Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
效率external-serviceclawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

tech-stack-evaluator技术堆栈评估器

Agent Skill

tech-stack-evaluator 用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和凭据风险排查,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要复核安全边界、认证流程或敏感配置时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

49,571

周安装

2,045

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

16,196
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tech-stack-evaluator(技术堆栈评估器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/tech-stack-evaluator
安装命令:
openclaw skills install tech-stack-evaluator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install tech-stack-evaluator

简介

tech-stack-evaluator 用于技术堆栈的综合评估与安全分析。

  • 适合在比较框架、评估测试时进行 TCO 分析和生态系统健康评分。
  • 提供安全审计、权限检查和凭据风险排查能力。tech-stack-evaluator 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 使用时需注意最小权限原则,避免直接执行敏感操作。
  • 建议结合具体项目环境验证输出结果的准确性。

SKILL.md

name
tech-stack-evaluator
description
Technology stack evaluation and comparison with TCO analysis, security assessment, and ecosystem health scoring. Use when comparing frameworks, evaluating technology stacks, calculating total cost of ownership, assessing migration paths, or analyzing ecosystem viability.

Technology Stack Evaluator

Evaluate and compare technologies, frameworks, and cloud providers with data-driven analysis and actionable recommendations.

Table of Contents


Capabilities

CapabilityDescription
Technology ComparisonCompare frameworks and libraries with weighted scoring
TCO AnalysisCalculate 5-year total cost including hidden costs
Ecosystem HealthAssess GitHub metrics, npm adoption, community strength
Security AssessmentEvaluate vulnerabilities and compliance readiness
Migration AnalysisEstimate effort, risks, and timeline for migrations
Cloud ComparisonCompare AWS, Azure, GCP for specific workloads

Quick Start

Compare Two Technologies

Compare React vs Vue for a SaaS dashboard.
Priorities: developer productivity (40%), ecosystem (30%), performance (30%).

Calculate TCO

Calculate 5-year TCO for Next.js on Vercel.
Team: 8 developers. Hosting: $2500/month. Growth: 40%/year.

Assess Migration

Evaluate migrating from Angular.js to React.
Codebase: 50,000 lines, 200 components. Team: 6 developers.

Input Formats

The evaluator accepts three input formats:

Text - Natural language queries

Compare PostgreSQL vs MongoDB for our e-commerce platform.

YAML - Structured input for automation

comparison:
  technologies: ["React", "Vue"]
  use_case: "SaaS dashboard"
  weights:
    ecosystem: 30
    performance: 25
    developer_experience: 45

JSON - Programmatic integration

{
  "technologies": ["React", "Vue"],
  "use_case": "SaaS dashboard"
}

Analysis Types

Quick Comparison (200-300 tokens)

  • Weighted scores and recommendation
  • Top 3 decision factors
  • Confidence level

Standard Analysis (500-800 tokens)

  • Comparison matrix
  • TCO overview
  • Security summary

Full Report (1200-1500 tokens)

  • All metrics and calculations
  • Migration analysis
  • Detailed recommendations

Scripts

stack_comparator.py

Compare technologies with customizable weighted criteria.

python scripts/stack_comparator.py --help

tco_calculator.py

Calculate total cost of ownership over multi-year projections.

python scripts/tco_calculator.py --input assets/sample_input_tco.json

ecosystem_analyzer.py

Analyze ecosystem health from GitHub, npm, and community metrics.

python scripts/ecosystem_analyzer.py --technology react

security_assessor.py

Evaluate security posture and compliance readiness.

python scripts/security_assessor.py --technology express --compliance soc2,gdpr

migration_analyzer.py

Estimate migration complexity, effort, and risks.

python scripts/migration_analyzer.py --from angular-1.x --to react

References

DocumentContent
references/metrics.mdDetailed scoring algorithms and calculation formulas
references/examples.mdInput/output examples for all analysis types
references/workflows.mdStep-by-step evaluation workflows

Confidence Levels

LevelScoreInterpretation
High80-100%Clear winner, strong data
Medium50-79%Trade-offs present, moderate uncertainty
Low< 50%Close call, limited data

When to Use

  • Comparing frontend/backend frameworks for new projects
  • Evaluating cloud providers for specific workloads
  • Planning technology migrations with risk assessment
  • Calculating build vs. buy decisions with TCO
  • Assessing open-source library viability

When NOT to Use

  • Trivial decisions between similar tools (use team preference)
  • Mandated technology choices (decision already made)
  • Emergency production issues (use monitoring tools)

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

87.08%
按下载量换算14,103

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills