Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

api-contract-review(API contract 审查)

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

api-contract-review 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,194。

总安装 1,004周安装 41GitHub Stars 539下载 321核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:api-contract-review(API contract 审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java
仓库路径:skills/api-contract-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java --skill api-contract-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java --skill api-contract-review

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

审计 REST API 设计的正确性与兼容性,识别常见反模式与潜在风险点。适用于发布前检查控制器变更,确保 HTTP 方法、版本控制与错误格式合规。使用时需提供接口定义或代码片段,重点验证实体暴露与状态码合理性。安装方式:通过 npx skills add 从 GitHub 仓库安装,支持主流 AI 开发工具链。

注意:审查结果应以 actionable 建议形式呈现,而非简单标记问题项。

来源仓库内路径:skills/api-contract-review

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java --skill api-contract…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

api-contract-review 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/decebals/claude-code-java --skill api-contract-review。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

api-contract-review 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

api-contract-review 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

api-contract-review 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

api-contract-review 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,004 次,近一周安装 41 次,下载 321 次,GitHub 539 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

api-contract-review 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
api-contract-review

API contract 审查 · 本页

1,004539需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

API Contract Review Skill

Audit REST API design for correctness, consistency, and compatibility.

When to Use

  • User asks "review this API" / "check REST endpoints"
  • Before releasing API changes
  • Reviewing PR with controller changes
  • Checking backward compatibility

Quick Reference: Common Issues

IssueSymptomImpact
Wrong HTTP verbPOST for idempotent operationConfusion, caching issues
Missing versioning/users instead of /v1/usersBreaking changes affect all clients
Entity leakJPA entity in responseExposes internals, N+1 risk
200 with error{"status": 200, "error": "..."}Breaks error handling
Inconsistent naming/getUsers vs /usersHard to learn API

HTTP Verb Semantics

Verb Selection Guide

VerbUse ForIdempotentSafeRequest Body
GETRetrieve resourceYesYesNo
POSTCreate new resourceNoNoYes
PUTReplace entire resourceYesNoYes
PATCHPartial updateNo*NoYes
DELETERemove resourceYesNoOptional

*PATCH can be idempotent depending on implementation

Common Mistakes

// ❌ POST for retrieval
@PostMapping("/users/search")
public List<User> searchUsers(@RequestBody SearchCriteria criteria) { }

// ✅ GET with query params (or POST only if criteria is very complex)
@GetMapping("/users")
public List<User> searchUsers(
    @RequestParam String name,
    @RequestParam(required = false) String email) { }

// ❌ GET for state change
@GetMapping("/users/{id}/activate")
public void activateUser(@PathVariable Long id) { }

// ✅ POST or PATCH for state change
@PostMapping("/users/{id}/activate")
public ResponseEntity<Void> activateUser(@PathVariable Long id) { }

// ❌ POST for idempotent update
@PostMapping("/users/{id}")
public User updateUser(@PathVariable Long id, @RequestBody UserDto dto) { }

// ✅ PUT for full replacement, PATCH for partial
@PutMapping("/users/{id}")
public User replaceUser(@PathVariable Long id, @RequestBody UserDto dto) { }

@PatchMapping("/users/{id}")
public User updateUser(@PathVariable Long id, @RequestBody UserPatchDto dto) { }

API Versioning

Strategies

StrategyExampleProsCons
URL path/v1/usersClear, easy routingURL changes
HeaderAccept: application/vnd.api.v1+jsonClean URLsHidden, harder to test
Query param/users?version=1Easy to addEasy to forget

Recommended: URL Path

// ✅ Versioned endpoints
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/v1/users")
public class UserControllerV1 { }

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/v2/users")
public class UserControllerV2 { }

// ❌ No versioning
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/users")  // Breaking changes affect everyone
public class UserController { }

Version Checklist

  • All public APIs have version in path
  • Internal APIs documented as internal (or versioned too)
  • Deprecation strategy defined for old versions

Request/Response Design

DTO vs Entity

// ❌ Entity in response (leaks internals)
@GetMapping("/{id}")
public User getUser(@PathVariable Long id) {
    return userRepository.findById(id).orElseThrow();
    // Exposes: password hash, internal IDs, lazy collections
}

// ✅ DTO response
@GetMapping("/{id}")
public UserResponse getUser(@PathVariable Long id) {
    User user = userService.findById(id);
    return UserResponse.from(user);  // Only public fields
}

Response Consistency

// ❌ Inconsistent responses
@GetMapping("/users")
public List<User> getUsers() { }  // Returns array

@GetMapping("/users/{id}")
public User getUser(@PathVariable Long id) { }  // Returns object

@GetMapping("/users/count")
public int countUsers() { }  // Returns primitive

// ✅ Consistent wrapper (optional but recommended for large APIs)
@GetMapping("/users")
public ApiResponse<List<UserResponse>> getUsers() {
    return ApiResponse.success(userService.findAll());
}

// Or at minimum, consistent structure:
// - Collections: always wrapped or always raw (pick one)
// - Single items: always object
// - Counts/stats: always object { "count": 42 }

Pagination

// ❌ No pagination on collections
@GetMapping("/users")
public List<User> getAllUsers() {
    return userRepository.findAll();  // Could be millions
}

// ✅ Paginated
@GetMapping("/users")
public Page<UserResponse> getUsers(
    @RequestParam(defaultValue = "0") int page,
    @RequestParam(defaultValue = "20") int size) {
    return userService.findAll(PageRequest.of(page, size));
}

HTTP Status Codes

Success Codes

CodeWhen to UseResponse Body
200 OKSuccessful GET, PUT, PATCHResource or result
201 CreatedSuccessful POST (created)Created resource + Location header
204 No ContentSuccessful DELETE, or PUT with no bodyEmpty

Error Codes

CodeWhen to UseCommon Mistake
400 Bad RequestInvalid input, validation failedUsing for "not found"
401 UnauthorizedNot authenticatedConfusing with 403
403 ForbiddenAuthenticated but not allowedUsing 401 instead
404 Not FoundResource doesn't existUsing 400
409 ConflictDuplicate, concurrent modificationUsing 400
422 UnprocessableSemantic error (valid syntax, invalid meaning)Using 400
500 Internal ErrorUnexpected server errorExposing stack traces

Anti-Pattern: 200 with Error Body

// ❌ NEVER DO THIS
@GetMapping("/{id}")
public ResponseEntity<Map<String, Object>> getUser(@PathVariable Long id) {
    try {
        User user = userService.findById(id);
        return ResponseEntity.ok(Map.of("status", "success", "data", user));
    } catch (NotFoundException e) {
        return ResponseEntity.ok(Map.of(  // Still 200!
            "status", "error",
            "message", "User not found"
        ));
    }
}

// ✅ Use proper status codes
@GetMapping("/{id}")
public ResponseEntity<UserResponse> getUser(@PathVariable Long id) {
    return userService.findById(id)
        .map(ResponseEntity::ok)
        .orElse(ResponseEntity.notFound().build());
}

Error Response Format

Consistent Error Structure

// ✅ Standard error response
public class ErrorResponse {
    private String code;        // Machine-readable: "USER_NOT_FOUND"
    private String message;     // Human-readable: "User with ID 123 not found"
    private Instant timestamp;
    private String path;
    private List<FieldError> errors;  // For validation errors
}

// In GlobalExceptionHandler
@ExceptionHandler(ResourceNotFoundException.class)
public ResponseEntity<ErrorResponse> handleNotFound(
        ResourceNotFoundException ex, HttpServletRequest request) {
    return ResponseEntity.status(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND)
        .body(ErrorResponse.builder()
            .code("RESOURCE_NOT_FOUND")
            .message(ex.getMessage())
            .timestamp(Instant.now())
            .path(request.getRequestURI())
            .build());
}

Security: Don't Expose Internals

// ❌ Exposes stack trace
@ExceptionHandler(Exception.class)
public ResponseEntity<String> handleAll(Exception ex) {
    return ResponseEntity.status(500)
        .body(ex.getStackTrace().toString());  // Security risk!
}

// ✅ Generic message, log details server-side
@ExceptionHandler(Exception.class)
public ResponseEntity<ErrorResponse> handleAll(Exception ex) {
    log.error("Unexpected error", ex);  // Full details in logs
    return ResponseEntity.status(500)
        .body(ErrorResponse.of("INTERNAL_ERROR", "An unexpected error occurred"));
}

Backward Compatibility

Breaking Changes (Avoid in Same Version)

ChangeBreaking?Migration
Remove endpointYesDeprecate first, remove in next version
Remove field from responseYesKeep field, return null/default
Add required field to requestYesMake optional with default
Change field typeYesAdd new field, deprecate old
Rename fieldYesSupport both temporarily
Change URL pathYesRedirect old to new

Non-Breaking Changes (Safe)

  • Add optional field to request
  • Add field to response
  • Add new endpoint
  • Add new optional query parameter

Deprecation Pattern

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/v1/users")
public class UserControllerV1 {

    @Deprecated
    @GetMapping("/by-email")  // Old endpoint
    public UserResponse getByEmailOld(@RequestParam String email) {
        return getByEmail(email);  // Delegate to new
    }

    @GetMapping(params = "email")  // New pattern
    public UserResponse getByEmail(@RequestParam String email) {
        return userService.findByEmail(email);
    }
}

API Review Checklist

1. HTTP Semantics

  • GET for retrieval only (no side effects)
  • POST for creation (returns 201 + Location)
  • PUT for full replacement (idempotent)
  • PATCH for partial updates
  • DELETE for removal (idempotent)

2. URL Design

  • Versioned (/v1/, /v2/)
  • Nouns, not verbs (/users, not /getUsers)
  • Plural for collections (/users, not /user)
  • Hierarchical for relationships (/users/{id}/orders)
  • Consistent naming (kebab-case or camelCase, pick one)

3. Request Handling

  • Validation with @Valid
  • Clear error messages for validation failures
  • Request DTOs (not entities)
  • Reasonable size limits

4. Response Design

  • Response DTOs (not entities)
  • Consistent structure across endpoints
  • Pagination for collections
  • Proper status codes (not 200 for errors)

5. Error Handling

  • Consistent error format
  • Machine-readable error codes
  • Human-readable messages
  • No stack traces exposed
  • Proper 4xx vs 5xx distinction

6. Compatibility

  • No breaking changes in current version
  • Deprecated endpoints documented
  • Migration path for breaking changes

Token Optimization

For large APIs:

  1. List all controllers: find. -name "*Controller.java"
  2. Sample 2-3 controllers for pattern analysis
  3. Check @ExceptionHandler configuration once
  4. Grep for specific anti-patterns: # Find potential entity leaks grep -r "public.*Entity.*@GetMapping" --include="*.java" # Find 200 with error patterns grep -r "ResponseEntity.ok.*error" --include="*.java" # Find unversioned APIs grep -r "@RequestMapping.*api" --include="*.java" | grep -v "/v[0-9]"

平台分布

Codex

37.47%
按下载量换算120

Claude

29.53%
按下载量换算95

Cursor

17.86%
按下载量换算57

Gemini CLI

9.27%
按下载量换算30

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills