Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

go-code-review进行代码审查

Agent Skill

go-code-review 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

5,191

周安装

223

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,820
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:go-code-review(进行代码审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anderskev/go-code-review
安装命令:
openclaw skills install go-code-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install go-code-review

简介

go-code-review 用于检查 Go 代码的惯用写法、错误处理和并发安全。

  • 适合识别 goroutine 泄漏和锁竞争风险。
  • 可发现接口设计和资源管理常见问题。go-code-review 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 使用前需确认项目为 .go 文件结构。
  • 建议结合 go vet 等工具交叉验证建议。

SKILL.md

name
go-code-review
description
Reviews Go code for idiomatic patterns, error handling, concurrency safety, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .go files, checking error handling, goroutine usage, or interface design. Covers generics (Go 1.18+), errors.Join and slog (Go 1.21+), and Go 1.22 loop variable semantics.

Go Code Review

Review Workflow

Follow this sequence in order. Do not emit findings until every Pass below is satisfied.

  1. Baseline go.mod — Open go.mod and read the go directive.

Pass: You can state the exact go X.YY value (in the review preamble or working notes). Apply version-gated advice only when it matches this baseline (loop capture pre-1.22, slog/structured logging from 1.21, errors.Join from 1.20).

  1. Read surrounding code — For each changed .go file, read full functions or logical units that contain the edits, not only the diff hunk.

Pass: At least one full enclosing function (or package-level init/var block) containing the change was read per changed file.

  1. Scope the checklist — Decide which Review Checklist blocks apply (error handling, concurrency, interfaces/types, resources, naming). Load references for those blocks; skip blocks that are irrelevant to the diff.

Pass: The review (or working notes) lists which checklist blocks you applied, or marks blocks N/A with a one-line reason tied to the diff (e.g. “no concurrency in change”).

  1. Pre-report verification — Load and follow review-verification-protocol.

Pass: The protocol’s Pre-Report Verification Checklist is satisfied for each finding you will report (actual code read, surrounding context checked, “wrong” vs “different style” distinguished, etc.).

Hard gates (same sequence, shorter)

StepObjective pass condition
1go X.YY from go.mod is recorded before version-specific advice.
2Full enclosing context read per changed file, not diff-only.
3In-scope checklist blocks listed or N/A with diff-tied reason; references opened as needed.
4review-verification-protocol completed for every reported issue.

Output Format

Report findings as:

[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
Missing error checks, wrapping, errors.Joinreferences/error-handling.md
Race conditions, channel misuse, goroutine lifecyclereferences/concurrency.md
Interface pollution, naming, genericsreferences/interfaces.md
Resource leaks, defer misuse, slog, namingreferences/common-mistakes.md

Review Checklist

Error Handling

  • [ ] All errors checked (no _ = err without justifying comment)
  • [ ] Errors wrapped with context (fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err))
  • [ ] errors.Is/errors.As used instead of string matching
  • [ ] errors.Join used for aggregating multiple errors (Go 1.20+)
  • [ ] Zero values returned alongside errors

Concurrency

  • [ ] No goroutine leaks (context cancellation or shutdown signal exists)
  • [ ] Channels closed by sender only, exactly once
  • [ ] Shared state protected by mutex or sync types
  • [ ] WaitGroups used to wait for goroutine completion
  • [ ] Context propagated through call chain
  • [ ] Loop variable capture handled (pre-Go 1.22 codebases only)

Interfaces and Types

  • [ ] Interfaces defined by consumers, not producers
  • [ ] Interface names follow -er convention
  • [ ] Interfaces minimal (1-3 methods)
  • [ ] Concrete types returned from constructors
  • [ ] any preferred over interface{} (Go 1.18+)
  • [ ] Generics used where appropriate instead of any or code generation

Resources and Lifecycle

  • [ ] Resources closed with defer immediately after creation
  • [ ] HTTP response bodies always closed
  • [ ] No defer in loops without closure wrapping
  • [ ] init() functions avoided in favor of explicit initialization

Naming and Style

  • [ ] Exported names have doc comments
  • [ ] No stuttering names (user.UserServiceuser.Service)
  • [ ] No naked returns in functions > 5 lines
  • [ ] Context passed as first parameter
  • [ ] slog used over log for structured logging (Go 1.21+)

Severity Calibration

Critical (Block Merge)

  • Unchecked errors on I/O, network, or database operations
  • Goroutine leaks (no shutdown path)
  • Race conditions on shared state (concurrent map access without sync)
  • Unbounded resource accumulation (defer in loop, unclosed connections)

Major (Should Fix)

  • Errors returned without context (bare return err)
  • Missing WaitGroup for spawned goroutines
  • panic for recoverable errors
  • Context not propagated to downstream calls

Minor (Consider Fixing)

  • interface{} instead of any in Go 1.18+ codebases
  • Missing doc comments on exports
  • Stuttering names
  • Slice not preallocated when size is known

Informational (Note Only)

  • Suggestions to add generics where code generation exists
  • Refactoring ideas for interface design
  • Performance optimizations without measured impact

When to Load References

  • Reviewing error return patterns → error-handling.md
  • Reviewing goroutines, channels, or sync types → concurrency.md
  • Reviewing type definitions, interfaces, or generics → interfaces.md
  • General review (resources, naming, init, performance) → common-mistakes.md

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These are acceptable Go patterns — reporting them wastes developer time:

  • _ = err with reason comment — Intentionally ignored errors with explanation
  • Empty interface / any — For truly generic code or interop with untyped APIs
  • Naked returns in short functions — Acceptable in functions < 5 lines with named returns
  • Channel without close — When consumer stops via context cancellation, not channel close
  • Mutex protecting struct fields — Even if accessed only via methods, this is correct encapsulation
  • //nolint directives with reason — Acceptable when accompanied by explanation
  • Defer in loop — When function scope cleanup is intentional (e.g., processing files in batches)
  • Functional options patterntype Option func(*T) with With* constructors is idiomatic
  • sync.Pool for hot paths — Acceptable for reducing allocation pressure in performance-critical code
  • context.Background() in main/tests — Valid root context for top-level calls
  • select with default — Non-blocking channel operation, intentional pattern
  • Short variable names in small scopei, err, ctx, ok are idiomatic Go

Context-Sensitive Rules

Only flag these issues when the specific conditions apply:

IssueFlag ONLY IF
Missing error checkError return is actionable (can retry, log, or propagate)
Goroutine leakNo context cancellation path exists for the goroutine
Missing deferResource isn't explicitly closed before next acquisition or return
Interface pollutionInterface has > 1 method AND only one consumer exists
Loop variable capturego.mod specifies Go < 1.22
Missing sloggo.mod specifies Go >= 1.21 AND code uses log package for structured output

Before Submitting Findings

Satisfy step 4 in Review Workflow: load review-verification-protocol and complete its pre-report checks for each issue.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

71.61%
按下载量换算1,303

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills