Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

deepagents-architecture(深度 Agent 架构)

deepagents-architecture 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

deepagents-architecture 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 20,516。

总安装 5,190周安装 212GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,679核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:deepagents-architecture(深度 Agent 架构)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anderskev/deepagents-architecture
安装命令:
openclaw skills install deepagents-architecture
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install deepagents-architecture

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

deepagents-architecture 用于指导深度代理系统的架构选型与模块划分。适合在多种代理范式间做出技术决策。可协助选择后端策略和子系统边界。deepagents-architecture 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。使用前需明确项目目标和资源约束。

建议结合具体用例验证架构方案的适用性。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install deepagents-architecture;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

deepagents-architecture 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install deepagents-architecture。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

deepagents-architecture 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

deepagents-architecture 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

deepagents-architecture 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

deepagents-architecture 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,190 次,近一周安装 212 次,下载 1,679 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

deepagents-architecture 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
deepagents-architecture

深度 Agent 架构 · 本页

5,190—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
deepagents-architecture
description
Guides architectural decisions for Deep Agents applications. Use when deciding between Deep Agents vs alternatives, choosing backend strategies, designing subagent systems, or selecting middleware approaches.

Deep Agents Architecture Decisions

When to Use Deep Agents

Use Deep Agents When You Need:

  • Long-horizon tasks - Complex workflows spanning dozens of tool calls
  • Planning capabilities - Task decomposition before execution
  • Filesystem operations - Reading, writing, and editing files
  • Subagent delegation - Isolated task execution with separate context windows
  • Persistent memory - Long-term storage across conversations
  • Human-in-the-loop - Approval gates for sensitive operations
  • Context management - Auto-summarization for long conversations

Consider Alternatives When:

ScenarioAlternativeWhy
Single LLM callDirect API callDeep Agents overhead not justified
Simple RAG pipelineLangChain LCELSimpler abstraction
Custom graph control flowLangGraph directlyMore flexibility
No file operations neededcreate_react_agentLighter weight
Stateless tool useFunction callingNo middleware needed

Backend Selection

Backend Comparison

BackendPersistenceUse CaseRequires
StateBackendEphemeral (per-thread)Working files, temp dataNothing (default)
FilesystemBackendDiskLocal development, real filesroot_dir path
StoreBackendCross-threadUser preferences, knowledge basesLangGraph store
CompositeBackendMixedHybrid memory patternsMultiple backends

Backend Decision Tree

Need real disk access?
├─ Yes → FilesystemBackend(root_dir="/path")
└─ No
   └─ Need persistence across conversations?
      ├─ Yes → Need mixed ephemeral + persistent?
      │  ├─ Yes → CompositeBackend
      │  └─ No → StoreBackend
      └─ No → StateBackend (default)

CompositeBackend Routing

Route different paths to different storage backends:

from deepagents import create_deep_agent
from deepagents.backends import CompositeBackend, StateBackend, StoreBackend

agent = create_deep_agent(
    backend=CompositeBackend(
        default=StateBackend(),  # Working files (ephemeral)
        routes={
            "/memories/": StoreBackend(store=store),    # Persistent
            "/preferences/": StoreBackend(store=store), # Persistent
        },
    ),
)

Subagent Architecture

When to Use Subagents

Use subagents when:

  • Task is complex, multi-step, and can run independently
  • Task requires heavy context that would bloat the main thread
  • Multiple independent tasks can run in parallel
  • You need isolated execution (sandboxing)
  • You only care about the final result, not intermediate steps

Don't use subagents when:

  • Task is trivial (few tool calls)
  • You need to see intermediate reasoning
  • Splitting adds latency without benefit
  • Task depends on main thread state mid-execution

Subagent Patterns

Pattern 1: Parallel Research
         ┌─────────────┐
         │  Orchestrator│
         └──────┬──────┘
    ┌──────────┼──────────┐
    ▼          ▼          ▼
┌──────┐  ┌──────┐  ┌──────┐
│Task A│  │Task B│  │Task C│
└──┬───┘  └──┬───┘  └──┬───┘
   └──────────┼──────────┘
              ▼
      ┌─────────────┐
      │  Synthesize │
      └─────────────┘

Best for: Research on multiple topics, parallel analysis, batch processing.

Pattern 2: Specialized Agents
research_agent = {
    "name": "researcher",
    "description": "Deep research on complex topics",
    "system_prompt": "You are an expert researcher...",
    "tools": [web_search, document_reader],
}

coder_agent = {
    "name": "coder",
    "description": "Write and review code",
    "system_prompt": "You are an expert programmer...",
    "tools": [code_executor, linter],
}

agent = create_deep_agent(subagents=[research_agent, coder_agent])

Best for: Domain-specific expertise, different tool sets per task type.

Pattern 3: Pre-compiled Subagents
from deepagents import CompiledSubAgent, create_deep_agent

# Use existing LangGraph graph as subagent
custom_graph = create_react_agent(model=..., tools=...)

agent = create_deep_agent(
    subagents=[CompiledSubAgent(
        name="custom-workflow",
        description="Runs specialized workflow",
        runnable=custom_graph
    )]
)

Best for: Reusing existing LangGraph graphs, complex custom workflows.

Middleware Architecture

Built-in Middleware Stack

Deep Agents applies middleware in this order:

  1. TodoListMiddleware - Task planning with write_todos/read_todos
  2. FilesystemMiddleware - File ops: ls, read_file, write_file, edit_file, glob, grep, execute
  3. SubAgentMiddleware - Delegation via task tool
  4. SummarizationMiddleware - Auto-summarizes at ~85% context or 170k tokens
  5. AnthropicPromptCachingMiddleware - Caches system prompts (Anthropic only)
  6. PatchToolCallsMiddleware - Fixes dangling tool calls from interruptions
  7. HumanInTheLoopMiddleware - Pauses for approval (if interrupt_on configured)

Custom Middleware Placement

from langchain.agents.middleware import AgentMiddleware

class MyMiddleware(AgentMiddleware):
    tools = [my_custom_tool]

    def transform_request(self, request):
        # Modify system prompt, inject context
        return request

    def transform_response(self, response):
        # Post-process, log, filter
        return response

# Custom middleware added AFTER built-in stack
agent = create_deep_agent(middleware=[MyMiddleware()])

Middleware vs Tools Decision

NeedUse MiddlewareUse Tools
Inject system prompt content✅❌
Add tools dynamically✅❌
Transform requests/responses✅❌
Standalone capability❌✅
User-invokable action❌✅

Subagent Middleware Inheritance

Subagents receive their own middleware stack by default:

  • TodoListMiddleware
  • FilesystemMiddleware (shared backend)
  • SummarizationMiddleware
  • AnthropicPromptCachingMiddleware
  • PatchToolCallsMiddleware

Override with default_middleware=[] in SubAgentMiddleware or per-subagent middleware key.

Gates: architecture decisions before implementation

Complete in order. A step passes only when the stated artifact exists in the design note, ADR stub, or ticket; internal intent alone does not count.

  1. Fit - Confirm Deep Agents vs alternatives (see tables above).

- Pass: Short written rationale that either names one matching "Use Deep Agents When You Need" bullet or one "Consider Alternatives" row plus the chosen alternative.

  1. Backend - Match the Backend Decision Tree to a concrete choice.

- Pass: Backend name(s) from the Backend Comparison table; if FilesystemBackend or CompositeBackend, root_dir and any route prefixes are written down (path placeholders OK).

  1. Subagents - Decide delegation boundaries.

- Pass: Either "no subagents" plus one sentence why or a named list where each subagent maps to at least one "When to Use Subagents" reason; parallel plans state what merges outputs.

  1. Human-in-the-loop - Approval surface.

- Pass: Explicit list of tools/operations that use interrupt_on, or "no HITL" plus one-line risk acceptance.

  1. Middleware - Custom vs built-in only.

- Pass: Either "custom middleware: none" or each custom piece named, placed after the built-in stack, and tied to prompt injection, tools, or request/response transforms.

  1. Context - Long threads and large inputs.

- Pass: Stated plan for default summarization behavior (~85% context / ~170k tokens) or an alternative cap; large files handled via references/chunking or equivalent, named in text.

  1. Checkpointing - Resume and durability.

- Pass: Checkpoint/checkpointer approach named for the graph or "none" with one-line rationale (e.g. ephemeral demo only).

平台分布

OpenClaw

86.37%
按下载量换算1,450

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills