Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

testing-strategy(测试策略)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

testing-strategy 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 18,252。

总安装 349周安装 14GitHub Stars 6下载 113核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:testing-strategy(测试策略)
来源仓库:https://github.com/atman36/ai-vibe-prompts
仓库路径:skills/testing-strategy
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/atman36/ai-vibe-prompts --skill testing-strategy
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/atman36/ai-vibe-prompts --skill testing-strategy

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

testing-strategy 构建金字塔式测试体系,70% 单元测试 + 20% 集成测试 + 10% E2E 测试分布。它使用 Vitest 和 Playwright 实现自动化验证,覆盖边界条件、异常流程和竞态场景。测试用例必须与业务需求对齐,避免过度模拟或遗漏关键路径验证。

所有测试都应在隔离环境中运行,夹具数据需定期清理防止残留影响后续执行。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/testing-strategy

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/atman36/ai-vibe-prompts --skill testing-strate…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

testing-strategy 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/atman36/ai-vibe-prompts --skill testing-strategy。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

testing-strategy 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

testing-strategy 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

testing-strategy 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

testing-strategy 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 349 次,近一周安装 14 次,下载 113 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

testing-strategy 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
testing-strategy

测试策略 · 本页

3496操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Testing Strategy Skill

Objective

Implement comprehensive testing strategy covering unit, integration, and E2E tests using modern tools (Vitest, Playwright) with clear coverage targets and best practices.

When to Use This Skill

Auto-invoke when:

  • User mentions "test", "testing", "coverage", "TDD", "E2E"
  • Setting up new project
  • Adding new features (need tests)
  • Debugging test failures
  • Improving test coverage

Testing Pyramid

        /\
       /E2E\         Few, slow, expensive
      /------\
     /  Integ \      Some, moderate speed
    /----------\
   / Unit Tests \    Many, fast, cheap
  /--------------\

Distribution:

  • 70% Unit Tests - Fast, isolated, cheap
  • 20% Integration Tests - Moderate speed, test interactions
  • 10% E2E Tests - Slow, expensive, critical user flows

Test Types

1. Unit Tests (Vitest)

What: Test individual functions/components in isolation

Tools: Vitest, React Testing Library

Coverage Target: 80%+

Setup:

npm install -D vitest @vitest/ui @testing-library/react @testing-library/jest-dom

Config (vitest.config.ts):

import { defineConfig } from 'vitest/config'
import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react'

export default defineConfig({
  plugins: [react()],
  test: {
    globals: true,
    environment: 'jsdom',
    setupFiles: './tests/setup.ts',
    coverage: {
      provider: 'v8',
      reporter: ['text', 'json', 'html'],
      exclude: ['node_modules/', 'tests/'],
      thresholds: {
        lines: 80,
        functions: 80,
        branches: 75,
        statements: 80
      }
    }
  }
})

Example (Button.test.tsx):

import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest'
import { Button } from './Button'

describe('Button', () => {
  it('renders with text', () => {
    render(<Button>Click me</Button>)
    expect(screen.getByText('Click me')).toBeInTheDocument()
  })

  it('calls onClick when clicked', () => {
    const handleClick = vi.fn()
    render(<Button onClick={handleClick}>Click</Button>)
    fireEvent.click(screen.getByText('Click'))
    expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledOnce()
  })

  it('is disabled when disabled prop is true', () => {
    render(<Button disabled>Disabled</Button>)
    expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
  })
})

Commands:

npm run test              # Run all tests
npm run test:watch        # Watch mode
npm run test:ui           # Visual UI
npm run test:coverage     # With coverage

2. Integration Tests (Vitest)

What: Test component interactions, API calls, state management

Example (UserProfile.test.tsx):

import { render, screen, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from 'vitest'
import { UserProfile } from './UserProfile'

// Mock API
vi.mock('./api', () => ({
  fetchUser: vi.fn(() => Promise.resolve({
    id: 1,
    name: 'John Doe',
    email: 'john@example.com'
  }))
}))

describe('UserProfile Integration', () => {
  it('fetches and displays user data', async () => {
    render(<UserProfile userId="1" />)

    expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()

    await waitFor(() => {
      expect(screen.getByText('John Doe')).toBeInTheDocument()
      expect(screen.getByText('john@example.com')).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })
})

3. E2E Tests (Playwright)

What: Test complete user flows in real browser

Tools: Playwright

Coverage Target: Critical paths only

Setup:

npm install -D @playwright/test
npx playwright install

Config (playwright.config.ts):

import { defineConfig, devices } from '@playwright/test'

export default defineConfig({
  testDir: './e2e',
  fullyParallel: true,
  forbidOnly: !!process.env.CI,
  retries: process.env.CI ? 2 : 0,
  workers: process.env.CI ? 1 : undefined,
  reporter: 'html',
  use: {
    baseURL: 'http://localhost:3000',
    trace: 'on-first-retry',
  },
  projects: [
    {
      name: 'chromium',
      use: { ...devices['Desktop Chrome'] },
    },
    {
      name: 'mobile',
      use: { ...devices['iPhone 13'] },
    },
  ],
  webServer: {
    command: 'npm run dev',
    url: 'http://localhost:3000',
    reuseExistingServer: !process.env.CI,
  },
})

Example (e2e/auth.spec.ts):

import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test'

test.describe('Authentication Flow', () => {
  test('user can sign up and log in', async ({ page }) => {
    // Sign up
    await page.goto('/signup')
    await page.fill('[name="email"]', 'test@example.com')
    await page.fill('[name="password"]', 'SecurePass123!')
    await page.click('button[type="submit"]')

    // Should redirect to dashboard
    await expect(page).toHaveURL(/\/dashboard/)
    await expect(page.locator('h1')).toContainText('Welcome')

    // Log out
    await page.click('[aria-label="User menu"]')
    await page.click('text=Logout')

    // Should redirect to home
    await expect(page).toHaveURL('/')

    // Log back in
    await page.goto('/login')
    await page.fill('[name="email"]', 'test@example.com')
    await page.fill('[name="password"]', 'SecurePass123!')
    await page.click('button[type="submit"]')

    await expect(page).toHaveURL(/\/dashboard/)
  })
})

Commands:

npx playwright test                    # Run all E2E
npx playwright test --ui               # Interactive mode
npx playwright test --headed           # Show browser
npx playwright test --project=chromium # Specific browser
npx playwright show-report             # View last report

Testing Best Practices

AAA Pattern

// Arrange
const user = { id: 1, name: 'John' }
const mockFetch = vi.fn()

// Act
const result = await fetchUser(mockFetch, 1)

// Assert
expect(result).toEqual(user)
expect(mockFetch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/api/users/1')

Test Naming

// Good: descriptive, explains what and when
it('displays error message when API returns 404', () => {})
it('disables submit button when form is invalid', () => {})

// Bad: vague, unclear
it('works', () => {})
it('test 1', () => {})

One Assertion Per Test (Guideline)

// Prefer focused tests
it('renders user name', () => {
  render(<User name="John" />)
  expect(screen.getByText('John')).toBeInTheDocument()
})

it('renders user email', () => {
  render(<User email="john@example.com" />)
  expect(screen.getByText('john@example.com')).toBeInTheDocument()
})

// Over complex tests
it('renders user data', () => {
  // Multiple unrelated assertions
})

Mock External Dependencies

// Mock API calls
vi.mock('./api', () => ({
  fetchUser: vi.fn()
}))

// Mock environment
vi.stubEnv('API_URL', 'http://test-api.com')

// Mock timers
vi.useFakeTimers()
const now = new Date('2024-01-01')
vi.setSystemTime(now)

Coverage Strategy

What to Test

✅ Do Test:

  • Business logic
  • Edge cases and error handling
  • User interactions
  • API integration
  • State management
  • Validation logic
  • Critical user flows (E2E)

❌ Don't Test:

  • Third-party libraries
  • Framework internals
  • Constants
  • Simple getters/setters
  • Generated code

Coverage Targets

Minimum:

  • Lines: 80%
  • Functions: 80%
  • Branches: 75%
  • Statements: 80%

Ideal:

  • Critical paths: 100%
  • Business logic: 95%+
  • UI components: 85%+
  • Utilities: 90%+

Run Coverage

npm run test:coverage

# View in browser
open coverage/index.html

Testing Workflow

1. TDD Approach (Recommended)

1. Write failing test
2. Write minimal code to pass
3. Refactor
4. Repeat

2. Test-After (Pragmatic)

1. Implement feature
2. Write tests
3. Achieve 80%+ coverage
4. Refactor with confidence

3. Pre-Commit Testing

# Run before every commit
npm run test:quick        # Fast unit tests
npm run lint
npm run typecheck

# Run before push
npm run test             # All unit/integration
npm run test:coverage    # Verify coverage

# Run before deploy
npm run test:e2e         # Full E2E suite

Test Organization

Directory Structure

src/
├── components/
│   ├── Button/
│   │   ├── Button.tsx
│   │   ├── Button.test.tsx      # Co-located
│   │   └── Button.stories.tsx   # Storybook
│   └── ...
tests/
├── setup.ts                      # Test setup
├── utils/                        # Test utilities
│   ├── renderWithProviders.tsx  # Custom render
│   └── mockData.ts              # Test fixtures
└── __mocks__/                   # Global mocks
e2e/
├── auth.spec.ts
├── checkout.spec.ts
└── fixtures/                    # E2E test data

Naming Conventions

  • Unit/Integration: *.test.ts or *.test.tsx
  • E2E: *.spec.ts
  • Setup: setup.ts, vitest.config.ts

Continuous Integration

GitHub Actions Example

name: Tests
on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v3
        with:
          node-version: 18
          cache: 'npm'

      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run lint
      - run: npm run typecheck
      - run: npm run test:coverage

      - name: Upload coverage
        uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
        with:
          files: ./coverage/coverage-final.json

  e2e:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v3
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npx playwright install --with-deps
      - run: npm run build
      - run: npx playwright test

      - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
        if: always()
        with:
          name: playwright-report
          path: playwright-report/

Debugging Tests

Vitest

# Run single test file
npm run test -- Button.test.tsx

# Run tests matching pattern
npm run test -- --grep "Button renders"

# Debug in VS Code
# Add breakpoint, press F5

Playwright

# Debug mode
npx playwright test --debug

# Specific test
npx playwright test auth.spec.ts --debug

# Trace viewer
npx playwright show-trace trace.zip

Common Testing Patterns

Testing Async Code

it('fetches user data', async () => {
  const { result } = renderHook(() => useUser(1))

  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(result.current.data).toEqual({ id: 1, name: 'John' })
  })
})

Testing Error States

it('displays error when fetch fails', async () => {
  vi.mocked(fetchUser).mockRejectedValue(new Error('Network error'))

  render(<UserProfile userId="1" />)

  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(screen.getByText(/error/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
  })
})

Testing Forms

it('submits form with valid data', async () => {
  const handleSubmit = vi.fn()
  render(<LoginForm onSubmit={handleSubmit} />)

  await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Email'), 'test@example.com')
  await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Password'), 'password123')
  await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i }))

  expect(handleSubmit).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
    email: 'test@example.com',
    password: 'password123'
  })
})

Integration with Other Skills

  • quality-gates - Run tests as quality check
  • git-workflow - Tests in pre-commit hooks
  • codebase-analysis - Identify untested code

Package.json Scripts

{
  "scripts": {
    "test": "vitest",
    "test:watch": "vitest --watch",
    "test:ui": "vitest --ui",
    "test:coverage": "vitest --coverage",
    "test:e2e": "playwright test",
    "test:e2e:ui": "playwright test --ui",
    "test:e2e:headed": "playwright test --headed",
    "test:all": "npm run test:coverage && npm run test:e2e"
  }
}

Version History

  • 1.0.0 (2025-01-03): Initial testing strategy with Vitest and Playwright

平台分布

Codex

36.71%
按下载量换算41

Claude

30.14%
按下载量换算34

Cursor

17.86%
按下载量换算20

Gemini CLI

8.21%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills