Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

amazon-lp(亚马逊公司)

amazon-lp 用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目、生成组件或检查界面实现时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

amazon-lp 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 6,088。

总安装 5,166周安装 209GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,622核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:amazon-lp(亚马逊公司)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wholeinsoul/amazon-lp
安装命令:
openclaw skills install amazon-lp
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install amazon-lp

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

将亚马逊领导力原则应用于产品开发与代码审查。指导功能设计、架构决策与团队协作规范。输出可落地的工程实践清单与评审要点。amazon-lp 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。安装命令:openclaw skills install amazon-lp。适用于内部开发流程而非直接面向客户工具。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install amazon-lp;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

amazon-lp 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install amazon-lp。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

amazon-lp 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

amazon-lp 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

amazon-lp 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

amazon-lp 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,166 次,近一周安装 209 次,下载 1,622 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

amazon-lp 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
amazon-lp

亚马逊公司 · 本页

5,166—权限未标注MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
amazon-lp
description
Apply Amazon's Leadership Principles to product building, feature development, code review, and architecture decisions. Use when building a new product or feature, reviewing code or designs, evaluating ideas, writing PRFAQs, making build-vs-buy decisions, prioritizing work, or when quality and customer focus need enforcement. Triggers on "build a product", "design a feature", "review this code", "evaluate this idea", "write a PRFAQ", "prioritize", "should we build this", "architecture review", "quality check".

Amazon Leadership Principles — Product & Engineering

Apply these principles at every decision point. Not all apply to every situation — use judgment.

Pre-Build: Is This Worth Building?

Customer Obsession

  • Who is the customer? Name them specifically.
  • What is their pain? Quote real complaints, not assumptions.
  • Work backwards: write the press release and FAQ BEFORE writing code.
  • If you can't articulate why the customer cares in one sentence, stop.

Ownership

  • Think long-term. Will this matter in 6 months?
  • Don't build something just because it's interesting. Build what's needed.
  • You own the outcome, not just the code. If it ships broken, that's on you.

Invent and Simplify

  • What's the simplest version that solves the problem?
  • Can you solve this with existing tools before building new ones?
  • Complexity is a cost. Every abstraction must earn its place.

Are Right, A Lot

  • What data supports this direction?
  • What's the strongest argument AGAINST building this?
  • Seek to disconfirm your hypothesis, not confirm it.

During Build: Execution Standards

Bias for Action

  • Ship the smallest useful version first. Perfect is the enemy of shipped.
  • Reversible decisions (two-way doors) → decide fast, move on.
  • Irreversible decisions (one-way doors) → slow down, get data.

Dive Deep

  • Don't hand-wave. Know the numbers: latency, error rates, user counts.
  • When something looks wrong, investigate. Don't assume it's fine.
  • "It works on my machine" is not a valid test.

Insist on the Highest Standards

  • Code must have error handling, not just the happy path.
  • Every feature needs: tests, documentation, monitoring.
  • Ask: "Would I be comfortable if this was the only thing a customer saw?"

Frugality

  • Do more with less. Fewer dependencies, smaller bundles, lower costs.
  • Don't gold-plate. Ship the 80% solution, iterate on the 20%.
  • Constraints breed resourcefulness. Treat them as features.

Think Big

  • Is this a band-aid or a real solution?
  • Will this approach scale to 10x the current load?
  • What would the ambitious version look like? (Then ship the pragmatic one.)

Code & Architecture Review Checklist

Apply when reviewing code, PRs, or architecture decisions:

  1. Customer Impact — Does this change make the customer's life better? How?
  2. Simplicity — Is this the simplest solution? Can anything be removed?
  3. Ownership — Does the author own the full lifecycle? Tests? Error handling? Monitoring?
  4. Dive Deep — Are edge cases handled? What happens when it fails?
  5. Highest Standards — Would you ship this to your most important customer today?
  6. Bias for Action — Is this blocked by a perfect-is-the-enemy-of-good decision? Ship it.
  7. Earn Trust — Is the code honest about its limitations? Are errors surfaced, not swallowed?

PRFAQ Template (Working Backwards)

Before building any significant feature or product, write this first:

PRESS RELEASE (1 paragraph)
- What is it? (one sentence)
- Who is it for?
- What problem does it solve?
- How does the customer benefit?
- Quote from a (hypothetical) customer

FAQ — Customer Questions
1. How does it work?
2. How much does it cost?
3. What if [common objection]?
4. How is this different from [competitor/alternative]?

FAQ — Internal/Technical Questions  
1. How will we measure success?
2. What are the biggest risks?
3. What's the simplest MVP?
4. What does v2 look like?

Anti-Patterns to Call Out

  • Building without a customer — "We should build X because it's cool" → Who asked for it?
  • Over-engineering — 3 layers of abstraction for a 50-line script → Simplify.
  • Ignoring failure modes — "It'll probably work" → What happens when it doesn't?
  • Scope creep — "While we're at it, let's also..." → Ship what you started first.
  • Vanity metrics — "We have 1000 users!" → How many are active? How many pay?
  • Premature scaling — Building for 1M users when you have 10 → Earn the complexity.

When to Apply Each Principle

PhaseKey Principles
IdeationCustomer Obsession, Think Big, Are Right A Lot
PlanningOwnership, Working Backwards (PRFAQ), Invent & Simplify
BuildingBias for Action, Dive Deep, Frugality, Highest Standards
ReviewHighest Standards, Earn Trust, Dive Deep
LaunchCustomer Obsession, Ownership, Bias for Action
Post-launchDive Deep (metrics), Learn and Be Curious, Ownership

平台分布

OpenClaw

83.61%
按下载量换算1,356

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills