Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

apqpppap(apqpppap 命令行)

apqpppap 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

apqpppap 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 8,327。

总安装 294周安装 12GitHub Stars 1下载 95核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:apqpppap(apqpppap 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure
仓库路径:skills/apqpppap
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Apqpppap
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Apqpppap

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

用于处理 APQP/PPAP 质量流程相关任务,如阶段评审、交付物清单和时间计划。适用于产品开发和生产批准过程中的质量规划与进度跟踪场景。通过命令行激活,根据输入关键词生成检查表、时间线或提交材料清单。使用前需确认当前项目阶段和所需交付物,避免误操作影响生产或合规要求。

apqpppap 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/apqpppap

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

apqpppap 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Apqpppap。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

apqpppap 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

apqpppap 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

apqpppap 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

apqpppap 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 294 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 95 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

apqpppap 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
apqpppap

apqpppap 命令行 · 本页

2941只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

APQP/PPAP - Advanced Product Quality Planning & Production Part Approval

When to Activate This Skill

  • "What APQP phase are we in?"
  • "Create a phase gate checklist"
  • "What PPAP elements are required?"
  • "Generate a PSW for [part]"
  • "Create a timing plan for [program]"
  • "Track open issues for [launch]"
  • "What's needed for PPAP Level [X]?"
  • "Run readiness review"

Workflow Routing

WorkflowTriggerFile
PhaseGate"phase gate review", "gate checklist"Workflows/PhaseGate.md
PpapPackage"PPAP elements", "PPAP submission"Workflows/PpapPackage.md
TimingPlan"timing plan", "launch schedule"Workflows/TimingPlan.md
OpenIssues"open issues", "issue tracker"Workflows/OpenIssues.md

APQP Five Phases

Phase 1: Plan and Define Program

Purpose: Determine customer needs and expectations

Key Deliverables:

DeliverableDescriptionOwner
Voice of CustomerCustomer requirements documentedCommercial
Business PlanProgram justification, capacity, investmentGM
Product/Process AssumptionsInitial feasibility assessmentEngineering
Product Assurance PlanQuality objectives, reliability goalsQuality
Preliminary BOMInitial bill of materialsEngineering
Preliminary Process FlowHigh-level manufacturing conceptMfg Eng
Preliminary Special CharacteristicsInitial CC/SC identificationQuality
Management SupportResource commitmentGM

Gate 1 Criteria:

  • Customer requirements documented and reviewed
  • Feasibility assessment complete
  • Resource plan approved
  • Risk assessment performed
  • Timing plan established

Phase 2: Product Design and Development

Purpose: Develop design to near-final form

Key Deliverables:

DeliverableDescriptionOwner
DFMEADesign Failure Mode Effects AnalysisDesign Eng
Design for Manufacturability (DFM)Manufacturing input to designMfg Eng
Design Verification PlanDVP&R creationDesign Eng
Engineering DrawingsReleased with GD&TDesign Eng
Engineering SpecificationsMaterial, performance specsDesign Eng
Prototype BuildSample parts for validationMultiple
Prototype Control PlanInspection plan for prototypesQuality
Special Characteristics (Updated)CC/SC finalizedQuality

Gate 2 Criteria:

  • DFMEA complete (RPN addressed)
  • Design reviews completed
  • Drawings released
  • Prototypes built and validated
  • Design verification results acceptable
  • Special characteristics agreed with customer

Note: For contract manufacturing (MNMUK), Phase 2 is often customer-led. Focus on DFM feedback and prototype support.


Phase 3: Process Design and Development

Purpose: Develop manufacturing process

Key Deliverables:

DeliverableDescriptionOwner
Process Flow DiagramAll operations mappedMfg Eng
Floor Plan LayoutEquipment and flow layoutMfg Eng
Characteristics MatrixLink characteristics to operationsQuality
PFMEAProcess Failure Mode Effects AnalysisQuality/Mfg Eng
Pre-Launch Control PlanEnhanced control for validationQuality
Process InstructionsOperator work instructionsMfg Eng
MSA PlanMeasurement system analysis planQuality
Preliminary Process Capability PlanCpk study planQuality
Packaging StandardsPack spec developedLogistics
Management Support (Updated)Confirm resourcesGM

Gate 3 Criteria:

  • Process flow complete and approved
  • PFMEA complete (high RPNs addressed)
  • Pre-launch control plan approved
  • Work instructions drafted
  • MSA plan established
  • Tooling/equipment ordered or available
  • Packaging spec approved

Phase 4: Product and Process Validation

Purpose: Validate manufacturing process

Key Deliverables:

DeliverableDescriptionOwner
Significant Production RunPPAP quantity producedProduction
MSA ResultsGage R&R completeQuality
Preliminary Process CapabilityInitial Cpk/Ppk studiesQuality
Production Part ApprovalPPAP package completeQuality
Production Validation TestingPerformance testingQuality
Production Control PlanFinal control planQuality
Quality Planning Sign-OffTeam approvalCross-functional
PSWPart Submission WarrantQuality

Gate 4 Criteria:

  • Significant production run complete
  • MSA acceptable (<10% GR&R for CC, <30% for SC)
  • Process capability acceptable (Ppk ≥1.67 for CC, ≥1.33 for SC)
  • PPAP package complete per customer level
  • Customer approval (PSW signed)
  • Production control plan implemented
  • Operators trained

Phase 5: Feedback, Assessment and Corrective Action

Purpose: Continuous improvement during production

Key Activities:

ActivityDescriptionFrequency
Variation ReductionReduce process variabilityOngoing
Customer SatisfactionMonitor complaints, returnsMonthly
Delivery PerformanceOTD trackingWeekly
Lessons LearnedCapture and sharePer program
Control Plan UpdatesBased on experienceAs needed
PFMEA UpdatesBased on field issuesAs needed

Ongoing Requirements:

  • Customer complaints tracked and resolved
  • Process capability maintained
  • Control plans current
  • Lessons learned documented
  • Continuous improvement projects active

PPAP Submission Levels

LevelRequirementsWhen Used
Level 1PSW onlyCustomer trusts supplier
Level 2PSW with product samples and limited dataReduced documentation
Level 3PSW with product samples and complete dataDefault
Level 4PSW with complete data (no samples)Customer-specific
Level 5PSW with product samples and complete data at supplier siteCustomer review on-site

MNMUK Default: Level 3 unless customer specifies otherwise.


PPAP 18 Elements

Element Checklist

#ElementLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Owner
1Design RecordsRSS*REngineering
2Authorized Engineering Change DocumentsRSS*REngineering
3Customer Engineering ApprovalRRS*RCommercial
4Design FMEARRS*REngineering
5Process Flow DiagramRRS*RMfg Eng
6Process FMEARRS*RQuality
7Control PlanRRS*RQuality
8Measurement System AnalysisRRS*RQuality
9Dimensional ResultsRSS*RQuality
10Material, Performance Test ResultsRSS*RQuality
11Initial Process StudiesRRS*RQuality
12Qualified Laboratory DocumentationRSS*RQuality
13Appearance Approval Report (AAR)SSS*RQuality
14Sample Production PartsRSSRRQuality
15Master SampleRRS*RQuality
16Checking AidsRRS*RQuality
17Customer-Specific RequirementsRRS*RQuality
18Part Submission Warrant (PSW)SSSSSQuality

Legend: S = Submit to customer | R = Retain at supplier | * = Retain and submit on request


Element Details

Element 1: Design Records

  • Released engineering drawings
  • CAD data if applicable
  • Current revision level
  • All engineering specifications referenced

Element 2: Authorized Engineering Change Documents

  • ECNs (Engineering Change Notices)
  • Deviations approved by customer
  • Temporary deviations with expiry dates

Element 3: Customer Engineering Approval

  • Evidence of customer approval for design
  • Typically for proprietary designs
  • Not required if customer-owned design

Element 4: Design FMEA (DFMEA)

  • Covers design failure modes
  • Often customer responsibility for contract manufacturing
  • MNMUK may not have access if design is proprietary

Element 5: Process Flow Diagram

  • All operations including rework/inspection
  • Material flow indicated
  • Must match Control Plan operations

Element 6: Process FMEA (PFMEA)

  • All process failure modes
  • Current controls documented
  • RPN/AP action items closed
  • Special characteristics identified
  • Reference: Load Pfmea skill

Element 7: Control Plan

  • Matches PFMEA and process flow
  • All special characteristics controlled
  • Appropriate sample sizes and frequencies
  • Reaction plans defined
  • Reference: Load Controlplan skill

Element 8: Measurement System Analysis (MSA)

  • Gage R&R for all variable gages
  • Attribute agreement for attribute checks
  • Acceptance: <10% for CC, <30% for SC
  • Reference: Load Msa skill

Element 9: Dimensional Results

  • All drawing dimensions measured
  • Sample size typically n=3-5 parts
  • Include layout inspection report
  • Mark CC/SC results

Element 10: Material, Performance Test Results

  • Material certifications
  • Performance test results (DVP&R)
  • Third-party test reports if required
  • Traceability to material lots

Element 11: Initial Process Studies

  • Capability studies (Ppk/Cpk)
  • Minimum 30 parts, 300 readings for SPC
  • Acceptance: Ppk ≥1.67 (CC), ≥1.33 (SC)
  • Reference: Load Spc skill

Element 12: Qualified Laboratory Documentation

  • Scope of lab accreditation
  • ISO/IEC 17025 scope if applicable
  • Third-party lab certifications

Element 13: Appearance Approval Report (AAR)

  • Required for appearance items only
  • Color, grain, texture approval
  • Customer-signed AAR form

Element 14: Sample Production Parts

  • Parts from significant production run
  • Quantity per customer requirement (typically 3-10)
  • Representative of normal production

Element 15: Master Sample

  • Retained production sample
  • Same as submitted samples
  • Stored per retention requirements

Element 16: Checking Aids

  • Custom gages, fixtures, templates
  • Calibrated and identified
  • Match Control Plan references

Element 17: Customer-Specific Requirements

  • OEM-specific PPAP requirements
  • May include additional forms/checklists
  • Check customer portal/manual

Element 18: Part Submission Warrant (PSW)

  • Summary of PPAP submission
  • Weight, material declaration
  • Customer-specific markings
  • Authorized signatures

PSW Generation Guide

Required Information

# Part Submission Warrant

## Part Information
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Part Number | [Customer P/N] |
| Part Name | [Description] |
| Drawing Number | [Dwg #] |
| Drawing Rev | [Rev Level] |
| Customer | [Customer Name] |
| Buyer/Code | [Buyer Name/Code] |

## Supplier Information
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Supplier Name | Multimatic Niche Manufacturing UK |
| Supplier Code | [Customer-assigned code] |
| Address | [MNMUK Address] |
| Contact | [Quality Manager] |
| Phone/Email | [Contact details] |

## Submission Details
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| PPAP Level | [1-5] |
| Submission Reason | [Initial, Change, Re-submission] |
| Engineering Change Level | [ECN #] |
| Purchase Order | [PO #] |

## Weight Declaration
| Measured | Specified | Difference |
|----------|-----------|------------|
| [Actual kg] | [Nominal kg] | [± kg] |

## Material Information
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Material | [Material spec] |
| Supplier | [Material supplier] |
| IMDS/MDS ID | [If required] |

## Special Characteristics
| Char | Drawing Ref | Result |
|------|-------------|--------|
| CC | [Zone/Ref] | PASS/FAIL |
| SC | [Zone/Ref] | PASS/FAIL |

## Submission Checklist
- [ ] All required elements per submission level included
- [ ] Capability requirements met
- [ ] No open issues or deviations
- [ ] Customer-specific requirements addressed

## Disposition (Customer Use)
[ ] Approved
[ ] Interim Approval (expiry: _______)
[ ] Rejected (reason: _______)

## Authorization
| Role | Signature | Date |
|------|-----------|------|
| Quality Manager | __________ | ________ |
| Customer Rep | __________ | ________ |

Timing Plan Elements

Standard Milestones

MilestoneAPQP PhaseTypical Timing
Program Kick-Off1T-24 weeks
Design Release2T-18 weeks
Tooling Order2T-16 weeks
Process Design Complete3T-12 weeks
Tooling Receive3T-10 weeks
First Article3T-8 weeks
PPAP Run4T-6 weeks
PPAP Submission4T-4 weeks
Customer Approval4T-2 weeks
SOP (Start of Production)5T-0

MNMUK Program Phases

PhaseDurationKey Activities
Quotation1-2 weeksRFQ response, feasibility
Award1 weekPO receipt, kick-off
Planning2-3 weeksAPQP plan, team formation
Development4-8 weeksProcess design, tooling
Validation2-4 weeksPPAP run, capability
Approval1-2 weeksPPAP submission, PSW
Launch1-2 weeksProduction ramp-up

Open Issues Management

Issue Categories

CategoryDescriptionExample
DesignDrawing/specification issuesGD&T clarification needed
ProcessManufacturing capabilityCpk below target
ToolingEquipment/fixture issuesTool modification required
QualityInspection/testing gapsMSA fail, need new gage
SupplyMaterial/supplier issuesLong lead material
CommercialContract/pricing issuesScope change

Issue Status

StatusDefinitionAction
OpenIssue identified, not resolvedAssign owner, target date
In ProgressWork underwayTrack to completion
PendingWaiting on external inputFollow up required
ClosedIssue resolvedDocument resolution
EscalatedRisk to timing/qualityManagement attention

Issue Tracking Format

## Open Issues Log

| # | Issue | Category | Owner | Target | Status | Notes |
|---|-------|----------|-------|--------|--------|-------|
| 1 | [Description] | [Cat] | [Name] | [Date] | [Status] | [Notes] |

Phase Gate Review Meeting

Agenda Format

  1. Program Status (5 min)

- Timeline status (Green/Yellow/Red) - Budget status - Customer communication

  1. Deliverable Review (20 min)

- Checklist walkthrough - Evidence of completion - Identify gaps

  1. Risk Review (10 min)

- Open issues summary - Top 3 risks - Mitigation status

  1. Gate Decision (5 min)

- Pass / Conditional Pass / Fail - Actions if conditional - Next gate schedule

Gate Decision Criteria

DecisionCriteriaAction
PassAll deliverables complete, no critical issuesProceed to next phase
Conditional PassMinor items open, clear path to closeProceed with tracking
FailCritical items incomplete, significant riskHold, develop recovery plan

IATF 16949 Alignment

APQP/PPAP is a core requirement of IATF 16949 (Clause 8.3 - Design and Development).

MNMUK IATF 16949 Context

Certification Target: November 2027 Current Status: ISO 9001 Certified, upgrading to IATF 16949

Reference Documentation:

  • Compliance Plan: ~/projects/work/docs/compliance/IATF16949_Compliance_Plan.md
  • Quality Manual: ~/projects/work/docs/work-instructions/QM-001_Quality_Manual.md

IATF Requirements Addressed by This Skill

IATF ClauseRequirementAPQP/PPAP Coverage
8.3.2.1Design and development planning (APQP)Full 5-phase APQP
8.3.3.1Product design inputsPhase 1 & 2 deliverables
8.3.3.2Manufacturing process design inputsPhase 3 deliverables
8.3.4.1Design outputs (DFMEA, Control Plan)Phase 2-4 outputs
8.3.5.2Manufacturing process validationPhase 4 validation
8.3.6.1Design and development changesRe-submission triggers
9.1.1.1Process capability monitoringPPAP Element 11

Capability Requirements (per QM-001)

CharacteristicPpk MinimumNotes
Critical (CC)≥1.67Safety/regulatory impact
Significant (SC)≥1.33Fit/function impact
Standard≥1.00All other characteristics

PMO Governance

APQP programs at MNMUK are managed through the Programme Management Office (PMO):

  • Monthly IATF Steering Committee reviews program status
  • Phase gate reviews align with IATF documentation requirements
  • Lessons learned feed into quality system continuous improvement

Integration with Related Skills

PFMEA

PFMEA is PPAP Element 6:

  • Required for all PPAP levels
  • Must be complete before Gate 3
  • High RPN items must be addressed

Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Pfmea/SKILL.md

Control Plan

Control Plan is PPAP Element 7:

  • Pre-launch for Gate 3
  • Production for Gate 4
  • Must align with PFMEA

Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Controlplan/SKILL.md

MSA

MSA is PPAP Element 8:

  • Plan at Gate 3
  • Results at Gate 4
  • All gages must pass

Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Msa/SKILL.md

SPC

Initial process studies are PPAP Element 11:

  • Capability studies at Gate 4
  • Cpk/Ppk targets must be met

Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Spc/SKILL.md

Internal Audit

APQP program audit requirements:

  • Phase gate reviews documented
  • PPAP records auditable
  • Process effectiveness verified

Load: read ~/.claude/skills/Internalaudit/SKILL.md


Examples

Example 1: Check PPAP readiness

User: "What PPAP elements do I need for Level 3?"
→ Lists all 18 elements with Submit/Retain status
→ Highlights elements to submit
→ Notes MNMUK-specific considerations

Example 2: Run phase gate review

User: "Run Gate 3 checklist for the XYZ project"
→ Loads PhaseGate workflow
→ Walks through Phase 3 deliverables
→ Identifies gaps and assigns actions

Example 3: Generate PSW

User: "Create a PSW for part 12345"
→ Collects required information
→ Generates PSW document
→ Includes all declarations and checklists

Example 4: Track program timing

User: "What's the timeline for our new damper launch?"
→ Loads TimingPlan workflow
→ Creates milestone schedule
→ Identifies critical path items

Supplementary Resources

For detailed guidance: read ~/.claude/skills/Apqpppap/CLAUDE.md

For templates: ls ~/.claude/skills/Apqpppap/templates/

For phase gate checklists: read ~/.claude/skills/Apqpppap/reference/gate-checklists.md

For PPAP element forms: read ~/.claude/skills/Apqpppap/reference/ppap-forms.md

平台分布

Codex

36.63%
按下载量换算35

Claude

27.99%
按下载量换算27

Cursor

19.69%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

9.9%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills