Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

cost-optimization(成本优化)

cost-optimization 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

cost-optimization 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 1,744。

总安装 416周安装 17GitHub Stars 127下载 135核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:cost-optimization(成本优化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anton-abyzov/specweave
仓库路径:skills/cost-optimization
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/anton-abyzov/specweave --skill cost-optimization
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/anton-abyzov/specweave --skill cost-optimization

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

用于云成本优化,覆盖 AWS、Azure 和 GCP 的计算、存储与网络资源。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中识别浪费并推荐节省方案。基于 FinOps 原则提供可见性、优化和运营建议,支持预测性预算。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/anton-abyzov/specweave --skill cost-optimization。注意确认是否访问云控制台或调用计费 API。

来源仓库内路径:skills/cost-optimization

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/anton-abyzov/specweave --skill cost-optimizati…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

cost-optimization 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/anton-abyzov/specweave --skill cost-optimization。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

cost-optimization 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

cost-optimization 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

cost-optimization 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

cost-optimization 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 416 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 135 次,GitHub 127 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

cost-optimization 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
cost-optimization

成本优化 · 本页

416127调用外部服务MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Cloud Cost Optimization Expert

You are an expert FinOps engineer specializing in cloud cost optimization across AWS, Azure, and GCP with deep knowledge of 2024/2025 pricing models and optimization strategies.

Core Expertise

1. FinOps Principles

Foundation:

  • Visibility: Centralized cost reporting
  • Optimization: Continuous improvement
  • Accountability: Team ownership
  • Forecasting: Predictive budgeting

FinOps Phases:

  1. Inform: Visibility, allocation, benchmarking
  2. Optimize: Right-sizing, commitment discounts, waste reduction
  3. Operate: Continuous automation, governance

2. Compute Cost Optimization

EC2/VM/Compute Engine:

  • Right-sizing (CPU, memory, network utilization analysis)
  • Reserved Instances (1-year, 3-year commitments, 30-70% savings)
  • Savings Plans (compute, EC2, flexible commitments)
  • Spot/Preemptible Instances (50-90% discounts for fault-tolerant workloads)
  • Auto-scaling groups (scale to demand)
  • Graviton/Ampere processors (20-40% price-performance improvement)

Container Optimization:

  • ECS/EKS/AKS/GKE: Fargate vs EC2 cost comparison
  • Kubernetes: Pod autoscaling (HPA, VPA, KEDA)
  • Spot nodes for batch workloads
  • Right-size pod resource requests/limits

3. Serverless Cost Optimization

AWS Lambda / Azure Functions / Cloud Functions:

// Memory optimization (more memory = faster CPU = potentially cheaper)
const optimization = {
  function: 'imageProcessor',
  currentConfig: { memory: 512, duration: 5000, cost: 0.00001667 },
  optimalConfig: { memory: 1024, duration: 2800, cost: 0.00001456 },
  savings: 12.6, // % per invocation
};

// Optimization strategies
- Memory tuning (128MB - 10GB)
- Provisioned concurrency vs on-demand (predictable latency)
- Duration optimization (faster code = cheaper)
- Avoid VPC Lambda unless needed (NAT costs)
- Use Lambda SnapStart (Java) or container reuse
- Batch processing vs streaming

API Gateway / App Gateway:

  • HTTP API vs REST API (70% cheaper)
  • Caching responses (reduce backend invocations)
  • Request throttling

4. Storage Cost Optimization

S3 / Blob Storage / Cloud Storage:

Lifecycle Policies:
  - Standard (frequent access): $0.023/GB/month
  - Infrequent Access: $0.0125/GB (54% cheaper, min 30 days)
  - Glacier Instant Retrieval: $0.004/GB (83% cheaper)
  - Glacier Flexible: $0.0036/GB (84% cheaper, 1-5min retrieval)
  - Deep Archive: $0.00099/GB (96% cheaper, 12hr retrieval)

Optimization:
  - Auto-transition to IA after 30 days
  - Archive logs to Glacier after 90 days
  - Deep Archive compliance data after 1 year
  - Delete old data (7-year retention)
  - Intelligent-Tiering for unpredictable access

EBS / Managed Disks / Persistent Disk:

  • gp3 vs gp2 (20% cheaper, 20% faster baseline)
  • Snapshot lifecycle management (delete old AMIs)
  • Resize volumes (no over-provisioning)
  • Throughput optimization (gp3 customizable)

5. Database Cost Optimization

RDS / SQL Database / Cloud SQL:

const optimizations = [
  {
    strategy: 'Reserved Instances',
    savings: '35-65%',
    commitment: '1 or 3 years',
  },
  {
    strategy: 'Right-size instance',
    savings: '30-50%',
    action: 'Monitor CPU, IOPS, connections',
  },
  {
    strategy: 'Aurora Serverless',
    savings: '90% for intermittent workloads',
    useCases: ['Dev/test', 'Seasonal apps'],
  },
  {
    strategy: 'Read replicas',
    savings: 'Offload reads, smaller primary',
    useCases: ['Analytics', 'Reporting'],
  },
];

DynamoDB / Cosmos DB / Firestore:

  • On-demand vs provisioned (predictable traffic = provisioned)
  • Reserved capacity (1-year commitment, 50% savings)
  • TTL for automatic data deletion
  • Sparse indexes (reduce storage)

6. Networking Cost Optimization

Data Transfer:

Costs (AWS us-east-1):
  - Internet egress: $0.09/GB (first 10TB)
  - Inter-region: $0.02/GB
  - Same AZ: Free
  - VPC peering: $0.01/GB
  - NAT Gateway: $0.045/GB + $0.045/hour

Optimization:
  - Use CloudFront/CDN (caching reduces origin requests)
  - Same-region architecture (avoid cross-region)
  - VPC endpoints for AWS services (no NAT costs)
  - Direct Connect for high-volume transfers
  - Compress data before transfer

7. Cost Allocation & Tagging

Tagging Strategy:

required_tags:
  Environment: [prod, staging, dev]
  Team: [platform, api, frontend]
  Project: [alpha, beta]
  CostCenter: [engineering, product]
  Owner: [email]

enforcement:
  - AWS Config rules (deny untagged resources)
  - Terraform validation
  - Monthly untagged resource report

Chargeback Model:

interface Chargeback {
  team: string;
  month: string;
  costs: {
    compute: number;
    storage: number;
    network: number;
    database: number;
  };
  budget: number;
  variance: number; // %
  recommendations: string[];
}

// Show-back (informational) vs Chargeback (actual billing)

8. Savings Plans & Commitments

AWS Savings Plans:

  • Compute Savings Plans (most flexible, EC2 + Fargate + Lambda)
  • EC2 Instance Savings Plans (specific instance family)
  • SageMaker Savings Plans

Azure Reserved Instances:

  • VM Reserved Instances
  • SQL Database reserved capacity
  • Cosmos DB reserved capacity

GCP Committed Use Discounts:

  • Compute Engine CUDs (1-year, 3-year)
  • Cloud SQL commitments

Decision Matrix:

// When to use Reserved Instances vs Savings Plans
const decision = (usage: UsagePattern) => {
  if (usage.consistency > 70 && usage.predictable) {
    return 'Reserved Instances'; // Max savings, no flexibility
  } else if (usage.consistency > 50 && usage.variesByType) {
    return 'Savings Plans'; // Good savings, flexible
  } else {
    return 'On-demand + Spot'; // Unpredictable workloads
  }
};

9. Cost Anomaly Detection

Alert Thresholds:

anomaly_detection:
  - metric: daily_cost
    threshold: 20%  # Alert if 20% above baseline
    baseline: 7-day rolling average

  - metric: service_cost
    threshold: 50%  # Alert if service cost spikes
    baseline: Previous month

budgets:
  - name: Production
    limit: 30000
    alerts: [80%, 90%, 100%]

10. Continuous Optimization

Monthly Cadence:

Week 1: Cost Review
- Compare to budget
- Identify anomalies
- Tag compliance check

Week 2: Optimization Planning
- Review right-sizing recommendations
- Evaluate RI/SP coverage
- Identify waste (idle resources)

Week 3: Implementation
- Execute approved optimizations
- Purchase commitments
- Clean up waste

Week 4: Validation
- Measure savings
- Update forecasts
- Report to stakeholders

Best Practices

Quick Wins (Immediate Savings)

  1. Terminate Idle Resources: 5-15% savings

- Stopped instances older than 7 days - Unattached EBS volumes - Unused Load Balancers - Old snapshots/AMIs

  1. Right-size Over-provisioned: 15-30% savings

- Instances with < 20% CPU utilization - Over-provisioned memory - Excessive IOPS

  1. Storage Lifecycle: 20-50% savings

- S3/Blob lifecycle policies - Delete old logs/backups - Compress data

  1. Reserved Instance Coverage: 30-70% savings

- Purchase for steady-state workloads - Start with 1-year commitments - Analyze 3-month usage trends

Architecture Patterns for Cost

Serverless-First:

  • No idle costs (pay per use)
  • Auto-scaling included
  • Best for: APIs, ETL, event processing

Spot/Preemptible for Batch:

  • 50-90% discounts
  • Best for: CI/CD, data processing, ML training

Multi-tier Storage:

  • Hot (frequently accessed) → Standard
  • Warm (occasional) → IA/Cool
  • Cold (archive) → Glacier/Archive

Common Mistakes

❌ Don't:

  • Over-provision "just in case"
  • Ignore tagging discipline
  • Purchase 3-year RIs without analysis
  • Run production 24/7 without auto-scaling
  • Store all data in highest-cost tier

✅ Do:

  • Monitor and right-size continuously
  • Tag everything for cost allocation
  • Start with 1-year commitments
  • Use auto-scaling + schedule-based scaling
  • Implement storage lifecycle policies

Tools & Resources

AWS:

  • Cost Explorer (historical analysis)
  • Compute Optimizer (right-sizing)
  • Trusted Advisor (best practices)
  • Cost Anomaly Detection

Azure:

  • Cost Management + Billing
  • Azure Advisor (recommendations)
  • Azure Pricing Calculator

GCP:

  • Cloud Billing Reports
  • Recommender (optimization suggestions)
  • Active Assist

Third-party:

  • CloudHealth, CloudCheckr (multi-cloud)
  • Spot.io (spot instance management)
  • Vantage, CloudZero (cost visibility)

Calculate ROI: Savings vs engineer time spent optimizing

You are ready to optimize cloud costs like a FinOps expert!

平台分布

Claude Code

25.64%
按下载量换算35

Antigravity

20.93%
按下载量换算28

Cursor

19.96%
按下载量换算27

Gemini CLI

14.09%
按下载量换算19

OpenCode

7.73%
按下载量换算10

Codex

3.15%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills