Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ad-campaign-analyzer(广告活动分析器)

ad-campaign-analyzer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ad-campaign-analyzer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 68,884。

总安装 222周安装 9GitHub Stars 607下载 70核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ad-campaign-analyzer(广告活动分析器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/ad-campaign-analyzer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-campaign-analyzer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-campaign-analyzer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务需求快速定位候选结果。它将原始广告活动数据转化为可执行决策,诊断渠道表现、验证统计显著性并提供预算重分配建议。

使用时需上传 CSV 格式的性能指标(如 ROAS、CPC、转化率),技能会自动对比各渠道投入产出比。安装前请确认是否具备 GitHub 访问权限,并评估是否会触发网络请求或令牌写入,避免安全风险。ad-campaign-analyzer 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ad-campaign-analyzer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-campaign-ana…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

ad-campaign-analyzer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-campaign-analyzer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ad-campaign-analyzer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ad-campaign-analyzer 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

ad-campaign-analyzer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ad-campaign-analyzer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 222 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 70 次,GitHub 607 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ad-campaign-analyzer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ad-campaign-analyzer

广告活动分析器 · 本页

222607权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Ad Campaign Analyzer

Take raw campaign performance data and turn it into clear decisions. This skill doesn't just summarize metrics — it diagnoses problems, identifies winners, checks statistical significance, and tells you exactly what to cut, scale, and test next. Then it goes further: it compares channels on equal terms, finds where you're over-spending vs under-spending relative to results, and produces a concrete budget reallocation plan.

Core principle: Most startup founders check their ad dashboard, see a ROAS number, and either panic or celebrate. This skill gives you the nuanced analysis a paid media specialist would: what's actually significant, what's noise, and where your next dollar should go. It also solves the allocation problem — most startups either spread budget too thin across channels (no channel gets enough to learn) or dump everything into one channel (missing cheaper opportunities elsewhere).

When to Use

  • "Analyze my Google Ads performance"
  • "Which ads should I kill?"
  • "Is this campaign working?"
  • "Where am I wasting ad spend?"
  • "Optimize my Meta Ads"
  • "How should I split my ad budget?"
  • "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
  • "Reallocate my ad spend across channels"
  • "Where am I getting the best return?"
  • "I have $X/month for ads — how should I distribute it?"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Campaign data — One of:

- CSV export from Google Ads / Meta Ads Manager / LinkedIn Campaign Manager - Pasted performance table - Screenshots of dashboard (we'll extract the data)

  1. Platform(s) — Google / Meta / LinkedIn / All
  2. Time period — What date range does this cover?
  3. Monthly budget — Total ad spend in this period
  4. Primary goal — What conversion are you optimizing for? (Demos / Trials / Purchases / Leads)
  5. Target metrics — Do you have target CPA or ROAS? (If not, we'll benchmark)
  6. Any known changes? — Did you change creative, budget, or targeting during this period?
  7. Channels currently running — Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter/X Ads, TikTok Ads, other
  8. Funnel data (if available):

- Lead → MQL rate - MQL → SQL rate - SQL → Close rate - Average deal size

  1. Channels you're considering but haven't tried — Want to test new channels?
  2. Constraints — Minimum spend on any channel? Platform you must stay on?

Phase 1: Data Ingestion & Normalization

Accepted Data Formats

SourceKey Columns Expected
Google AdsCampaign, Ad Group, Keyword, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Conv Rate, Cost, Conv Value
Meta AdsCampaign, Ad Set, Ad, Impressions, Reach, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost Per Result, Amount Spent, ROAS
LinkedIn AdsCampaign, Impressions, Clicks, CTR, CPC, Conversions, Cost, Leads

Normalize all data into a standard analysis format:

DimensionImpressionsClicksCTRCPCConversionsConv RateCPASpendRevenue/Value

Multi-Channel Normalization

When data spans multiple channels, also produce a channel-level rollup:

ChannelMonthly SpendImpressionsClicksCTRCPCConversionsConv RateCPAROASCAC*
Google Search$[X][N][N][X%]$[X][N][X%]$[X][X]$[X]
Google Display...
Meta (FB/IG)...
LinkedIn...
[Other]...
Total$[X][N]$[X] avg[X] avg$[X] avg

*CAC = Full customer acquisition cost if funnel data provided (CPA × close-rate adjustment)

Funnel-Adjusted CAC (If Funnel Data Available)

Channel CAC = CPA ÷ (MQL rate × SQL rate × Close rate)

This reveals which channels produce leads that actually close, not just convert.

Phase 2: Performance Diagnostics

2A: Campaign-Level Health Check

For each campaign:

MetricValueBenchmarkStatus
CTR[X%][Industry avg][Good/Okay/Poor]
CPC$[X][Category avg][Good/Okay/Poor]
Conv Rate[X%][Benchmark][Good/Okay/Poor]
CPA$[X][Target or benchmark][Good/Okay/Poor]
ROAS[X][Target or benchmark][Good/Okay/Poor]
Impression Share[X%][>60% ideal][Good/Okay/Poor]

2B: Budget Waste Detection

Identify spend that produced no or negative return:

Waste TypeSignalAction
Zero-conversion keywords/adsSpend > $[X] with 0 conversionsPause or add negatives
High CPA outliersCPA > 3x targetPause or restructure
Low CTR adsCTR < 50% of campaign averageReplace creative
Broad match bleedSearch terms report showing irrelevant clicksAdd negative keywords
Audience overlapSame users hit by multiple campaignsExclude audiences
Dayparting wasteConversions cluster at certain hours; spend is 24/7Set ad schedule

2C: Winner Identification

Find what's actually working:

Winner TypeSignalAction
Top-performing keywordsLowest CPA, highest conv rateIncrease bid, add variants
Winning adsHighest CTR + conv rate comboScale spend, clone for other groups
Best audiencesLowest CPA segmentIncrease budget allocation
Best timesPeak conversion hours/daysConcentrate budget

2D: Statistical Significance Check

For any A/B test (ad variants, audiences, landing pages):

Test: [Variant A] vs [Variant B]
Metric: [Conv Rate / CTR / CPA]
Variant A: [X%] (n=[sample_size])
Variant B: [Y%] (n=[sample_size])
Confidence level: [X%]
Verdict: [Statistically significant / Not enough data / Too close to call]
Recommended action: [Pick winner / Continue test / Increase budget to reach significance]

Minimum sample: 100 clicks per variant for CTR tests, 30 conversions per variant for CPA tests.

Phase 3: Funnel Analysis

Click → Conversion Path

Impressions: [N] (100%)
     ↓ CTR: [X%]
Clicks: [N] ([X%] of impressions)
     ↓ Landing page → Conversion: [X%]
Conversions: [N] ([X%] of clicks)
     ↓ Conversion → Revenue: $[X] avg
Revenue: $[N]

Funnel Drop-Off Diagnosis

Drop-Off PointRateBenchmarkLikely CauseFix
Impression → Click[CTR%][Benchmark][Ad relevance / targeting][Copy/targeting change]
Click → Conversion[Conv%][Benchmark][Landing page / offer / audience mismatch][LP optimization]
Conversion → Revenue[Close%][Benchmark][Lead quality / sales process][Qualification criteria]

Phase 4: Budget Reallocation

When data spans multiple channels, perform cross-channel budget optimization.

4A: Channel Efficiency Ranking

RankChannelCPAFunnel-Adj CACShare of SpendShare of ConversionsEfficiency Index
1[Channel]$[X]$[X][X%][X%][Conv share ÷ Spend share]

Efficiency Index:

  • > 1.0 = Under-invested (getting more than its share of conversions)
  • = 1.0 = Proportional (fair share)
  • < 1.0 = Over-invested (getting less than its share)

4B: Marginal Return Analysis

For each channel, estimate if additional spend would yield proportional returns:

ChannelCurrent CPAImpression Share / Saturation SignalMarginal Return Estimate
Google Search$[X][X%] impression share — room to growLikely positive
Meta$[X]Frequency [X] — audience may be saturatedDiminishing
LinkedIn$[X]Low volume — limited targeting poolCeiling soon

4C: Funnel Stage Coverage

Funnel StageChannels Covering ItCurrent SpendGap?
Awareness (top)[Meta Display, YouTube]$[X][Yes/No]
Consideration (mid)[Google Search, Meta retargeting]$[X][Yes/No]
Decision (bottom)[Google Brand, Google Search]$[X][Yes/No]
Retargeting[Meta, Google Display]$[X][Yes/No]

4D: Budget Shift Recommendations

ChannelCurrent SpendRecommended SpendChangeReasoning
Google Search$[X]$[Y]+$[Z][Lowest CPA, room to scale]
Meta$[X]$[Y]-$[Z][Audience saturation, frequency too high]
LinkedIn$[X]$[Y]$0[Maintain — niche but valuable]
[New channel]$0$[Y]+$[Y][Test budget — competitors succeeding here]
Total$[X]$[X]$0Budget-neutral reallocation

4E: Scenario Modeling

Scenario 1: Conservative shift (+/- 20%)

  • Expected conversions: [N] (currently [N]) = [X%] improvement
  • Expected blended CPA: $[X] (currently $[X])
  • Risk: Low

Scenario 2: Aggressive shift (+/- 40%)

  • Expected conversions: [N] = [X%] improvement
  • Expected blended CPA: $[X]
  • Risk: Medium — less data on scaled channels

Scenario 3: Budget increase to $[Y]/mo

  • Recommended allocation: [table]
  • Expected conversions: [N]
  • New channels to test: [list]

Phase 5: Output Format

# Ad Campaign Analysis — [Product/Client] — [DATE]

Period: [Date range]
Total spend: $[X]
Platform(s): [Google / Meta / LinkedIn]
Primary goal: [Conversions / Revenue / Leads]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-5 sentences: Overall performance verdict, biggest win, biggest problem, top recommendation including any reallocation moves]

---

## Performance Dashboard

| Campaign | Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | CPA | ROAS | Verdict |
|----------|-------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|-----|------|---------|
| [Name] | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | $[X] | [X] | [Scale/Optimize/Pause] |

---

## Budget Waste Report

**Total estimated waste: $[X] ([X%] of total spend)**

### Wasted on zero-conversion items: $[X]
[List of keywords/ads/audiences with spend but no conversions]

### Wasted on high-CPA items: $[X]
[List of items with CPA > 3x target]

### Recommended saves: $[X]/month
[Specific items to pause]

---

## Winners to Scale

### Top Keywords/Audiences
| Item | CPA | Conv Rate | Current Spend | Recommended Spend |
|------|-----|----------|--------------|-------------------|

### Top Ads
| Ad | CTR | Conv Rate | Why It Works |
|----|-----|----------|-------------|

---

## A/B Test Results

### [Test Name]
- Variant A: [Metric] (n=[N])
- Variant B: [Metric] (n=[N])
- Confidence: [X%]
- **Verdict:** [Winner / Continue / Inconclusive]

---

## Budget Reallocation

### Current vs Recommended Allocation

| Channel | Current | Recommended | Change | Why |
|---------|---------|------------|--------|-----|
| [Channel] | $[X] | $[Y] | [+/-$Z] | [1-line reason] |

**Projected impact:**
- Conversions: [N] → [N] (+[X%])
- Blended CPA: $[X] → $[Y] (-[X%])

### Funnel Stage Coverage
[Coverage map with gaps identified]

### New Channel Recommendations

#### [Channel Name]
- **Why test:** [Reasoning]
- **Recommended test budget:** $[X]/mo for [X weeks]
- **Success criteria:** CPA < $[X]
- **Competitors using it:** [Yes/No — who]

---

## Action Plan

### Immediate (This Week)
- [ ] **Pause:** [Specific items — keywords, ads, audiences]
- [ ] **Scale:** [Specific items — increase budget/bids]
- [ ] **Add negatives:** [Specific keywords from search terms]
- [ ] **Reallocate:** [Specific dollar shifts between channels]

### This Month
- [ ] **Test:** [New ad angles / audiences / landing pages]
- [ ] **Restructure:** [Ad groups that need splitting or merging]
- [ ] **Optimize:** [Bid strategy changes]
- [ ] **Monitor reallocation:** Track CPA shifts on scaled channels, watch for diminishing returns

### Next Month
- [ ] **Expand:** [New campaigns / channels to test]
- [ ] **Re-evaluate:** [Run this analysis again with new data, adjust allocations based on actual results]

Save to campaign-analysis-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory (or user-specified path).

Cost

ComponentCost
Data analysisFree (LLM reasoning)
Statistical calculationsFree
TotalFree

Tools Required

  • No external tools needed — pure reasoning skill
  • User provides campaign data as CSV, paste, or screenshot

Trigger Phrases

  • "Analyze my ad campaign performance"
  • "Which ads should I pause?"
  • "Where am I wasting ad budget?"
  • "Is my Google Ads campaign working?"
  • "Optimize my Meta Ads spend"
  • "How should I allocate my ad budget?"
  • "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
  • "Reallocate my ad spend"
  • "Where am I getting the best ROAS?"
  • "Optimize my multi-channel ad budget"

平台分布

Codex

32.21%
按下载量换算23

Claude

32.05%
按下载量换算22

Cursor

16.47%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.5%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills