Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

autoresearch-fleet(自动研究舰队)

autoresearch-fleet 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

autoresearch-fleet 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 58,594。

总安装 412周安装 17GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 135核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:autoresearch-fleet(自动研究舰队)
来源仓库:https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills
仓库路径:skills/autoresearch-fleet
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill autoresearch-fleet
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill autoresearch-fleet

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

autoresearch-fleet 实现一个持续优化的自主研究循环,灵感来自 karpathy/autoresearch,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中进行指标驱动的代码改进。适用于有快速确定性评估机制的单目标优化问题,如延迟、准确率等可量化指标的提升。

通过修改代码、运行评估、保留改进并丢弃回归,循环迭代;当进展停滞时自动注入网络搜索以突破知识边界。安装前应检查环境依赖、API 密钥配置及是否会触发外部命令或网络请求。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/autoresearch-fleet

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill autoresearch-flee…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

autoresearch-fleet 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill autoresearch-fleet。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

autoresearch-fleet 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

autoresearch-fleet 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill autoresearch-fleet 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

autoresearch-fleet 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

autoresearch-fleet 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 412 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 135 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

autoresearch-fleet 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
autoresearch-fleet

自动研究舰队 · 本页

412—执行命令未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Autoresearch Fleet

Autonomous research loop inspired by karpathy/autoresearch. One mutable file, one immutable eval harness, git as state machine, and a "NEVER STOP" directive. The agent modifies code, evaluates the result, keeps improvements, discards regressions, and repeats indefinitely.

Open-world extension: when the agent plateaus (N consecutive discards), the orchestrator injects a web-search prompt, breaking through knowledge ceilings the LLM can't cross alone.

When to use

  • Optimizing a single metric (latency, accuracy, loss, score)
  • The problem has a fast, deterministic eval harness
  • You want autonomous overnight runs (100+ experiments while you sleep)
  • The search space is too large for manual exploration

How it works

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                 orchestrator.sh                  │
│                                                  │
│  for each iteration:                             │
│    1. Count trailing discards in results.tsv     │
│    2. If >= plateau_threshold → search prompt    │
│    3. Spawn agent (claude -p or codex exec)      │
│    4. Agent reads program.md, edits file, evals  │
│    5. Agent updates results.tsv, keeps/reverts   │
│    6. Check stop conditions (iter/cost/plateau)  │
│    7. Loop                                       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

The agent handles everything: reading files, editing code, running eval, committing, updating results.tsv, and reverting on failure. The orchestrator just loops, switches prompts on plateau, and enforces stop conditions.

Directory structure

$FLEET_ROOT/                    # The problem directory
  fleet.json                    # Fleet config
  program.md                    # Agent instructions (you write this)
  eval.py                       # Immutable eval harness (you write this)
  solution.py                   # Mutable file (agent edits this)
  results.tsv                   # Experiment log (agent updates, git-untracked)
  orchestrator.sh               # Generated by launch.sh
  .orch-state.json              # Iteration state
  .paused                       # Sentinel (touch to pause)
  logs/
    session-iter-1.jsonl         # Per-iteration session logs
    session-iter-2.jsonl
    ...

fleet.json schema

{
  "fleet_name": "optimize-api-latency",
  "type": "autoresearch",
  "config": {
    "model": "sonnet",
    "fallback_model": "haiku",
    "provider": "claude",
    "budget_per_iter": 2.00,
    "max_turns": 0
  },
  "problem": {
    "workdir": "/home/user/my-project",
    "eval_command": "make benchmark",
    "metric_regex": "^p99_latency_ms:\\s*([0-9.]+)",
    "metric_direction": "minimize",
    "results_file": "results.tsv",
    "program_md": "program.md"
  },
  "stop_when": {
    "max_iterations": 30,
    "cost_cap_usd": 15.0
  },
  "search": {
    "enabled": true,
    "plateau_threshold": 3
  }
}

Config fields

FieldDefaultDescription
config.modelsonnetAgent model
config.fallback_modelhaikuFallback model (must differ from model)
config.providerclaudeclaude or codex
config.budget_per_iter1.00Max USD per iteration
config.max_turns0Max agent turns (0 = unlimited)
problem.workdirfleet rootWorking directory — the repo/dir the agent operates in. Fleet root stores config + logs only.
problem.eval_commandrequiredCommand to run evaluation (python3 eval.py, make benchmark, pytest --tb=short, etc.)
problem.metric_regex*(optional)*Regex to extract metric from eval output. Must have one capture group. Omit if eval prints a single number.
problem.metric_directionminimizeminimize or maximize
problem.results_fileresults.tsvTSV log file (in workdir)
problem.program_mdprogram.mdAgent instructions file (checked in workdir first, then fleet root)
stop_when.max_iterations50Hard iteration limit
stop_when.cost_cap_usd0Total cost limit (0 = no limit)
search.enabledtrueEnable plateau-triggered web search
search.plateau_threshold3Consecutive discards before search

Required inputs

You need 3 things in a fleet root directory:

  1. fleet.json — points problem.workdir at the target repo, sets eval_command
  2. program.md — agent instructions. Must say NEVER STOP.
  3. An eval command — anything that outputs a metric
fleet-root/              ← fleet.json + program.md + logs
  fleet.json
  program.md
  logs/                  ← created automatically
your-repo/               ← workdir (agent operates here)
  src/...
  results.tsv            ← created automatically

When the user doesn't specify a benchmark

If the user gives you a repo and a goal but no eval command:

  1. Check for existing benchmarks: look for Makefile targets (make benchmark, make perf), package.json scripts (npm run bench, yarn test), pytest markers (pytest -m benchmark), or bench/ directories.
  2. If found: use it as eval_command. Set metric_regex if it doesn't print a single number.
  3. If not found: write a benchmark script (bench.sh or bench.py) in the workdir that:

- Runs the relevant operation (API call, function invocation, build, test suite) - Measures the metric the user cares about (latency, pass rate, bundle size, etc.) - Prints a single number to stdout - Exits 0 on success, non-zero on crash

  1. Set eval_command to run this script.

Example: user says "optimize API latency in my Express app":

#!/usr/bin/env bash
# bench.sh — measure p99 latency
npm start &>/dev/null &
PID=$!
sleep 3
RESULT=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{time_total}' http://localhost:3000/api/health)
kill $PID 2>/dev/null
echo "$RESULT"

Then set "eval_command": "bash bench.sh" in fleet.json.

Setup

  1. Create fleet root with fleet.json + program.md (+ bench.sh if you wrote one)
  2. bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/launch.sh <fleet-root> (git init + results.tsv auto-created)
  3. bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/status.sh <fleet-root> to monitor

Available scripts

ScriptPurpose
launch.sh <fleet-root> [--dry-run]Generate orchestrator.sh, spawn in tmux with monitor
status.sh <fleet-root> [--watch]Show iteration, best metric, results.tsv, cost, plateau
`view.sh <fleet-root> <iter\latest> [--follow]`View parsed session events for a specific iteration
report.sh <fleet-root> [--output file.md]Generate markdown summary after run completes
pause.sh <fleet-root>Pause at next iteration boundary
resume.sh <fleet-root>Resume paused fleet
kill.sh <fleet-root>Hard stop: kill tmux, sweep orphans

program.md template

Your program.md should follow this structure (adapt to your problem):

# autoresearch: <problem description>

## Setup
1. Explore the codebase to understand the architecture.
2. Read `results.tsv` for prior experiment history.
3. Run `<eval_command>` to establish a baseline.

## Rules
- Goal: <minimize|maximize> the metric.
- Make ONE change per experiment. Keep changes focused.
- <any constraints: don't touch tests, don't modify config, etc.>

## The experiment loop
LOOP FOREVER:
1. Read results.tsv for context on what's been tried.
2. Make ONE change to the codebase.
3. `git add -A && git commit -m "short description"`
4. Run: `<eval_command>`
5. Record in results.tsv (tab-separated): `commit  metric  status  description`
6. If metric improved: keep the commit.
7. If worse or crash: `git reset --hard HEAD~1` and log as discard/crash.
8. Go to step 1.

**NEVER STOP.** Run until manually interrupted.

Key design principles (from Karpathy)

  1. Git as state machine — improvement = advance branch; regression = reset
  2. Fixed eval — makes all experiments comparable
  3. results.tsv as shared memory — agent reads history to avoid repeating failures
  4. NEVER STOP — agent runs autonomously until killed
  5. Simplicity criterion — a small gain with ugly complexity is not worth it

Open-world search (the extension)

When search.enabled is true, the orchestrator counts trailing discards in results.tsv. If the count exceeds search.plateau_threshold, the next iteration gets a search-augmented prompt telling the agent to use WebSearch before coding.

This is validated: in experiment 009, search found Winograd's Strassen variant (15 additions vs 18) — a technique not in the LLM's training data — breaking through a plateau where vanilla autoresearch was stuck.

Critical: plateau detection is done in bash (deterministic), not by the LLM. The agent miscounted consecutive discards in early experiments, hallucinating plateaus. External counting is mandatory.

Rationalizations to reject

Agent saysRebuttal
"The agent should search every iteration for best results"Search-on-plateau beats always-search. Most early searches are redundant and add latency. Only search when stuck (3+ discards).
"I should manage git from the orchestrator"The agent handles git. It can fix commit messages, handle edge cases, and revert intelligently. The orchestrator just loops.
"The eval harness can reuse the same inputs"Reusing inputs is gameable. The agent will discover identity-based memoization and optimize for the benchmark, not the problem. Use fresh seeded inputs per timed run.
"I should use iterative-fleet for this"Iterative-fleet has a reviewer. Autoresearch has no reviewer — the eval script IS the quality gate. Different pattern, different skill.

$ARGUMENTS

平台分布

Codex

34.3%
按下载量换算46

Claude

30.26%
按下载量换算41

Cursor

17.34%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

8.42%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/quickcall-dev/skills --skill autoresearch-fleet 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills