Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

altitude-horizon-framework(高度地平线框架)

altitude-horizon-framework 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

altitude-horizon-framework 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 399。

总安装 17,352周安装 723GitHub Stars 3,864下载 5,784核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:altitude-horizon-framework(高度地平线框架)
来源仓库:https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills
仓库路径:skills/altitude-horizon-framework
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills --skill altitude-horizon-framework
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills --skill altitude-horizon-framework

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

altitude-horizon-framework 提供 Director 级战略思维模型,用于诊断组织过渡期的摩擦点并指导方向调整。适用于高层决策、跨部门协作或组织变革场景,强调‘高度’与‘视野’的双轴分析框架。

使用时需明确当前所处‘过渡带’,结合 Cascading Context Map 工具梳理信息层级与责任边界。安装前应评估其对现有管理流程的影响,确保不干扰日常运营而仅作为战略参考工具。注意该框架非职位等级划分依据,正确使用需匹配角色实际职责范围以避免误用。

来源仓库内路径:skills/altitude-horizon-framework

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills --skill alti…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

altitude-horizon-framework 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills --skill altitude-horiz…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

altitude-horizon-framework 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

altitude-horizon-framework 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

altitude-horizon-framework 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

altitude-horizon-framework 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 17,352 次,近一周安装 723 次,下载 5,784 次,GitHub 3,864 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

altitude-horizon-framework 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 3,864 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
altitude-horizon-framework

高度地平线框架 · 本页

17,3523,864权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Purpose

Defines the two-axis mental model that distinguishes Director-level thinking from PM thinking: Altitude (how wide you zoom out) and Horizon (how far ahead you look). Use this to understand what actually changes in the transition, diagnose which transition zone is creating friction, and apply the Cascading Context Map when organizational direction is vague or absent.

This is not a seniority hierarchy. A PM operating at the right altitude for their role is doing excellent work. A Director operating at PM altitude is leaving their actual job undone.

Key Concepts

The Two Axes

Altitude — Scope

  • PM altitude: Close to the ground. Customer problems, individual features, sprint priorities, specific team dynamics.
  • Director altitude: High-level view. Product portfolio, cross-functional systems, organizational dynamics, budget allocation, market positioning.
  • The shift is not about losing empathy for customers — it's about zooming out to see the entire restaurant, not just one table.

Horizon — Time

  • PM horizon: Days, weeks, sprints. A quarter at most.
  • Director horizon: Quarter as the starting point. Annual planning cycles, multi-year strategy, market shifts.
  • Directors plan for where the product ecosystem needs to be in a year, then work backward.

The Waiter vs. Restaurant Operator

The sharpest analogy for the role shift:

DimensionPM (Waiter)Director (Restaurant Operator)
FocusIndividual diner experienceEntire system — staffing, margins, menu, suppliers
AuthorityInfluence without controlPortfolio decisions, budget, resource allocation
Success metricTable seven is happyRestaurant is profitable, consistent, and scalable
Relationship to customersDirect, daily, intimateAggregate patterns, buyer personas, market cohorts
Failure modeIgnoring Table Seven's needsObsessing over Table Seven's lemons

The waiter excels at translating the experience of individual diners. The operator isn't ignoring diners — they're asking different questions: "Are we overspending on ingredients? Is a 75-page menu confusing customers? Do we need another server for the dinner rush?" Neither question is more important in absolute terms. They're appropriate to different roles.


Four Transition Zones

The PM → Director shift requires movement across four zones. Most people struggle with one or two more than the others — diagnosing which one is the leverage point.

Zone 1 — Thinking Altitude

  • Stop: Solving individual customer problems directly
  • Start: Designing systems and teams that solve classes of problems

Zone 2 — Persona Shift

  • Stop: Obsessing over individual user personas and daily customer touchpoints
  • Start: Thinking in buyer personas, market cohorts, organizational stakeholders, and executive dynamics

Zone 3 — Hero Syndrome Recovery

  • Stop: Being the person who saves the day and earns the pat on the back
  • Start: Getting satisfaction from team success — your product is your people, not the roadmap

Zone 4 — Direction Creation

  • Stop: Waiting for clear direction from above before moving
  • Start: Creating context cascades that translate company strategy into team clarity, even when inputs are incomplete

Named Failure Modes

Hero Syndrome What it looks like: Jumping in to solve problems directly. Staying close to the tactical work. Wanting visibility on individual wins. Why it happens: PMs are trained to be helpful and responsive. Directors get fewer pats on the back, so they regress to the old reward loop. The cost: You under-perform as a Director while over-functioning as a senior IC. Your team doesn't develop because you're in their way.

Allergic to Process What it looks like: Resisting shared structures. Letting high-performing PMs run their own playbooks independently. Why it happens: PMs naturally resist bureaucracy. Early director permissiveness can feel like "great leadership" and "trusting the team." The cost: Stakeholders across marketing, finance, and leadership can't synthesize inconsistent outputs. Without shared processes, teams become "monkeys in the room breaking glass."

People-Pleaser Leadership What it looks like: Wanting the team to like you. Avoiding hard feedback. Saying yes to stakeholder requests to preserve relationships. Why it happens: The skills that made you a great PM — listening, empathy, responsiveness — become liabilities at organizational scale. The cost: You confuse "popular" with "effective." Respect is built through clarity and hard calls, not niceness.

Instant Gratification Trap What it looks like: Reading leadership books, collecting certifications, asking "what do I need to do to get promoted?" Why it happens: PMs are good at optimization. They try to shortcut the experience requirement. The cost: Director readiness requires war stories and lived humility. You can study your way to fluency in the vocabulary, but not to readiness for the role.

Black-and-White Thinking What it looks like: "This seems like an obvious decision." "Why can't we fund both?" "Why is everything so political here?" Why it happens: PMs operate in cleaner problem spaces with clearer cause-and-effect. Director decisions involve competing constraints, limited information, and organizational dynamics. The cost: Fast decisions with low confidence create downstream chaos. The grayscale is not a failure of leadership — it's the actual terrain.


The Cascading Context Map

When organizational direction is vague or absent, Directors don't wait — they cascade.

The six steps:

  1. Listen to the top-level strategy — QBRs, company messaging, executive communications
  2. Extract key priorities leadership stated — Identify 3–5 themes, not 20 bullet points
  3. Map the second layer: "How does our business unit accomplish these objectives?"
  4. Map the third layer: "How does our product portfolio accomplish that?"
  5. Map the fourth layer: "What are my team's specific accountabilities that drive success at layer three?"
  6. Communicate the cascade to the team — Not just what to do, but why it connects upward

What this fixes: Teams "wandering in the wilderness" — shipping work that doesn't connect to strategy because the context was never translated for them.

The core principle: Even with incomplete direction from above, a Director's job is to fill the gap downward. Waiting for perfect clarity is a PM habit. Creating imperfect-but-useful clarity is a Director skill.


Application

Using This Framework as a PM (Pre-Transition)

  1. Identify which transition zone you're weakest in — not to act on it yet, but to know what to observe
  2. Use 1-on-1s with your manager to practice Zone 4: "How does my work connect to business strategy? What's the organizational context I'm not seeing?"
  3. Watch for Hero Syndrome habits now: do you jump in to solve things that others could solve with your coaching?
  4. Don't over-invest in Director thinking while you're still in a PM role. Serve your current scope with full commitment — director altitude will be available when the context requires it

Using This Framework as a Newly Promoted Director

  1. First 30 days: Draw your new Altitude & Horizon map. Who are your new stakeholders? What does a quarter-to-annual planning horizon actually look like in this organization?
  2. First 60 days: Identify your Hero Syndrome triggers. When do you feel the pull to jump in directly instead of coaching?
  3. First 90 days: Run your first Cascading Context Map. Even if company strategy is unclear, make your best translation and share it with your team
  4. Ongoing: When friction appears, name which transition zone it lives in. Diagnosis before prescription

Running a Cascading Context Map

Use when your team is unclear on what organizational strategy means for their work.

## Context Cascade

**Company Priority:** [What leadership said — in their words]
**Business Unit Translation:** [How your BU contributes to that priority]
**Product Portfolio Translation:** [How your products contribute to that]
**Team Accountabilities:** [What each team owns specifically]
**Why this matters:** [The so-what for your team — what changes, what stays the same]

One page is better than ten. The goal is clarity, not comprehensiveness.


Examples

See examples/sample.md for a full worked scenario with a completed Cascading Context Map and anti-pattern contrast.

Good: Director Creates Clarity from a Vague Company Priority

Situation: CEO announces at QBR: "We're doubling down on enterprise." Three PMs ask their Director: "What does that mean for our roadmaps?"

PM response (wrong altitude): "Let's add enterprise features to our sprint backlogs."

Director response (right altitude): Runs a Cascading Context Map. Translates: "Enterprise means larger deal sizes, longer sales cycles, and more integration requirements. For our portfolio: Product A owns the admin controls story, Product B owns the API documentation story, Product C owns the security certification story. Here's what changes in Q3 planning and what doesn't."

Why it works: Director didn't wait for more clarity. They created it from available signal.


Bad: Hero Syndrome in Action

Situation: A PM on the team is struggling with a difficult stakeholder relationship.

Director response (wrong): "Let me just talk to that stakeholder directly — I'll get it sorted out."

Director response (right): "Walk me through what you've tried. Let's figure out where it broke down and what you'll do differently."

Why it matters: The first response solves the problem and creates dependency. The second response grows the PM. Directors who rescue too often build teams that can't function without them.


Good: Shifting from Waiter to Operator

Situation: A high-performing PM insists on documenting requirements in a different format from the rest of the team because "my stakeholders prefer it."

Director response (wrong): "That's fine, she's our best PM — if it works for her team, let it go."

Director response (right): "Joe is crushing it individually. But when marketing tries to synthesize across all three PMs' work, they can't. Shared process isn't bureaucracy — it's what makes the system legible to everyone outside it."

Why it matters: Protecting high-performer exceptions creates invisible coordination costs. The Restaurant Operator's job is the system, not the star waiter.


Common Pitfalls

Pitfall 1: Altitude Theater

Symptom: Using strategy language ("portfolio," "ecosystem," "long-term vision") while still making sprint-level decisions

Consequence: You sound like a Director but function like a PM. Your team is confused about who's actually deciding and at what level.

Fix: If you're in the details, own it. If you're not, delegate it fully. Mixing altitude levels without signaling creates ambiguity that erodes team trust.


Pitfall 2: One-and-Done Context Cascade

Symptom: Running the Cascading Context Map once at annual planning, then never revisiting it

Consequence: Team aligns in Q1 and drifts as strategy evolves. By Q3, team work is decoupled from current priorities.

Fix: Revisit the cascade at major inflection points — quarterly planning, significant exec changes, pivots, or org restructuring.


Pitfall 3: Confusing Kindness with Leadership

Symptom: Shielding the team from hard decisions, over-explaining constraints you're holding, softening feedback into meaninglessness

Consequence: Team operates without accurate context; trust erodes when reality eventually lands without warning.

Fix: Be transparent about the "why" behind hard decisions. You don't need to share everything — but what you share should be honest and actionable.


Pitfall 4: Premature Director Thinking as a PM

Symptom: Spending PM years worried about portfolio strategy, organizational dynamics, and "thinking above your pay grade"

Consequence: You under-serve your current role. PMs who think like Directors often miss the customer-level signal their actual role requires.

Fix: Play your current role with full commitment. The transition will demand Director thinking soon enough — you'll be ready because you did your PM work well, not because you rehearsed the Director role prematurely.


References

Related Skills

  • skills/director-readiness-advisor/SKILL.md — Interactive advisor that uses this framework to diagnose and coach your specific transition situation

Source Material

External Frameworks

  • Marty Cagan, *Empowered* — Organizational dynamics and role clarity in product leadership
  • Julie Zhuo, *The Making of a Manager* — IC-to-manager transition with practical war stories
  • Michael Watkins, *The First 90 Days* — Structured approach to leadership transitions

平台分布

Codex

36.99%
按下载量换算2,140

Claude

31.21%
按下载量换算1,805

Cursor

17.75%
按下载量换算1,027

Gemini CLI

9.27%
按下载量换算536

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills