Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

fda-consultant-specialist(FDA 顾问专家)

fda-consultant-specialist 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

fda-consultant-specialist 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 24,407。

总安装 4,027周安装 173GitHub Stars 13,239下载 1,412核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:fda-consultant-specialist(FDA 顾问专家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/fda-consultant-specialist
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill fda-consultant-specialist
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill fda-consultant-specialist

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

提供 FDA 医疗器械注册咨询,涵盖 510(k) 路径选择和质量体系合规指导。适用于医疗设备厂商应对监管要求和网络安全审查场景。包含 HIPAA 合规、设计控制与上市后监督流程要点。输出基于最新法规解读,但需结合具体产品特性二次确认。不提供法律意见或官方申报文件代填,仅作流程参考。

fda-consultant-specialist 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/fda-consultant-specialist

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill fda-consu…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

fda-consultant-specialist 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill fda-consultant-spec…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

fda-consultant-specialist 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

fda-consultant-specialist 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

fda-consultant-specialist 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

fda-consultant-specialist 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,027 次,近一周安装 173 次,下载 1,412 次,GitHub 13,239 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

fda-consultant-specialist 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
fda-consultant-specialist

FDA 顾问专家 · 本页

4,02713,239需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

FDA Consultant Specialist

FDA regulatory consulting for medical device manufacturers covering submission pathways, Quality System Regulation (QSR), HIPAA compliance, and device cybersecurity requirements.

Table of Contents


FDA Pathway Selection

Determine the appropriate FDA regulatory pathway based on device classification and predicate availability.

Decision Framework

Predicate device exists?
├── YES → Substantially equivalent?
│   ├── YES → 510(k) Pathway
│   │   ├── No design changes → Abbreviated 510(k)
│   │   ├── Manufacturing only → Special 510(k)
│   │   └── Design/performance → Traditional 510(k)
│   └── NO → PMA or De Novo
└── NO → Novel device?
    ├── Low-to-moderate risk → De Novo
    └── High risk (Class III) → PMA

Pathway Comparison

PathwayWhen to UseTimelineCost
510(k) TraditionalPredicate exists, design changes90 days$21,760
510(k) SpecialManufacturing changes only30 days$21,760
510(k) AbbreviatedGuidance/standard conformance30 days$21,760
De NovoNovel, low-moderate risk150 days$134,676
PMAClass III, no predicate180+ days$425,000+

Pre-Submission Strategy

  1. Identify product code and classification
  2. Search 510(k) database for predicates
  3. Assess substantial equivalence feasibility
  4. Prepare Q-Sub questions for FDA
  5. Schedule Pre-Sub meeting if needed

Reference: See fda_submission_guide.md for pathway decision matrices and submission requirements.


510(k) Submission Process

Workflow

Phase 1: Planning
├── Step 1: Identify predicate device(s)
├── Step 2: Compare intended use and technology
├── Step 3: Determine testing requirements
└── Checkpoint: SE argument feasible?

Phase 2: Preparation
├── Step 4: Complete performance testing
├── Step 5: Prepare device description
├── Step 6: Document SE comparison
├── Step 7: Finalize labeling
└── Checkpoint: All required sections complete?

Phase 3: Submission
├── Step 8: Assemble submission package
├── Step 9: Submit via eSTAR
├── Step 10: Track acknowledgment
└── Checkpoint: Submission accepted?

Phase 4: Review
├── Step 11: Monitor review status
├── Step 12: Respond to AI requests
├── Step 13: Receive decision
└── Verification: SE letter received?

Required Sections (21 CFR 807.87)

SectionContent
Cover LetterSubmission type, device ID, contact info
Form 3514CDRH premarket review cover sheet
Device DescriptionPhysical description, principles of operation
Indications for UseForm 3881, patient population, use environment
SE ComparisonSide-by-side comparison with predicate
Performance TestingBench, biocompatibility, electrical safety
Software DocumentationLevel of concern, hazard analysis (IEC 62304)
LabelingIFU, package labels, warnings
510(k) SummaryPublic summary of submission

Common RTA Issues

IssuePrevention
Missing user feeVerify payment before submission
Incomplete Form 3514Review all fields, ensure signature
No predicate identifiedConfirm K-number in FDA database
Inadequate SE comparisonAddress all technological characteristics

QSR Compliance

Quality System Regulation (21 CFR Part 820) requirements for medical device manufacturers.

Key Subsystems

SectionTitleFocus
820.20Management ResponsibilityQuality policy, org structure, management review
820.30Design ControlsInput, output, review, verification, validation
820.40Document ControlsApproval, distribution, change control
820.50Purchasing ControlsSupplier qualification, purchasing data
820.70Production ControlsProcess validation, environmental controls
820.100CAPARoot cause analysis, corrective actions
820.181Device Master RecordSpecifications, procedures, acceptance criteria

Design Controls Workflow (820.30)

Step 1: Design Input
└── Capture user needs, intended use, regulatory requirements
    Verification: Inputs reviewed and approved?

Step 2: Design Output
└── Create specifications, drawings, software architecture
    Verification: Outputs traceable to inputs?

Step 3: Design Review
└── Conduct reviews at each phase milestone
    Verification: Review records with signatures?

Step 4: Design Verification
└── Perform testing against specifications
    Verification: All tests pass acceptance criteria?

Step 5: Design Validation
└── Confirm device meets user needs in actual use conditions
    Verification: Validation report approved?

Step 6: Design Transfer
└── Release to production with DMR complete
    Verification: Transfer checklist complete?

CAPA Process (820.100)

  1. Identify: Document nonconformity or potential problem
  2. Investigate: Perform root cause analysis (5 Whys, Fishbone)
  3. Plan: Define corrective/preventive actions
  4. Implement: Execute actions, update documentation
  5. Verify: Confirm implementation complete
  6. Effectiveness: Monitor for recurrence (30-90 days)
  7. Close: Management approval and closure

Reference: See qsr_compliance_requirements.md for detailed QSR implementation guidance.


HIPAA for Medical Devices

HIPAA requirements for devices that create, store, transmit, or access Protected Health Information (PHI).

Applicability

Device TypeHIPAA Applies
Standalone diagnostic (no data transmission)No
Connected device transmitting patient dataYes
Device with EHR integrationYes
SaMD storing patient informationYes
Wellness app (no diagnosis)Only if stores PHI

Required Safeguards

Administrative (§164.308)
├── Security officer designation
├── Risk analysis and management
├── Workforce training
├── Incident response procedures
└── Business associate agreements

Physical (§164.310)
├── Facility access controls
├── Workstation security
└── Device disposal procedures

Technical (§164.312)
├── Access control (unique IDs, auto-logoff)
├── Audit controls (logging)
├── Integrity controls (checksums, hashes)
├── Authentication (MFA recommended)
└── Transmission security (TLS 1.2+)

Risk Assessment Steps

  1. Inventory all systems handling ePHI
  2. Document data flows (collection, storage, transmission)
  3. Identify threats and vulnerabilities
  4. Assess likelihood and impact
  5. Determine risk levels
  6. Implement controls
  7. Document residual risk

Reference: See hipaa_compliance_framework.md for implementation checklists and BAA templates.


Device Cybersecurity

FDA cybersecurity requirements for connected medical devices.

Premarket Requirements

ElementDescription
Threat ModelSTRIDE analysis, attack trees, trust boundaries
Security ControlsAuthentication, encryption, access control
SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials (CycloneDX or SPDX)
Security TestingPenetration testing, vulnerability scanning
Vulnerability PlanDisclosure process, patch management

Device Tier Classification

Tier 1 (Higher Risk):

  • Connects to network/internet
  • Cybersecurity incident could cause patient harm

Tier 2 (Standard Risk):

  • All other connected devices

Postmarket Obligations

  1. Monitor NVD and ICS-CERT for vulnerabilities
  2. Assess applicability to device components
  3. Develop and test patches
  4. Communicate with customers
  5. Report to FDA per guidance

Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure

Researcher Report
    ↓
Acknowledgment (48 hours)
    ↓
Initial Assessment (5 days)
    ↓
Fix Development
    ↓
Coordinated Public Disclosure

Reference: See device_cybersecurity_guidance.md for SBOM format examples and threat modeling templates.


Resources

scripts/

ScriptPurpose
fda_submission_tracker.pyTrack 510(k)/PMA/De Novo submission milestones and timelines
qsr_compliance_checker.pyAssess 21 CFR 820 compliance against project documentation
hipaa_risk_assessment.pyEvaluate HIPAA safeguards in medical device software

references/

FileContent
fda_submission_guide.md510(k), De Novo, PMA submission requirements and checklists
qsr_compliance_requirements.md21 CFR 820 implementation guide with templates
hipaa_compliance_framework.mdHIPAA Security Rule safeguards and BAA requirements
device_cybersecurity_guidance.mdFDA cybersecurity requirements, SBOM, threat modeling
fda_capa_requirements.mdCAPA process, root cause analysis, effectiveness verification

Usage Examples

# Track FDA submission status
python scripts/fda_submission_tracker.py /path/to/project --type 510k

# Assess QSR compliance
python scripts/qsr_compliance_checker.py /path/to/project --section 820.30

# Run HIPAA risk assessment
python scripts/hipaa_risk_assessment.py /path/to/project --category technical

平台分布

Claude Code

28.82%
按下载量换算407

OpenCode

23.5%
按下载量换算332

Gemini CLI

17.38%
按下载量换算245

Codex

11.93%
按下载量换算168

Antigravity

8.9%
按下载量换算126

Cursor

3.47%
按下载量换算49

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills