Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

audio-quality-check(音频质量检查)

用于辅助音频、音乐、语音转写、语音合成或声音素材处理。它适合让 Agent 生成配乐说明、整理音频流程、调用语音工具或处理播客和视频配音素材。使用时需要确认输入音频来源、输出格式、时长和模型限制;涉及人声克隆、版权音乐或公开发布时,应先核对授权和合规边界。

audio-quality-check 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 29,506。

总安装 3,041周安装 123GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 954核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
0.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:audio-quality-check(音频质量检查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/tenequm/audio-quality-check
安装命令:
openclaw skills install audio-quality-check
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install audio-quality-check

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

专业级录音质量检测工具,分析回声、响度和语音清晰度。提供SNR信噪比、频谱分布等多维度质量评估指标。自动识别常见问题并提供改进建议,适合直播和会议场景。需配合标准测试音频验证检测准确性,定期校准设备。audio-quality-check 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install audio-quality-check;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

audio-quality-check 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install audio-quality-check。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

audio-quality-check 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

audio-quality-check 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

audio-quality-check 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

audio-quality-check 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,041 次,近一周安装 123 次,下载 954 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

audio-quality-check 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
audio-quality-check

音频质量检查 · 本页

3,041—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
audio-quality-check
description
Analyze audio recording quality - echo detection, loudness, speech intelligibility, SNR, spectral analysis. Use when the user wants to check a recording's quality, detect echo or duplication in audio files, measure speech clarity, compare original vs processed audio, diagnose why a recording sounds bad, or analyze audio tracks from Blackbox or any call recording app. Triggers on audio quality, recording analysis, echo detection, check recording, sound quality, analyze audio, speech quality, PESQ, STOI, loudness, SNR, audio diagnostics, recording sounds bad, echo in recording, audio duplication.
metadata
version
0.1.1

Audio Recording Quality Analyzer

Comprehensive audio quality analysis for call recordings. Handles dual-track M4A files (system audio + mic), single-track recordings, and AEC-processed files.

Quick Start

Run the bundled analysis script on a recording directory:

python <skill-path>/scripts/analyze_recording.py "/path/to/recording/directory"

Modes for focused analysis:

python <skill-path>/scripts/analyze_recording.py /path --tracks   # track info only
python <skill-path>/scripts/analyze_recording.py /path --echo     # echo detection only
python <skill-path>/scripts/analyze_recording.py /path --quality  # quality metrics (skip echo)

For Blackbox recordings, the directory is typically: ~/Library/Application Support/Blackbox/Recordings/<timestamp-id>/

Dependencies

System: ffmpeg, ffprobe (brew install ffmpeg) Python: numpy, soundfile, scipy, pyloudnorm, pesq, pystoi, librosa

Install all Python deps: pip3 install numpy soundfile scipy pyloudnorm pesq pystoi librosa

What Each Metric Tells You

EBU R128 Loudness (pyloudnorm)

  • What: Perceptual loudness in LUFS (Loudness Units Full Scale)
  • Target: -16 to -24 LUFS for speech
  • Watch for: AEC/post-processed tracks being significantly louder than originals (indicates the processing is amplifying without normalizing)

Echo Detection - Autocorrelation

  • What: Detects delayed copies of the signal within a single track by correlating the signal with itself at various time offsets
  • How to read: Peaks in the 20-100ms range with correlation > 0.3 indicate signal duplication. The lag tells you the delay of the duplicate copy
  • Key insight: If you see a consistent peak at the same lag across multiple time segments, that's a systematic duplication (e.g., a virtual audio processor like Krisp introducing a delayed copy at ~53ms)
  • Normal values: Peaks below 0.15 are typically speech pitch harmonics (harmless). Peaks above 0.3 at consistent lags are echo

Cross-Track Correlation

  • What: Measures how much one track's content appears in another (e.g., system audio bleeding into the mic track)
  • How to read: Values near 0 mean no bleed. Values above 0.1 indicate the mic is picking up system audio
  • Coherence: Frequency-domain version of the same test. Voice-band coherence (300-3400Hz) is most relevant for speech echo

PESQ - Speech Quality (requires reference + degraded)

  • What: ITU-T P.862 standard. Gives a MOS (Mean Opinion Score) comparing a degraded signal against a reference
  • Scale: 1.0 (bad) to 4.5 (excellent). NB = narrowband (phone quality), WB = wideband
  • Use for: Comparing AEC-processed mic vs original mic to see if processing helps or hurts
  • Thresholds: 4.0+ excellent, 3.0+ good, 2.5-3.0 fair, <2.5 poor

STOI - Speech Intelligibility (requires reference + degraded)

  • What: Short-Time Objective Intelligibility. Measures how understandable speech remains after processing
  • Scale: 0.0 to 1.0
  • Thresholds: >0.8 good, >0.6 fair, <0.6 poor
  • Key insight: If STOI drops significantly between original and processed, the processing is degrading intelligibility

Spectral Analysis (librosa)

  • Centroid: Average frequency weighted by amplitude. Higher = brighter/harsher audio
  • Rolloff (85%): Frequency below which 85% of spectral energy sits. Lower = more bass-heavy
  • Zero-crossing rate: How often the signal crosses zero. Higher = noisier signal. Speech is typically 0.05-0.20; values above 0.30 suggest significant noise

SNR - Signal-to-Noise Ratio

  • What: Ratio of speech energy to background noise energy (estimated via energy-based VAD)
  • Thresholds: >20dB excellent, >15dB good, >10dB fair, <10dB poor
  • Note: This measures background noise, not echo. A recording can have excellent SNR but still have echo problems

Per-Minute Energy

  • What: RMS energy and voice-band energy per minute of recording
  • Use for: Spotting segments that went silent (mic cut out), got unexpectedly loud (clipping risk), or had activity patterns that help identify when speakers were active

Manual Analysis Recipes

When you need analysis beyond what the script provides, these patterns are useful.

Extract individual tracks from dual-track M4A

ffmpeg -y -i audio.m4a -map 0:0 -ac 1 -ar 16000 /tmp/system.wav
ffmpeg -y -i audio.m4a -map 0:1 -ac 1 -ar 16000 /tmp/mic.wav

Quick loudness check with sox

sox audio.wav -n stat 2>&1

Check specific time range for echo (Python)

import numpy as np
import soundfile as sf
from scipy import signal

data, sr = sf.read('/tmp/system.wav')
# Analyze 5 seconds starting at 2 minutes
start = 120 * sr
seg = data[start:start + 5*sr]
seg_norm = seg / (np.max(np.abs(seg)) + 1e-10)
autocorr = np.correlate(seg_norm, seg_norm, mode='full')
mid = len(seg_norm) - 1
autocorr = autocorr / autocorr[mid]
# Check 20-100ms range for echo peaks
min_lag = int(0.020 * sr)
max_lag = int(0.100 * sr)
region = autocorr[mid + min_lag:mid + max_lag]
peaks, props = signal.find_peaks(region, height=0.1)
for i, p in enumerate(peaks[:5]):
    lag_ms = (p + min_lag) / sr * 1000
    print(f"  Peak at {lag_ms:.1f}ms, r={props['peak_heights'][i]:.3f}")

Common Issues and What Causes Them

SymptomLikely causeWhat to check
Speakers sound slightly doubled/echoedVirtual audio processor (Krisp) creating delayed copy in system audioAutocorrelation: consistent peak at 40-60ms
Mic track has remote speakers' voicesAcoustic echo (speakers to mic)Cross-track correlation > 0.1
AEC-processed file sounds worseDTLN-aec degrading signal qualityPESQ/STOI comparing original vs processed
AEC-processed file is too loudMissing loudness normalization after processingLoudness: processed > -10 LUFS
Recording has hiss/noiseLow SNR, noisy mic, or AGC artifactsSNR < 15dB, high zero-crossing rate
Quiet segments mid-recordingMic cut out or device changedPer-minute energy: sudden RMS drop

平台分布

OpenClaw

75.38%
按下载量换算719

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills