element names — always scan first and use real data from scan_result.json.

★ MANDATORY 4-STEP WORKFLOW ★

When the user asks to test anything, you MUST follow these 4 steps in order. Do NOT skip any step. Do NOT combine steps.

STEP 1: SCAN — Analyze the target site

aat scan --url <URL>

After scanning, read .aat/scan_result.json and present a summary to the user:

"I scanned http://localhost:3000 and found 83 interactive elements:
 - 5 input fields (email, password, search, ...)
 - 12 buttons (Login, Sign Up, Submit, ...)
 - 15 links (Home, About, Dashboard, ...)

 Should I create a test scenario based on these elements?"

⏸️ WAIT for user response before proceeding to Step 2.

STEP 2: GENERATE + PRESENT — Create scenario and show it

Write a YAML scenario using the exact data from scan_result.json. Then show the full scenario to the user:

"Here is the test scenario I created (5 steps):

 1. 🌐 Navigate to http://localhost:3000
 2. 🖱  Type 'test@example.com' into email field
 3. 🖱  Type 'password123' into password field
 4. 🖱  Click 'Login' button (critical)
 5. ✅ Verify URL contains '/dashboard'

 Should I run this test? Or would you like me to modify anything?"

⏸️ WAIT for user approval before proceeding to Step 3.

  • If user says "modify X" → edit the scenario and show it again
  • If user says "go ahead" / "진행해" / "yes" → proceed to Step 3
  • If user says "cancel" → stop entirely

STEP 3: EXECUTE — Run the approved scenario

aat run --skill-mode --fast scenarios/<scenario>.yaml

Monitor the output. If any step fails:

  1. STOP immediately — do not continue to the next scenario
  2. Read the failure details from the AWT output
  3. Read the SCREENSHOT if provided in the === AWT SKILL DEVQA === block
  4. Report to the user:
"Test failed at Step 3 (Click Login button):
 - Error: Element 'Login' not found in DOM
 - Possible cause: The button text might be 'Sign In' instead of 'Login'
 - Screenshot: .aat/screenshots/step_003_fail.png

 Should I:
 (a) Fix the scenario (change 'Login' to 'Sign In') and re-test?
 (b) Fix the source code instead?
 (c) Skip this step and continue?"

⏸️ WAIT for user instruction before fixing or re-running.

STEP 4: REPORT — Summarize results

When all steps pass, report to the user:

"✅ Test complete: 5/5 steps passed (37.8 seconds)

 All navigation links and login flow are working correctly."

Auto-Setup

which aat || (pip install aat-devqa && playwright install chromium)

Scenario YAML Reference

Writing Scenarios from scan_result.json

Read .aat/scan_result.json and write YAML using the exact element data:

id: "SC-001"
name: "Login Flow"
steps:
  - step: 1
    action: navigate
    value: "http://localhost:3000/login"
    description: "Go to login page"

  # Use EXACT coordinates/selectors from scan_result.json
  - step: 2
    action: find_and_type
    target:
      selector: "#email"           # from scan_result.json
      text: "Email"
    value: "test@example.com"
    description: "Enter email"

  - step: 3
    action: find_and_click
    target:
      text: "Login"                # from scan_result.json
    region: main                   # exclude nav panel
    critical: true                 # stop if login fails
    description: "Click login button"

  - step: 4
    action: assert_url
    value: "/dashboard"
    on_fail: stop
    message: "Login failed — not redirected to dashboard"
    description: "Verify redirect to dashboard"

Rules:

  • Use selector from scan data when available (most reliable)
  • Use text as fallback (OCR-based)
  • Use region: main for all clicks (avoid nav panel False Positives)
  • Mark login/auth steps as critical: true
  • Add assert_url after navigation-triggering clicks

Actions (21 types)

CategoryActions
Navigationnavigate, go_back, refresh
Find + Mousefind_and_click, find_and_double_click, find_and_right_click
Find + Keyboardfind_and_type, find_and_clear
Directclick_at, type_text (supports verify: true), press_key, key_combo
Assertassert, assert_text, assert_screen_changed, assert_url
Sessionsave_session, load_session
Utilitywait, screenshot, scroll

Key Step Options

- action: find_and_click
  target:
    text: "Submit"               # OCR text
    selector: "#submit-btn"      # CSS selector (highest priority)
  region: main                   # top/bottom/left/right/center/main/full
  critical: true                 # stop test on failure
  on_fail: stop                  # same as critical
  method: auto                   # auto/semantics/template/ocr/vision
  match_index: 0                 # 0=first match, -1=last
  change_threshold: 0.05         # for critical auto-verification
  description: "Click submit"

assert_url (login/navigation verification)

- action: assert_url
  value: "/dashboard"
  on_fail: stop
  message: "Login failed"
  description: "Verify redirect"

Session Reuse

# Save after login
- action: save_session
  name: "my_app_login"

# Load in next run (24h expiry)
- action: load_session
  name: "my_app_login"

Region Parameter

RegionAreaUse When
fullEntire screen (default)General use
mainRight 80%Always use for clicks (avoids nav panel)
topTop 30%Header elements
bottomBottom 30%Footer, floating buttons
centerCentral 60%x60%Modal dialogs

Flutter CanvasKit Support

AWT automatically detects Flutter CanvasKit and activates Semantics:

  1. After navigate, clicks flt-semantics-placeholder (3 retries, 3s each)
  2. Reads flt-semantics[aria-label] for element coordinates
  3. Falls back to OCR if Semantics unavailable

Matching priority on Flutter: CSS selector → Flutter Semantics → Playwright text → OCR → Vision AI

Flutter-specific rules:

  • Always use region: main (Canvas OCR picks up nav text)
  • Use verify: true on type_text (Canvas input may not render)
  • Add assert_screen_changed after clicks
  • Use method: semantics to force Semantics lookup

Source Code Root Cause Analysis

When a test fails, trace to the source code:

  1. Read test output — which step, what error, what URL
  2. Search codebase — grep for the expected text, URL route, component
  3. Read the component — find why it doesn't render/redirect/respond
  4. Propose a fix to the user — show a concrete diff, ask for approval
  5. After user approves — apply fix, re-build, re-scan, re-test

Key principle: NEVER auto-apply fixes. Always show the diff and ask.


CLI Commands

CommandDescription
aat scan --url URLScan page, collect elements to scan_result.json
aat run --skill-mode PATHExecute with structured output for AI
aat run --skill-mode --fast PATHExecute in fast DOM-only mode (Next.js, React, etc.)
aat run --debug PATHExecute with OCR candidate debug logs
aat doctorCheck environment
aat setupConfigure AI + Vision providers
aat validate PATHValidate YAML scenarios
aat costView AI API costs

Key Flags

--skill-mode    Structured output for AI assistants
--fast          DOM-only matching (skip Vision/OCR — fastest for standard web apps)
--debug         Show OCR candidates and matcher details
--strict        Treat skipped steps as failures
--learn         Record healed steps for pattern learning
--slow-mo N     Slow down actions by N ms

⛔ Banned Flags (NEVER use these)

-y / --auto-approve    Bypasses user approval — NEVER USE

Best Practices

  1. Always scan before writing scenarios — never guess element names
  2. Use region: main on all find_and_click — prevents nav panel False Positives
  3. Mark auth steps critical: true — no point testing after login fails
  4. Add assert_url after form submits — verify navigation happened
  5. Use save_session/load_session — skip login on repeated runs
  6. Read screenshots on failure — the SCREENSHOT path is a real PNG file
  7. One fix per retry — change only the failing step
  8. Always ask user before fixing — never auto-modify code or scenarios

AI Providers (for Vision AI Tier 3)

ProviderVisionCostSetup
Gemini FlashYesFreeaat setup → Gemini
ClaudeYesMediumaat setup → Claude
GPT-4oYesHigheraat setup → OpenAI

Vision AI is optional — Tier 1 (template) + Tier 2 (OCR) are free and work without API keys.

Reference Files

  • references/scenario-schema.md — Full YAML schema
  • references/cli-reference.md — Complete CLI reference
  • references/config-reference.md — All configuration options
  • templates/scenario-template.yaml — Blank scenario template
  • templates/config-template.yaml — Default config template

平台分布

Codex

32.48%
按下载量换算26

Claude

31.56%
按下载量换算25

Cursor

18.94%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

10.16%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills