Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

agentic-development-principles(主体发展原则)

agentic-development-principles 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

agentic-development-principles 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 56,650。

总安装 447周安装 19GitHub Stars 11下载 157核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agentic-development-principles(主体发展原则)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akillness/skills-template
仓库路径:skills/agentic-development-principles
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/skills-template --skill agentic-development-principles
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/skills-template --skill agentic-development-principles

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

agentic-development-principles 确立以人为中心的 AI 协作准则,强调开发者最终控制权。适用于启动协作会话、制定复杂任务策略及优化工作流程设计。提出上下文管理、责任归属与生产力提升三大核心原则。鼓励在采纳新技术时保持批判性思维,避免盲目自动化。

可作为团队培训材料,统一成员对 AI 辅助开发的认知预期。

来源仓库内路径:skills/agentic-development-principles

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/skills-template --skill agentic-deve…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

agentic-development-principles 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/skills-template --skill agentic-development-pr…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

agentic-development-principles 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

agentic-development-principles 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

agentic-development-principles 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

agentic-development-principles 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 447 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 157 次,GitHub 11 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

agentic-development-principles 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
agentic-development-principles

主体发展原则 · 本页

44711接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Agentic development principles (Agentic Development Principles)

"AI is the copilot; you are the pilot" AI agents amplify the developer's thinking and take over repetitive work, but final decision-making authority and responsibility always remain with the developer.

When to use this skill

  • When starting a collaboration session with an AI agent
  • When deciding an approach before starting a complex task
  • When establishing a context management strategy
  • When reviewing workflows to improve productivity
  • When onboarding teammates on how to collaborate with AI
  • When applying baseline principles while adopting a new AI tool

Principle 1: Divide and conquer (Divide and Conquer)

Core concept

AI performs much better with small, clear instructions than with large, ambiguous tasks.

How to apply

Wrong exampleRight example
"Build me a login page"1. "Create the login form UI component"
2. "Implement the login API endpoint"
3. "Wire up the authentication logic"
4. "Write test code"
"Optimize the app"1. "Analyze performance bottlenecks"
2. "Optimize database queries"
3. "Reduce frontend bundle size"

Practical pattern: staged implementation

Step 1: Design and validate the model/schema
Step 2: Implement core logic (minimum viable functionality)
Step 3: Connect APIs/interfaces
Step 4: Write and run tests
Step 5: Integrate and refactor

Validation points

  • Can each step be validated independently?
  • If it fails, can you fix only that step?
  • Is the scope clear enough for the AI to understand?

Principle 2: Context is like milk (Context is like Milk)

Core concept

Context (the AI's working memory) should always be kept fresh and compact.

  • Old and irrelevant information reduces AI performance
  • Context drift: mixing multiple topics can reduce performance by up to 39% (research)

Context management strategies

Strategy 1: Single-purpose conversation
Session 1: Work on the authentication system
Session 2: Work on UI components
Session 3: Write test code
Session 4: DevOps/deployment work
  • Do not mix multiple topics in a single conversation
  • Start a new session for a new topic
Strategy 2: HANDOFF.md technique

When the conversation gets long, summarize only the essentials and hand them to a new session:

# HANDOFF.md

## Completed work
- ✅ Implemented user authentication API
- ✅ Implemented JWT token issuance logic

## Current status
- Working on token refresh logic

## Next tasks
- Implement refresh tokens
- Add logout endpoint

## Tried but failed
- Failed to integrate Redis session store (network issue)

## Cautions
- Watch for conflicts with existing session management code
Strategy 3: Monitor context state
  • When the conversation gets long, ask the AI to summarize the current state
  • If needed, reset the conversation and restart using HANDOFF.md
Strategy 4: Optimization metrics
MetricRecommended valueAction
Conversation lengthKeep to a reasonable levelCreate HANDOFF.md if it gets long
Topic count1 (single purpose)Use a new session for new topics
Active filesOnly what's neededRemove unnecessary context

Principle 3: Choose the right abstraction level

Core concept

Choose an appropriate abstraction level depending on the situation.

ModeDescriptionWhen to use
Vibe CodingHigh level (see only overall structure)Rapid prototyping, idea validation, one-off projects
Deep DiveLow level (go line-by-line)Bug fixes, security review, performance optimization, production code

In practice

When adding a new feature:
1. High abstraction: "Create a user profile page" → understand overall structure
2. Medium abstraction: "Show the validation logic for the profile edit form" → review a specific feature
3. Low abstraction: "Explain why this regex fails email validation" → detailed debugging

Abstraction level selection guide

  • Prototype/PoC: Vibe Coding 80%, Deep Dive 20%
  • Production code: Vibe Coding 30%, Deep Dive 70%
  • Bug fixes: Deep Dive 100%

Principle 4: Automation of automation (Automation of Automation)

Core concept

If you've repeated the same task 3+ times → find a way to automate it
And the automation process itself → automate that too

Automation level evolution

LevelApproachExample
1Manual copy/pasteAI output → copy into terminal
2Terminal integrationUse AI tools directly
3Voice inputVoice transcription system
4Automate repeated instructionsUse project config files
5Workflow automationCustom commands/scripts
6Automate decisionsUse Skills
7Enforce rules automaticallyUse hooks/guardrails

Checklist: identify automation targets

  • Do you run the same command 3+ times?
  • Do you repeat the same explanations?
  • Do you often write the same code patterns?
  • Do you repeat the same validation procedures?

Automation priority

  1. High: tasks repeated daily
  2. Medium: tasks repeated weekly (or more)
  3. Low: tasks repeated about once a month

Principle 5: Balance caution and speed (Plan vs Execute)

Plan mode (Plan Mode)

Analyze without executing; execute only after review/approval

When to use:

  • A complex task you're doing for the first time
  • A large refactor spanning multiple files
  • Architecture changes
  • Database migrations
  • Hard-to-roll-back work

Execute mode (Execute Mode)

AI directly edits code and runs commands

When to use:

  • Simple, clear tasks
  • Work with well-validated patterns
  • Sandbox/container environments
  • Easy-to-revert work

Recommended ratio

  • Plan mode: 70-90% (use as the default)
  • Execute mode: 10-30% (only in safe environments)

Safety principles

  • ⚠️ Auto-running dangerous commands only in isolated environments
  • Always back up before changing important data
  • Always use plan mode for irreversible work

Principle 6: Verify and reflect (Verify and Reflect)

How to verify output

  1. Write test code "Write tests for this function. Include edge cases too."
  2. Visual review

- Review changed files via diff - Revert unintended changes

  1. Draft PR / code review "Create a draft PR for these changes"
  2. Ask for self-verification "Review the code you just generated again. Validate every claim, and summarize the verification results in a table at the end."

Verification checklist

  • Does the code work as intended?
  • Are edge cases handled?
  • Are there any security vulnerabilities?
  • Are tests sufficient?
  • Are there any performance issues?

Reflection questions

  • What did you learn in this session?
  • What could you do better next time?
  • Were there repetitive tasks you could automate?

Quick Reference

Six principles summary

PrincipleCorePractice
1. Divide and conquerSmall, clear unitsSplit into independently verifiable steps
2. Context managementKeep it freshSingle-purpose conversations, HANDOFF.md
3. Abstraction choiceDepth per situationAdjust Vibe ↔ Deep Dive
4. Automation²Remove repetitionAutomate after 3 repetitions
5. Plan/execute balanceCaution firstPlan 70-90%, execute 10-30%
6. Verification/reflectionCheck outputsTests, reviews, self-verification

Mastery rule

"To truly master AI tools, you need to use them enough"

Learning by using is key - theory alone is not enough; you need to experience different situations in real projects.

Golden rule

When instructing an AI:
1. Clearly (Specific)
2. Step-by-step (Step-by-step)
3. Verifiable (Verifiable)

Best Practices

DO (recommended)

  • Focus on one clear goal per conversation
  • Regularly clean up context
  • Plan before complex work
  • Always verify outputs
  • Automate repetitive work

DON'T (prohibited)

  • Handle multiple unrelated tasks in one conversation
  • Keep working with a bloated context
  • Auto-run dangerous commands carelessly
  • Use AI output as-is without verification
  • Repeat the same work without automating it

References

平台分布

Codex

33.89%
按下载量换算53

Claude

31.2%
按下载量换算49

Cursor

18.48%
按下载量换算29

Gemini CLI

9.2%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills