Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

assumption-checker(假设检验器)

assumption-checker 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

assumption-checker 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,016。

总安装 256周安装 11GitHub Stars 4下载 90核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:assumption-checker(假设检验器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/fatih-developer/fth-skills
仓库路径:skills/assumption-checker
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/fatih-developer/fth-skills --skill assumption-checker
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/fatih-developer/fth-skills --skill assumption-checker

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

assumption-checker 在执行前暂停任务,扫描并验证当前隐含的假设。适用于模糊任务、外部依赖或不可逆操作场景。输出假设清单与可验证项,区分已知与未知信息。目标是尽早捕获错误假设,避免后续连锁失败。每次新任务启动时建议自动激活。

assumption-checker 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/assumption-checker

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/fatih-developer/fth-skills --skill assumption-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

assumption-checker 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/fatih-developer/fth-skills --skill assumption-checker。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

assumption-checker 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

assumption-checker 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

assumption-checker 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

assumption-checker 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 256 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 90 次,GitHub 4 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

assumption-checker 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
assumption-checker

假设检验器 · 本页

2564需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Assumption Checker Protocol

Before acting, stop and surface the assumptions you are making. Verify what you can, ask about what you cannot. Goal: catch wrong assumptions before building on them.

Core principle: Catching a wrong assumption now is far cheaper than discovering it 10 minutes later.


When to Activate

At Task Start

Run an assumption scan on every new task. Especially when:

  • Task is ambiguous or missing information
  • Phrasing is open to interpretation ("update", "fix", "clean up")
  • Task involves irreversible actions
  • External dependencies exist (API, files, database)

Before Critical Steps

Re-scan during execution when:

  • Previous step output was unexpected
  • A new dependency emerged
  • User changed direction

4 Assumption Types

Technical Assumptions

Beliefs about environment, tools, and infrastructure.

  • "Is this library installed?" → verifiable, check it
  • "Is this API accessible?" → verifiable, test it
  • "Does this work on this OS?" → platform-dependent

Data Assumptions

Beliefs about files, formats, and data structures.

  • "Does this file exist?" → verifiable, check it
  • "Does this CSV have headers?" → verifiable, inspect it
  • "All rows are in the same format" → verify with sample

Business Logic Assumptions

Beliefs about rules, scope, and requirements.

  • "Delete means soft delete" → ambiguous, ask
  • "All users are affected" → scope unclear, ask
  • "Date format is DD/MM/YYYY" → needs confirmation

User Intent Assumptions

Beliefs about what the user actually wants.

  • "Refactor = don't change behavior" → ask
  • "Quick = not production quality" → ask
  • "Update = keep existing, add new" → ask
  • "Clean up = delete? archive? organize?" → ambiguous, ask

Confidence Levels

Assign a confidence level to each assumption:

LevelMeaningAction
VERIFIEDChecked and confirmedProceed
VERIFIABLECan be checked with a tool/commandCheck now
UNCERTAINCannot be verified, open to interpretationAsk the user
RISKYIf wrong, causes significant damageMust ask

Output Format

Task Start Scan

ASSUMPTION CHECK — Task Start
Assumptions found: N
Verified: N | Checking: N | Need to ask: N

## Technical
| Assumption | Confidence | Action |
|------------|------------|--------|
| [assumption] | VERIFIED/VERIFIABLE/UNCERTAIN/RISKY | [action] |

## Data
| Assumption | Confidence | Action |
|------------|------------|--------|
| [assumption] | ... | [action] |

## Business Logic
| Assumption | Confidence | Action |
|------------|------------|--------|
| [assumption] | ... | [action] |

## User Intent
| Assumption | Confidence | Action |
|------------|------------|--------|
| [assumption] | ... | [action] |

[Verifiable assumptions being checked now...]
[Questions for uncertain/risky assumptions:]

? [Question 1]
? [Question 2]

Pre-Step Scan (lighter format)

ASSUMPTION CHECK — Before [step name]
New assumptions: N found

| Assumption | Type | Confidence | Action |
|------------|------|------------|--------|
| [assumption] | Technical/Data/Logic/Intent | ... | ... |

[Questions or "All assumptions verified, proceeding."]

Verification Protocol

Check verifiable assumptions with tools before asking the user:

  • File exists? → check filesystem
  • Library installed? → check import
  • JSON field present? → inspect data
  • API reachable? → test endpoint

Update the assumption table: VERIFIABLE → VERIFIED or RISKY


Question Rules

  • Ask at most 3 questions at a time — don't overwhelm the user
  • Ask riskiest first — RISKY > UNCERTAIN
  • Use yes/no or multiple choice — not open-ended
  • Do not start the related step until answers arrive

When to Skip

  • Task is single-step, clear, and easily reversible
  • User said "just do it, make your own assumptions"
  • All assumptions were already verified in previous steps
  • Repeated task — same structure worked before

Guardrails

  • Never skip assumption checking for irreversible actions, regardless of task simplicity.
  • Keep scans concise — table format, not paragraphs.
  • Verify before asking — don't ask the user things you can check yourself.
  • Cross-skill: works with checkpoint-guardian (risk gates) and task-decomposer (plan validation).

平台分布

Codex

34.25%
按下载量换算31

Claude

32.35%
按下载量换算29

Cursor

19.89%
按下载量换算18

Gemini CLI

8.4%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills