Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

architecting-data构建数据

Agent Skill

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

总安装

380

周安装

34

GitHub Stars

350

下载量

280
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:architecting-data(构建数据)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components
仓库路径:skills/architecting-data
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill architecting-data
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill architecting-data

简介

用于指导现代云原生数据平台的战略数据架构决策。

  • 适用于数据平台设计、存储选型、建模方式和架构模式评估。
  • 提供 medallion 架构、开放表格式和 data mesh 等具体实施框架。
  • 安装需从指定 GitHub 仓库获取,使用时注意数据来源和字段含义。
  • 涉及敏感数据时应确认脱敏策略和操作权限边界。

SKILL.md

Data Architecture

Purpose

Guide architects and platform engineers through strategic data architecture decisions for modern cloud-native data platforms.

When to Use This Skill

Invoke this skill when:

  • Designing a new data platform or modernizing legacy systems
  • Choosing between data lake, data warehouse, or data lakehouse
  • Deciding on data modeling approaches (dimensional, normalized, data vault, wide tables)
  • Evaluating centralized vs data mesh architecture
  • Selecting open table formats (Apache Iceberg, Delta Lake, Apache Hudi)
  • Designing medallion architecture (bronze, silver, gold layers)
  • Implementing data governance and cataloging

Core Concepts

1. Storage Paradigms

Three primary patterns for analytical data storage:

Data Lake: Centralized repository for raw data at scale

  • Schema-on-read, cost-optimized ($0.02-0.03/GB/month)
  • Use when: Diverse data sources, exploratory analytics, ML/AI training data

Data Warehouse: Structured repository optimized for BI

  • Schema-on-write, ACID transactions, fast queries
  • Use when: Known BI requirements, strong governance needed

Data Lakehouse: Hybrid combining lake flexibility with warehouse reliability

  • Open table formats (Iceberg, Delta Lake), ACID on object storage
  • Use when: Mixed BI + ML workloads, cost optimization (60-80% cheaper than warehouse)

Decision Framework:

  • BI/Reporting only + Known queries → Data Warehouse
  • ML/AI primary + Raw data needed → Data Lake or Lakehouse
  • Mixed BI + ML + Cost optimization → Data Lakehouse (recommended)
  • Exploratory/Unknown use cases → Data Lake

For detailed comparison, see references/storage-paradigms.md.

2. Data Modeling Approaches

Four primary modeling patterns:

Dimensional (Kimball): Star/snowflake schemas for BI

  • Use when: Known query patterns, BI dashboards, trend analysis

Normalized (3NF): Eliminate redundancy for transactional systems

  • Use when: OLTP systems, frequent updates, strong consistency

Data Vault 2.0: Flexible model with complete audit trail

  • Use when: Compliance requirements, multiple sources, agile warehousing

Wide Tables: Denormalized, optimized for columnar storage

  • Use when: ML feature stores, data science notebooks, high-performance dashboards

Decision Framework:

  • Analytical (BI) + Known queries → Dimensional (Star Schema)
  • Transactional (OLTP) → Normalized (3NF)
  • Compliance/Audit → Data Vault 2.0
  • Data Science/ML → Wide Tables

For detailed patterns, see references/modeling-approaches.md.

3. Data Mesh Principles

Decentralized architecture for large organizations (>500 people).

Four Core Principles:

  1. Domain-oriented decentralization
  2. Data as a product (SLAs, quality, documentation)
  3. Self-serve data infrastructure
  4. Federated computational governance

Readiness Assessment (Score 1-5 each):

  1. Domain clarity
  2. Team maturity
  3. Platform capability
  4. Governance maturity
  5. Scale need
  6. Organizational buy-in

Scoring: 24-30: Strong candidate | 18-23: Hybrid | 12-17: Build foundation first | 6-11: Centralized

Red Flags: Small org (<100 people), unclear domains, no platform team, weak governance

For full guide, see references/data-mesh-guide.md.

4. Medallion Architecture

Standard lakehouse pattern: Bronze (raw) → Silver (cleaned) → Gold (business-level)

Bronze Layer: Exact copy of source data, immutable, append-only

Silver Layer: Validated, deduplicated, typed data

Gold Layer: Business logic, aggregates, dimensional models, ML features

Data Quality by Layer:

  • Bronze → Silver: Schema validation, type checks, deduplication
  • Silver → Gold: Business rule validation, referential integrity
  • Gold: Anomaly detection, statistical checks

For patterns, see references/medallion-pattern.md.

5. Open Table Formats

Enable ACID transactions on data lakes:

Apache Iceberg: Multi-engine, vendor-neutral (Context7: 79.7 score)

  • Use when: Avoid vendor lock-in, multi-engine flexibility

Delta Lake: Databricks ecosystem, Spark-optimized

  • Use when: Committed to Databricks

Apache Hudi: Optimized for CDC and frequent upserts

  • Use when: CDC-heavy workloads

Recommendation: Apache Iceberg for new projects (vendor-neutral, broadest support)

For comparison, see references/table-formats.md.

6. Modern Data Stack

Standard Layers:

  • Ingestion: Fivetran, Airbyte, Kafka
  • Storage: Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery
  • Transformation: dbt (Context7: 87.0 score), Spark
  • Orchestration: Airflow, Dagster, Prefect
  • Visualization: Tableau, Looker, Power BI
  • Governance: DataHub, Alation, Great Expectations

Tool Selection:

  • Fivetran vs Airbyte: Pre-built connectors vs cost-sensitive
  • Snowflake vs Databricks: BI-focused vs ML-focused
  • dbt vs Spark: SQL-based vs large-scale processing

For detailed recommendations, see references/tool-recommendations.md and references/modern-data-stack.md.

7. Data Governance

Data Catalog: Searchable inventory (DataHub, Alation, Collibra)

Data Lineage: Track data flow (OpenLineage, Marquez)

Data Quality: Validation and testing (Great Expectations, Soda, dbt tests)

Access Control:

  • RBAC: Role-based (sales_analyst role)
  • ABAC: Attribute-based (row-level security)
  • Column-level: Dynamic data masking for PII

For governance patterns, see references/governance-patterns.md.

Decision Frameworks

Framework 1: Storage Paradigm Selection

Step 1: Identify Primary Use Case

  • BI/Reporting only → Data Warehouse
  • ML/AI primary → Data Lake or Lakehouse
  • Mixed BI + ML → Data Lakehouse
  • Exploratory → Data Lake

Step 2: Evaluate Budget

  • High budget, known queries → Data Warehouse
  • Cost-sensitive, flexible → Data Lakehouse

Recommendation by Org Size:

  • Startup (<50): Data Warehouse (simplicity)
  • Growth (50-500): Data Lakehouse (balance)
  • Enterprise (>500): Hybrid or unified Lakehouse

See references/decision-frameworks.md.

Framework 2: Data Modeling Approach

Decision Tree:

  • Analytical (BI) workload → Dimensional or Wide Tables
  • Transactional (OLTP) → Normalized (3NF)
  • Compliance/Audit → Data Vault 2.0
  • Data Science/ML → Wide Tables

See references/decision-frameworks.md.

Framework 3: Data Mesh Readiness

Use 6-factor assessment. Score interpretation:

  • 24-30: Proceed with data mesh
  • 18-23: Hybrid approach
  • 12-17: Build foundation first
  • 6-11: Centralized

See references/decision-frameworks.md.

Framework 4: Open Table Format Selection

Decision Tree:

  • Multi-engine flexibility → Apache Iceberg
  • Databricks ecosystem → Delta Lake
  • Frequent upserts/CDC → Apache Hudi

Recommendation: Apache Iceberg for new projects

See references/decision-frameworks.md.

Common Scenarios

Startup Data Platform

Context: 50-person startup, PostgreSQL + MongoDB + Stripe

Recommendation:

  • Storage: BigQuery or Snowflake
  • Ingestion: Airbyte or Fivetran
  • Transformation: dbt
  • Orchestration: dbt Cloud
  • Architecture: Simple data warehouse

See references/scenarios.md.

Enterprise Modernization

Context: Legacy Oracle warehouse, need cloud migration

Recommendation:

  • Storage: Data Lakehouse (Databricks or Snowflake with Iceberg)
  • Strategy: Incremental migration with CDC
  • Architecture: Medallion (bronze, silver, gold)
  • Cost Savings: 60-80%

See references/scenarios.md.

Data Mesh Assessment

Context: 200-person company, 5-person central data team

Recommendation: NOT YET. Build foundation first.

  • Organization too small (<500 recommended)
  • Central team not yet bottleneck
  • Invest in self-serve platform and governance

See references/scenarios.md.

Tool Recommendations

Research-Validated (Context7, December 2025)

dbt: Score 87.0, 3,532+ code snippets

  • SQL-based transformations, version control, testing
  • Industry standard for data transformation

Apache Iceberg: Score 79.7, 832+ code snippets

  • Open table format, multi-engine, vendor-neutral
  • Production-ready (Netflix, Apple, Adobe)

Tool Stack by Use Case:

Startup: BigQuery + Airbyte + dbt + Metabase (<$1K/month)

Growth: Snowflake + Fivetran + dbt + Airflow + Tableau ($10K-50K/month)

Enterprise: Snowflake + Databricks + Fivetran + Kafka + dbt + Airflow + Alation ($50K-500K/month)

See references/tool-recommendations.md.

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: Medallion Architecture

-- Bronze: Raw ingestion
CREATE TABLE bronze.raw_customers (_ingested_at TIMESTAMP, _raw_data STRING);

-- Silver: Cleaned
CREATE TABLE silver.customers AS
SELECT json_extract(_raw_data, '$.id') AS customer_id, ...
FROM bronze.raw_customers
QUALIFY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY customer_id ORDER BY _ingested_at DESC) = 1;

-- Gold: Business-level
CREATE TABLE gold.fact_sales AS
SELECT s.order_id, d.date_key, c.customer_key, ...
FROM silver.sales s
JOIN gold.dim_date d ON s.order_date = d.date;

Pattern 2: Apache Iceberg Table

CREATE TABLE catalog.db.sales (order_id BIGINT, amount DECIMAL(10,2))
USING iceberg
PARTITIONED BY (days(order_date));

-- Time travel
SELECT * FROM catalog.db.sales TIMESTAMP AS OF '2025-01-01';

Pattern 3: dbt Transformation

-- models/staging/stg_customers.sql
WITH source AS (SELECT * FROM {{ source('raw', 'customers') }}),
cleaned AS (
  SELECT customer_id, UPPER(customer_name) AS customer_name
  FROM source WHERE customer_id IS NOT NULL
)
SELECT * FROM cleaned

For complete examples, see examples/.

Best Practices

  1. Start simple: Avoid over-engineering; begin with warehouse or basic lakehouse
  2. Invest in governance early: Catalog, lineage, quality from day one
  3. Medallion architecture: Use bronze-silver-gold for clear quality layers
  4. Open table formats: Prefer Iceberg or Delta Lake to avoid vendor lock-in
  5. Assess mesh readiness: Don't decentralize prematurely (<500 people)
  6. Automate quality: Integrate tests (Great Expectations, dbt) into CI/CD
  7. Monitor pipelines: Observability is critical (freshness, quality, health)
  8. Document as code: Use dbt docs, DataHub, YAML for self-service
  9. Incremental loading: Only load new/changed data (watermark columns)
  10. Business alignment: Align architecture to outcomes, not just technologies

Anti-Patterns

  • ❌ Data swamp: Lake without governance or cataloging
  • ❌ Premature mesh: Mesh before organizational readiness
  • ❌ Tool sprawl: Too many tools without integration
  • ❌ No quality checks: "Garbage in, garbage out"
  • ❌ Centralized bottleneck: Single team in large org (>500 people)
  • ❌ Vendor lock-in: Proprietary formats without migration path
  • ❌ No lineage: Can't answer "where did this come from?"
  • ❌ Over-engineering: Complex architecture for simple use cases

Integration with Other Skills

Direct Dependencies:

  • ingesting-data: ETL/ELT mechanics, Fivetran, Airbyte implementation
  • data-transformation: dbt and Dataform detailed implementation
  • streaming-data: Kafka, Flink for real-time pipelines

Complementary:

  • databases-relational: PostgreSQL, MySQL as source systems
  • databases-document: MongoDB, DynamoDB as sources
  • ai-data-engineering: Feature stores, ML training pipelines
  • designing-distributed-systems: CAP theorem, consistency models
  • observability: Monitoring pipeline health, data quality metrics

Downstream:

  • visualizing-data: BI and dashboard patterns
  • sql-optimization: Query performance tuning

Common Workflows:

End-to-End Analytics:

data-architecture (warehouse) → ingesting-data (Fivetran) →
data-transformation (dbt) → visualizing-data (Tableau)

Data Platform for AI/ML:

data-architecture (lakehouse) → ingesting-data (Kafka) →
data-transformation (dbt features) → ai-data-engineering (feature store)

Further Reading

Reference Files:

Examples:

External Resources:

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

27.15%
按下载量换算76

OpenCode

26.16%
按下载量换算73

Gemini CLI

20.14%
按下载量换算56

Antigravity

13.9%
按下载量换算39

Cursor

7.36%
按下载量换算21

mux

3.99%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills