Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

code-refactoring(代码重构)

code-refactoring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

code-refactoring 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 72,863。

总安装 186周安装 8GitHub Stars 1下载 65核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:code-refactoring(代码重构)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-unity3d
仓库路径:skills/code-refactoring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-unity3d --skill code-refactoring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-unity3d --skill code-refactoring

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于代码结构优化,支持函数提取、类拆分和重复模式消除等重构手法。适合代码审查后清理技术债务,或在添加新功能前提升可读性与可维护性。使用时需保证重构前后行为一致,建议配合测试用例验证逻辑不变。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-unity3d --skill code-refactoring 大型重构应分阶段实施,避免单次提交过多变更增加风险。

来源仓库内路径:skills/code-refactoring

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-unity3d --skill code-refactori…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

code-refactoring 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-unity3d --skill code-refactoring。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

code-refactoring 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

code-refactoring 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

code-refactoring 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

code-refactoring 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 186 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 65 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

code-refactoring 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
code-refactoring

代码重构 · 本页

1861只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Code Refactoring

When to use this skill

  • Code review: Discovering complex or duplicated code
  • Before adding new features: Cleaning up existing code
  • After bug fixes: Removing root causes
  • Resolving technical debt: Regular refactoring

Instructions

Step 1: Extract Method

Before (long function):

function processOrder(order: Order) {
  // Validation
  if (!order.items || order.items.length === 0) {
    throw new Error('Order must have items');
  }
  if (!order.customerId) {
    throw new Error('Order must have customer');
  }

  // Price calculation
  let total = 0;
  for (const item of order.items) {
    total += item.price * item.quantity;
  }
  const tax = total * 0.1;
  const shipping = total > 100 ? 0 : 10;
  const finalTotal = total + tax + shipping;

  // Inventory check
  for (const item of order.items) {
    const product = await db.product.findUnique({ where: { id: item.productId } });
    if (product.stock < item.quantity) {
      throw new Error(`Insufficient stock for ${product.name}`);
    }
  }

  // Create order
  const newOrder = await db.order.create({
    data: {
      customerId: order.customerId,
      items: order.items,
      total: finalTotal,
      status: 'pending'
    }
  });

  return newOrder;
}

After (method extraction):

async function processOrder(order: Order) {
  validateOrder(order);
  const total = calculateTotal(order);
  await checkInventory(order);
  return await createOrder(order, total);
}

function validateOrder(order: Order) {
  if (!order.items || order.items.length === 0) {
    throw new Error('Order must have items');
  }
  if (!order.customerId) {
    throw new Error('Order must have customer');
  }
}

function calculateTotal(order: Order): number {
  const subtotal = order.items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.price * item.quantity, 0);
  const tax = subtotal * 0.1;
  const shipping = subtotal > 100 ? 0 : 10;
  return subtotal + tax + shipping;
}

async function checkInventory(order: Order) {
  for (const item of order.items) {
    const product = await db.product.findUnique({ where: { id: item.productId } });
    if (product.stock < item.quantity) {
      throw new Error(`Insufficient stock for ${product.name}`);
    }
  }
}

async function createOrder(order: Order, total: number) {
  return await db.order.create({
    data: {
      customerId: order.customerId,
      items: order.items,
      total,
      status: 'pending'
    }
  });
}

Step 2: Remove Duplication

Before (duplication):

async function getActiveUsers() {
  return await db.user.findMany({
    where: { status: 'active', deletedAt: null },
    select: { id: true, name: true, email: true }
  });
}

async function getActivePremiumUsers() {
  return await db.user.findMany({
    where: { status: 'active', deletedAt: null, plan: 'premium' },
    select: { id: true, name: true, email: true }
  });
}

After (extract common logic):

type UserFilter = {
  plan?: string;
};

async function getActiveUsers(filter: UserFilter = {}) {
  return await db.user.findMany({
    where: {
      status: 'active',
      deletedAt: null,
      ...filter
    },
    select: { id: true, name: true, email: true }
  });
}

// Usage
const allActiveUsers = await getActiveUsers();
const premiumUsers = await getActiveUsers({ plan: 'premium' });

Step 3: Replace Conditional with Polymorphism

Before (long if-else):

class PaymentProcessor {
  process(payment: Payment) {
    if (payment.method === 'credit_card') {
      // Credit card processing
      const cardToken = this.tokenizeCard(payment.card);
      const charge = this.chargeCreditCard(cardToken, payment.amount);
      return charge;
    } else if (payment.method === 'paypal') {
      // PayPal processing
      const paypalOrder = this.createPayPalOrder(payment.amount);
      const approval = this.getPayPalApproval(paypalOrder);
      return approval;
    } else if (payment.method === 'bank_transfer') {
      // Bank transfer processing
      const transfer = this.initiateBankTransfer(payment.account, payment.amount);
      return transfer;
    }
  }
}

After (polymorphism):

interface PaymentMethod {
  process(payment: Payment): Promise<PaymentResult>;
}

class CreditCardPayment implements PaymentMethod {
  async process(payment: Payment): Promise<PaymentResult> {
    const cardToken = await this.tokenizeCard(payment.card);
    return await this.chargeCreditCard(cardToken, payment.amount);
  }
}

class PayPalPayment implements PaymentMethod {
  async process(payment: Payment): Promise<PaymentResult> {
    const order = await this.createPayPalOrder(payment.amount);
    return await this.getPayPalApproval(order);
  }
}

class BankTransferPayment implements PaymentMethod {
  async process(payment: Payment): Promise<PaymentResult> {
    return await this.initiateBankTransfer(payment.account, payment.amount);
  }
}

class PaymentProcessor {
  private methods: Map<string, PaymentMethod> = new Map([
    ['credit_card', new CreditCardPayment()],
    ['paypal', new PayPalPayment()],
    ['bank_transfer', new BankTransferPayment()]
  ]);

  async process(payment: Payment): Promise<PaymentResult> {
    const method = this.methods.get(payment.method);
    if (!method) {
      throw new Error(`Unknown payment method: ${payment.method}`);
    }
    return await method.process(payment);
  }
}

Step 4: Introduce Parameter Object

Before (many parameters):

function createUser(
  name: string,
  email: string,
  password: string,
  age: number,
  country: string,
  city: string,
  postalCode: string,
  phoneNumber: string
) {
  // ...
}

After (grouped into object):

interface UserProfile {
  name: string;
  email: string;
  password: string;
  age: number;
}

interface Address {
  country: string;
  city: string;
  postalCode: string;
}

interface CreateUserParams {
  profile: UserProfile;
  address: Address;
  phoneNumber: string;
}

function createUser(params: CreateUserParams) {
  const { profile, address, phoneNumber } = params;
  // ...
}

// Usage
createUser({
  profile: { name: 'John', email: 'john@example.com', password: 'xxx', age: 30 },
  address: { country: 'US', city: 'NYC', postalCode: '10001' },
  phoneNumber: '+1234567890'
});

Step 5: Apply SOLID Principles

Single Responsibility:

// ❌ Bad example: multiple responsibilities
class User {
  constructor(public name: string, public email: string) {}

  save() {
    // Save to DB
  }

  sendEmail(subject: string, body: string) {
    // Send email
  }

  generateReport() {
    // Generate report
  }
}

// ✅ Good example: separated responsibilities
class User {
  constructor(public name: string, public email: string) {}
}

class UserRepository {
  save(user: User) {
    // Save to DB
  }
}

class EmailService {
  send(to: string, subject: string, body: string) {
    // Send email
  }
}

class UserReportGenerator {
  generate(user: User) {
    // Generate report
  }
}

Output format

Refactoring Checklist

- [ ] Function does one thing only (SRP)
- [ ] Function name clearly describes what it does
- [ ] Function is 20 lines or fewer (guideline)
- [ ] 3 or fewer parameters
- [ ] No duplicate code (DRY)
- [ ] if nesting is 2 levels or fewer
- [ ] No magic numbers (extract as constants)
- [ ] Understandable without comments (self-documenting)

Constraints

Mandatory Rules (MUST)

  1. Test first: Write tests before refactoring
  2. Small steps: Change one thing at a time
  3. Behavior preservation: No functional changes

Prohibited (MUST NOT)

  1. Multiple tasks simultaneously: No refactoring + feature addition at the same time
  2. Refactoring without tests: Risk of regression

Best practices

  1. Boy Scout Rule: Leave code cleaner than you found it
  2. Refactoring timing: Red-Green-Refactor (TDD)
  3. Incremental improvement: Consistency over perfection
  4. Behavior preservation: Refactoring involves no functional changes
  5. Small commits: Commit in focused units

Behavior Validation (Code Simplifier Integration)

Step A: Understand Current Behavior

Fully understand current behavior before refactoring:

## Behavior Analysis

### Inputs
- [list of input parameters]
- [types and constraints]

### Outputs
- [return values]
- [side effects]

### Invariants
- [conditions that must always be true]
- [edge cases]

### Dependencies
- [external dependencies]
- [state dependencies]

Step B: Validate After Refactoring

# 1. Run tests
npm test -- --coverage

# 2. Type check
npx tsc --noEmit

# 3. Lint check
npm run lint

# 4. Compare with previous behavior (snapshot tests)
npm test -- --updateSnapshot

Step C: Document Changes

## Refactoring Summary

### Changes Made
1. [Change 1]: [reason]
2. [Change 2]: [reason]

### Behavior Preserved
- [x] Same input → same output
- [x] Same side effects
- [x] Same error handling

### Risks & Follow-ups
- [potential risks]
- [follow-up tasks]

### Test Status
- [ ] Unit tests: passing
- [ ] Integration tests: passing
- [ ] E2E tests: passing

Troubleshooting

Issue: Tests fail after refactor

Cause: Behavior change occurred Solution: Revert and isolate the change, then retry

Issue: Code still complex

Cause: Multiple responsibilities mixed in one function Solution: Extract into smaller units with clear boundaries

Issue: Performance regression

Cause: Inefficient abstraction introduced Solution: Profile and optimize the hot path


Multi-Agent Workflow

Validation & Retrospectives

  • Round 1 (Orchestrator): Validate behavior preservation checklist
  • Round 2 (Analyst): Complexity and duplication analysis
  • Round 3 (Executor): Test or static analysis verification

Agent Roles

AgentRole
ClaudeRefactoring plan, code transformation
GeminiLarge-scale codebase analysis, pattern detection
CodexTest execution, build verification

Workflow Example

# 1. Gemini: Codebase analysis
ask-gemini "@src/ extract list of high-complexity functions"

# 2. Claude: Refactoring plan and execution
# Work based on IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md

# 3. Codex: Verification
codex-cli shell "npm test && npm run lint"

References

Metadata

Version

  • Current Version: 1.0.0
  • Last Updated: 2025-01-01
  • Compatible Platforms: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini

Related Skills

Tags

#refactoring #code-quality #DRY #SOLID #design-patterns #clean-code

Examples

Example 1: Basic usage

Example 2: Advanced usage

平台分布

Codex

34.86%
按下载量换算23

Claude

28.78%
按下载量换算19

Cursor

21.17%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

10.67%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills