Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

analyzing-command-and-control-communication(分析命令和控制通信)

analyzing-command-and-control-communication 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

analyzing-command-and-control-communication 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 12,041。

总安装 1,467周安装 63GitHub Stars 5,877下载 514核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:analyzing-command-and-control-communication(分析命令和控制通信)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/analyzing-command-and-control-communication
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-command-and-control-communication
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-command-and-control-communication

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

逆向分析恶意软件的命令与控制通信协议与数据结构。适用于特定 C2 框架(如 Cobalt Strike)的检测签名设计与基础设施映射。可还原加密算法、命令集格式与备用连接机制。仅限授权安全研究,不适用于通用网络异常检测任务。

analyzing-command-and-control-communication 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/analyzing-command-and-control-communication

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

analyzing-command-and-control-communication 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzin…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

analyzing-command-and-control-communication 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

analyzing-command-and-control-communication 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

analyzing-command-and-control-communication 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

analyzing-command-and-control-communication 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,467 次,近一周安装 63 次,下载 514 次,GitHub 5,877 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

analyzing-command-and-control-communication 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,877 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
analyzing-command-and-control-communication

分析命令和控制通信 · 本页

1,4675,877需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Analyzing Command-and-Control Communication

When to Use

  • Reverse engineering a malware sample has revealed network communication that needs protocol analysis
  • Building network-level detection signatures for a specific C2 framework (Cobalt Strike, Metasploit, Sliver)
  • Mapping C2 infrastructure including primary servers, fallback domains, and dead drops
  • Analyzing encrypted or encoded C2 traffic to understand the command set and data format
  • Attributing malware to a threat actor based on C2 infrastructure patterns and tooling

Do not use for general network anomaly detection; this is specifically for understanding known or suspected C2 protocols from malware analysis.

Prerequisites

  • PCAP capture of malware network traffic (from sandbox, network tap, or full packet capture)
  • Wireshark/tshark for packet-level analysis
  • Reverse engineering tools (Ghidra, dnSpy) for understanding C2 code in the malware binary
  • Python 3.8+ with scapy, dpkt, and requests for protocol analysis and replay
  • Threat intelligence databases for C2 infrastructure correlation (VirusTotal, Shodan, Censys)
  • JA3/JA3S fingerprint databases for TLS-based C2 identification

Workflow

Step 1: Identify the C2 Channel

Determine the protocol and transport used for C2 communication:

C2 Communication Channels:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
HTTP/HTTPS:     Most common; uses standard web traffic to blend in
                Indicators: Regular POST/GET requests, specific URI patterns, custom headers

DNS:            Tunneling data through DNS queries and responses
                Indicators: High-volume TXT queries, long subdomain names, high entropy

Custom TCP/UDP: Proprietary binary protocol on non-standard port
                Indicators: Non-HTTP traffic on high ports, unknown protocol

ICMP:           Data encoded in ICMP echo/reply payloads
                Indicators: ICMP packets with large or non-standard payloads

WebSocket:      Persistent bidirectional connection for real-time C2
                Indicators: WebSocket upgrade followed by binary frames

Cloud Services: Using legitimate APIs (Telegram, Discord, Slack, GitHub)
                Indicators: API calls to cloud services from unexpected processes

Email:          SMTP/IMAP for C2 commands and data exfiltration
                Indicators: Automated email operations from non-email processes

Step 2: Analyze Beacon Pattern

Characterize the periodic communication pattern:

from scapy.all import rdpcap, IP, TCP
from collections import defaultdict
import statistics
import json

packets = rdpcap("c2_traffic.pcap")

# Group TCP SYN packets by destination
connections = defaultdict(list)
for pkt in packets:
    if IP in pkt and TCP in pkt and (pkt[TCP].flags & 0x02):
        key = f"{pkt[IP].dst}:{pkt[TCP].dport}"
        connections[key].append(float(pkt.time))

# Analyze each destination for beaconing
for dst, times in sorted(connections.items()):
    if len(times) < 3:
        continue

    intervals = [times[i+1] - times[i] for i in range(len(times)-1)]
    avg_interval = statistics.mean(intervals)
    stdev = statistics.stdev(intervals) if len(intervals) > 1 else 0
    jitter_pct = (stdev / avg_interval * 100) if avg_interval > 0 else 0
    duration = times[-1] - times[0]

    beacon_data = {
        "destination": dst,
        "connections": len(times),
        "duration_seconds": round(duration, 1),
        "avg_interval_seconds": round(avg_interval, 1),
        "stdev_seconds": round(stdev, 1),
        "jitter_percent": round(jitter_pct, 1),
        "is_beacon": 5 < avg_interval < 7200 and jitter_pct < 25,
    }

    if beacon_data["is_beacon"]:
        print(f"[!] BEACON DETECTED: {dst}")
        print(f"    Interval: {avg_interval:.0f}s +/- {stdev:.0f}s ({jitter_pct:.0f}% jitter)")
        print(f"    Sessions: {len(times)} over {duration:.0f}s")

Step 3: Decode C2 Protocol Structure

Reverse engineer the message format from captured traffic:

# HTTP-based C2 protocol analysis
import dpkt
import base64

with open("c2_traffic.pcap", "rb") as f:
    pcap = dpkt.pcap.Reader(f)

for ts, buf in pcap:
    eth = dpkt.ethernet.Ethernet(buf)
    if not isinstance(eth.data, dpkt.ip.IP):
        continue
    ip = eth.data
    if not isinstance(ip.data, dpkt.tcp.TCP):
        continue
    tcp = ip.data

    if tcp.dport == 80 or tcp.dport == 443:
        if len(tcp.data) > 0:
            try:
                http = dpkt.http.Request(tcp.data)
                print(f"\n--- C2 REQUEST ---")
                print(f"Method: {http.method}")
                print(f"URI: {http.uri}")
                print(f"Headers: {dict(http.headers)}")
                if http.body:
                    print(f"Body ({len(http.body)} bytes):")
                    # Try Base64 decode
                    try:
                        decoded = base64.b64decode(http.body)
                        print(f"  Decoded: {decoded[:200]}")
                    except:
                        print(f"  Raw: {http.body[:200]}")
            except:
                pass

Step 4: Identify C2 Framework

Match observed patterns to known C2 frameworks:

Known C2 Framework Signatures:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Cobalt Strike:
  - Default URIs: /pixel, /submit.php, /___utm.gif, /ca, /dpixel
  - Malleable C2 profiles customize all traffic characteristics
  - JA3: varies by profile, catalog at ja3er.com
  - Watermark in beacon config (unique per license)
  - Config extraction: use CobaltStrikeParser or 1768.py

Metasploit/Meterpreter:
  - Default staging URI patterns: random 4-char checksum
  - Reverse HTTP(S) handler patterns
  - Meterpreter TLV (Type-Length-Value) protocol structure

Sliver:
  - mTLS, HTTP, DNS, WireGuard transport options
  - Protobuf-encoded messages
  - Unique implant ID in communication

Covenant:
  - .NET-based C2 framework
  - HTTP with customizable profiles
  - Task-based command execution

PoshC2:
  - PowerShell/C# based
  - HTTP with encrypted payloads
  - Cookie-based session management
# Extract Cobalt Strike beacon configuration from PCAP or sample
python3 << 'PYEOF'
# Using CobaltStrikeParser (pip install cobalt-strike-parser)
from cobalt_strike_parser import BeaconConfig

try:
    config = BeaconConfig.from_file("suspect.exe")
    print("Cobalt Strike Beacon Configuration:")
    for key, value in config.items():
        print(f"  {key}: {value}")
except Exception as e:
    print(f"Not a Cobalt Strike beacon or parse error: {e}")
PYEOF

Step 5: Map C2 Infrastructure

Document the full C2 infrastructure and failover mechanisms:

# Infrastructure mapping
import requests
import json

c2_indicators = {
    "primary_c2": "185.220.101.42",
    "domains": ["update.malicious.com", "backup.evil.net"],
    "ports": [443, 8443],
    "failover_dns": ["ns1.malicious-dns.com"],
}

# Enrich with Shodan
def shodan_lookup(ip, api_key):
    resp = requests.get(f"https://api.shodan.io/shodan/host/{ip}?key={api_key}")
    if resp.status_code == 200:
        data = resp.json()
        return {
            "ip": ip,
            "ports": data.get("ports", []),
            "os": data.get("os"),
            "org": data.get("org"),
            "asn": data.get("asn"),
            "country": data.get("country_code"),
            "hostnames": data.get("hostnames", []),
            "last_update": data.get("last_update"),
        }
    return None

# Enrich with passive DNS
def pdns_lookup(domain):
    # Using VirusTotal passive DNS
    resp = requests.get(
        f"https://www.virustotal.com/api/v3/domains/{domain}/resolutions",
        headers={"x-apikey": VT_API_KEY}
    )
    if resp.status_code == 200:
        data = resp.json()
        resolutions = []
        for r in data.get("data", []):
            resolutions.append({
                "ip": r["attributes"]["ip_address"],
                "date": r["attributes"]["date"],
            })
        return resolutions
    return []

Step 6: Create Network Detection Signatures

Build detection rules based on analyzed C2 characteristics:

# Suricata rules for the analyzed C2
cat << 'EOF' > c2_detection.rules
# HTTP beacon pattern
alert http $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (
    msg:"MALWARE MalwareX C2 HTTP Beacon";
    flow:established,to_server;
    http.method; content:"POST";
    http.uri; content:"/gate.php"; startswith;
    http.header; content:"User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0)";
    threshold:type threshold, track by_src, count 5, seconds 600;
    sid:9000010; rev:1;
)

# JA3 fingerprint match
alert tls $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (
    msg:"MALWARE MalwareX TLS JA3 Fingerprint";
    ja3.hash; content:"a0e9f5d64349fb13191bc781f81f42e1";
    sid:9000011; rev:1;
)

# DNS beacon detection (high-entropy subdomain)
alert dns $HOME_NET any -> any any (
    msg:"MALWARE Suspected DNS C2 Tunneling";
    dns.query; pcre:"/^[a-z0-9]{20,}\./";
    threshold:type threshold, track by_src, count 10, seconds 60;
    sid:9000012; rev:1;
)

# Certificate-based detection
alert tls $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (
    msg:"MALWARE MalwareX Self-Signed C2 Certificate";
    tls.cert_subject; content:"CN=update.malicious.com";
    sid:9000013; rev:1;
)
EOF

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
BeaconingPeriodic check-in communication from malware to C2 server at regular intervals, often with jitter to avoid pattern detection
JitterRandomization applied to beacon interval (e.g., 60s +/- 15%) to make the timing pattern less predictable and harder to detect
Malleable C2Cobalt Strike feature allowing operators to customize all aspects of C2 traffic (URIs, headers, encoding) to mimic legitimate services
Dead DropIntermediate location (paste site, cloud storage, social media) where C2 commands are posted for the malware to retrieve
Domain FrontingUsing a trusted CDN domain in the TLS SNI while routing to a different backend, making C2 traffic appear to go to a legitimate service
Fast FluxRapidly changing DNS records for C2 domains to distribute across many IPs and resist takedown efforts
C2 FrameworkSoftware toolkit providing C2 server, implant generator, and operator interface (Cobalt Strike, Metasploit, Sliver, Covenant)

Tools & Systems

  • Wireshark: Packet analyzer for detailed C2 protocol analysis at the packet level
  • RITA (Real Intelligence Threat Analytics): Open-source tool analyzing Zeek logs for beacon detection and DNS tunneling
  • CobaltStrikeParser: Tool extracting Cobalt Strike beacon configuration from samples and memory dumps
  • JA3/JA3S: TLS fingerprinting method for identifying C2 frameworks by their TLS implementation characteristics
  • Shodan/Censys: Internet scanning platforms for mapping C2 infrastructure and identifying related servers

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Reverse Engineering a Custom C2 Protocol

Context: A malware sample communicates with its C2 server using an unknown binary protocol over TCP port 8443. The protocol needs to be decoded to understand the command set and build detection signatures.

Approach:

  1. Filter PCAP for TCP port 8443 conversations and extract the TCP streams
  2. Analyze the first few exchanges to identify the handshake/authentication mechanism
  3. Map the message structure (length prefix, type field, payload encoding)
  4. Cross-reference with Ghidra disassembly of the send/receive functions in the malware
  5. Identify the command dispatcher and document each command code's function
  6. Build a protocol decoder in Python for ongoing traffic analysis
  7. Create Suricata rules matching the protocol handshake or static header bytes

Pitfalls:

  • Assuming the protocol is static; some C2 frameworks negotiate encryption during the handshake
  • Not capturing enough traffic to see all command types (some commands are rare)
  • Missing fallback C2 channels (DNS, ICMP) that activate when the primary channel fails
  • Confusing encrypted payload data with the protocol framing structure

Output Format

C2 COMMUNICATION ANALYSIS REPORT
===================================
Sample:           malware.exe (SHA-256: e3b0c44...)
C2 Framework:     Cobalt Strike 4.9

BEACON CONFIGURATION
C2 Server:        hxxps://185.220.101[.]42/updates
Beacon Type:      HTTPS (reverse)
Sleep:            60 seconds
Jitter:           15%
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64)
URI (GET):        /dpixel
URI (POST):       /submit.php
Watermark:        1234567890

PROTOCOL ANALYSIS
Transport:        HTTPS (TLS 1.2)
JA3 Hash:         a0e9f5d64349fb13191bc781f81f42e1
Certificate:      CN=Microsoft Update (self-signed)
Encoding:         Base64 with XOR key 0x69
Command Format:   [4B length][4B command_id][payload]

COMMAND SET
0x01 - Sleep          Change beacon interval
0x02 - Shell          Execute cmd.exe command
0x03 - Download       Transfer file from C2
0x04 - Upload         Exfiltrate file to C2
0x05 - Inject         Process injection
0x06 - Keylog         Start keylogger
0x07 - Screenshot     Capture screen

INFRASTRUCTURE
Primary:          185.220.101[.]42 (AS12345, Hosting Co, NL)
Failover:         91.215.85[.]17 (AS67890, VPS Provider, RU)
DNS:              update.malicious[.]com -> 185.220.101[.]42
Registrar:        NameCheap
Registration:     2025-09-01

DETECTION SIGNATURES
SID 9000010:      HTTP beacon pattern
SID 9000011:      JA3 TLS fingerprint
SID 9000013:      C2 certificate match

平台分布

Codex

34.4%
按下载量换算177

Claude

32.27%
按下载量换算166

Cursor

16.66%
按下载量换算86

Gemini CLI

9.42%
按下载量换算48

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills