Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

argocd-deployment-analyzer(argocd 部署分析器)

用于辅助云资源、部署、容器、基础设施和运维自动化任务。它适合让 Agent 检查配置、整理部署步骤、分析资源状态、生成排障思路或辅助云服务接入。使用时需要明确目标环境、账号权限、区域和资源组,区分本地测试与生产操作;涉及删除资源、重启服务、修改网络或权限配置时,应先确认影响范围。

argocd-deployment-analyzer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 45,663。

总安装 832周安装 34GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 267核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:argocd-deployment-analyzer(argocd 部署分析器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/charlie-morrison/argocd-deployment-analyzer
安装命令:
openclaw skills install argocd-deployment-analyzer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install argocd-deployment-analyzer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

分析 ArgoCD 应用程序同步状态、检测配置偏差、查看安全清单和最佳实践,以及诊断同步故障。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install argocd-deployment-analyzer;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

argocd-deployment-analyzer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install argocd-deployment-analyzer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

argocd-deployment-analyzer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

argocd-deployment-analyzer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

argocd-deployment-analyzer 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

argocd-deployment-analyzer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 832 次,近一周安装 34 次,下载 267 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

argocd-deployment-analyzer 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
argocd-deployment-analyzer

argocd 部署分析器 · 本页

832—需要联网MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
argocd-deployment-analyzer
description
Analyze ArgoCD application sync status, detect configuration drift, review manifests for security and best practices, and diagnose sync failures.
metadata
tags
["argocd", "gitops", "kubernetes", "deployment", "drift-detection", "sync", "devops", "cd"]

ArgoCD Deployment Analyzer

Deep-dive analysis of ArgoCD-managed applications — detect sync drift, diagnose failed syncs, audit manifest security, review sync policies, and validate ArgoCD configurations against production best practices. Turns ArgoCD operational noise into actionable findings.

Use when: "analyze argocd apps", "why is my argocd app out of sync", "review argocd config", "audit gitops deployments", "diagnose sync failure", or when ArgoCD applications are degraded, drifting, or misconfigured.

Prerequisites

The agent checks for access to ArgoCD:

# CLI access
argocd version --client

# Logged in
argocd account get-user-info

# Or: kubectl access to ArgoCD namespace
kubectl get applications.argoproj.io -n argocd

# Or: ArgoCD API access
curl -s https://argocd.example.com/api/v1/applications \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $ARGOCD_TOKEN" | jq '.items | length'

Usage

Provide one or more of:

  • Application name — specific ArgoCD app to analyze (e.g., production/api-server)
  • Project name — analyze all apps in an ArgoCD project
  • Scope — all to analyze every application
  • Focus area — sync, security, health, drift, config, or all

Example invocations:

Analyze why the payments-service ArgoCD app keeps going OutOfSync.
Security audit all ArgoCD applications in the production project.
Review our ArgoCD ApplicationSet configurations for best practices.

How It Works

Step 1: Application Inventory

Gather the full picture of all ArgoCD-managed applications:

# List all applications with status
argocd app list -o json | jq '[.[] | {
  name: .metadata.name,
  project: .spec.project,
  syncStatus: .status.sync.status,
  healthStatus: .status.health.status,
  repo: .spec.source.repoURL,
  path: .spec.source.path,
  targetRevision: .spec.source.targetRevision,
  destination: .spec.destination.server,
  namespace: .spec.destination.namespace,
  syncPolicy: .spec.syncPolicy
}]'

# Or via kubectl
kubectl get applications.argoproj.io -n argocd -o json | jq '[.items[] | {
  name: .metadata.name,
  sync: .status.sync.status,
  health: .status.health.status
}]'

Classify applications into categories:

  • Healthy + Synced — no action needed
  • Healthy + OutOfSync — drift detected, needs investigation
  • Degraded — health check failing
  • Progressing — sync in progress, check if stuck
  • Missing — target resources don't exist
  • Unknown — ArgoCD can't determine state

Step 2: Sync Drift Analysis

For each OutOfSync application, identify what drifted and why:

# Get the diff between live and desired state
argocd app diff <app-name> --local-repo-root /path/to/repo

# Detailed sync status with resource-level breakdown
argocd app get <app-name> -o json | jq '{
  syncStatus: .status.sync.status,
  revision: .status.sync.revision,
  comparedTo: .status.sync.comparedTo,
  resources: [.status.resources[] | select(.status != "Synced") | {
    kind: .kind,
    name: .name,
    namespace: .namespace,
    status: .status,
    health: .health.status,
    message: .health.message
  }]
}'

# Check sync history for patterns
argocd app get <app-name> -o json | jq '[.status.history[] | {
  revision: .revision[:8],
  deployedAt: .deployedAt,
  source: .source.path
}]'

Common drift causes the agent checks:

  1. Manual kubectl edits — someone modified a resource directly, bypassing GitOps
  2. Mutating webhooks — admission controllers injecting sidecars, labels, or annotations
  3. Horizontal Pod Autoscaler — HPA changes replica count, conflicts with Git-declared replicas
  4. Controller-managed fields — Kubernetes controllers (e.g., EndpointSlice controller) update fields
  5. CRD defaults — CRD defaulting webhooks adding fields not in the Git source
  6. Helm value drift — values.yaml in Git doesn't match what was rendered

Step 3: Sync Failure Diagnosis

When sync operations fail, diagnose the root cause:

# Get sync operation result
argocd app get <app-name> -o json | jq '.status.operationState | {
  phase: .phase,
  message: .message,
  startedAt: .startedAt,
  finishedAt: .finishedAt,
  syncResult: .syncResult.resources | map(select(.status != "Synced"))
}'

# Check for resource-level errors
argocd app resources <app-name> --orphaned

# Check events on the target namespace
kubectl get events -n <namespace> --sort-by='.lastTimestamp' | tail -20

Failure categories the agent identifies:

CategorySymptomsTypical Fix
RBACforbidden errors in syncFix ArgoCD service account permissions
Schema validationvalidation failedFix manifest against CRD/API schema
Namespace missingnamespace not foundCreate namespace or enable auto-create
Resource conflictalready existsCheck for duplicate resource management
Quota exceededexceeded quotaRequest quota increase or reduce resource requests
Immutable fieldfield is immutableDelete and recreate the resource
Dependency orderresource X not foundAdd sync waves or sync ordering
Timeoutdeadline exceededIncrease sync timeout or fix health check

Step 4: Health Check Analysis

Evaluate application health and identify degraded components:

# Health of each resource in the app
argocd app get <app-name> -o json | jq '[.status.resources[] | {
  kind: .kind,
  name: .name,
  health: .health.status,
  message: .health.message
}] | group_by(.health) | map({status: .[0].health, count: length, resources: map(.name)})'

# Pod-level issues for Degraded deployments
kubectl get pods -n <namespace> -l app=<app-label> -o json | jq '[.items[] | {
  name: .metadata.name,
  phase: .status.phase,
  ready: ([.status.conditions[] | select(.type=="Ready")] | .[0].status),
  restarts: ([.status.containerStatuses[].restartCount] | add),
  waiting: [.status.containerStatuses[] | select(.state.waiting) | .state.waiting.reason]
}]'

Step 5: Configuration Audit

Review ArgoCD Application and Project configurations for security and best practices:

Sync policy analysis:

# Check for dangerous sync policies
argocd app list -o json | jq '[.[] | select(
  .spec.syncPolicy.automated.prune == true and
  .spec.syncPolicy.automated.selfHeal == true
) | {name: .metadata.name, warning: "auto-prune + self-heal enabled"}]'

Checks performed:

  • Auto-sync without prune protection — accidental resource deletion risk
  • Self-heal on production — could mask legitimate manual hotfixes
  • Missing sync windows — production should have maintenance windows
  • No retry policy — transient failures won't self-recover
  • Wildcard project destinations — * server or namespace defeats RBAC
  • No resource whitelist/blacklist — project can deploy any resource type
  • Plaintext secrets in Git — secrets not managed by Sealed Secrets / SOPS / ESO
  • Missing ignoreDifferences — known benign drift causing noise
  • No notification triggers — sync failures go unnoticed
  • Orphaned resources — resources in the namespace not managed by any app

Step 6: Security Review

Audit manifests managed by ArgoCD applications for security issues:

# Extract rendered manifests
argocd app manifests <app-name> --source live > /tmp/live-manifests.yaml
argocd app manifests <app-name> --source git > /tmp/git-manifests.yaml

Security checks:

  • Containers running as root or with privileged: true
  • Missing SecurityContext, readOnlyRootFilesystem, runAsNonRoot
  • Missing resource limits (CPU/memory) — noisy neighbor risk
  • hostNetwork, hostPID, hostIPC enabled
  • ServiceAccount token auto-mounting when not needed
  • Missing NetworkPolicies
  • Images using :latest tag or no tag
  • Secrets mounted as environment variables instead of files
  • Missing PodDisruptionBudgets for critical services

Step 7: ApplicationSet Analysis

If ApplicationSets are used, validate their generators and templates:

kubectl get applicationsets -n argocd -o json | jq '[.items[] | {
  name: .metadata.name,
  generators: [.spec.generators[] | keys[0]],
  template: .spec.template.spec.source.repoURL,
  syncPolicy: .spec.template.spec.syncPolicy
}]'

Checks:

  • Git generator with overly broad directory patterns
  • Missing preserveResourcesOnDeletion (deleting the AppSet deletes all apps)
  • Cluster generator without label selectors (deploys to ALL clusters)
  • Template overrides that bypass project restrictions
  • No goTemplate validation (template injection risk)

Output

The agent produces a structured report:

  1. Dashboard summary — total apps, sync status distribution, health distribution
  2. Drift report — each OutOfSync app with specific resources and fields that drifted, with root cause
  3. Failure diagnosis — for each failed sync: root cause, specific error, and remediation steps
  4. Health issues — degraded resources with pod-level diagnostics
  5. Configuration findings — ranked by severity (Critical / High / Medium / Low) with fix recommendations
  6. Security findings — manifest-level security issues with remediation
  7. Recommended ignoreDifferences — for known benign drift patterns (HPA replicas, annotation mutations, etc.)
  8. Action items — prioritized list of changes to make, with example YAML patches

Common Remediation Patterns

HPA replica drift:

spec:
  ignoreDifferences:
    - group: apps
      kind: Deployment
      jsonPointers:
        - /spec/replicas

Mutating webhook annotations:

spec:
  ignoreDifferences:
    - group: ""
      kind: Service
      jqPathExpressions:
        - .metadata.annotations["webhook.example.com/injected"]

Sync wave ordering for dependencies: Use argocd.argoproj.io/sync-wave annotations: -1 for namespaces, 0 for ConfigMaps/Secrets, 1 for Deployments/Services.

平台分布

OpenClaw

76.61%
按下载量换算205

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills