api-design-fundamentals（API 设计 fundamentals）

API Design Fundamentals

Guidance for designing effective APIs including protocol selection, resource modeling, and best practices.

When to Use This Skill

• Choosing between REST, GraphQL, and gRPC
• Designing resource models and endpoints
• Understanding API design best practices
• Creating consistent API conventions
• Designing for developer experience

Protocol Comparison

REST (Representational State Transfer)

Best for: CRUD operations, public APIs, broad client compatibility

Characteristics:
- Resource-oriented (nouns, not verbs)
- HTTP methods map to operations (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)
- Stateless
- Cacheable responses
- Self-descriptive messages

Example:
GET    /users          - List users
GET    /users/{id}     - Get user
POST   /users          - Create user
PUT    /users/{id}     - Update user
DELETE /users/{id}     - Delete user

Strengths:

• Simple, widely understood
• Excellent caching support
• Works with any HTTP client
• Good for public APIs

Weaknesses:

• Over-fetching (get more data than needed)
• Under-fetching (multiple requests needed)
• No built-in schema/types

GraphQL

Best for: Complex data requirements, mobile apps, aggregating multiple services

Characteristics:
- Single endpoint
- Client specifies exact data needed
- Strongly typed schema
- Introspection support
- Real-time with subscriptions

Example:
query {
  user(id: "123") {
    name
    email
    posts(limit: 5) {
      title
      comments { count }
    }
  }
}

Strengths:

• No over/under-fetching
• Strong typing and schema
• Excellent developer tooling
• Version-free evolution

Weaknesses:

• Caching complexity
• N+1 query problems
• Learning curve
• Not ideal for simple APIs

gRPC

Best for: Internal microservices, high-performance, polyglot systems

Characteristics:
- Protocol Buffers (binary format)
- HTTP/2 transport
- Bi-directional streaming
- Code generation
- Strong typing

Example (proto):
service UserService {
  rpc GetUser(GetUserRequest) returns (User);
  rpc ListUsers(ListUsersRequest) returns (stream User);
  rpc CreateUser(CreateUserRequest) returns (User);
}

Strengths:

• High performance (binary, HTTP/2)
• Strong contracts (protobuf)
• Bi-directional streaming
• Excellent for microservices

Weaknesses:

• Browser support limited (needs grpc-web)
• Not human-readable
• Steeper learning curve
• Debugging more complex

Protocol Selection Guide

Decision Tree:

Is this a public API for external developers?
├── Yes → REST (broadest compatibility)
└── No
    └── Do clients need flexible queries?
        ├── Yes → GraphQL
        └── No
            └── Is performance critical?
                ├── Yes → gRPC
                └── No → REST or GraphQL

REST API Design Best Practices

Resource Naming

DO:
- Use nouns, not verbs: /users, /orders, /products
- Use plural form: /users (not /user)
- Use kebab-case: /user-profiles (not /userProfiles)
- Nest for relationships: /users/{id}/orders

DON'T:
- /getUsers, /createOrder (verbs)
- /user (singular)
- /user_profiles (snake_case in URLs)

HTTP Methods

*PATCH can be idempotent depending on implementation

Status Codes

Pagination

Offset-based (simple, but problematic at scale):
GET /users?offset=20&limit=10

Cursor-based (recommended for large datasets):
GET /users?cursor=eyJpZCI6MTAwfQ&limit=10

Response:
{
  "data": [...],
  "pagination": {
    "next_cursor": "eyJpZCI6MTEwfQ",
    "has_more": true
  }
}

Filtering and Sorting

Filtering:
GET /products?category=electronics&price_min=100&price_max=500

Sorting:
GET /products?sort=price:asc,name:desc

Field selection (partial responses):
GET /users?fields=id,name,email

Error Responses

{
  "error": {
    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
    "message": "Invalid request parameters",
    "details": [
      {
        "field": "email",
        "message": "Invalid email format"
      }
    ],
    "request_id": "req_abc123"
  }
}

GraphQL Best Practices

Schema Design

# Use clear, descriptive types
type User {
  id: ID!
  email: String!
  profile: UserProfile
  posts(first: Int, after: String): PostConnection!
}

# Use connections for pagination
type PostConnection {
  edges: [PostEdge!]!
  pageInfo: PageInfo!
}

# Use input types for mutations
input CreateUserInput {
  email: String!
  name: String!
}

Query Complexity Limits

Protect against expensive queries:
- Depth limiting (max nesting level)
- Complexity scoring (assign costs to fields)
- Query timeout
- Rate limiting per client

N+1 Prevention

Use DataLoader pattern:
- Batch requests for same type
- Cache within single request
- Prevents N+1 database queries

gRPC Best Practices

Service Design

// Keep messages focused
message User {
  string id = 1;
  string email = 2;
  string name = 3;
}

// Use request/response wrappers
message GetUserRequest {
  string id = 1;
}

message GetUserResponse {
  User user = 1;
}

// Support streaming for large datasets
service UserService {
  rpc GetUser(GetUserRequest) returns (GetUserResponse);
  rpc ListUsers(ListUsersRequest) returns (stream User);
}

Error Handling

Use standard gRPC status codes:
- OK (0): Success
- INVALID_ARGUMENT (3): Bad request
- NOT_FOUND (5): Resource missing
- PERMISSION_DENIED (7): Forbidden
- INTERNAL (13): Server error
- UNAVAILABLE (14): Service down

API Evolution

Backward Compatibility Rules

Safe changes (backward compatible):
- Adding new endpoints
- Adding optional fields
- Adding new enum values (at end)
- Relaxing validation rules

Breaking changes (avoid):
- Removing endpoints
- Removing fields
- Changing field types
- Renaming fields
- Adding required fields

Deprecation Strategy

1. Mark as deprecated (add header/annotation)
2. Document migration path
3. Set sunset date
4. Monitor usage
5. Remove after sunset

Related Skills

• rate-limiting-patterns - API protection
• idempotency-patterns - Reliable APIs
• api-versioning - API evolution