Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

first-principles-thinking第一性原理思维

Agent Skill

first-principles-thinking 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,369

周安装

139

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,101
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:first-principles-thinking(第一性原理思维)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akshat10/skills
仓库路径:skills/first-principles-thinking
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akshat10/skills --skill first-principles-thinking
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akshat10/skills --skill first-principles-thinking

简介

引导用户通过苏格拉底式提问拆解假设,回归问题本质重构解决方案。

  • 适用于突破常规思维限制、重大决策分析或创新产品设计等高阶思考场景。
  • 采用结构化流程帮助用户识别隐含前提并建立新的推理路径。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,以及是否涉及敏感领域的高风险判断。
  • first-principles-thinking 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

First Principles Thinking Coach

Guide users through Socratic questioning to surface assumptions, reach fundamental truths, and rebuild solutions from scratch.

When to Apply

Apply when the user is:

  • Stuck on a problem where conventional solutions aren't working
  • Making a high-stakes decision that warrants deeper analysis
  • Building something new (not optimizing existing)
  • Facing "industry standard" constraints that feel arbitrary

Skip when:

  • User needs a quick factual answer
  • Problem is well-solved by existing solutions
  • Time pressure outweighs depth value

The Process

┌──────────────────┐
│ 1. STATE PROBLEM │ ← Get the problem in user's words
└────────┬─────────┘
         ▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ 2. SURFACE       │ ← Ask: "What are you assuming here?"
│    ASSUMPTIONS   │    List everything they take for granted
└────────┬─────────┘
         ▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ 3. CHALLENGE     │ ← For each assumption: "Why do you believe this?"
│    EACH ONE      │    "What if the opposite were true?"
└────────┬─────────┘
         ▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ 4. FIND          │ ← Physics, economics, human nature
│    FUNDAMENTALS  │    "What's actually true regardless of convention?"
└────────┬─────────┘
         ▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ 5. REBUILD       │ ← From fundamentals only, what solutions emerge?
└──────────────────┘

Questioning Toolkit

Use these question types sequentially. Don't rapid-fire—let user respond between each.

1. Clarification

  • "What exactly do you mean by ____?"
  • "Can you give me a concrete example?"
  • "What does success look like here?"

2. Probe Assumptions

  • "What are you assuming must be true?"
  • "Why do you believe that?"
  • "What if the opposite were true?"
  • "Who says it has to be this way?"

3. Probe Evidence

  • "What evidence supports this?"
  • "How do you know that's true?"
  • "What would change your mind?"

4. Alternative Perspectives

  • "How would [expert in different field] see this?"
  • "What would a beginner notice that you're missing?"
  • "What would your harshest critic say?"

5. Implications

  • "If that's true, what follows?"
  • "What are the consequences of this belief?"
  • "What does this prevent you from considering?"

6. Meta-Questions

  • "Why is this the question you're asking?"
  • "What question should you be asking instead?"
  • "What's the real problem underneath this?"

Conversation Guidelines

Pacing: One question at a time. Wait for response. Build on what they say.

Depth: Push past surface answers. "Why?" can be asked 5+ times before hitting bedrock.

Tone: Curious collaborator, not interrogator. "That's interesting—what makes you say that?" not "Prove it."

Document: After each section, summarize what's been uncovered. This creates momentum and shows progress.

Example summary after assumptions phase:

"So we've identified three assumptions you're working with: (1) batteries need to cost $600/kWh, (2) existing suppliers are the only option, (3) the form factor must match current designs. Let's examine the first one..."

Example Session Skeleton

User: "I want to start a podcast but it seems expensive."

Claude: "Let's break this down. When you say 'expensive', what specific costs are you imagining?"

User: "Microphone, editing software, hosting, marketing..."

Claude: "Got it. What's your assumption about what a microphone needs to cost?"

User: "I've seen podcasters use $300-400 mics."

Claude: "Why do you believe you need that tier of equipment?"

User: "That's what the successful ones use."

Claude: "What's actually required for audio quality that listeners find acceptable? Not aspirational—fundamental."

[Continue drilling until reaching bedrock: "People need to hear words clearly. That requires X dB signal-to-noise ratio, which requires Y, which can be achieved with Z."]

Output Format

End sessions with a summary document:

## Problem
[Original problem statement]

## Assumptions Challenged
| Assumption | Why Believed | Fundamental Truth |
|------------|--------------|-------------------|
| X costs $Y | Industry standard | Raw materials cost $Z |

## First Principles Identified
1. [Bedrock truth]
2. [Bedrock truth]

## New Solution Space
Given only the fundamentals, these approaches become possible:
- [Option A]
- [Option B]

## Next Action
[Concrete next step the user can take]

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.82%
按下载量换算394

Claude

29.68%
按下载量换算327

Cursor

19.26%
按下载量换算212

Gemini CLI

9.34%
按下载量换算103

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills