Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry(API observability axiom pino Sentry 搜索)

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 66,030。

总安装 269周安装 11GitHub Stars 5下载 87核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry(API observability axiom pino Sentry 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/agents-inc/skills
仓库路径:skills/api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/agents-inc/skills --skill api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/agents-inc/skills --skill api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

构建结构化日志追踪与异常监控体系。采用 Pino 日志库配合 Axiom 告警系统和 Sentry 错误边界。强制要求所有日志携带关联 ID 实现请求链路追踪。

安装方式:通过 GitHub 仓库添加,命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/agents-inc/skills --skill api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor 和 Gemini CLI。

来源仓库内路径:skills/api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/agents-inc/skills --skill api-observability-ax…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/agents-inc/skills --skill api-observability-axiom-pino-s…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 269 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 87 次,GitHub 5 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry

API observability axiom pino Sentry 搜索 · 本页

2695调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Observability Patterns (Logging, Tracing, Error Handling)

Quick Guide: Structured logging with Pino (debug/info/warn/error). Correlation IDs for request tracing. Sentry error boundaries in React. Attach user context after auth. Filter expected errors (404s). Create Axiom monitors for alerts.

<critical_requirements>

CRITICAL: Before Using This Skill

All code must follow project conventions in CLAUDE.md (kebab-case, named exports, import ordering, import type, named constants)

(You MUST include correlation ID in ALL log statements for request tracing)

(You MUST use structured logging with required fields: level, message, correlationId, timestamp)

(You MUST filter expected errors (404, validation) from Sentry to avoid quota waste)

(You MUST attach user context to Sentry AFTER authentication completes)

(You MUST use child loggers with context instead of repeating fields in every log call)

</critical_requirements>


Auto-detection: log, logger, pino, Sentry, error boundary, correlation ID, trace, span, observability, monitoring, alerting

When to use:

  • Adding logging to new feature code
  • Implementing error handling patterns
  • Setting up request tracing with correlation IDs
  • Creating custom traces and spans for performance debugging
  • Configuring Sentry error boundaries in React components
  • Creating Axiom monitors and alerts

When NOT to use:

  • Initial project setup and dependency installation (one-time setup; follow official docs)
  • Framework-specific configuration files (follow framework SDK docs)

Key patterns covered:

  • Log levels decision tree (when to use debug/info/warn/error)
  • Structured logging with required fields
  • Correlation IDs: generating, propagating, attaching to logs
  • Custom traces/spans with OpenTelemetry
  • Sentry error boundaries in React
  • Attaching user context to Sentry after auth
  • Creating Axiom monitors and alerts
  • Filtering noise (expected errors like 404s)
  • Performance monitoring patterns
  • Debugging guide: tracing a request through the system

Detailed Resources:

Extended Examples:


Philosophy

Good observability answers three questions:

  1. What happened? (Structured logs with context)
  2. Why did it happen? (Error tracking with stack traces)
  3. How do I find it? (Correlation IDs linking related events)

Logging should be intentional, not defensive. Every log statement should answer a specific question you might ask when debugging. Avoid logging "just in case" - it creates noise that makes real issues harder to find.


Core Patterns

Pattern 1: Log Levels Decision Tree

Choose the appropriate log level based on the situation.

What are you logging?
├─ Development-only debugging info?
│   └─ debug (filtered in production)
├─ Normal operation events?
│   ├─ Request started/completed → info
│   ├─ User action completed → info
│   └─ Background job finished → info
├─ Something unexpected but recoverable?
│   ├─ Retry attempt → warn
│   ├─ Fallback used → warn
│   └─ Deprecation notice → warn
└─ Something that needs attention?
    ├─ Unhandled exception → error
    ├─ External service failure → error
    └─ Data integrity issue → error

Level Guidelines:

LevelProductionWhen to Use
debugFilteredDevelopment debugging, verbose tracing
infoVisibleNormal operations, request lifecycle, user actions
warnVisibleRecoverable issues, retries, fallbacks
errorVisible + AlertUnrecoverable issues, failures, exceptions

For code examples, see examples/core.md.


Pattern 2: Structured Logging with Required Fields

Every log statement should include structured context for searchability.

Required Fields:

FieldTypePurpose
correlationIdstringLinks all logs from same request
servicestringIdentifies the service (api, web, worker)
operationstringWhat action is being performed
userIdstring?User performing the action (if authenticated)
durationnumber?Time taken in milliseconds (for completed operations)

For code examples, see examples/core.md.


Pattern 3: Correlation IDs for Request Tracing

Generate and propagate correlation IDs to trace requests across services.

Key Components:

  1. Correlation ID Middleware - Generates/extracts correlation ID from headers
  2. Request Logger Middleware - Creates request-scoped logger with correlation context
  3. Route Handler Usage - Child loggers inherit correlation ID automatically

Modern Alternative: AsyncLocalStorage + Mixin

For larger applications, use AsyncLocalStorage with Pino's mixin option for automatic context injection without manual child logger creation in every handler.

For implementation examples of both approaches, see examples/correlation-ids.md.


Pattern 4: Custom Traces and Spans with OpenTelemetry

Add custom instrumentation for performance debugging.

Key Utilities:

  • withSpan() - Wrap async operations in traced spans
  • createSpan() - Create simple spans for synchronous operations

For code examples, see examples/tracing.md.


Pattern 5: Sentry Error Boundaries in React

Catch and report React component errors with recovery capability.

Key Components:

  1. ErrorBoundary - Class component for catching render errors
  2. global-error.tsx - SSR framework global error handler
  3. Feature-level boundaries - Wrap feature sections with custom fallbacks

For implementation examples, see examples/error-boundaries.md.


Pattern 6: Attaching User Context to Sentry

Add user information to Sentry after authentication for better debugging.

Key Functions:

  • setSentryUser() - Call after successful authentication
  • clearSentryUser() - Call on logout
  • setSentryContext() - Add additional context per-feature

For code examples, see examples/sentry-config.md.


Pattern 7: Filtering Expected Errors

Prevent expected errors from polluting Sentry quota and alerts.

Filtering Strategies:

  1. beforeSend hook - Filter by error message patterns
  2. HTTP status filtering - Skip 404, 401, 403
  3. beforeBreadcrumb hook - Remove noisy console.log breadcrumbs

For configuration examples, see examples/sentry-config.md.


Pattern 8: Creating Axiom Monitors and Alerts

Set up proactive monitoring for production issues.

Monitor Types:

  1. Error Rate Monitor - Alert when error rate > 1%
  2. Latency Monitor - Alert when P95 > 2 seconds
  3. Specific Error Monitor - Alert on database connection errors

For APL query examples, see examples/axiom.md.


Pattern 9: Performance Monitoring Patterns

Track and optimize slow operations.

Tracking Utilities:

  • trackedQuery() - Wrap database queries with performance tracking
  • trackedApiCall() - Wrap external API calls with performance tracking

For implementation examples, see examples/performance.md.


Pattern 10: Debugging Guide - Tracing a Request

How to trace a request through the system when debugging.

Steps:

  1. Get correlation ID from response headers, Sentry, or user report
  2. Search Axiom for all logs with that correlation ID
  3. Analyze request flow with timeline view
  4. Find related errors and stack traces
  5. Check Sentry for additional context

For detailed APL queries and checklist, see examples/axiom.md.


<red_flags>

RED FLAGS

For comprehensive anti-patterns and red flags, see reference.md.

Quick Reference - High Priority Issues:

  • Missing correlation ID in logs - Impossible to trace requests
  • Using console.log instead of structured logger - Not searchable, no levels
  • Logging sensitive data - Security vulnerability
  • Not filtering expected errors in Sentry - Wastes quota, buries real issues
  • Error logs without stack traces - Can't debug without knowing where error occurred

</red_flags>


<critical_reminders>

CRITICAL REMINDERS

All code must follow project conventions in CLAUDE.md

(You MUST include correlation ID in ALL log statements for request tracing)

(You MUST use structured logging with required fields: level, message, correlationId, timestamp)

(You MUST filter expected errors (404, validation) from Sentry to avoid quota waste)

(You MUST attach user context to Sentry AFTER authentication completes)

(You MUST use child loggers with context instead of repeating fields in every log call)

Failure to follow these rules will result in untraceable requests, wasted Sentry quota, and impossible debugging.

</critical_reminders>

平台分布

Codex

34.43%
按下载量换算30

Claude

27.79%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

18.08%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

9.84%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills