Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

auditing-access-control(审计访问控制)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

auditing-access-control 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 48,434。

总安装 689周安装 29GitHub Stars 2,065下载 241核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:auditing-access-control(审计访问控制)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
仓库路径:skills/auditing-access-control
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill auditing-access-control
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill auditing-access-control

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

审计代码库、云配置和应用层的访问控制实现,识别越权路径和违反最小权限原则的问题。针对 IAM 策略、ACL、RBAC 配置和 API 授权逻辑进行深度分析,发现权限滥用风险。使用 grep、find 等工具遍历文件系统,结合框架约定和业务规则生成合规性报告。

安装方式:通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库添加,支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor 等宿主环境。输出包含具体修复方案和影响范围评估,建议在沙箱环境中先行验证再应用到生产环境。

来源仓库内路径:skills/auditing-access-control

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

auditing-access-control 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

auditing-access-control 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

auditing-access-control 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill auditing-access-control 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

auditing-access-control 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

auditing-access-control 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 689 次,近一周安装 29 次,下载 241 次,GitHub 2,065 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

auditing-access-control 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 2,065 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
auditing-access-control

审计访问控制 · 本页

6892,065执行命令未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Access Control Auditing

Overview

Audit access control implementations across codebases, cloud configurations, and application layers for security vulnerabilities and policy violations. This skill targets IAM policies, ACLs, RBAC configurations, file permissions, and API authorization logic to identify privilege escalation paths, overly permissive grants, and violations of the principle of least privilege.

Prerequisites

  • Access to the target codebase and configuration files in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/
  • Familiarity with the authorization model in use (RBAC, ABAC, ACL, or IAM)
  • grep, find, and standard shell utilities available via Bash
  • For cloud audits: CLI tools such as aws iam, gcloud, or az role installed and authenticated
  • Reference: ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/README.md for IAM best practices, ACL vulnerability patterns, and NIST/GDPR access control standards

Instructions

  1. Enumerate all access control definitions by scanning for IAM policy files, RBAC configuration, ACL definitions, middleware authorization checks, and .htaccess or equivalent files using Glob and Grep.
  2. Map each role or principal to its granted permissions, building a permission matrix that identifies which subjects access which resources at which privilege level.
  3. Evaluate each permission grant against the principle of least privilege -- flag any wildcard permissions (*), overly broad resource scopes, or administrative access granted to non-admin roles.
  4. Check for separation of duties violations where a single role combines mutually exclusive privileges (e.g., both "create user" and "approve user").
  5. Identify privilege escalation paths by tracing role inheritance chains, looking for roles that can modify their own permissions or assume higher-privileged roles.
  6. Inspect API route handlers and middleware for missing or inconsistent authorization checks -- compare route definitions against their corresponding auth guards.
  7. Verify that default-deny is enforced: confirm that unauthenticated or unauthorized requests are rejected unless explicitly allowed.
  8. Cross-reference findings against compliance requirements (NIST AC-1 through AC-25, GDPR Article 25, SOC 2 CC6.1) and flag gaps.
  9. Classify each finding by severity (critical, high, medium, low) based on exploitability and blast radius.
  10. Generate a remediation plan with specific configuration changes, code patches, or policy updates for each finding.

Output

  • Permission matrix: Role-to-resource mapping table showing all grants
  • Findings report: Each finding includes severity, affected resource, description, CWE reference (e.g., CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management, CWE-285 Improper Authorization), and remediation steps
  • Compliance gap analysis: Checklist of NIST SP 800-53 AC controls and GDPR access control requirements with pass/fail status
  • Privilege escalation paths: Diagram or list of role chains that enable escalation
  • Executive summary: Total findings by severity, top risks, and recommended priority actions

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Permission denied reading config filesInsufficient filesystem accessRun with elevated permissions or request read access to the target directory
IAM CLI command not foundCloud CLI tools not installedInstall aws-cli, gcloud, or az and authenticate before running cloud audits
Empty role/permission scan resultsIncorrect glob patterns for the frameworkAdjust search patterns to match the target framework (e.g., @Roles() for NestJS, [Authorize] for.NET)
Timeout scanning large codebasesToo many files in scopeNarrow the scan scope with --exclude patterns for node_modules, vendor, or dist directories
Inconsistent policy formatMixed IAM policy versions or formatsNormalize policies to a single format before analysis; flag format inconsistencies in the report

Examples

Auditing a Node.js Express API

Scan route definitions in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/src/routes/ for missing authorization middleware. Grep for router.post, router.put, router.delete and verify each has a corresponding authMiddleware or requireRole() call. Flag any state-changing endpoint lacking authorization as CWE-862 (Missing Authorization), severity high.

Reviewing AWS IAM Policies

Parse all JSON policy files in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/infra/iam/. Flag policies containing "Effect": "Allow" with "Resource": "*" or "Action": "*" as CWE-269 (Improper Privilege Management), severity critical. Recommend scoping to specific ARNs and actions per the principle of least privilege.

RBAC Configuration Audit

Analyze role definitions in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/config/roles.yaml. Build a permission matrix, identify roles with overlapping admin-level privileges, and flag any role that can both create and approve its own resources as a separation-of-duties violation (NIST AC-5), severity medium.

Resources

平台分布

Codex

36.13%
按下载量换算87

Claude

29.3%
按下载量换算71

Cursor

21.74%
按下载量换算52

Gemini CLI

9.9%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills --skill auditing-access-control 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills