Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

analyzing-command-and-control-communication分析命令和控制通信

Agent Skill

analyzing-command-and-control-communication 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,467

周安装

63

GitHub Stars

5,877

下载量

514
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:analyzing-command-and-control-communication(分析命令和控制通信)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/analyzing-command-and-control-communication
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-command-and-control-communication
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill analyzing-command-and-control-communication

简介

逆向分析恶意软件的命令与控制通信协议与数据结构。

  • 适用于特定 C2 框架(如 Cobalt Strike)的检测签名设计与基础设施映射。
  • 可还原加密算法、命令集格式与备用连接机制。
  • 仅限授权安全研究,不适用于通用网络异常检测任务。
  • analyzing-command-and-control-communication 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Analyzing Command-and-Control Communication

When to Use

  • Reverse engineering a malware sample has revealed network communication that needs protocol analysis
  • Building network-level detection signatures for a specific C2 framework (Cobalt Strike, Metasploit, Sliver)
  • Mapping C2 infrastructure including primary servers, fallback domains, and dead drops
  • Analyzing encrypted or encoded C2 traffic to understand the command set and data format
  • Attributing malware to a threat actor based on C2 infrastructure patterns and tooling

Do not use for general network anomaly detection; this is specifically for understanding known or suspected C2 protocols from malware analysis.

Prerequisites

  • PCAP capture of malware network traffic (from sandbox, network tap, or full packet capture)
  • Wireshark/tshark for packet-level analysis
  • Reverse engineering tools (Ghidra, dnSpy) for understanding C2 code in the malware binary
  • Python 3.8+ with scapy, dpkt, and requests for protocol analysis and replay
  • Threat intelligence databases for C2 infrastructure correlation (VirusTotal, Shodan, Censys)
  • JA3/JA3S fingerprint databases for TLS-based C2 identification

Workflow

Step 1: Identify the C2 Channel

Determine the protocol and transport used for C2 communication:

C2 Communication Channels:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
HTTP/HTTPS:     Most common; uses standard web traffic to blend in
                Indicators: Regular POST/GET requests, specific URI patterns, custom headers

DNS:            Tunneling data through DNS queries and responses
                Indicators: High-volume TXT queries, long subdomain names, high entropy

Custom TCP/UDP: Proprietary binary protocol on non-standard port
                Indicators: Non-HTTP traffic on high ports, unknown protocol

ICMP:           Data encoded in ICMP echo/reply payloads
                Indicators: ICMP packets with large or non-standard payloads

WebSocket:      Persistent bidirectional connection for real-time C2
                Indicators: WebSocket upgrade followed by binary frames

Cloud Services: Using legitimate APIs (Telegram, Discord, Slack, GitHub)
                Indicators: API calls to cloud services from unexpected processes

Email:          SMTP/IMAP for C2 commands and data exfiltration
                Indicators: Automated email operations from non-email processes

Step 2: Analyze Beacon Pattern

Characterize the periodic communication pattern:

from scapy.all import rdpcap, IP, TCP
from collections import defaultdict
import statistics
import json

packets = rdpcap("c2_traffic.pcap")

# Group TCP SYN packets by destination
connections = defaultdict(list)
for pkt in packets:
    if IP in pkt and TCP in pkt and (pkt[TCP].flags & 0x02):
        key = f"{pkt[IP].dst}:{pkt[TCP].dport}"
        connections[key].append(float(pkt.time))

# Analyze each destination for beaconing
for dst, times in sorted(connections.items()):
    if len(times) < 3:
        continue

    intervals = [times[i+1] - times[i] for i in range(len(times)-1)]
    avg_interval = statistics.mean(intervals)
    stdev = statistics.stdev(intervals) if len(intervals) > 1 else 0
    jitter_pct = (stdev / avg_interval * 100) if avg_interval > 0 else 0
    duration = times[-1] - times[0]

    beacon_data = {
        "destination": dst,
        "connections": len(times),
        "duration_seconds": round(duration, 1),
        "avg_interval_seconds": round(avg_interval, 1),
        "stdev_seconds": round(stdev, 1),
        "jitter_percent": round(jitter_pct, 1),
        "is_beacon": 5 < avg_interval < 7200 and jitter_pct < 25,
    }

    if beacon_data["is_beacon"]:
        print(f"[!] BEACON DETECTED: {dst}")
        print(f"    Interval: {avg_interval:.0f}s +/- {stdev:.0f}s ({jitter_pct:.0f}% jitter)")
        print(f"    Sessions: {len(times)} over {duration:.0f}s")

Step 3: Decode C2 Protocol Structure

Reverse engineer the message format from captured traffic:

# HTTP-based C2 protocol analysis
import dpkt
import base64

with open("c2_traffic.pcap", "rb") as f:
    pcap = dpkt.pcap.Reader(f)

for ts, buf in pcap:
    eth = dpkt.ethernet.Ethernet(buf)
    if not isinstance(eth.data, dpkt.ip.IP):
        continue
    ip = eth.data
    if not isinstance(ip.data, dpkt.tcp.TCP):
        continue
    tcp = ip.data

    if tcp.dport == 80 or tcp.dport == 443:
        if len(tcp.data) > 0:
            try:
                http = dpkt.http.Request(tcp.data)
                print(f"\n--- C2 REQUEST ---")
                print(f"Method: {http.method}")
                print(f"URI: {http.uri}")
                print(f"Headers: {dict(http.headers)}")
                if http.body:
                    print(f"Body ({len(http.body)} bytes):")
                    # Try Base64 decode
                    try:
                        decoded = base64.b64decode(http.body)
                        print(f"  Decoded: {decoded[:200]}")
                    except:
                        print(f"  Raw: {http.body[:200]}")
            except:
                pass

Step 4: Identify C2 Framework

Match observed patterns to known C2 frameworks:

Known C2 Framework Signatures:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Cobalt Strike:
  - Default URIs: /pixel, /submit.php, /___utm.gif, /ca, /dpixel
  - Malleable C2 profiles customize all traffic characteristics
  - JA3: varies by profile, catalog at ja3er.com
  - Watermark in beacon config (unique per license)
  - Config extraction: use CobaltStrikeParser or 1768.py

Metasploit/Meterpreter:
  - Default staging URI patterns: random 4-char checksum
  - Reverse HTTP(S) handler patterns
  - Meterpreter TLV (Type-Length-Value) protocol structure

Sliver:
  - mTLS, HTTP, DNS, WireGuard transport options
  - Protobuf-encoded messages
  - Unique implant ID in communication

Covenant:
  - .NET-based C2 framework
  - HTTP with customizable profiles
  - Task-based command execution

PoshC2:
  - PowerShell/C# based
  - HTTP with encrypted payloads
  - Cookie-based session management
# Extract Cobalt Strike beacon configuration from PCAP or sample
python3 << 'PYEOF'
# Using CobaltStrikeParser (pip install cobalt-strike-parser)
from cobalt_strike_parser import BeaconConfig

try:
    config = BeaconConfig.from_file("suspect.exe")
    print("Cobalt Strike Beacon Configuration:")
    for key, value in config.items():
        print(f"  {key}: {value}")
except Exception as e:
    print(f"Not a Cobalt Strike beacon or parse error: {e}")
PYEOF

Step 5: Map C2 Infrastructure

Document the full C2 infrastructure and failover mechanisms:

# Infrastructure mapping
import requests
import json

c2_indicators = {
    "primary_c2": "185.220.101.42",
    "domains": ["update.malicious.com", "backup.evil.net"],
    "ports": [443, 8443],
    "failover_dns": ["ns1.malicious-dns.com"],
}

# Enrich with Shodan
def shodan_lookup(ip, api_key):
    resp = requests.get(f"https://api.shodan.io/shodan/host/{ip}?key={api_key}")
    if resp.status_code == 200:
        data = resp.json()
        return {
            "ip": ip,
            "ports": data.get("ports", []),
            "os": data.get("os"),
            "org": data.get("org"),
            "asn": data.get("asn"),
            "country": data.get("country_code"),
            "hostnames": data.get("hostnames", []),
            "last_update": data.get("last_update"),
        }
    return None

# Enrich with passive DNS
def pdns_lookup(domain):
    # Using VirusTotal passive DNS
    resp = requests.get(
        f"https://www.virustotal.com/api/v3/domains/{domain}/resolutions",
        headers={"x-apikey": VT_API_KEY}
    )
    if resp.status_code == 200:
        data = resp.json()
        resolutions = []
        for r in data.get("data", []):
            resolutions.append({
                "ip": r["attributes"]["ip_address"],
                "date": r["attributes"]["date"],
            })
        return resolutions
    return []

Step 6: Create Network Detection Signatures

Build detection rules based on analyzed C2 characteristics:

# Suricata rules for the analyzed C2
cat << 'EOF' > c2_detection.rules
# HTTP beacon pattern
alert http $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (
    msg:"MALWARE MalwareX C2 HTTP Beacon";
    flow:established,to_server;
    http.method; content:"POST";
    http.uri; content:"/gate.php"; startswith;
    http.header; content:"User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0)";
    threshold:type threshold, track by_src, count 5, seconds 600;
    sid:9000010; rev:1;
)

# JA3 fingerprint match
alert tls $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (
    msg:"MALWARE MalwareX TLS JA3 Fingerprint";
    ja3.hash; content:"a0e9f5d64349fb13191bc781f81f42e1";
    sid:9000011; rev:1;
)

# DNS beacon detection (high-entropy subdomain)
alert dns $HOME_NET any -> any any (
    msg:"MALWARE Suspected DNS C2 Tunneling";
    dns.query; pcre:"/^[a-z0-9]{20,}\./";
    threshold:type threshold, track by_src, count 10, seconds 60;
    sid:9000012; rev:1;
)

# Certificate-based detection
alert tls $HOME_NET any -> $EXTERNAL_NET any (
    msg:"MALWARE MalwareX Self-Signed C2 Certificate";
    tls.cert_subject; content:"CN=update.malicious.com";
    sid:9000013; rev:1;
)
EOF

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
BeaconingPeriodic check-in communication from malware to C2 server at regular intervals, often with jitter to avoid pattern detection
JitterRandomization applied to beacon interval (e.g., 60s +/- 15%) to make the timing pattern less predictable and harder to detect
Malleable C2Cobalt Strike feature allowing operators to customize all aspects of C2 traffic (URIs, headers, encoding) to mimic legitimate services
Dead DropIntermediate location (paste site, cloud storage, social media) where C2 commands are posted for the malware to retrieve
Domain FrontingUsing a trusted CDN domain in the TLS SNI while routing to a different backend, making C2 traffic appear to go to a legitimate service
Fast FluxRapidly changing DNS records for C2 domains to distribute across many IPs and resist takedown efforts
C2 FrameworkSoftware toolkit providing C2 server, implant generator, and operator interface (Cobalt Strike, Metasploit, Sliver, Covenant)

Tools & Systems

  • Wireshark: Packet analyzer for detailed C2 protocol analysis at the packet level
  • RITA (Real Intelligence Threat Analytics): Open-source tool analyzing Zeek logs for beacon detection and DNS tunneling
  • CobaltStrikeParser: Tool extracting Cobalt Strike beacon configuration from samples and memory dumps
  • JA3/JA3S: TLS fingerprinting method for identifying C2 frameworks by their TLS implementation characteristics
  • Shodan/Censys: Internet scanning platforms for mapping C2 infrastructure and identifying related servers

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Reverse Engineering a Custom C2 Protocol

Context: A malware sample communicates with its C2 server using an unknown binary protocol over TCP port 8443. The protocol needs to be decoded to understand the command set and build detection signatures.

Approach:

  1. Filter PCAP for TCP port 8443 conversations and extract the TCP streams
  2. Analyze the first few exchanges to identify the handshake/authentication mechanism
  3. Map the message structure (length prefix, type field, payload encoding)
  4. Cross-reference with Ghidra disassembly of the send/receive functions in the malware
  5. Identify the command dispatcher and document each command code's function
  6. Build a protocol decoder in Python for ongoing traffic analysis
  7. Create Suricata rules matching the protocol handshake or static header bytes

Pitfalls:

  • Assuming the protocol is static; some C2 frameworks negotiate encryption during the handshake
  • Not capturing enough traffic to see all command types (some commands are rare)
  • Missing fallback C2 channels (DNS, ICMP) that activate when the primary channel fails
  • Confusing encrypted payload data with the protocol framing structure

Output Format

C2 COMMUNICATION ANALYSIS REPORT
===================================
Sample:           malware.exe (SHA-256: e3b0c44...)
C2 Framework:     Cobalt Strike 4.9

BEACON CONFIGURATION
C2 Server:        hxxps://185.220.101[.]42/updates
Beacon Type:      HTTPS (reverse)
Sleep:            60 seconds
Jitter:           15%
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64)
URI (GET):        /dpixel
URI (POST):       /submit.php
Watermark:        1234567890

PROTOCOL ANALYSIS
Transport:        HTTPS (TLS 1.2)
JA3 Hash:         a0e9f5d64349fb13191bc781f81f42e1
Certificate:      CN=Microsoft Update (self-signed)
Encoding:         Base64 with XOR key 0x69
Command Format:   [4B length][4B command_id][payload]

COMMAND SET
0x01 - Sleep          Change beacon interval
0x02 - Shell          Execute cmd.exe command
0x03 - Download       Transfer file from C2
0x04 - Upload         Exfiltrate file to C2
0x05 - Inject         Process injection
0x06 - Keylog         Start keylogger
0x07 - Screenshot     Capture screen

INFRASTRUCTURE
Primary:          185.220.101[.]42 (AS12345, Hosting Co, NL)
Failover:         91.215.85[.]17 (AS67890, VPS Provider, RU)
DNS:              update.malicious[.]com -> 185.220.101[.]42
Registrar:        NameCheap
Registration:     2025-09-01

DETECTION SIGNATURES
SID 9000010:      HTTP beacon pattern
SID 9000011:      JA3 TLS fingerprint
SID 9000013:      C2 certificate match

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.4%
按下载量换算177

Claude

32.27%
按下载量换算166

Cursor

16.66%
按下载量换算86

Gemini CLI

9.42%
按下载量换算48

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills