Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

asyncreview(asyncreview 搜索)

asyncreview 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

asyncreview 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 37,133。

总安装 1,788周安装 76GitHub Stars 434下载 626核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:asyncreview(asyncreview 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/asyncfuncai/asyncreview
仓库路径:skills/asyncreview
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/asyncfuncai/asyncreview --skill asyncreview
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/asyncfuncai/asyncreview --skill asyncreview

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务需求快速定位候选结果。它支持 GitHub PR 审查、代码变更反馈和功能影响验证,可自动提取 Issue 内容并生成结构化问答。

使用时需提供 GEMINI_API_KEY 和 GITHUB_TOKEN(私有仓库时),通过 gh 工具获取 PR/Issue URL,再调用技能进行深度分析。安装前请确认是否具备 GitHub 访问权限,并评估是否会触发网络请求或令牌写入,避免安全风险。

asyncreview 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/asyncreview

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/asyncfuncai/asyncreview --skill asyncreview;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

asyncreview 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/asyncfuncai/asyncreview --skill asyncreview。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

asyncreview 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

asyncreview 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

asyncreview 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

asyncreview 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,788 次,近一周安装 76 次,下载 626 次,GitHub 434 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

asyncreview 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
asyncreview

asyncreview 搜索 · 本页

1,788434接触敏感数据未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

AsyncReview CLI

When to use this skill

Use this skill when the user:

  • Asks to review a GitHub pull request
  • Wants AI feedback on code changes in a PR
  • Needs to check if a PR breaks existing functionality
  • Asks questions about a GitHub issue or PR
  • Wants to verify if something was missed in a code change

How to use this skill

  1. Check prerequisites — Verify GEMINI_API_KEY is set
  2. Check if repo is private — Use gh repo view to determine if GITHUB_TOKEN is required
  3. Set GITHUB_TOKEN if needed — Use gh auth token for private repos
  4. Get the PR/Issue URL — Ask user if not provided
  5. Formulate a question — Convert user's request into a specific question
  6. Run the review command — Execute npx asyncreview review --url <URL> -q "<question>"
  7. Present the results — Share the AI's findings with sources

Prerequisites

1. Check for GEMINI_API_KEY (Required)

Before running any command, check for GEMINI_API_KEY:

echo $GEMINI_API_KEY

If empty or not set, ask the user to provide their Gemini API key:

"AsyncReview requires a Gemini API key. Please set GEMINI_API_KEY in your environment or provide it now."

Then set it:

export GEMINI_API_KEY="user-provided-key"

2. Check if Repository is Private (Critical)

IMPORTANT: Before reviewing a PR/Issue, you MUST check if the repository is private. If it is, GITHUB_TOKEN is REQUIRED.

Step 1: Extract owner and repo from URL

From a URL like https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123, extract:

  • owner: owner
  • repo: repo
Step 2: Check repository visibility

Option A: Using GitHub CLI (if available)

gh repo view owner/repo --json isPrivate -q '.isPrivate'

Option B: Without GitHub CLI (using curl)

# Try to access the repo via GitHub API without authentication
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://api.github.com/repos/owner/repo

Possible outcomes:

  • With gh:

- true → Repository is private, GITHUB_TOKEN is REQUIRED - false → Repository is public, GITHUB_TOKEN is optional - Error (e.g., "not found") → May indicate private repo without auth, or repo doesn't exist

  • With curl:

- 200 → Repository is public, GITHUB_TOKEN is optional (but recommended for higher rate limits) - 404 → Repository is private or doesn't exist, GITHUB_TOKEN is REQUIRED - 403 → Rate limited, need GITHUB_TOKEN

Step 3: If private, ensure GITHUB_TOKEN is set
# Check if GITHUB_TOKEN is already set
echo $GITHUB_TOKEN

If empty or not set, obtain it using one of these methods:

Option A: Using GitHub CLI (if available)

# Get token from GitHub CLI (must be authenticated with `gh auth login` first)
export GITHUB_TOKEN=$(gh auth token)

# Verify it's set
echo $GITHUB_TOKEN

If gh auth token fails, authenticate first:

gh auth login

Option B: Without GitHub CLI (create token via web)

  1. Go to GitHub: https://github.com/settings/tokens
  2. Click "Generate new token" → "Generate new token (classic)"
  3. Give it a descriptive name (e.g., "AsyncReview CLI")
  4. Select scopes:

- ✅ repo (Full control of private repositories)

  1. Click "Generate token"
  2. Copy the token (you won't see it again!)
  3. Set it in your terminal:
export GITHUB_TOKEN="ghp_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"

# Verify it's set
echo $GITHUB_TOKEN

Security tip: For better security, consider creating a fine-grained token with minimal permissions:

Then run the review with the token:

npx asyncreview review --url <URL> -q "question" --github-token $GITHUB_TOKEN

Or set it as an environment variable for the session:

export GITHUB_TOKEN=$(gh auth token)
npx asyncreview review --url <URL> -q "question"

Quick start

npx asyncreview review --url <PR_URL> -q "question"   # Review a PR
npx asyncreview review --url <PR_URL> --expert        # Expert code review
npx asyncreview review --url <PR_URL> --output markdown     # Markdown output

Core workflow

  1. Get PR URL from user
  2. Run review with specific question
  3. Read the step-by-step reasoning output
  4. Model can fetch files outside the diff autonomously

Commands

Review

npx asyncreview review --url <url> -q "question"      # Review with question
npx asyncreview review --url <url> -q "q" --output markdown # Markdown output
npx asyncreview review --url <url> -q "q" -o json     # JSON output

URL formats supported:

  • https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123
  • https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/456

Environment variables

GEMINI_API_KEY="your-key"         # Required: Google Gemini API key
GITHUB_TOKEN="ghp_xxx"            # Optional: For private repos / higher rate limits

Example: Review a PR

npx asyncreview review \
  --url https://github.com/stanfordnlp/dspy/pull/9223 \
  -q "Does this change break any existing callers?"

Output shows:

  • Step number
  • 💭 Reasoning (what the AI is thinking)
  • 📝 Code (Python being executed)
  • 📤 Output (REPL result)
  • Final answer with sources

Example: Check if feature exists elsewhere

npx asyncreview review \
  --url https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123 \
  -q "Fetch src/utils.py and check if deprecated_func is still used"

The AI will:

  1. Search for the file path
  2. Fetch the file via GitHub API
  3. Analyze content in the Python sandbox
  4. Report findings with evidence

Example: Review a Private Repository PR

Complete workflow for private repositories:

# Step 1: Extract owner/repo from URL
# URL: https://github.com/myorg/private-repo/pull/42
# owner="myorg", repo="private-repo"

# Step 2: Check if repository is private

## Option A: With GitHub CLI
gh repo view myorg/private-repo --json isPrivate -q '.isPrivate'
# Output: true (it's private!)

## Option B: Without GitHub CLI (using curl)
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://api.github.com/repos/myorg/private-repo
# Output: 404 (likely private or doesn't exist)

# Step 3: Ensure GITHUB_TOKEN is set
echo $GITHUB_TOKEN

## If empty, Option A: Get from GitHub CLI
export GITHUB_TOKEN=$(gh auth token)

## If empty, Option B: Create via web (https://github.com/settings/tokens)
## Then:
export GITHUB_TOKEN="ghp_xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"

# Step 4: Run the review with the token
npx asyncreview review \
  --url https://github.com/myorg/private-repo/pull/42 \
  -q "Does this PR introduce any security vulnerabilities?" \
  --github-token $GITHUB_TOKEN

# Alternative: Token is already in environment, no flag needed
npx asyncreview review \
  --url https://github.com/myorg/private-repo/pull/42 \
  -q "Does this PR introduce any security vulnerabilities?"

If you get a 404 or authentication error: The repository is likely private, and you need to provide GITHUB_TOKEN.

Output formats

FormatFlagDescription
Pretty(default)Rich terminal output with boxes
Markdown--output markdown or -o markdownMarkdown formatted
JSON--output json or -o jsonMachine-readable

Expert Code Review

Use --expert flag for comprehensive PR reviews covering SOLID principles, security, performance, and code quality:

# Full expert review (no question needed)
npx asyncreview review --url <PR_URL> --expert

# Expert review with additional custom question
npx asyncreview review --url <PR_URL> --expert -q "Also check for breaking API changes"

Expert review analyzes:

  • SOLID Principles - SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP violations
  • Security - XSS, injection, auth gaps, race conditions, secrets
  • Code Quality - Error handling, N+1 queries, boundary conditions
  • Removal Candidates - Dead code, unused imports

Output includes:

  • Severity-tagged findings (P0 Critical → P3 Low)
  • Suggested fixes for P0/P1 issues
  • Overall assessment: APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / COMMENT

平台分布

Codex

33.01%
按下载量换算207

Claude

31.45%
按下载量换算197

Cursor

18.84%
按下载量换算118

Gemini CLI

9.47%
按下载量换算59

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills