Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维和基础设施敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

standupstandup 搜索

Agent Skill

standup 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

256

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

90
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:standup(standup 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anortham/goldfish
仓库路径:skills/standup
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/anortham/goldfish --skill standup
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/anortham/goldfish --skill standup

简介

standup 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。
  • 生成跨项目状态报告,汇总已完成工作、下一步计划与阻塞问题。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/anortham/goldfish --skill standup。
  • 需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或命令执行。

SKILL.md

Standup — Cross-Project Status Report

What This Does

Generates a concise standup report by recalling checkpoints across all workspaces and reviewing active plans from multiple sources. Covers what happened, what's next, and what's stuck.

How to Generate a Standup

Step 1: Recall cross-project activity

mcp__goldfish__recall({ workspace: "all", days: 1 })

For a Monday standup covering the weekend:

mcp__goldfish__recall({ workspace: "all", days: 3 })

For a custom range:

mcp__goldfish__recall({ workspace: "all", from: "2026-02-10", to: "2026-02-14" })

Step 2: Gather plans from ALL sources

Plans may exist in two locations per project. Check BOTH:

Source 1: Goldfish plans — already included in recall output if an active plan exists.

Source 2: Project plan docs — scan docs/plans/*.md in each project that appeared in the recall results. Read files modified in the last 14 days (skip older ones — they're likely completed). Look at the **Status:** field in the header of each file.

Step 3: Assess plan status from evidence

Do NOT blindly trust the Status field in plan docs. Cross-reference against checkpoints:

  • Status says "Approved" + checkpoints show all tasks done → effectively complete, note as done
  • Status says "Approved" + checkpoints show partial progress → in progress, report remaining items
  • Status says "Approved" + no checkpoint activity → upcoming work, report as planned
  • Status says "Complete" → trust it, skip or mention briefly as done

For Goldfish plans (from recall), use the plan's status field directly — it's managed by the agent via the plan tool.

Step 4: Synthesize the report

Report Format

Structure the standup with these rules:

  • One bullet per accomplishment. Each on its own line for easy scanning.
  • Lead with impact, not activity. "Shipped auth refresh tokens" not "Worked on auth."
  • Use past tense for done items. "Fixed," "Implemented," "Shipped."
  • Blockquote (>) for forward-looking items. Visually separates past from future.
  • Abbreviated month names in headers. Feb 14 not February 14.
  • Date range in header when covering multiple days (Feb 12–14, 2026).
  • Always state blockers explicitly. If none, say "Nothing currently blocked."

Multi-Project Format

When checkpoints span multiple projects, group by project with bullets for accomplishments, blockquotes for next/blocked, and plan references:

## Standup — Feb 14, 2026

### goldfish
- Implemented 4 skill files with behavioral language patterns
- Converted tool handlers from JSON to markdown output
> Next: Test skills with live agent sessions
> Plan: v5.1 skills refresh — 2/4 tasks complete (docs/plans/2026-02-16-v5.1-implementation.md)

### api-gateway
- Fixed rate limiter race condition in Redis cluster mode
- Added integration tests for multi-node scenarios
> Next: Deploy to staging, run load tests
> Blocked: Waiting on DevOps for staging Redis cluster

Single-Project Format

When all checkpoints are from a single project, drop the project grouping and use section headers:

## Standup — Feb 14, 2026

### Done
- Implemented 4 skill files with behavioral language patterns
- Converted tool handlers from JSON to markdown output

### Up Next
- Test skills with live agent sessions
- v5.1 skills refresh: workspace env var implementation (2/4 tasks complete)

### Blocked
- Nothing currently blocked

Synthesis Rules

  • Be concise. A standup is 2 minutes, not 20. One line per accomplishment.
  • Group by theme. Five checkpoints about "auth" become one bullet: "Implemented auth token refresh with rotation."
  • Highlight blockers prominently. These are the most actionable items in a standup.
  • Skip noise. Minor refactors, formatting changes, and config tweaks don't need individual mentions unless they were the main work.
  • Use past tense for accomplishments. "Shipped," "Fixed," "Implemented" — not "Working on" for done items.
  • Surface decisions. If a checkpoint captured an architectural decision, mention it briefly — the team may need to know.
  • Include plan progress. When active plans exist, include a brief progress summary (e.g., "3/5 tasks complete") in the Up Next section.

Handling Edge Cases

No checkpoints found

Report honestly: "No activity recorded in the requested period." Don't fabricate.

Single project only

Use the single-project format above (Done / Up Next / Blocked sections).

Too many checkpoints (20+)

Be more aggressive about grouping. Summarize by theme rather than listing individual items. A standup with 15 bullet points defeats the purpose.

No plans found

That's fine — just skip the plan progress lines. Not every project has active plans.

Plans in docs/plans/ but no Goldfish plan

Include them in the forward-looking section. Plans don't need to be in Goldfish to be useful for standup.

Critical Rules

  • Do NOT ask the user what to include. Recall gives you everything. Synthesize it yourself.
  • Do NOT fabricate activity. Only report what checkpoints actually show.
  • Keep it standup-length. If your report is more than a screenful, you're being too verbose.
  • Include dates when covering multi-day ranges so the reader knows the timeline.
  • Check BOTH plan sources. .memories/plans/ (via recall) AND docs/plans/ (via file reading). Missing one source means an incomplete forward-looking view.
  • Infer plan status from evidence. Don't trust stale Status headers — verify against checkpoint activity.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.91%
按下载量换算31

Claude

31.13%
按下载量换算28

Cursor

19.14%
按下载量换算17

Gemini CLI

8.74%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills