Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

anti-ai-writing反 AI 写作

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

2,328

周安装

146

GitHub Stars

9

下载量

816
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:anti-ai-writing(反 AI 写作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/cdeistopened/skill-stack
仓库路径:skills/anti-ai-writing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/cdeistopened/skill-stack --skill anti-ai-writing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/cdeistopened/skill-stack --skill anti-ai-writing

简介

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown 和内容稿件的整理与改写,提升文本可读性与真实性。

  • 检测并消除 AI 写作特征,如被动语态滥用、模糊指代与过度修饰,转为自然口语风格。
  • 基于写作基本原则重构内容结构,增强逻辑连贯性与读者代入感。
  • 使用时需保留项目已有事实与路径,不虚构未确认信息,对外文案需控制语气避免夸大。
  • anti-ai-writing 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Anti-AI Writing Engine

Transform any content into authentic, human-sounding prose by eliminating AI patterns and applying proven writing fundamentals.

Purpose

This skill serves as the core humanization engine for all written content. It detects and eliminates patterns that signal AI involvement while teaching the principles of natural, engaging writing.

Core Philosophy: The best writing is invisible. Readers should feel like they're reading a real person's thoughts - not processed, filtered, or generated content.

When to Use This Skill

  • Reviewing and humanizing AI-generated drafts
  • Writing content that must not appear AI-assisted
  • Editing any prose for authenticity and impact
  • Training yourself to avoid AI-like patterns
  • Quality-checking content before publication

Pairs well with: Voice style skills (voice-pirate-wires, voice-analytical, etc.) for writing in a specific author's style.


Universal Writing Fundamentals

Master these principles first, then layer on specific style choices.

1. Energy Transfer

The best writing is a transfer of energy from writer to reader.

  • Write conversations, not speeches
  • Speak WITH your audience, not AT them
  • Remove corporate jargon, academic language, and buzzwords

Example:

  • ❌ "The implementation of our innovative frameworks has demonstrated significant positive outcomes in terms of engagement metrics."
  • ✅ "Our new approach works. People are paying attention."

The second version transfers energy. Readers feel conviction, not formality.

2. Conciseness is King

Every word must earn its place.

Process:

  1. Write your first draft freely
  2. Read it aloud
  3. Delete anything that:

- Repeats an idea already stated - Softens your main point - Sounds formal instead of conversational - Takes more words than necessary

Example:

  • ❌ "Our approach incorporates multiple methodologies designed to accommodate diverse requirements and development patterns."
  • ✅ "We adapt to how you work."

3. The SUCKS Framework

Before writing anything, answer these questions:

S - Specific

  • Write for ONE person, not a crowd
  • Know their struggles, goals, language
  • If you write for everyone, you write for no one

U - Unique & Useful

  • Does this change how your reader thinks, feels, or acts?
  • Unique: they haven't seen this perspective before
  • Useful: they can actually apply this

C - Clear, Curious, Conversational

  • Clear: Main idea is unmissable
  • Curious: Questions that make readers think
  • Conversational: Reads like talking to a friend

K - Kept Simple & Structured

  • Simple ideas, simple words
  • Clear beginning, middle, end

S - Sticky

  • Memorable phrases they'll repeat
  • Ideas that lodge in memory

Application checklist:

  • Who is my ONE reader?
  • What will they think, feel, or do differently?
  • Could a 12-year-old understand the main point?
  • Does this flow like a conversation?

4. Be Undeniable

Transform vague claims into concrete specifics.

  • ❌ "How to boost your results by at least 87% in just one month."
  • ✅ "This year, I helped 13 clients boost their results by 87%-256% in just one month. Here's how:"

Pattern: Replace vague language with data, examples, specifics, or personal experience.

5. Craft Sticky Sentences

Use these techniques to create memorable statements:

Alliteration - Same starting sounds

  • "Specificity is the secret"
  • "The best jobs are neither decreed nor degreed"

Symmetry - Parallel structure

  • "Read for awareness. Write for understanding."
  • "It's not 10,000 hours. It's 10,000 iterations."

Contrast - Opposing ideas

  • "To be everywhere is to be nowhere."
  • "Be clear, not clever. Concise, not complex."

Rhyme - Similar ending sounds

  • "Tell a story or lose your glory"

Rhythm - Pleasing cadence

  • "When you can't wait to share it, they can't help but read it"

For maximum stickiness, combine techniques:

  • "Anger prepares us to fight. Fear prepares us to flee." (Symmetry + Alliteration)

See references/sticky-sentences.md for expanded examples.


Forbidden Patterns (AI Tells)

These patterns consistently signal AI involvement. Eliminate them aggressively.

The Correlative Construction (Most Common AI Tell)

This is the #1 pattern to avoid:

  • ❌ "X aren't just Y - they're Z"
  • ❌ "X isn't just about Y, it's about Z"
  • ❌ "Teachers aren't just instructors - they're mentors"

Why it's bad: This is the default structure AI models produce. Every AI writing sample uses this.

Better alternatives:

  • ✅ "Teachers mentor students"
  • ✅ "X accomplishes both Y and Z"
  • ✅ State the point directly

Forbidden Constructions

  • ❌ "It's not about X, it's about Y"
  • ❌ "The truth is..." / "The reality is..."
  • ❌ "Let that sink in"
  • ❌ "Now more than ever..."

Better: State your point directly without setup.

Forbidden Rhetorical Flourishes

  • ❌ "The best part?..."
  • ❌ "The secret?..."
  • ❌ "Sounds impossible? It's not."
  • ❌ "What if I told you..."
  • ❌ "Here's the thing..."
  • ❌ "Let's be honest..."
  • ❌ "At the end of the day..."

Forbidden Staccato Phrasing

Do not use faux-dramatic sentence fragments:

  • ❌ "No fluff. No filler. Just results."
  • ❌ "Big ideas. Small words. Maximum impact."
  • ❌ "Simple. Clear. Effective."
  • ❌ "Stop guessing. Start winning."

Forbidden Openers

  • ❌ "In the ever-evolving world of..."
  • ❌ "In today's fast-paced..."
  • ❌ "Gone are the days when..."
  • ❌ "This underscores..."
  • ❌ "In an era where..."

Formatting Restrictions

  • Do not use boldface for emphasis in body text
  • Do not use emojis unless explicitly requested
  • Do not add summaries like "In conclusion" or "In summary"
  • Do not rely on bullet points unless explicitly asked

Dash Usage

Use regular hyphens with spaces for parenthetical breaks - like this - not em dashes (—) or en dashes (–).

  • ✅ "Education is changing - and parents are noticing"
  • ❌ "Education is changing—and parents are noticing"

Anti-AI Pattern Detection

Beyond forbidden syntax, these patterns consistently signal AI involvement:

1. Overuse of "Just"

Problem: AI uses "just" constantly as a softener.

  • ❌ "We just need to understand that it's just about learning, and we just have to focus on what matters."
  • ✅ "It's about learning. Focus on what matters."

When "just" is acceptable: "just one question," "just in case," "just started"

When to remove it: Middle of sentences as a softener, more than once per paragraph

2. Overuse of "Actually"

Problem: AI uses "actually" to sound like it's adding nuance.

  • ❌ "It's actually about teaching, but actually about community, and students actually need both."
  • ✅ "It's about teaching. It's also about community. Students need both."

When acceptable: Correcting a previous misunderstanding

Limit: Once per 500 words maximum

3. Hedging Language

AI loves hedge words because they make uncertain claims safer. But they make writing weak.

Common hedges to eliminate:

  • ❌ "This might help you" → ✅ "This will help you"
  • ❌ "Some people say..." → ✅ "I've found that..."
  • ❌ "It could be argued that..." → ✅ "It's true that..."
  • ❌ "Perhaps we should consider..." → ✅ "We should..."
  • ❌ "One could say..." → ✅ "This is true because..."

Test: If you find "might," "could," "perhaps," "possibly," "maybe," "somewhat," or "it seems like," ask: Do I actually believe this? If yes, remove the hedge.

4. Passive Voice

Problem: AI defaults to passive voice because it's safer.

  • ❌ "It was determined that improvements were needed"
  • ✅ "We need to improve"
  • ❌ "It has been shown that users benefit from..."
  • ✅ "Users benefit from..."

Test: If you can't identify who's doing the action, it's passive. Rewrite with a subject.

5. Corporate Jargon

These signal over-processing:

  • ❌ "Leveraging synergies across stakeholder ecosystems"
  • ✅ "Getting different people talking to each other"
  • ❌ "Optimize engagement metrics"
  • ✅ "Get people paying attention"

Test: Would you say this to a friend? If not, rewrite it plainly.

6. Vague Language

AI tends toward vagueness because it's safer. Vague writing is weak writing.

  • ❌ "Our users improve" → ✅ "Users improve by 40% in 6 months"
  • ❌ "Many people think..." → ✅ "A survey found that 73% of users..."
  • ❌ "Significant improvements" → ✅ "Improvements of 23-47%"

Test: Can you back it up with a specific number, example, or name?

7. Too Many Transition Words

AI overuses transitions trying to seem sophisticated:

  • ❌ "Furthermore, it is important to note that, in addition to this, moreover..."
  • ✅ Strong structure needs fewer transitions

Limit transitions to: but, and, so, then, because

8. Overcomplicated Sentence Structure

AI loves long, complex sentences trying to sound smart.

  • ❌ "The multifaceted nature of contemporary paradigms, which encompasses diverse modalities and approaches, necessitates a comprehensive reevaluation of traditional methodologies."
  • ✅ "Things have changed. We need to rethink our approach."

The Humanization Workflow

Step 1: Understand Your Source

  • What's the core insight or story?
  • What's the emotional arc?
  • What's the most important takeaway?

Ask yourself:

  • What's being said that no one else is saying?
  • What will readers think, feel, or do differently?
  • What's the 30-second version?

Step 2: Apply the SUCKS Framework

  • Who is my ONE reader?
  • Is this unique and useful to them?
  • Can I make it clear, curious, and conversational?
  • How do I keep it simple and structured?
  • What will stick with them?

Step 3: Write or Edit the Draft

If writing fresh:

  1. Write freely without self-editing
  2. Get the ideas down first
  3. Polish in subsequent passes

If editing AI output:

  1. Read the entire draft
  2. Identify the core message
  3. Rewrite rather than patch

Step 4: Apply Sticky Sentences

Identify 2-3 most important statements and strengthen them:

  • Add alliteration, symmetry, contrast, or rhythm
  • Make them quotable
  • Make them memorable

Step 5: Eliminate AI Tells (Critical)

Go through systematically and remove:

  • Correlative constructions ("X aren't just Y, they're Z")
  • Overuse of "just" and "actually"
  • Hedge words (might, could, perhaps, seems)
  • Passive voice
  • Corporate jargon
  • Vague language (replace with specifics)
  • Forbidden patterns ("Let that sink in," etc.)
  • Too many transitions
  • Overcomplicated sentences

Test for each sentence: Would this sentence appear in a ChatGPT output? If yes, rewrite it.

Step 6: Read Aloud & Quality Check

Read your entire piece aloud:

  • Does it sound like a real person talking?
  • Does energy transfer (not feel formal)?
  • Is every sentence earning its place?
  • Do important ideas have sticky phrasing?
  • Are there obvious AI tells remaining?

If you answer "no" to any checkbox, fix it before publishing.


Quick Reference Checklists

The "Would a Human Write This?" Test

For each paragraph, ask:

  1. Does it sound like how I actually talk?
  2. Is there unnecessary formality?
  3. Are there words I'd never use in conversation?
  4. Does it take the long way to make a point?
  5. Does it hedge when I'm actually certain?

The AI Tell Scan

Before publishing, scan for:

  • "It's not X, it's Y" constructions
  • "Just" appearing more than once
  • "Actually" as sentence filler
  • Passive voice ("was determined," "has been shown")
  • Hedge words ("might," "could," "perhaps")
  • Corporate speak ("leverage," "optimize," "ecosystem")
  • Vague claims without specifics
  • Overused transitions ("furthermore," "moreover")
  • Complex sentences that could be simple
  • Rhetorical flourishes ("The best part?")

Elements of Effective Content

Include in your writing:

  1. Immediate attention - First sentence hooks
  2. Specific numbers - "1.5 million" not "many"
  3. Pattern interrupts - Surprise the reader
  4. Direct problem-addressing - Name the struggle
  5. Confidence - Eliminate hedge words
  6. Concrete benefits - "Double output in 30 days" not "boost productivity"
  7. Powerful questions - Make readers think
  8. Warnings/stakes - Create urgency

Bundled Resources

References

  • references/sticky-sentences.md - Extended guide to memorable phrasing
  • references/forbidden-patterns.md - Comprehensive list of AI tells
  • references/human-desires.md - 8 core desires that drive engagement

Related Skills

  • voice-analyzer - Create a custom voice style from writing samples
  • voice-[style] - Write in a specific author's voice
  • transcript-polisher - Clean spoken content while preserving authenticity
  • hook-and-headline-writing - Craft attention-grabbing headlines

*This skill is the foundation of the writing quality system. Use it standalone for basic humanization, or combine with voice styles for authentic, distinctive content.*

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.15%
按下载量换算287

Claude

30.28%
按下载量换算247

Cursor

16.9%
按下载量换算138

Gemini CLI

8.46%
按下载量换算69

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills