Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ad-to-landing-page-auditor(向着陆页审核员投放广告)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

ad-to-landing-page-auditor 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 67,317。

总安装 247周安装 10GitHub Stars 607下载 78核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ad-to-landing-page-auditor(向着陆页审核员投放广告)
来源仓库:https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/ad-to-landing-page-auditor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-to-landing-page-auditor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-to-landing-page-auditor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于审核广告与落地页的一致性,识别从广告承诺到页面体验的断点。适合分析广告文案与落地页内容是否匹配,提升点击转化效率。通过自动化检查消息一致性、视觉元素和转化路径,输出改进建议。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-to-landing-page-auditor 需确认目标网站可访问,避免处理受保护或私有页面内容。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ad-to-landing-page-auditor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-to-landing-p…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ad-to-landing-page-auditor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-to-landing-page-audito…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ad-to-landing-page-auditor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ad-to-landing-page-auditor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ad-to-landing-page-auditor 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ad-to-landing-page-auditor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 247 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 78 次,GitHub 607 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ad-to-landing-page-auditor 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ad-to-landing-page-auditor

向着陆页审核员投放广告 · 本页

247607需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Ad-to-Landing Page Auditor

The #1 reason ads get clicks but not conversions: the landing page doesn't deliver on the ad's promise. This skill audits the full click path — from ad copy to landing page experience — and flags every disconnect.

Core principle: A great ad with a mismatched landing page is worse than a mediocre ad with a matched one. Message match is the single biggest conversion lever most startups ignore.

When to Use

  • "Why are my ads getting clicks but no conversions?"
  • "Audit my ad-to-landing page flow"
  • "Check message match on our campaigns"
  • "My conversion rate is low — help me figure out why"
  • "Review our landing pages for our ad campaigns"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Ad copy — For each ad, provide:

- Headline(s) - Body / description text - CTA text - Platform (Google Search / Meta / LinkedIn)

  1. Landing page URLs — The URL each ad points to
  2. Conversion goal — What should happen after someone clicks? (Demo / Trial / Purchase / Download)
  3. Known conversion rates? — Current click → conversion rate per ad/LP (if available)

If the user has a CSV export from their ad platform, parse that instead.

Phase 1: Ad Inventory

Parse the provided ads into:

Ad IDPlatformHeadlineBody/DescriptionCTALanding Page URLConv Rate (if known)

Phase 2: Landing Page Audit

For each unique landing page URL, fetch the page content:

fetch_webpage: [landing_page_url]

If fetch_webpage is not available, use curl to retrieve the page HTML.

Extract and score:

2A: Content Elements

ElementFound?Content
Hero headline[Y/N]"[Text]"
Subheadline[Y/N]"[Text]"
Primary CTA[Y/N]"[Button text]"
CTA above fold[Y/N]—
Social proof[Y/N][Logos / testimonials / metrics]
Benefit list[Y/N][Key benefits listed]
Form / Sign-up[Y/N][Field count: N]
Video[Y/N]—
Trust signals[Y/N][Security badges, guarantees]

2B: Message Match Scoring

For each ad → landing page pair, score on:

DimensionScore (1-10)Criteria
Promise continuity[X]Does the LP headline deliver on the ad's promise?
Language match[X]Does the LP use the same words/phrases as the ad?
Visual continuity[X]Does the LP feel like a continuation of the ad? (Not assessable for search)
CTA alignment[X]Does the LP's ask match what the ad implied?
Specificity match[X]If the ad was specific ("for sales teams"), is the LP specific too?
Emotional match[X]If the ad used fear/urgency, does the LP carry that forward?

Message Match Score: [Average/60]

Scoring Guide

ScoreRatingMeaning
50-60ExcellentStrong match — LP delivers on every ad promise
40-49GoodMinor disconnects but overall coherent
30-39Needs workNoticeable gaps — visitor has to hunt for relevance
20-29PoorAd and LP feel like different products
Below 20CriticalComplete mismatch — fix immediately

Phase 3: Conversion Friction Analysis

Beyond message match, assess landing page conversion friction:

Friction TypeCheckStatus
Load timeDoes the page feel heavy/slow? (Asset count proxy)[Fast/Slow/Unknown]
Form lengthHow many fields before conversion?[N fields] — [Appropriate/Too many]
CTA clarityIs there one clear CTA or competing actions?[Clear/Cluttered]
Above-fold conversionCan someone convert without scrolling?[Yes/No]
Social proof placementIs proof near the CTA?[Yes/No]
Navigation distractionDoes the LP have full site nav? (Should be minimal)[Minimal/Full nav]
Mobile experienceAny mobile-unfriendly elements?[Good/Issues]

Phase 4: Output Format

# Ad-to-Landing Page Audit — [Product/Client] — [DATE]

Ads audited: [N]
Unique landing pages: [N]
Platform(s): [Google / Meta / LinkedIn]
Overall message match: [Score/60] — [Rating]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-4 sentences: Overall finding, biggest disconnect, top recommendation, estimated conversion impact]

---

## Audit Results by Ad → Landing Page Pair

### Ad 1: "[Ad headline excerpt]"
**Platform:** [Google Search / Meta / LinkedIn]
**Ad copy:**
> Headline: "[text]"
> Body: "[text]"
> CTA: "[text]"

**Landing page:** [URL]
> LP headline: "[text]"
> LP subhead: "[text]"
> LP CTA: "[button text]"

**Message Match Score: [X/60] — [Rating]**

| Dimension | Score | Issue |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Promise continuity | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Language match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| CTA alignment | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Specificity match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |
| Emotional match | [X/10] | [Specific finding] |

**Disconnect found:** [Specific description of mismatch]
**Recommended fix:** [Specific change to ad or LP]

### Ad 2: ...

---

## Landing Page Friction Report

### [Landing Page URL]
| Friction Point | Status | Impact | Fix |
|---------------|--------|--------|-----|
| [Friction] | [Red/Yellow/Green] | [High/Med/Low] | [Specific fix] |

---

## Priority Fixes

### Critical (Fix This Week)
1. **[Ad/LP pair]:** [Specific mismatch] → [Specific fix]
   - Est. conversion impact: [X% improvement]

### Important (Fix This Month)
2. **[Issue]:** [Fix]

### Nice-to-Have
3. **[Issue]:** [Fix]

---

## Rewrite Suggestions

### For [Ad or LP with worst match]:

**Current ad headline:** "[current]"
**Suggested ad headline:** "[rewrite that matches LP]"

OR

**Current LP headline:** "[current]"
**Suggested LP headline:** "[rewrite that matches ad]"

Save to ad-lp-audit-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory (or user-specified path).

Cost

ComponentCost
Landing page fetchingFree
AnalysisFree (LLM reasoning)
TotalFree

Tools Required

  • fetch_webpage or curl — for landing page analysis
  • No API keys required

Trigger Phrases

  • "Audit my ad-to-landing page match"
  • "Why is my conversion rate so low?"
  • "Check message match on our campaigns"
  • "Do our landing pages match our ads?"
  • "Run a CRO audit on our ad funnels"

平台分布

Codex

38.4%
按下载量换算30

Claude

28.34%
按下载量换算22

Cursor

19.58%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

8.79%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills