Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ascn-integrations(ascn 集成)

ascn-integrations 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ascn-integrations 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,122。

总安装 661周安装 27GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 214核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ascn-integrations(ascn 集成)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ascnai/skills
仓库路径:skills/ascn-integrations
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ascnai/skills --skill ascn-integrations
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ascnai/skills --skill ascn-integrations

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ascn-integrations 用于设计与交付缺失的 ASCN 能力,封装为可复用的集成插件。它识别 API 服务、事件源或 schema 不匹配问题,推动可靠工作流组合。适用于无法用现有处理器完成的新任务,需收集能力缺口与目标用例。安装来自 GitHub,注意权限与部署环境,确保与 ASCN 平台兼容。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ascn-integrations

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ascnai/skills --skill ascn-integrations;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ascn-integrations 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ascnai/skills --skill ascn-integrations。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ascn-integrations 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ascn-integrations 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

ascn-integrations 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ascn-integrations 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 661 次,近一周安装 27 次,下载 214 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ascn-integrations 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ascn-integrations

ascn 集成 · 本页

661—接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

ASCN Integrations

Design and deliver missing ASCN capability as reusable integrations, then package as user-facing plugins.

When To Use

Use this skill when a workflow task cannot be completed with existing handlers/triggers/tools.

Typical triggers:

  1. missing handler for a required API/service
  2. missing trigger type for required event source
  3. schema/contract mismatch blocks reliable workflow composition
  4. required UI usability (params_ui, options, conditional fields) are missing

Required Inputs

The integrator MUST collect:

  1. capability gap summary (what cannot be built today)
  2. target use-cases (at least one concrete workflow scenario)
  3. expected input/output contract (JSON-level)
  4. auth/secret requirements
  5. publish target (user plugin first, system copy later)

If contract expectations are missing, stop and return input_validation_error.

Required Tool Surface

  1. control.docs.get
  2. control.registry.list
  3. control.registry.details
  4. control.registry.resolve_options
  5. control.workflows.list
  6. control.workflows.describe
  7. control.workflows.validate
  8. control.workflows.create
  9. control.workflows.patch
  10. control.workflows.activate
  11. control.tools.ensure_export
  12. control.tools.list_exports
  13. control.plugins.create_plugin
  14. control.plugins.validate_definition
  15. control.plugins.update_plugin
  16. control.plugins.get
  17. control.plugins.list

If required tools are unavailable, stop and return dependency_failure.

Delivery Modes

Mode A: Workflow-backed (default)

Use existing handlers to build a reusable workflow and export it through Trigger.Tool.

Mode B: Native integration (new handler/trigger code)

Use only when Mode A cannot satisfy latency, auth, determinism, or protocol constraints.

Native integrations MUST still be wrapped/published as plugins for user consumption.

Mode decision gate:

  1. choose Mode A first
  2. choose Mode B only with explicit constraint evidence
  3. if native code surfaces are unavailable in current context, return a native implementation proposal and stop before claiming implementation

Delivery Flow

  1. Discover existing capability (control.registry.list, control.registry.details, control.tools.list_exports).
  2. Produce contract draft:

- exact handler id (Vendor.Action) - params_schema (input object) - returns_schema (output object)

  1. Choose delivery mode (A or B) with explicit reason.
  2. Implement integration.
  3. Validate workflow/config contract (control.workflows.validate).

- payload MUST be wrapped as {"workflow": {...}}

  1. Reconcile export (control.tools.list_exports, control.tools.ensure_export).
  2. Run plugin-definition preflight (control.plugins.validate_definition).
  3. Activate the final workflow (control.workflows.activate).
  4. Bundle handlers into plugin (control.plugins.create_plugin then update_plugin if needed).
  5. Verify plugin visibility with control.plugins.list and registry views (control.plugins.get for deterministic reads).
  6. Return output contract payload with verification evidence.

Plugin Packaging Rules

  1. Plugin name MUST be stable and vendor/domain-scoped (e.g. StripeOps, CRMHubspot).
  2. Handler names MUST be exact and collision-safe.
  3. One plugin MAY contain multiple handlers if they share domain and auth model.
  4. Plugin definitions SHOULD include UI metadata (name, description, icon, tags) before handoff.
  5. Unwrapped Trigger.Tool exports MUST still be user-visible as flat User.<Handler> entries.
  6. Wrapped/published handlers MUST be rendered as first-class plugin cards/forms with plugin metadata (name, description, icon) and handler params_ui.

Params UI Best Practices

params_ui MUST be human-usable and contract-aligned.

  1. Every key in params_ui SHOULD exist in params_schema.properties.
  2. Localize labels/hints where possible (en, ru).
  3. Prefer explicit controls:

- string, string_multiline, number, boolean, options, array, object, string_json

  1. Use conditional visibility for complex forms via displayOptions.show.
  2. Put dangerous/advanced options behind conditional toggles.
  3. Include safe defaults where predictable behavior is expected.
  4. Use options only for selectable values; use displayOptions.show only for conditional visibility.
  5. Keep field order identical to the execution mental model (auth -> target -> behavior -> advanced).
  6. For options_source fields, resolve options via control.registry.resolve_options (never via direct DB queries).
  7. Reuse existing handler params_ui patterns by reading control.plugins.list with include_definition=true.

Example conditional field pattern:

[
  {
    "key": "auth_mode",
    "control": "options",
    "label": {"en": "Auth mode"},
    "options": [
      {"value": "api_key", "label": {"en": "API key"}},
      {"value": "oauth", "label": {"en": "OAuth"}}
    ]
  },
  {
    "key": "api_key",
    "control": "string",
    "label": {"en": "API key"},
    "displayOptions": {"show": {"auth_mode": ["api_key"]}}
  }
]

Minimal params_ui field contract (recommended):

{
  "key": "string",
  "control": "string|string_multiline|number|boolean|options|array|object|string_json",
  "label": {"en": "Field label"},
  "hint": {"en": "Optional guidance"},
  "required": false,
  "default": null,
  "options": [
    {"value": "v1", "label": {"en": "Value 1"}}
  ],
  "displayOptions": {"show": {"other_key": ["match_value"]}}
}

Rules for this contract:

  1. options MUST exist only when control=options.
  2. displayOptions.show MUST reference keys that exist in the same params_ui.
  3. required=true fields SHOULD be present in params_schema.required.
  4. Secret-bearing fields SHOULD use hints directing users to secrets, not literal defaults.

Conditional UI Recipes

Use these generic recipes as defaults for displayOptions.show. They mirror stable patterns already used in current plugin definitions.

Recipe 1: Dropdown controls field visibility

[
  {
    "key": "mode",
    "control": "options",
    "label": {"en": "Mode"},
    "required": true,
    "options": [
      {"value": "inline", "label": {"en": "Inline"}},
      {"value": "file", "label": {"en": "File"}}
    ]
  },
  {
    "key": "file_ref",
    "control": "object",
    "label": {"en": "File"},
    "displayOptions": {"show": {"mode": ["file"]}}
  }
]

Recipe 2: Boolean toggle controls section visibility

[
  {
    "key": "send_body",
    "control": "boolean",
    "label": {"en": "Send Body"}
  },
  {
    "key": "body_format",
    "control": "options",
    "label": {"en": "Body Format"},
    "displayOptions": {"show": {"send_body": [true]}},
    "options": [
      {"value": "json", "label": {"en": "JSON"}},
      {"value": "raw", "label": {"en": "Raw"}}
    ]
  }
]

Recipe 3: Multi-condition show (AND)

[
  {
    "key": "send_body",
    "control": "boolean",
    "label": {"en": "Send Body"}
  },
  {
    "key": "body_format",
    "control": "options",
    "label": {"en": "Body Format"},
    "options": [
      {"value": "json", "label": {"en": "JSON"}},
      {"value": "formdata", "label": {"en": "Form Data"}}
    ]
  },
  {
    "key": "body",
    "control": "string_json",
    "label": {"en": "Body"},
    "displayOptions": {
      "show": {
        "send_body": [true],
        "body_format": ["json"]
      }
    }
  }
]

Recipe 4: Filter dropdown options by another dropdown

[
  {
    "key": "provider",
    "control": "options",
    "label": {"en": "Provider"},
    "options": [
      {"value": "openai", "label": {"en": "OpenAI"}},
      {"value": "azure", "label": {"en": "Azure"}}
    ]
  },
  {
    "key": "model",
    "control": "options",
    "label": {"en": "Model"},
    "options": [
      {
        "value": "gpt-4o-mini",
        "label": {"en": "gpt-4o-mini"},
        "displayOptions": {"show": {"provider": ["openai"]}}
      },
      {
        "value": "azure/gpt-4o-mini",
        "label": {"en": "azure/gpt-4o-mini"},
        "displayOptions": {"show": {"provider": ["azure"]}}
      }
    ]
  }
]

Conditional UI Validation Checklist

Before publish/update, the integrator MUST verify:

  1. Every displayOptions.show key exists in the same params_ui.
  2. Comparison values match the source field type (true as boolean, not "true" string).
  3. show comparisons use option value, not option label.
  4. Controller fields appear earlier than dependent fields in params_ui order.
  5. Hidden-by-default advanced fields have safe defaults or are optional in schema.
  6. For option-level filtering, each option-level displayOptions.show references an existing controller key.

Security & Secrets

  1. Credentials MUST come from secrets (={{$secrets.name}}), never literals.
  2. params_schema SHOULD mark required secret-driven fields clearly.
  3. Integration MUST document minimum secret set for successful invocation.

Stop And Retry Rules

  1. Retry only transient tool/runtime failures, max 3 attempts with exponential backoff.
  2. Do not auto-retry schema mismatch, validation errors, or missing capability.
  3. Do not claim completion if plugin visibility or activation checks are not executed.

Output Contract

Every completion MUST include:

{
  "integration": {
    "mode": "workflow|native|proposal_only",
    "capability_status": "implemented|partially_implemented|blocked",
    "handler_names": ["Vendor.Action"],
    "workflow_id": "uuid-or-null",
    "exported_tool_name": "string-or-null"
  },
  "plugin": {
    "plugin_name": "VendorOps",
    "created_or_updated": true,
    "visible_in_plugins_list": true
  },
  "verification": {
    "validated": true,
    "activated": true,
    "smoke_tested": true,
    "latest_run_status": "COMPLETED|FAILED|RUNNING|UNKNOWN",
    "run_id": "string-or-null"
  },
  "failure": {
    "class": "none|input_validation_error|dependency_failure|schema_failure|runtime_failure|native_surface_unavailable",
    "message": "string"
  },
  "open_items": [],
  "next_action": "string"
}

Hand-off Back To ASCN Operator

After integration delivery:

  1. return exact handler/plugin identifiers
  2. return required secrets and minimal invocation payload
  3. instruct caller to resume lifecycle operations with ascn-operator

平台分布

Codex

35.36%
按下载量换算76

Claude

31.24%
按下载量换算67

Cursor

19.78%
按下载量换算42

Gemini CLI

9.51%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills