Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

audio-quality-checker(音频质量检查器)

用于辅助音频、音乐、语音转写、语音合成或声音素材处理。它适合让 Agent 生成配乐说明、整理音频流程、调用语音工具或处理播客和视频配音素材。使用时需要确认输入音频来源、输出格式、时长和模型限制;涉及人声克隆、版权音乐或公开发布时,应先核对授权和合规边界。

audio-quality-checker 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 6,543。

总安装 9,210周安装 369GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,982核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.2

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:audio-quality-checker(音频质量检查器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/scikkk/audio-quality-checker
安装命令:
openclaw skills install audio-quality-checker
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install audio-quality-checker

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

智能音频质检系统,自动识别噪声类型并提出优化方案。支持环境噪音、电流声、爆音等多种问题检测与分类。通过可视化报告展示问题位置和改进建议,便于后期处理。建议结合人工审核,避免误判导致过度处理影响音质。audio-quality-checker 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install audio-quality-checker;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

audio-quality-checker 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install audio-quality-checker。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

audio-quality-checker 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

audio-quality-checker 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

audio-quality-checker 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

audio-quality-checker 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 9,210 次,近一周安装 369 次,下载 2,982 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

audio-quality-checker 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
audio-quality-checker

音频质量检查器 · 本页

9,210—接触敏感数据MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
senseaudio-audio-quality-checker
description
Analyze audio quality, detect noise types, and provide improvement recommendations. Use when users need to check audio quality, validate recordings, or identify audio problems.
metadata
openclaw
requires
env
primaryEnv
SENSEAUDIO_API_KEY
homepage
https://senseaudio.cn
compatibility
required_credentials
description
API key from https://senseaudio.cn/platform/api-key
env_var
SENSEAUDIO_API_KEY

SenseAudio Audio Quality Checker

Analyze audio files to detect quality issues, identify noise types, and provide improvement recommendations.

What This Skill Does

  • Detect noise and quality issues in audio files
  • Identify specific noise types (background noise, hum, static, etc.)
  • Provide noise severity ratings
  • Generate quality assessment reports
  • Recommend improvements for audio quality

Prerequisites

Install required Python packages:

pip install requests

Implementation Guide

Step 1: Analyze Audio File

import os
import requests

API_KEY = os.environ["SENSEAUDIO_API_KEY"]

def check_audio_quality(audio_file):
    url = "https://api.senseaudio.cn/v1/audio/analysis"

    headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {API_KEY}"}
    files = {"file": open(audio_file, "rb")}
    data = {"model": "sense-asr-check"}

    response = requests.post(url, headers=headers, files=files, data=data)
    return response.json()

# Example response:
# {
#   "audio_info": {
#     "duration": 5230,
#     "format": "wav"
#   },
#   "result": {
#     "has_noise": true,
#     "noise_score": 0.65,
#     "severity": "moderate",
#     "noise_types": ["background_noise", "hum"],
#     "analysis": "Audio contains moderate background noise and electrical hum"
#   }
# }

Step 2: Parse Quality Report

def parse_quality_report(analysis_result):
    audio_info = analysis_result.get("audio_info", {})
    result = analysis_result.get("result", {})

    report = {
        "duration_ms": audio_info.get("duration"),
        "format": audio_info.get("format"),
        "has_issues": result.get("has_noise", False),
        "noise_score": result.get("noise_score", 0),
        "severity": result.get("severity", "none"),
        "noise_types": result.get("noise_types", []),
        "analysis": result.get("analysis", ""),
        "recommendations": generate_recommendations(result)
    }

    return report

Step 3: Generate Recommendations

def generate_recommendations(quality_result):
    recommendations = []

    noise_score = quality_result.get("noise_score", 0)
    noise_types = quality_result.get("noise_types", [])
    severity = quality_result.get("severity", "none")

    # General recommendations based on severity
    if severity == "severe":
        recommendations.append("Re-record audio in a quieter environment")
        recommendations.append("Use professional audio equipment")
    elif severity == "moderate":
        recommendations.append("Apply noise reduction in post-processing")
        recommendations.append("Consider using a better microphone")
    elif severity == "mild":
        recommendations.append("Minor noise reduction may improve quality")

    # Specific recommendations based on noise types
    if "background_noise" in noise_types:
        recommendations.append("Record in a quieter location")
        recommendations.append("Use acoustic treatment (foam panels, curtains)")

    if "hum" in noise_types:
        recommendations.append("Check for electrical interference")
        recommendations.append("Use balanced audio cables")
        recommendations.append("Ensure proper grounding of equipment")

    if "static" in noise_types:
        recommendations.append("Check cable connections")
        recommendations.append("Replace faulty cables or equipment")

    if "wind_noise" in noise_types:
        recommendations.append("Use a windscreen or pop filter")
        recommendations.append("Record indoors or in sheltered location")

    if "echo" in noise_types:
        recommendations.append("Add acoustic treatment to reduce reflections")
        recommendations.append("Record closer to microphone")

    return recommendations

Step 4: Batch Quality Check

def batch_quality_check(audio_files):
    results = []

    for audio_file in audio_files:
        try:
            analysis = check_audio_quality(audio_file)
            report = parse_quality_report(analysis)

            results.append({
                "file": audio_file,
                "status": "analyzed",
                "report": report
            })
        except Exception as e:
            results.append({
                "file": audio_file,
                "status": "error",
                "error": str(e)
            })

    return results

Advanced Features

Quality Scoring System

def calculate_quality_score(analysis_result):
    """Calculate overall quality score (0-100)"""
    noise_score = analysis_result.get("noise_score", 0)
    severity = analysis_result.get("severity", "none")

    # Base score
    base_score = 100

    # Deduct based on noise score
    noise_penalty = noise_score * 50  # Max 50 points

    # Additional penalty for severity
    severity_penalties = {
        "none": 0,
        "mild": 10,
        "moderate": 25,
        "severe": 40
    }
    severity_penalty = severity_penalties.get(severity, 0)

    final_score = max(0, base_score - noise_penalty - severity_penalty)

    return {
        "score": round(final_score, 1),
        "grade": get_quality_grade(final_score)
    }

def get_quality_grade(score):
    if score >= 90:
        return "Excellent"
    elif score >= 75:
        return "Good"
    elif score >= 60:
        return "Fair"
    elif score >= 40:
        return "Poor"
    else:
        return "Unacceptable"

Comparative Analysis

def compare_audio_quality(original_file, processed_file):
    """Compare quality before and after processing"""

    original_analysis = check_audio_quality(original_file)
    processed_analysis = check_audio_quality(processed_file)

    original_score = calculate_quality_score(original_analysis["result"])
    processed_score = calculate_quality_score(processed_analysis["result"])

    comparison = {
        "original": {
            "file": original_file,
            "score": original_score,
            "noise_score": original_analysis["result"]["noise_score"]
        },
        "processed": {
            "file": processed_file,
            "score": processed_score,
            "noise_score": processed_analysis["result"]["noise_score"]
        },
        "improvement": {
            "score_delta": processed_score["score"] - original_score["score"],
            "noise_reduction": original_analysis["result"]["noise_score"] - processed_analysis["result"]["noise_score"]
        }
    }

    return comparison

Automated Quality Gate

def quality_gate_check(audio_file, min_score=70):
    """Check if audio meets minimum quality threshold"""

    analysis = check_audio_quality(audio_file)
    quality = calculate_quality_score(analysis["result"])

    passed = quality["score"] >= min_score

    return {
        "passed": passed,
        "score": quality["score"],
        "grade": quality["grade"],
        "threshold": min_score,
        "analysis": analysis
    }

Detailed Report Generation

def generate_detailed_report(audio_file):
    """Generate comprehensive quality report"""

    analysis = check_audio_quality(audio_file)
    report = parse_quality_report(analysis)
    quality = calculate_quality_score(analysis["result"])

    detailed_report = f"""
# Audio Quality Report

## File Information
- **File**: {audio_file}
- **Duration**: {report['duration_ms']/1000:.2f} seconds
- **Format**: {report['format']}

## Quality Assessment
- **Overall Score**: {quality['score']}/100
- **Grade**: {quality['grade']}
- **Noise Score**: {report['noise_score']:.2f}
- **Severity**: {report['severity']}

## Issues Detected
{'- ' + '\\
- '.join(report['noise_types']) if report['noise_types'] else 'No issues detected'}

## Analysis
{report['analysis']}

## Recommendations
{'- ' + '\\
- '.join(report['recommendations']) if report['recommendations'] else 'No recommendations'}
"""

    return detailed_report

Use Cases

Pre-Recording Validation

def validate_recording_environment():
    """Test recording environment before actual recording"""

    # record_test_audio() is a placeholder — implement using your preferred
    # audio capture library (e.g. sounddevice, pyaudio) to record a short clip.
    test_file = record_test_audio(duration=5)

    # Check quality
    gate_result = quality_gate_check(test_file, min_score=75)

    if gate_result["passed"]:
        return {
            "ready": True,
            "message": "Environment is suitable for recording"
        }
    else:
        return {
            "ready": False,
            "message": "Environment needs improvement",
            "recommendations": gate_result["analysis"]["result"]["recommendations"]
        }

Post-Production Quality Control

def qc_pipeline(audio_files, min_score=80):
    """Quality control for batch of audio files"""

    qc_results = {
        "passed": [],
        "failed": [],
        "total": len(audio_files)
    }

    for audio_file in audio_files:
        result = quality_gate_check(audio_file, min_score)

        if result["passed"]:
            qc_results["passed"].append(audio_file)
        else:
            qc_results["failed"].append({
                "file": audio_file,
                "score": result["score"],
                "issues": result["analysis"]["result"]["noise_types"]
            })

    qc_results["pass_rate"] = len(qc_results["passed"]) / qc_results["total"] * 100

    return qc_results

Output Format

  • Quality analysis JSON
  • Detailed quality report (Markdown/PDF)
  • Noise detection results
  • Improvement recommendations
  • Quality score and grade

Tips for Best Results

  • Test audio files before important recordings
  • Use quality gates in production pipelines
  • Compare before/after processing
  • Track quality metrics over time
  • Address severe issues immediately

Example Usage

User request: "Check the quality of this audio recording and tell me if it's good enough for a podcast"

Skill actions:

  1. Upload audio file to analysis API
  2. Parse quality results
  3. Calculate quality score
  4. Generate recommendations
  5. Provide clear pass/fail assessment
  6. Suggest improvements if needed

Reference

API docs: https://senseaudio.cn/docs/speech_recognition

平台分布

OpenClaw

96.23%
按下载量换算2,870

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills