Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

audit-openclaw-security(审核 OpenClaw 安全)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

audit-openclaw-security 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 5,288。

总安装 26,695周安装 1,135GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 9,352核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.0.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:audit-openclaw-security(审核 OpenClaw 安全)
来源仓库:https://github.com/tristanmanchester/audit-openclaw-security
安装命令:
openclaw skills install audit-openclaw-security
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install audit-openclaw-security

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

审核并强化 OpenClaw 部署环境的安全性配置。解释“openclaw 安全审核”结果并提供加固建议。当用户希望保护网关暴露接口与整体系统安全时使用。不能将工具输出视为最终结论,需人工复核关键项。audit-openclaw-security 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

涉及生产系统时应先评估最小权限与操作影响范围。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install audit-openclaw-security;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

audit-openclaw-security 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install audit-openclaw-security。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

audit-openclaw-security 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

audit-openclaw-security 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

audit-openclaw-security 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

audit-openclaw-security 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 26,695 次,近一周安装 1,135 次,下载 9,352 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

audit-openclaw-security 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
audit-openclaw-security

审核 OpenClaw 安全 · 本页

26,695—操作浏览器MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
audit-openclaw-security
description
Audit and harden OpenClaw deployments and interpret openclaw security audit findings. Use when the user wants to secure OpenClaw, review gateway exposure/auth/reverse proxies/Tailscale Serve or Funnel, check DM/group access (pairing, allowlists, mention gating, session.dmScope), minimise tool permissions and sandboxing, review plugins/skills/secrets/transcripts/log retention, or lock down Docker/macOS/laptop/EC2 installs. Not for generic OS, Docker, or cloud hardening unrelated to OpenClaw.
license
MIT
compatibility
Best with local shell access (Claude Code, OpenClaw desktop/CLI, or a similar agent runtime). In chat-only environments, ask the user to run the bundled commands locally and share redacted outputs.
metadata
{"author":"community","version":"2.1.0","validated_for":"2026.3.8","upstream":"OpenClaw docs + Agent Skills guidance (validated 2026-03-11)"}

audit-openclaw-security

Run a defensive, permissioned security audit of an OpenClaw deployment and turn the results into a practical remediation plan.

This revision is tuned for OpenClaw 2026.3.8 and uses {baseDir} when referencing bundled scripts from commands.

Guardrails

  1. Only audit systems the user owns or has explicit permission to assess.
  2. Never ask for raw secrets. Do not request gateway tokens/passwords, model API keys, session cookies, OAuth creds, or raw credential files.
  3. Prefer outputs that are designed to be shareable or redacted:

- openclaw status --all - openclaw status --deep - openclaw gateway probe --json - openclaw security audit --json - openclaw security audit --deep --json

  1. Treat the Gateway, Control UI, browser control, paired nodes, and automation surfaces as operator-level access.
  2. Default to audit-only. Before any config edits, --fix operations, firewall changes, or restarts, create a backup first and get explicit user approval.
  3. When the user wants remediation, make the backup step explicit:

- openclaw backup create --verify - use --no-include-workspace if the config is invalid but you still need state + creds - use --only-config if the user only wants a minimal safety copy before edits

What “good” looks like

  • Gateway is bound to loopback unless there is a deliberate, defended reason not to.
  • Strong Gateway auth is enabled.
  • No accidental public exposure (LAN bind, port-forward, permissive reverse proxy, Tailscale Funnel).
  • Control UI is either localhost/Serve or explicitly origin-restricted behind a trusted proxy.
  • DMs require pairing or strict allowlists.
  • Groups require mention gating and are not open if broad tools are enabled.
  • session.dmScope is isolated appropriately:

- per-channel-peer for most multi-user setups - per-account-channel-peer when the same provider runs multiple accounts

  • Tooling is least privilege:

- tools.profile: "messaging" or stricter for inbox-facing agents - deny group:runtime, group:fs, group:automation on untrusted surfaces - tools.fs.workspaceOnly: true - tools.exec.security: "deny" or at least approval-gated - tools.elevated.enabled: false unless there is a narrow, intentional need

  • Plugins and skills are explicitly trusted, minimally writable, and not used as an easy persistence path.
  • Secrets, transcripts, and logs have tight permissions and an intentional retention plan.

Use the bundled files progressively

Only open the extra files you need for the task:

  • references/command-cheatsheet.md — exact command ladders
  • references/openclaw-audit-checks.md — current high-signal checkId glossary
  • references/openclaw-baseline-config.md — secure baseline snippets
  • references/platform-mac-mini.md
  • references/platform-personal-laptop.md
  • references/platform-docker.md
  • references/platform-aws-ec2.md
  • assets/report-template.md — report structure

Step 0 — Establish context quickly

Collect just enough context to choose the audit path:

  • Where is OpenClaw running?

- macOS host / Mac mini - personal laptop - Docker host - EC2 / VPS / other cloud VM

  • Install style?

- native install - Docker / Compose - source checkout

  • Do we have local shell access?

- Mode A: chat-only / user runs commands - Mode B: agent can run shell commands directly

Mode A — Assisted self-audit (chat-only)

Ask the user to run the following on the OpenClaw host and share the outputs.

Minimum audit set

openclaw --version
openclaw status --all
openclaw status --deep
openclaw gateway status
openclaw gateway probe --json
openclaw channels status --probe
openclaw doctor
openclaw security audit --json
openclaw security audit --deep --json

Helpful extras

openclaw health --json
openclaw backup create --dry-run --json
openclaw backup create --only-config --dry-run --json
openclaw skills list --eligible --json
openclaw plugins list --json

Safe targeted config reads

Prefer targeted reads over a full config dump:

openclaw config get gateway.bind
openclaw config get gateway.auth.mode
openclaw config get gateway.auth.allowTailscale
openclaw config get gateway.controlUi.allowedOrigins
openclaw config get gateway.trustedProxies
openclaw config get gateway.allowRealIpFallback
openclaw config get discovery.mdns.mode
openclaw config get session.dmScope
openclaw config get tools.profile
openclaw config get tools.fs.workspaceOnly
openclaw config get tools.exec.security
openclaw config get tools.elevated.enabled
openclaw config get channels.defaults.dmPolicy
openclaw config get channels.defaults.groupPolicy
openclaw config get logging.redactSensitive

DM / group follow-up checks

If the issue is “the bot is online but DMs or groups behave strangely”, check pairing and mention gating:

openclaw pairing list <channel>

Examples of <channel> include discord, slack, signal, telegram, whatsapp, matrix, imessage, and bluebubbles.

If the user must share the config

OpenClaw config is often JSON5-like. Redact it before sharing:

python3 "{baseDir}/scripts/redact_openclaw_config.py" ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json > openclaw.json.redacted

Host / network snapshots

macOS

whoami
sw_vers
uname -a
lsof -nP -iTCP -sTCP:LISTEN
/usr/libexec/ApplicationFirewall/socketfilterfw --getglobalstate
/usr/libexec/ApplicationFirewall/socketfilterfw --getstealthmode
fdesetup status || true

Linux / cloud VM

whoami
cat /etc/os-release
uname -a
ss -ltnp
sudo ufw status verbose || true
sudo nft list ruleset || true
sudo iptables -S || true

Docker / Compose

docker ps --format 'table {{.Names}}	{{.Image}}	{{.Ports}}'
docker compose ps || true
docker port openclaw-gateway 18789 || true

Mode B — Automated local audit (shell access)

Run the bundled collector and report renderer:

bash "{baseDir}/scripts/collect_openclaw_audit.sh" --out ./openclaw-audit
python3 "{baseDir}/scripts/render_report.py" --input ./openclaw-audit --output ./openclaw-security-report.md

Then review openclaw-security-report.md, refine wording where needed, and present the final report to the user.

Notes on the collector

  • It is read-only by default.
  • It does not run openclaw security audit --fix.
  • It collects shareable CLI diagnostics plus basic host/network context.
  • It now captures current high-value signals such as:

- openclaw status --deep - openclaw gateway probe --json - openclaw channels status --probe - targeted safe config get values - backup dry-run metadata

How to interpret the audit

Use OpenClaw’s own security audit output as the primary source of truth, then translate it into a clear threat narrative.

Triage order

Prioritise in this order:

  1. Anything open + tools enabled

Lock down DMs/groups first, then tighten tool policy and sandboxing.

  1. Public network exposure

LAN bind, Funnel, missing auth, weak reverse-proxy handling.

  1. Browser / node / Control UI exposure

Treat these as operator access, not “just another feature”.

  1. Filesystem permissions

State dir, config file, auth profiles, logs, and transcript locations.

  1. Plugin / skill supply chain

Trust only what is intentionally installed and writable by the right user.

  1. Model and prompt-injection resilience

Important, but not a substitute for access control.

Findings that are easy to miss in newer OpenClaw builds

Pay extra attention to these newer or high-signal check IDs:

  • gateway.control_ui.allowed_origins_required
  • gateway.control_ui.host_header_origin_fallback
  • gateway.real_ip_fallback_enabled
  • config.insecure_or_dangerous_flags
  • sandbox.dangerous_network_mode
  • tools.exec.host_sandbox_no_sandbox_defaults
  • tools.exec.host_sandbox_no_sandbox_agents
  • tools.exec.safe_bins_interpreter_unprofiled
  • skills.workspace.symlink_escape
  • security.exposure.open_groups_with_elevated
  • security.exposure.open_groups_with_runtime_or_fs
  • security.trust_model.multi_user_heuristic

Use references/openclaw-audit-checks.md and assets/openclaw_checkid_map.json to map each finding to likely config paths and remediation areas.

Core remediation patterns

1) Gateway exposure and auth

  • Prefer gateway.bind: "loopback".
  • Require token or password auth for anything beyond strictly local use.
  • Do not treat gateway.remote.* values as protection for local WS access; actual protection comes from gateway.auth.*.
  • If the user needs a new shared secret, openclaw doctor --generate-gateway-token is the safe boring path.

2) Reverse proxies and browser-origin policy

If there is a reverse proxy in front of the Gateway:

  • configure gateway.trustedProxies
  • keep gateway.allowRealIpFallback: false unless there is a very specific need
  • for non-loopback Control UI use, set gateway.controlUi.allowedOrigins
  • do not enable Host-header origin fallback unless the user knowingly accepts the downgrade

3) Tailscale Serve vs Funnel

  • tailscale.mode: "serve" keeps the Gateway tailnet-only.
  • tailscale.mode: "funnel" is public and should be treated as urgent/high risk.
  • gateway.auth.allowTailscale can allow tokenless Control UI/WebSocket auth via Tailscale identity headers. That assumes the gateway host itself is trusted.
  • If untrusted code can run on the host, or if any reverse proxy sits in front of the gateway, disable gateway.auth.allowTailscale and require token/password or trusted-proxy auth.

4) DM and group isolation

  • Use dmPolicy: "pairing" or allowlist for inbox-facing bots.
  • For shared or support-style inboxes, set session.dmScope: "per-channel-peer".
  • For multi-account channel setups, prefer per-account-channel-peer.
  • Avoid groupPolicy: "open" unless the tool surface is extremely limited.
  • Require mentions in groups and use agents.list[].groupChat.mentionPatterns where native mentions are unreliable.

5) Tool surface reduction

Start from the conservative baseline in references/openclaw-baseline-config.md.

Good defaults for user-facing agents:

  • tools.profile: "messaging"
  • deny group:automation
  • deny group:runtime
  • deny group:fs
  • tools.fs.workspaceOnly: true
  • tools.exec.security: "deny" and ask: "always"
  • tools.exec.applyPatch.workspaceOnly: true
  • tools.elevated.enabled: false

6) Node / browser / automation trust

  • Paired nodes are remote execution surfaces. Audit them like you would audit operator access.
  • Browser control is not “just viewing pages”; it is effectively remote operator capability.
  • gateway / cron tools create persistence and should not be reachable from untrusted chat surfaces.

7) Secrets, logs, transcripts, and writable paths

Audit and discuss these paths carefully without asking for raw contents:

  • ~/.openclaw/openclaw.json
  • ~/.openclaw/secrets.json
  • ~/.openclaw/agents/<agentId>/agent/auth-profiles.json
  • ~/.openclaw/agents/<agentId>/sessions/*.jsonl
  • /tmp/openclaw/openclaw-YYYY-MM-DD.log
  • pairing stores under ~/.openclaw/credentials/

Platform-specific guidance

Load the matching playbook when the environment is clear:

  • macOS host / Mac mini -> references/platform-mac-mini.md
  • personal laptop -> references/platform-personal-laptop.md
  • Docker / Compose -> references/platform-docker.md
  • EC2 / VPS -> references/platform-aws-ec2.md

Deliverable format

Use assets/report-template.md or the rendered report from {baseDir}/scripts/render_report.py.

The final deliverable should include:

  • executive summary
  • environment overview
  • findings table with redacted evidence
  • sequenced remediation plan
  • verification commands
  • residual risk / operational practices

Troubleshooting notes

“openclaw: command not found”

  • Confirm the CLI is installed and on PATH.
  • On Windows, prefer WSL2 for shell-driven audit flows.
  • Re-run the official install / update path, then retry openclaw --version.

“Gateway won’t start — configuration invalid”

OpenClaw now fails closed on invalid config keys, invalid values, or invalid types. That is intentional and security-relevant.

Use:

openclaw doctor
openclaw doctor --fix

Even when the config is invalid, diagnostic commands such as openclaw status, openclaw gateway status, openclaw gateway probe, and openclaw health are still useful.

“Runtime: running” but “RPC probe: failed”

Trust the probe details, not just the supervisor status:

  • Probe target
  • Listening
  • Last gateway error

This often means service/config drift, auth mismatch, or a listener that is not actually reachable by the CLI.

“Bot is online but DMs fail”

Check:

openclaw channels status --probe
openclaw pairing list <channel>

Common root causes:

  • pending pairing approval
  • dmPolicy too strict for the expected sender
  • provider-side permission or token drift

“Groups are silent”

Check:

  • groupPolicy
  • requireMention
  • mentionPatterns
  • audit findings about open groups combined with runtime/fs/elevated tools

Trigger tests (skill author sanity check)

Should trigger:

  • “Can you audit my OpenClaw setup for security?”
  • “My OpenClaw gateway is exposed through Tailscale Serve — is that okay?”
  • “Interpret my openclaw security audit --deep --json findings.”
  • “I’m running OpenClaw in Docker on a VPS; help me harden it.”
  • “Why is my OpenClaw Control UI complaining about origins and trusted proxies?”
  • “My bot is online but DMs don’t reply; can you audit pairing and access policy?”

Should not trigger:

  • generic macOS hardening unrelated to OpenClaw
  • generic Docker security unrelated to OpenClaw
  • general AWS or VPS hardening unrelated to OpenClaw
  • unrelated software audits

平台分布

OpenClaw

81.74%
按下载量换算7,644

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills