Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

go-code-review(进行代码审查)

go-code-review 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

go-code-review 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 20,501。

总安装 5,191周安装 223GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,820核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.3.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:go-code-review(进行代码审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anderskev/go-code-review
安装命令:
openclaw skills install go-code-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install go-code-review

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

go-code-review 用于检查 Go 代码的惯用写法、错误处理和并发安全。适合识别 goroutine 泄漏和锁竞争风险。可发现接口设计和资源管理常见问题。go-code-review 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。使用前需确认项目为 .go 文件结构。

建议结合 go vet 等工具交叉验证建议。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install go-code-review;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

go-code-review 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install go-code-review。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

go-code-review 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

go-code-review 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

go-code-review 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

go-code-review 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,191 次,近一周安装 223 次,下载 1,820 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

go-code-review 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
go-code-review

进行代码审查 · 本页

5,191—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
go-code-review
description
Reviews Go code for idiomatic patterns, error handling, concurrency safety, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .go files, checking error handling, goroutine usage, or interface design. Covers generics (Go 1.18+), errors.Join and slog (Go 1.21+), and Go 1.22 loop variable semantics.

Go Code Review

Review Workflow

Follow this sequence in order. Do not emit findings until every Pass below is satisfied.

  1. Baseline go.mod — Open go.mod and read the go directive.

Pass: You can state the exact go X.YY value (in the review preamble or working notes). Apply version-gated advice only when it matches this baseline (loop capture pre-1.22, slog/structured logging from 1.21, errors.Join from 1.20).

  1. Read surrounding code — For each changed .go file, read full functions or logical units that contain the edits, not only the diff hunk.

Pass: At least one full enclosing function (or package-level init/var block) containing the change was read per changed file.

  1. Scope the checklist — Decide which Review Checklist blocks apply (error handling, concurrency, interfaces/types, resources, naming). Load references for those blocks; skip blocks that are irrelevant to the diff.

Pass: The review (or working notes) lists which checklist blocks you applied, or marks blocks N/A with a one-line reason tied to the diff (e.g. “no concurrency in change”).

  1. Pre-report verification — Load and follow review-verification-protocol.

Pass: The protocol’s Pre-Report Verification Checklist is satisfied for each finding you will report (actual code read, surrounding context checked, “wrong” vs “different style” distinguished, etc.).

Hard gates (same sequence, shorter)

StepObjective pass condition
1go X.YY from go.mod is recorded before version-specific advice.
2Full enclosing context read per changed file, not diff-only.
3In-scope checklist blocks listed or N/A with diff-tied reason; references opened as needed.
4review-verification-protocol completed for every reported issue.

Output Format

Report findings as:

[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
Missing error checks, wrapping, errors.Joinreferences/error-handling.md
Race conditions, channel misuse, goroutine lifecyclereferences/concurrency.md
Interface pollution, naming, genericsreferences/interfaces.md
Resource leaks, defer misuse, slog, namingreferences/common-mistakes.md

Review Checklist

Error Handling

  • [ ] All errors checked (no _ = err without justifying comment)
  • [ ] Errors wrapped with context (fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err))
  • [ ] errors.Is/errors.As used instead of string matching
  • [ ] errors.Join used for aggregating multiple errors (Go 1.20+)
  • [ ] Zero values returned alongside errors

Concurrency

  • [ ] No goroutine leaks (context cancellation or shutdown signal exists)
  • [ ] Channels closed by sender only, exactly once
  • [ ] Shared state protected by mutex or sync types
  • [ ] WaitGroups used to wait for goroutine completion
  • [ ] Context propagated through call chain
  • [ ] Loop variable capture handled (pre-Go 1.22 codebases only)

Interfaces and Types

  • [ ] Interfaces defined by consumers, not producers
  • [ ] Interface names follow -er convention
  • [ ] Interfaces minimal (1-3 methods)
  • [ ] Concrete types returned from constructors
  • [ ] any preferred over interface{} (Go 1.18+)
  • [ ] Generics used where appropriate instead of any or code generation

Resources and Lifecycle

  • [ ] Resources closed with defer immediately after creation
  • [ ] HTTP response bodies always closed
  • [ ] No defer in loops without closure wrapping
  • [ ] init() functions avoided in favor of explicit initialization

Naming and Style

  • [ ] Exported names have doc comments
  • [ ] No stuttering names (user.UserService → user.Service)
  • [ ] No naked returns in functions > 5 lines
  • [ ] Context passed as first parameter
  • [ ] slog used over log for structured logging (Go 1.21+)

Severity Calibration

Critical (Block Merge)

  • Unchecked errors on I/O, network, or database operations
  • Goroutine leaks (no shutdown path)
  • Race conditions on shared state (concurrent map access without sync)
  • Unbounded resource accumulation (defer in loop, unclosed connections)

Major (Should Fix)

  • Errors returned without context (bare return err)
  • Missing WaitGroup for spawned goroutines
  • panic for recoverable errors
  • Context not propagated to downstream calls

Minor (Consider Fixing)

  • interface{} instead of any in Go 1.18+ codebases
  • Missing doc comments on exports
  • Stuttering names
  • Slice not preallocated when size is known

Informational (Note Only)

  • Suggestions to add generics where code generation exists
  • Refactoring ideas for interface design
  • Performance optimizations without measured impact

When to Load References

  • Reviewing error return patterns → error-handling.md
  • Reviewing goroutines, channels, or sync types → concurrency.md
  • Reviewing type definitions, interfaces, or generics → interfaces.md
  • General review (resources, naming, init, performance) → common-mistakes.md

Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

These are acceptable Go patterns — reporting them wastes developer time:

  • _ = err with reason comment — Intentionally ignored errors with explanation
  • Empty interface / any — For truly generic code or interop with untyped APIs
  • Naked returns in short functions — Acceptable in functions < 5 lines with named returns
  • Channel without close — When consumer stops via context cancellation, not channel close
  • Mutex protecting struct fields — Even if accessed only via methods, this is correct encapsulation
  • //nolint directives with reason — Acceptable when accompanied by explanation
  • Defer in loop — When function scope cleanup is intentional (e.g., processing files in batches)
  • Functional options pattern — type Option func(*T) with With* constructors is idiomatic
  • sync.Pool for hot paths — Acceptable for reducing allocation pressure in performance-critical code
  • context.Background() in main/tests — Valid root context for top-level calls
  • select with default — Non-blocking channel operation, intentional pattern
  • Short variable names in small scope — i, err, ctx, ok are idiomatic Go

Context-Sensitive Rules

Only flag these issues when the specific conditions apply:

IssueFlag ONLY IF
Missing error checkError return is actionable (can retry, log, or propagate)
Goroutine leakNo context cancellation path exists for the goroutine
Missing deferResource isn't explicitly closed before next acquisition or return
Interface pollutionInterface has > 1 method AND only one consumer exists
Loop variable capturego.mod specifies Go < 1.22
Missing sloggo.mod specifies Go >= 1.21 AND code uses log package for structured output

Before Submitting Findings

Satisfy step 4 in Review Workflow: load review-verification-protocol and complete its pre-report checks for each issue.

平台分布

OpenClaw

71.61%
按下载量换算1,303

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills