Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls(pydantic ai 常见陷阱)

pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 20,356。

总安装 5,242周安装 210GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,697核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls(pydantic ai 常见陷阱)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anderskev/pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls
安装命令:
openclaw skills install pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

避免 PydanticAI 代理中的常见错误和调试问题。在遇到错误、意外行为或检查代理实现时使用。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,242 次,近一周安装 210 次,下载 1,697 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls

pydantic ai 常见陷阱 · 本页

5,242—接触敏感数据MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls
description
Avoid common mistakes and debug issues in PydanticAI agents. Use when encountering errors, unexpected behavior, or when reviewing agent implementations.

PydanticAI Common Pitfalls and Debugging

Tool Decorator Errors

Wrong: RunContext in tool_plain

# ERROR: RunContext not allowed in tool_plain
@agent.tool_plain
async def bad_tool(ctx: RunContext[MyDeps]) -> str:
    return "oops"
# UserError: RunContext annotations can only be used with tools that take context

Fix: Use @agent.tool if you need context:

@agent.tool
async def good_tool(ctx: RunContext[MyDeps]) -> str:
    return "works"

Wrong: Missing RunContext in tool

# ERROR: First param must be RunContext
@agent.tool
def bad_tool(user_id: int) -> str:
    return "oops"
# UserError: First parameter of tools that take context must be annotated with RunContext[...]

Fix: Add RunContext as first parameter:

@agent.tool
def good_tool(ctx: RunContext[MyDeps], user_id: int) -> str:
    return "works"

Wrong: RunContext not first

# ERROR: RunContext must be first parameter
@agent.tool
def bad_tool(user_id: int, ctx: RunContext[MyDeps]) -> str:
    return "oops"

Fix: RunContext must always be the first parameter.

Valid Patterns (Not Errors)

Raw Function Tool Registration

The following pattern IS valid and supported by pydantic-ai:

from pydantic_ai import Agent, RunContext

async def search_db(ctx: RunContext[MyDeps], query: str) -> list[dict]:
    """Search the database."""
    return await ctx.deps.db.search(query)

async def get_user(ctx: RunContext[MyDeps], user_id: int) -> dict:
    """Get user by ID."""
    return await ctx.deps.db.get_user(user_id)

# Valid: Pass raw functions to Agent(tools=[...])
agent = Agent(
    'openai:gpt-4o',
    deps_type=MyDeps,
    tools=[search_db, get_user]  # RunContext detected from signature
)

Why this works: PydanticAI inspects function signatures. If the first parameter is RunContext[T], it's treated as a context-aware tool. No decorator required.

Reference: https://ai.pydantic.dev/agents/#registering-tools-via-the-tools-argument

Do NOT flag code that passes functions with RunContext signatures to Agent(tools=[...]). This is equivalent to using @agent.tool and is explicitly documented.

Dependency Type Mismatches

Wrong: Missing deps at runtime

agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', deps_type=MyDeps)

# ERROR: deps required but not provided
result = agent.run_sync('Hello')  # Missing deps!

Fix: Always provide deps when deps_type is set:

result = agent.run_sync('Hello', deps=MyDeps(...))

Wrong: Wrong deps type

@dataclass
class AppDeps:
    db: Database

@dataclass
class WrongDeps:
    api: ApiClient

agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', deps_type=AppDeps)

# Type error: WrongDeps != AppDeps
result = agent.run_sync('Hello', deps=WrongDeps(...))

Output Type Issues

Pydantic validation fails

class Response(BaseModel):
    count: int
    items: list[str]

agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', output_type=Response)
result = agent.run_sync('List items')
# May fail if LLM returns wrong structure

Fix: Increase retries or improve prompt:

agent = Agent(
    'openai:gpt-4o',
    output_type=Response,
    retries=3,  # More attempts
    instructions='Return JSON with count (int) and items (list of strings).'
)

Complex nested types

# May cause schema issues with some models
class Complex(BaseModel):
    nested: dict[str, list[tuple[int, str]]]

Fix: Simplify or use intermediate models:

class Item(BaseModel):
    id: int
    name: str

class Simple(BaseModel):
    items: list[Item]

Async vs Sync Mistakes

Wrong: Calling async in sync context

# ERROR: Can't await in sync function
def handler():
    result = await agent.run('Hello')  # SyntaxError!

Fix: Use run_sync or make handler async:

def handler():
    result = agent.run_sync('Hello')

# Or
async def handler():
    result = await agent.run('Hello')

Wrong: Blocking in async tools

@agent.tool
async def slow_tool(ctx: RunContext[Deps]) -> str:
    time.sleep(5)  # WRONG: Blocks event loop!
    return "done"

Fix: Use async I/O:

@agent.tool
async def slow_tool(ctx: RunContext[Deps]) -> str:
    await asyncio.sleep(5)  # Correct
    return "done"

Model Configuration Errors

Missing API key

# ERROR: OPENAI_API_KEY not set
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o')
result = agent.run_sync('Hello')
# ModelAPIError: Authentication failed

Fix: Set environment variable or use defer_model_check:

# For testing
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', defer_model_check=True)
with agent.override(model=TestModel()):
    result = agent.run_sync('Hello')

Invalid model string

# ERROR: Unknown provider
agent = Agent('unknown:model')
# ValueError: Unknown model provider

Fix: Use valid provider:model format.

Streaming Issues

Wrong: Using result before stream completes

async with agent.run_stream('Hello') as response:
    # DON'T access .output before streaming completes
    print(response.output)  # May be incomplete!

# Correct: access after context manager
print(response.output)  # Complete result

Wrong: Not iterating stream

async with agent.run_stream('Hello') as response:
    pass  # Never consumed!

# Stream was never read - output may be incomplete

Fix: Always consume the stream:

async with agent.run_stream('Hello') as response:
    async for chunk in response.stream_output():
        print(chunk, end='')

Tool Return Issues

Wrong: Returning non-serializable

@agent.tool_plain
def bad_return() -> object:
    return CustomObject()  # Can't serialize!

Fix: Return serializable types (str, dict, Pydantic model):

@agent.tool_plain
def good_return() -> dict:
    return {"key": "value"}

Debugging Tips

Gates (ambiguous failures)

When the agent misbehaves but the stack trace or error string is unclear, follow in order; do not skip ahead.

  1. Capture evidence — Re-run with capture_run_messages() or, after run/run_sync, inspect result.all_messages() (or print message types in order). Pass: You can name the message part type and one line of content that explains the failure (e.g. RetryPromptPart, tool return, model text).
  2. Separate model from schema — If validation or RetryPromptPart appears, compare the last model message to your output_type fields and types. Pass: You identified a concrete mismatch (missing field, wrong type, refusal) before only raising retries or changing the model.
  3. Confirm deps on every path — If tools or deps fail, verify each call site (run, run_sync, run_stream) supplies deps=... when deps_type is set. Pass: A minimal repro with explicit deps matches or rules out a deps wiring bug.

Enable tracing

import logfire
logfire.configure()
logfire.instrument_pydantic_ai()

# Or per-agent
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4o', instrument=True)

Capture messages

from pydantic_ai import capture_run_messages

with capture_run_messages() as messages:
    result = agent.run_sync('Hello')

for msg in messages:
    print(type(msg).__name__, msg)

Check model responses

result = agent.run_sync('Hello')
print(result.all_messages())  # Full message history
print(result.response)  # Last model response
print(result.usage())  # Token usage

Common Error Messages

ErrorCauseFix
First parameter... RunContext@agent.tool missing ctxAdd ctx: RunContext[...]
RunContext... only... context@agent.tool_plain has ctxRemove ctx or use @agent.tool
Unknown model providerInvalid model stringUse valid provider:model
ModelAPIErrorAPI auth/quotaCheck API key, limits
RetryPromptPart in messagesValidation failedCheck output_type, increase retries

平台分布

OpenClaw

83.18%
按下载量换算1,412

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills