Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发权限需确认clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

amazon-lp亚马逊公司

Agent Skill

amazon-lp 用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目、生成组件或检查界面实现时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

5,166

周安装

209

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,622
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:amazon-lp(亚马逊公司)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wholeinsoul/amazon-lp
安装命令:
openclaw skills install amazon-lp
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install amazon-lp

简介

将亚马逊领导力原则应用于产品开发与代码审查。

  • 指导功能设计、架构决策与团队协作规范。
  • 输出可落地的工程实践清单与评审要点。amazon-lp 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 安装命令:openclaw skills install amazon-lp。
  • 适用于内部开发流程而非直接面向客户工具。

SKILL.md

name
amazon-lp
description
Apply Amazon's Leadership Principles to product building, feature development, code review, and architecture decisions. Use when building a new product or feature, reviewing code or designs, evaluating ideas, writing PRFAQs, making build-vs-buy decisions, prioritizing work, or when quality and customer focus need enforcement. Triggers on "build a product", "design a feature", "review this code", "evaluate this idea", "write a PRFAQ", "prioritize", "should we build this", "architecture review", "quality check".

Amazon Leadership Principles — Product & Engineering

Apply these principles at every decision point. Not all apply to every situation — use judgment.

Pre-Build: Is This Worth Building?

Customer Obsession

  • Who is the customer? Name them specifically.
  • What is their pain? Quote real complaints, not assumptions.
  • Work backwards: write the press release and FAQ BEFORE writing code.
  • If you can't articulate why the customer cares in one sentence, stop.

Ownership

  • Think long-term. Will this matter in 6 months?
  • Don't build something just because it's interesting. Build what's needed.
  • You own the outcome, not just the code. If it ships broken, that's on you.

Invent and Simplify

  • What's the simplest version that solves the problem?
  • Can you solve this with existing tools before building new ones?
  • Complexity is a cost. Every abstraction must earn its place.

Are Right, A Lot

  • What data supports this direction?
  • What's the strongest argument AGAINST building this?
  • Seek to disconfirm your hypothesis, not confirm it.

During Build: Execution Standards

Bias for Action

  • Ship the smallest useful version first. Perfect is the enemy of shipped.
  • Reversible decisions (two-way doors) → decide fast, move on.
  • Irreversible decisions (one-way doors) → slow down, get data.

Dive Deep

  • Don't hand-wave. Know the numbers: latency, error rates, user counts.
  • When something looks wrong, investigate. Don't assume it's fine.
  • "It works on my machine" is not a valid test.

Insist on the Highest Standards

  • Code must have error handling, not just the happy path.
  • Every feature needs: tests, documentation, monitoring.
  • Ask: "Would I be comfortable if this was the only thing a customer saw?"

Frugality

  • Do more with less. Fewer dependencies, smaller bundles, lower costs.
  • Don't gold-plate. Ship the 80% solution, iterate on the 20%.
  • Constraints breed resourcefulness. Treat them as features.

Think Big

  • Is this a band-aid or a real solution?
  • Will this approach scale to 10x the current load?
  • What would the ambitious version look like? (Then ship the pragmatic one.)

Code & Architecture Review Checklist

Apply when reviewing code, PRs, or architecture decisions:

  1. Customer Impact — Does this change make the customer's life better? How?
  2. Simplicity — Is this the simplest solution? Can anything be removed?
  3. Ownership — Does the author own the full lifecycle? Tests? Error handling? Monitoring?
  4. Dive Deep — Are edge cases handled? What happens when it fails?
  5. Highest Standards — Would you ship this to your most important customer today?
  6. Bias for Action — Is this blocked by a perfect-is-the-enemy-of-good decision? Ship it.
  7. Earn Trust — Is the code honest about its limitations? Are errors surfaced, not swallowed?

PRFAQ Template (Working Backwards)

Before building any significant feature or product, write this first:

PRESS RELEASE (1 paragraph)
- What is it? (one sentence)
- Who is it for?
- What problem does it solve?
- How does the customer benefit?
- Quote from a (hypothetical) customer

FAQ — Customer Questions
1. How does it work?
2. How much does it cost?
3. What if [common objection]?
4. How is this different from [competitor/alternative]?

FAQ — Internal/Technical Questions  
1. How will we measure success?
2. What are the biggest risks?
3. What's the simplest MVP?
4. What does v2 look like?

Anti-Patterns to Call Out

  • Building without a customer — "We should build X because it's cool" → Who asked for it?
  • Over-engineering — 3 layers of abstraction for a 50-line script → Simplify.
  • Ignoring failure modes — "It'll probably work" → What happens when it doesn't?
  • Scope creep — "While we're at it, let's also..." → Ship what you started first.
  • Vanity metrics — "We have 1000 users!" → How many are active? How many pay?
  • Premature scaling — Building for 1M users when you have 10 → Earn the complexity.

When to Apply Each Principle

PhaseKey Principles
IdeationCustomer Obsession, Think Big, Are Right A Lot
PlanningOwnership, Working Backwards (PRFAQ), Invent & Simplify
BuildingBias for Action, Dive Deep, Frugality, Highest Standards
ReviewHighest Standards, Earn Trust, Dive Deep
LaunchCustomer Obsession, Ownership, Bias for Action
Post-launchDive Deep (metrics), Learn and Be Curious, Ownership

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

83.61%
按下载量换算1,356

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills