Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

skill-standardization(技能标准化)

skill-standardization 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

skill-standardization 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 36,263。

总安装 1,953周安装 79GitHub Stars 11下载 613核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:skill-standardization(技能标准化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills
仓库路径:skills/skill-standardization
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill skill-standardization
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill skill-standardization

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于标准化 Agent Skills 的开发规范与文档结构,提升技能可维护性。适合创建新 SKILL.md、审计现有技能合规性或合并重复技能定义。支持验证仓库级目录漂移或材料重写后的格式一致性,确保触发描述准确。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill skill-standardization 使用前应参考 working-modes.md 选择合适的模式(如 validate 或 repair)。

来源仓库内路径:skills/skill-standardization

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill skill-standardi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

skill-standardization 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill skill-standardization。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

skill-standardization 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

skill-standardization 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill skill-standardization 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

skill-standardization 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

skill-standardization 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,953 次,近一周安装 79 次,下载 613 次,GitHub 11 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

skill-standardization 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
skill-standardization

技能标准化 · 本页

1,95311执行命令未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Skill Standardization

When to use this skill

  • Creating a new SKILL.md from scratch
  • Auditing an existing skill for Agent Skills spec compliance
  • Repairing weak trigger descriptions or stale route-outs
  • Canonicalizing duplicate skills into a default skill plus compatibility alias
  • Validating repo-level discovery/catalog drift after add/rename/remove/alias work
  • Reviewing SKILL.toon / SKILL.compact.md drift after material rewrites

Instructions

Step 1: Pick the smallest working mode

Use references/working-modes.md and pick exactly one primary mode:

  1. validate or repair one existing skill
  2. create or rewrite a SKILL.md
  3. canonicalize duplicates
  4. structural catalog / discovery sync
  5. derived-surface sync after a material rewrite

Do not start with a giant blended pass if one of those modes answers the job.

Step 2: Run the truthful validator command for the current working directory

For oh-my-skills repo-root maintenance loops, use:

bash .agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/validate_skill.sh .agent-skills/<skill-name>

If you are running from inside .agent-skills/skill-standardization, use the skill-local form from references/working-modes.md instead. Do not copy bare scripts/... commands into repo-root runbooks unless the current cwd really makes them valid.

The validator checks:

  • required frontmatter (name, description)
  • directory-safe naming
  • description length and imperative trigger phrasing
  • recommended sections
  • file-length warning

Repo-specific validator nuance:

  • validate_skill.sh is expected to accept valid multiline description: > blocks that contain ordinary apostrophes or shell-like text. If it still fails on prose-level quoting, treat that as a validator bug to repair, not as a reason to weaken the skill description.
  • Prefer fixing the validator or adding a regression case before rewriting natural language just to appease shell parsing.

Step 3: Fix or write the primary SKILL.md

When creating or rewriting the skill:

  • keep the description trigger-oriented and specific about when to use the skill
  • make the default job-to-be-done obvious before listing edge cases
  • keep the front door routing-first; move slower-changing examples/checklists/templates to references/ when they start to crowd the main skill
  • keep SKILL.md under 500 lines and preferably much smaller when the skill is a high-frequency router

Use the compact template and legacy heading map in references/working-modes.md instead of copying a bloated starter by hand.

Step 4: Improve description quality before polishing anything else

A weak description means the skill never activates. Use this pattern:

description: >
  [What it does — list specific operations.]
  Use when [trigger conditions]. Even if the user does not explicitly
  mention [domain keyword] — also triggers on: [synonym list].

Description rules:

  1. use imperative phrasing — "Use when..."
  2. describe user intent, not internal implementation
  3. include edge triggers and nearby synonyms
  4. stay under 1024 characters
  5. keep route-outs truthful when adjacent skills should win

Step 5: Add evals whenever the behavior changed materially

Create or refresh evals/evals.json when you add a skill, rewrite its trigger surface, or narrow it into an alias.

Good eval coverage includes:

  • a normal prompt that should clearly trigger the skill
  • a near-miss prompt that should route elsewhere
  • a structural-change prompt that checks catalog/discovery sync when relevant
  • compact/discovery-surface checks when SKILL.toon / SKILL.compact.md matter in the repo

Keep assertions concrete and verifiable.

Step 6: Canonicalize duplicates instead of letting them compete

When two skills cover the same default job closely enough that their name + description metadata competes:

  1. pick the canonical skill
  2. sharpen the canonical description so it wins ordinary prompts
  3. convert the overlapping skill into a narrow compatibility alias when old workflows or exact-name installs still depend on it
  4. add evals for both sides
  5. sync discovery surfaces in the same change so users do not see two false peers
  6. if the alias includes support docs or examples that restate the canonical contract, refresh those alias-side docs too so they do not keep advertising the pre-ratchet packet shape

Hard deletion is usually a later step, not the first move.

Step 7: Run structural catalog sync after add / rename / remove / alias / major repositioning work

For repo-level drift in oh-my-skills, use:

python3 .agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/validate_catalog_sync.py --repo-root /Users/jang_jennie/projects/oh-my-skills

Portable form:

python3 .agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/validate_catalog_sync.py --repo-root /path/to/repo

Treat the catalog validator as a guardrail, not the whole job. It checks membership/count/path drift, but it does not replace manual review of derived discovery wording or compact freshness.

Step 8: Sync derived discovery surfaces when the rewrite was material

If SKILL.md changed the job-to-be-done, route-outs, or supported use-cases materially, review and refresh as needed:

  • skill-local SKILL.toon / SKILL.compact.md
  • alias-side support docs or checklists that mirror the canonical contract
  • .agent-skills/skills.json
  • .agent-skills/skills.toon
  • README.md
  • README.ko.md
  • setup-all-skills-prompt.md

If one of those surfaces does not need a change, be able to explain why.

Step 9: Do a residue scan before calling the pass done

After support-heavy or structural rewrites, search for obvious residue:

  • stale filenames or paths
  • removed command examples
  • old canonical-vs-alias wording
  • compact/discovery text that still advertises the old job

Keep the pass only if the result is more truthful and transferable than the baseline.

Available scripts

  • bash.agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/validate_skill.sh <skill-dir> — validate one skill
  • bash.agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/validate_skill.sh --all.agent-skills/ — batch validation
  • python3.agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/validate_catalog_sync.py --repo-root /path/to/repo — compare live folders against catalog/discovery surfaces
  • bash.agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/regression_folded_description_quotes.sh [repo-root] — regression-check folded descriptions with apostrophes / shell-like text

Examples

Example 1: Validate one skill from repo root

bash .agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/validate_skill.sh .agent-skills/my-skill

Example 2: Batch validate the whole repo

bash .agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/validate_skill.sh --all .agent-skills/

Example 3: Check catalog/discovery sync after a rename or alias change

python3 .agent-skills/skill-standardization/scripts/validate_catalog_sync.py --repo-root /path/to/repo

Use this after adding, renaming, removing, or canonicalizing a skill so stale manifest entries, wrong inventory counts, and forgotten derived-surface updates do not linger.

Example 4: Fix common frontmatter issues

# WRONG
metadata:
  tags: [tag1, tag2]
  platforms: Claude

# CORRECT
metadata:
  tags: tag1, tag2
allowed-tools: Bash Read Write

Best practices

  1. Description quality first — weak descriptions mean the skill never activates
  2. Shrink high-frequency routers — move slower-changing detail to references/ before the front door turns into a handbook
  3. Use truthful command paths — match repo-root vs skill-local execution context explicitly
  4. Keep scripts non-interactive and structured — prefer flags and machine-readable output
  5. Add evals before publishing — cover should-trigger, should-not-trigger, and structural-change cases
  6. Treat compact/discovery files as derived artifacts — refresh them after material rewrites or document why not
  7. Canonicalize duplicates instead of multiplying peers — prefer one default skill plus a compatibility alias
  8. Sync alias-side support when the canonical contract changes — if the alias has checklists, references, or examples that restate the old packet shape, update them in the same pass so the alias does not quietly preserve stale guidance
  9. Run residue scans after structural rewrites — passing validators can still leave stale filenames, commands, or discovery copy behind

References

平台分布

Codex

34.5%
按下载量换算211

Claude

31.89%
按下载量换算195

Cursor

16.48%
按下载量换算101

Gemini CLI

8.28%
按下载量换算51

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill skill-standardization 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills