Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

anti-seo-researcher(anti SEO researcher 搜索)

anti-seo-researcher 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

anti-seo-researcher 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 16,087。

总安装 7,393周安装 302GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,392核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.2

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:anti-seo-researcher(anti SEO researcher 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/amoshc/anti-seo-researcher
安装命令:
openclaw skills install anti-seo-researcher
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install anti-seo-researcher

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

anti-seo-researcher 深度分析消费者评论与非 SEO 内容,辅助购买决策。适用于 OpenClaw 中当用户需评估产品真实口碑时调用,自动适配语言环境。整合电商平台、论坛与社交媒体数据源,过滤营销话术干扰。使用前请确认是否允许访问外部网站内容,并注意隐私政策合规性。

建议结合个人需求权重筛选信息,避免过度依赖单一观点。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install anti-seo-researcher;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

anti-seo-researcher 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install anti-seo-researcher。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

anti-seo-researcher 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

anti-seo-researcher 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

anti-seo-researcher 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

anti-seo-researcher 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,393 次,近一周安装 302 次,下载 2,392 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

anti-seo-researcher 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
anti-seo-researcher

anti SEO researcher 搜索 · 本页

7,393—接触敏感数据MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
anti-seo-researcher
description
>
allowed-tools

Anti-SEO Deep Consumer Researcher

Detailed rules, scoring criteria, and category examples: see references/SKILL_REFERENCE.md

Tool Availability & Graceful Degradation

This skill works best with web_search + web_fetch, but web_search is optional. If your environment does not have web_search available (e.g., no API key configured), the skill will automatically degrade to use built-in Bing scraping scripts instead.

Detection (run at skill startup)

At the very beginning, before any research steps, determine which search mode to use:

  1. Full mode (preferred): If web_search tool is available in your environment, use it directly for all search operations as described in the workflow below.
  2. Fallback mode: If web_search is NOT available (tool missing, API key not configured, or returns errors), use the built-in fallback script for ALL search operations:
# Instead of: web_search("电竞椅 推荐 避坑 2025")
# Use:
python scripts/web_search_fallback.py "电竞椅 推荐 避坑 2025" --count 10 --days 365

# Instead of: web_search("site:reddit.com office chair review")
# Use:
python scripts/web_search_fallback.py "office chair review" --site reddit.com --count 10

# Multi-site search (searches each site independently):
python scripts/web_search_fallback.py "电竞椅 推荐" --sites zhihu.com,v2ex.com,smzdm.com --count 5

# Search + fetch content in one call (reduces round trips):
python scripts/web_search_fallback.py "电竞椅 避坑" --count 10 --fetch-content --fetch-limit 3

The fallback script uses DuckDuckGo HTML search as the primary engine (most reliable, no captcha), with Bing HTML as automatic fallback — zero API keys needed. It outputs the same JSON format as web_search results.

Fallback Mode Workflow Adjustments

When in fallback mode, apply these adjustments throughout the entire workflow:

Original (Full Mode)Fallback Mode Replacement
web_search("query")python scripts/web_search_fallback.py "query" --count 10
web_search("site:xxx.com query")python scripts/web_search_fallback.py "query" --site xxx.com
Step 2c: AI uses web_search for forum searchesUse platform_search.py with --dual-window --append-year flags
Step 4.5: AI uses web_search for safety eventsUse deep_dive_search.py with --safety-only flag, OR web_search_fallback.py

Important: web_fetch is STILL used normally in fallback mode for fetching specific page content. Only web_search is replaced.

All other steps (credibility scoring, conflict resolution, brand scoring, report generation) work identically in both modes — they process search results regardless of how those results were obtained.

Architecture Overview

Language Detection → AI Category Adaptation → AI Multi-layer Search (forum posts + e-commerce reviews + social comment sections) → Script Scoring → AI Semantic Analysis → Dynamic Multi-dimensional Scoring → Report

  • Language & Region Layer: Detect user's language from query, generate region-specific platform config, search templates, and keyword dictionaries
  • Category Layer: AI generates category_profile JSON (evaluation dimensions/weights/pain point keywords/safety risks/platform weights/e-commerce search strategy)
  • Search Layer (3-tier data sources):

- L1 E-commerce Review Layer (highest priority): Indirect search for real buyer reviews (e.g., Amazon reviews, JD follow-up reviews, depending on region) - L2 Social Comment Section Layer (second priority): Search for "debunking" feedback in comment sections of promotional posts - L3 Forum Post Layer (traditional): AI uses web_search (or web_search_fallback.py when web_search is unavailable) + site: for targeted community searches

  • Scoring Layer: credibility_scorer.py (regex pre-filter + category signal injection + data source tier weighting) → ai_credibility_analyzer.py (AI deep analysis for gray zone 30-85 scores)
  • Multi-dimensional Scoring: brand_scorer.py (dimensions/weights from profile, safety capping is category-adaptive)
  • Report Layer: generate_report.py (dynamic table headers + data source distribution stats, from profile dimension definitions)

Multi-language & Multi-region Adaptation

Core Principle: This tool adapts to any language and region. The AI detects the user's language from their query and generates ALL region-specific configurations dynamically in the category_profile.

Language Detection Rules

  1. Detect the language of the user's query (Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, etc.)
  2. Infer the target market/region from context (e.g., Chinese query → China market; English query about "best vacuum" → likely US/UK market; Japanese query → Japan market)
  3. ALL subsequent search queries, keywords, and report text MUST match the detected language and region
  4. If the user explicitly mentions a region (e.g., "available in the UK", "sold on Amazon Japan"), use that region regardless of query language

Regional Platform Mapping

The AI MUST generate appropriate platform configurations based on the detected region. Below are reference mappings (the AI should adapt these based on actual availability and relevance):

China (zh-CN):

TierPlatformsExamples
L1 E-commerceJD.com, Taobao, PinduoduoReview aggregation posts, follow-up reviews
L2 Social CommentsXiaohongshu, Zhihu"Debunking" comments under promotional posts
L3/L4 ForumsV2EX, Chiphell, NGA, Baidu Tieba, SMZDM, Douban, BilibiliCommunity discussions, in-depth reviews

United States / English-speaking (en-US):

TierPlatformsExamples
L1 E-commerceAmazon, Best Buy, WalmartVerified purchase reviews, long-term reviews
L2 Social CommentsReddit, YouTube commentsComment sections debunking sponsored content
L3/L4 ForumsReddit (subreddits), Head-Fi, AVSForum, Wirecutter comments, SlickdealsCommunity discussions, enthusiast reviews

Japan (ja-JP):

TierPlatformsExamples
L1 E-commerceAmazon.co.jp, Rakuten, Kakaku.comPurchase reviews, price comparison reviews
L2 Social CommentsTwitter/X, note.com commentsReal user feedback under promotional content
L3/L4 ForumsKakaku.com forums, 5ch, Price.comCommunity discussions, expert reviews

South Korea (ko-KR):

TierPlatformsExamples
L1 E-commerceCoupang, Naver ShoppingPurchase reviews
L2 Social CommentsNaver Blog comments, InstagramReal feedback
L3/L4 ForumsDC Inside, Naver Cafe, ClienCommunity discussions

Europe (various):

TierPlatformsExamples
L1 E-commerceAmazon (regional), TrustpilotPurchase reviews, trust scores
L2 Social CommentsReddit, YouTube, regional socialComment section feedback
L3/L4 ForumsRegional forums, Reddit (subreddits)Community discussions

Regional Regulatory Authorities

Safety event searches must include the correct regulatory bodies for the target region:

RegionRegulatory Bodies
ChinaSAMR (State Administration for Market Regulation), CFDA
USFDA, CPSC, FTC
EUEFSA, ECHA, national agencies
JapanMHLW, CAA, NITE
South KoreaMFDS, KCA

Regional Marketing Signal Adaptation

Each region has different marketing manipulation patterns. The AI MUST generate region-appropriate marketing signals in category_profile:

China: SEO manipulation keywords (e.g., marketing buzzwords, "zhong cao/ba cao" patterns), fake review indicators, WeChat marketing patterns US/UK: Affiliate link indicators, sponsored content disclaimers, Amazon vine/incentivized review patterns, influencer disclosure signals Japan: Stealth marketing (ステマ) indicators, PR article patterns, affiliate blog signals Universal: Excessive superlatives, zero-defect descriptions, brand-official language repetition

Data Source Tier Strategy

Problem: Over-reliance on search-engine-indexable "post-type" content (forum answers, review articles) where the ad-to-content ratio is high. E-commerce platforms' real purchase reviews and social platforms' comment section feedback have higher information density and higher cost of astroturfing, but are dynamically loaded and cannot be directly indexed by search engines.

Solution: Use indirect search strategies (search for "review compilation posts", "follow-up review summaries", "negative review roundups", etc.) to access e-commerce reviews and comment section data.

Data Source TierSourceCore ValueBase Credibility Weight
L1 E-commerce ReviewsPlatform purchase reviews (indirect)Real buyers with real money, long-term follow-up reviews0.85
L2 Comment SectionsSocial platform comment sections (indirect)Real "debunking" feedback on promotional content0.75
L3 Forum PostsCommunity forums (per region)Enthusiast deep experience, comparisonsUses platform_relevance
L4 Independent PostsQ&A platforms, review sitesSystematic review frameworksUses platform_relevance

Key Constraint: E-commerce review layer and comment section layer searches should account for no less than 30% of total search volume.

Workflow (7 Steps)

Step 1: Interactive Requirements Confirmation

Core Principle: Research cannot be interrupted once started (time-consuming and token-intensive), so requirements must be confirmed before starting. Better to ask one more question than to research in the wrong direction.

Mandatory Confirmation Items (MUST ask user if missing):

  • Target Category: What does the user want to buy? — Never assume the category
  • Budget Range: What is the price range? — Never use a default budget
  • Core Use Case or Pain Point: What is the main purpose? What matters most? — Never assume the need

Conditional Confirmation Items (proactively ask when relevant):

  • When significant version/channel differences exist (e.g., domestic vs. import versions, regional variants) → confirm variant preference
  • When brand preference is apparent → confirm whether to limit to specific brands
  • When user needs are ambiguous → use multiple-choice questions to confirm

Confirmation Format: Use short multiple-choice or open questions, max 3 questions.

After confirmation, output task_config (for reference in subsequent steps):

{
  "category": "category name",
  "budget_min": 2500,
  "budget_max": 3500,
  "currency": "USD",
  "locale": "en-US",
  "core_scenario": "gaming",
  "pain_points": ["cooling", "frame rate stability"],
  "excluded_brands": [],
  "preferred_brands": [],
  "variant_preference": "",
  "special_requirements": []
}

Skip confirmation only if ALL conditions are met:

  1. Category is clear (e.g., "recommend a $200 gaming keyboard")
  2. Budget is clear (has specific numbers or clear range)
  3. Use case is clear (e.g., "for gaming", "for my baby")

Step 1.5: AI Category-Adaptive Analysis

Before searching, generate category_profile JSON, strictly following this Schema:

{
  "category": "<category name>",
  "category_type": "<food|durable_goods|electronics|personal_care|service|other>",
  "locale": "<locale code, e.g. en-US, zh-CN, ja-JP>",
  "language": "<language code, e.g. en, zh, ja>",
  "currency": "<currency code, e.g. USD, CNY, JPY>",
  "evaluation_dimensions": [
    {"name":"dimension name","weight":0.25,"description":"description","key_parameters":["param1"],"data_sources":["source"]}
  ],
  "pain_point_keywords": {"safety":[],"quality":[],"experience":[],"trust":[]},
  "safety_risk_types": {"critical":[],"high":[],"medium":[],"low":[]},
  "platform_relevance": {
    "<platform_key>": <weight 0.0-1.0>,
    "...": "..."
  },
  "regional_platforms": {
    "<platform_key>": {
      "name": "<display name>",
      "site": "<domain>",
      "description": "<role description>",
      "base_weight": 0.8
    }
  },
  "category_positive_signals": [{"pattern_description":"description","regex_hint":"regex","score":15,"label":"label"}],
  "has_variant_issue": false,
  "variant_types": [],
  "variant_search_keywords": [],
  "non_commercial_indicators": [],
  "commercial_bias_sources": [],
  "regulatory_authorities": ["<relevant regulatory bodies for this region>"],
  "marketing_signals": {
    "high_neg": ["<region-specific marketing buzzwords/phrases>"],
    "medium_neg": ["<region-specific promotional patterns>"],
    "low_neg": ["<region-specific clickbait patterns>"]
  },
  "authenticity_signals": {
    "long_term_use": ["<region-specific long-term use phrases, e.g. 'used for 6 months', '半年使用感受'>"],
    "defect_description": ["<region-specific defect/complaint terms>"],
    "purchase_proof": ["<region-specific purchase proof terms, e.g. 'verified purchase', '已购买'>"],
    "time_units": ["<region-specific time expressions>"]
  },
  "ecommerce_search_strategy": {
    "enabled": true,
    "primary_platforms": ["<region-appropriate e-commerce platforms>"],
    "search_templates": {
      "review_aggregation": ["[product] <region-appropriate review search terms>"],
      "negative_reviews": ["[product] <region-appropriate negative review search terms>"],
      "long_term_reviews": ["[product] <region-appropriate long-term review search terms>"]
    },
    "high_value_indicators": ["<region-appropriate follow-up review indicators>"],
    "low_value_indicators": ["<region-appropriate fake/incentivized review indicators>"]
  },
  "comment_section_strategy": {
    "enabled": true,
    "primary_platforms": ["<region-appropriate social platforms>"],
    "search_templates": {
      "debunk_feedback": ["[product] <region-appropriate debunking search terms>"],
      "experience_sharing": ["[product] <region-appropriate real experience search terms>"]
    },
    "high_value_indicators": ["<region-appropriate real comment indicators>"],
    "low_value_indicators": ["<region-appropriate astroturfing comment indicators>"]
  },
  "safety_search_config": {
    "general_keywords": ["<region-appropriate recall/safety terms>"],
    "regulatory_keywords": ["<region-appropriate regulatory terms>"],
    "source_domains": ["<region-appropriate regulatory/news domains>"]
  },
  "report_labels": {
    "recommend": "<region-language recommendation label>",
    "conditional_recommend": "<region-language conditional recommendation label>",
    "caution": "<region-language caution label>",
    "avoid": "<region-language avoid label>",
    "high_credibility": "<region-language high credibility label>",
    "medium_credibility": "<region-language medium credibility label>",
    "low_credibility": "<region-language low credibility label>",
    "suspected_ad": "<region-language suspected ad label>",
    "sufficient": "<data sufficiency label>",
    "mostly_sufficient": "<mostly sufficient label>",
    "insufficient": "<insufficient label>",
    "severely_insufficient": "<severely insufficient label>"
  }
}

Constraints: 3-6 dimensions, max 0.4 weight per dimension, weights sum to 1.0. Platform weights adjusted per category. [product] placeholders in search_templates are replaced with actual product names during search.

CRITICAL: The regional_platforms, marketing_signals, authenticity_signals, ecommerce_search_strategy, comment_section_strategy, safety_search_config, and report_labels fields are ALL dynamically generated by the AI based on the detected locale. They must be in the user's language and appropriate for the user's region. The scripts will read these from the profile and use them instead of hardcoded defaults.

Step 2: Multi-layer Data Source Search (with E-commerce + Comment Section + Result Adaptation)

Search in 3 tiers from highest to lowest data source priority, ensuring high-value sources get priority coverage.

Step 2a: E-commerce Review Indirect Search (L1, ≥15% of total)

E-commerce platform reviews are dynamically loaded — search engines cannot directly index them. Use indirect strategies from ecommerce_search_strategy.search_templates.

Tag results with source_layer: "L1_ecommerce", base_weight: 0.85.

Step 2b: Social Comment Section Indirect Search (L2, ≥15% of total)

Search for real "debunking" feedback in comment sections. Use templates from comment_section_strategy.search_templates.

Tag results with source_layer: "L2_comment_section", base_weight: 0.75.

Step 2c: Forum Post + Independent Post Search (L3/L4, ≤70% of total)

Full mode: Use web_search + site: for targeted searches on platforms from regional_platforms. Fallback mode: Use python scripts/platform_search.py or python scripts/web_search_fallback.py --site [domain] instead.

Search Balance Strategy: 40% neutral + 20% positive + 40% negative.

Dual Time Window: Each search group combines current year (instant window) + no year limit (historical window).

Platform Priority: Sort by platform_relevance weight, skip platforms with weight < 0.2.

Search Keyword Construction (in the user's language):

  • Neutral: [product] [category] review comparison [key_parameters]
  • Positive: [product] [category] long-term use satisfied recommend
  • Negative: [product] [category] [pain_point_keywords.quality/experience/trust]

Search Result Adaptation:

SufficiencyConditionStrategy
SufficientTotal ≥30 AND ≥5 per productProceed normally
Mostly SufficientTotal ≥15 AND ≤1 product underservedSupplement search for underserved product
InsufficientTotal <15 OR multiple products underservedRemove site: restriction, expand time window, add platforms
Severely InsufficientTotal <8Niche category mode: lower scoring thresholds, note data limitations in report
python scripts/platform_search.py "[query]" --adaptive \
    --candidate-products "Product A,Product B,Product C" \
    --category-profile category_profile.json

Step 3: Content Fetching & Analysis

web_fetch to retrieve valuable posts (containing usage duration, multi-person discussion, no marketing keywords in title).

Step 3.5: Category Parameter Structured Extraction

Extract structured parameter tables for candidate products based on evaluation_dimensions[].key_parameters.

Step 4: Dynamic Deep Dive (with E-commerce Review Deep Dive)

Execute negative long-tail searches for high-frequency models, using keywords from pain_point_keywords.

E-commerce review deep dive: For each candidate model, execute additional e-commerce review searches using templates from the profile.

python scripts/deep_dive_search.py --auto-extract results.json --days 730 \
    --category-profile category_profile.json \
    --ecommerce-dive

Step 4.5: Safety Event Search

For each candidate brand, search for safety events across the web. Two-tier classification: general layer (recall/death/removal) + category layer (safety_risk_types). Use keywords from safety_search_config.

python scripts/deep_dive_search.py "[brand]" --days 365 \
    --category-profile category_profile.json

Step 5: Credibility Assessment

python scripts/credibility_scorer.py results.json --v2 --output scored.json --threshold 40 \
    --category-profile category_profile.json

Scoring Architecture: Regex pre-filter → Category signal injection (from profile) → AI semantic analysis (gray zone 30-85) → Weighted fusion

Step 5.5: Evidence Conflict Arbitration

When the same product receives contradictory reviews from different sources:

python scripts/conflict_resolver.py scored.json \
    --category-profile category_profile.json \
    --output conflicts.json

Arbitration rules: Non-commercial sources > commercial sources, long-term feedback > short-term feedback, high credibility > low credibility.

Step 6: Multi-dimensional Scoring

python scripts/brand_scorer.py scored.json \
    --category-profile category_profile.json \
    --safety-results safety.json \
    --output scores.json
ScoreVerdict
≥70Recommend (use report_labels.recommend)
55-69Conditional Recommend (use report_labels.conditional_recommend)
40-54Caution (use report_labels.caution)
<40Avoid (use report_labels.avoid)

Safety Capping: food (threshold 30) > personal_care (25) > electronics (20) > durable_goods (15)

Step 7: Report Generation

python scripts/generate_report.py scored.json \
    --query "[category]" --budget [budget] --pain-point "[pain point]" \
    --category-profile category_profile.json \
    --brand-scores scores.json \
    --output report.md

The report MUST be written in the user's language (as specified by category_profile.language). All section headers, verdicts, labels, and analysis text must match the user's language.

Key Rules (Non-skippable)

  1. Confirm requirements before searching — Budget, category, and use case are all mandatory; ask user if any are missing
  2. Never assume user needs — If user says "recommend a phone" without budget or use case, ask first
  3. Generate category_profile before searching — It is the foundation for all subsequent steps
  4. Search twice — After broad search, always do targeted negative deep dive on high-frequency models
  5. Append year to searches — Include current year and previous year
  6. Negative search ratio ≥40% — Actively search for negatives; finding none means search depth is insufficient
  7. Safety events MUST be searched — Top recommended brands must pass safety event screening
  8. Adapt search results — Expand when insufficient, trim when excessive
  9. High-engagement content needs scrutiny — High upvotes/likes ≠ authenticity (applies to Zhihu, Reddit, etc.)
  10. Prioritize long-term feedback — "Used for 2 years" is 10x more valuable than "just bought, looks great"
  11. Cross-validation is core — Commercial review says good + niche forum complains → trust the latter
  12. Profile is the sole category knowledge source — Script hardcoded values are only fallback
  13. E-commerce review layer is mandatory — Every research must include e-commerce review indirect search (L1), ≥15% of total
  14. Comment section layer is mandatory — Every research must include social comment section search (L2), ≥15% of total
  15. Follow-up reviews > unboxing — Long-term follow-up reviews (3+ months) are far more valuable than unboxing reviews
  16. Comment sections > post body — Real "debunking" feedback in comment sections takes priority over the post's own conclusions
  17. Match user's language throughout — ALL search queries, scoring labels, and the final report MUST be in the user's language

平台分布

OpenClaw

83.94%
按下载量换算2,008

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills