Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

scrapling(scrapling 命令行)

scrapling 用于处理浏览器自动化、网页检查和页面信息提取,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要让 Agent 打开页面、读取网页或验证前端流程时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

scrapling 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 38,990。

总安装 1,482周安装 63GitHub Stars 11下载 519核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:scrapling(scrapling 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills
仓库路径:skills/scrapling
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill scrapling
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill scrapling

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于网页数据整理与自动化测试,支持自适应爬取与 stealth 模式访问。适合解析 HTML、抓取动态内容或多页状态管理,适用于数据调研与前端验证。使用时需遵守目标站点的 robots.txt 与速率限制,避免触发反爬机制。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill scrapling 建议先尝试轻量 HTTP 请求,再逐步升级至浏览器渲染模式以确保稳定性。

来源仓库内路径:skills/scrapling

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill scrapling;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

scrapling 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill scrapling。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

scrapling 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

scrapling 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

scrapling 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

scrapling 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,482 次,近一周安装 63 次,下载 519 次,GitHub 11 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

scrapling 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
scrapling

scrapling 命令行 · 本页

1,48211操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

scrapling - routing-first adaptive web scraping

Keyword: scrapling · adaptive scraping · stealthy fetch · scrapling spider Respect each target site's terms, robots, rate limits, authorization boundaries, and anti-abuse policies.

Scrapling is most useful when you choose the smallest scraping mode that fits the job:

  • parse known HTML before reaching for a browser
  • start with plain HTTP before rendering JavaScript
  • escalate to stealth only when simpler paths fail
  • switch to spiders only when crawl state and multi-page orchestration become the real problem

When to use this skill

  • The user needs one page or a few pages extracted and you must decide between parser-only, HTTP fetch, browser rendering, or stealth
  • The user wants to prototype with scrapling extract, scrapling shell, or wrapper scripts instead of writing Python first
  • The user wants adaptive selector recovery because the target DOM changes over time
  • The user wants Scrapling exposed to an agent via MCP
  • The user is about to turn repeated fetches into a site crawl and needs to know when Scrapling spiders are justified
  • The user keeps drifting toward Playwright/Crawlee-style orchestration, direct API interception, or managed unblockers and needs an honest route-out

Instructions

Step 1: Capture one intake packet before choosing tools

Collect the minimum packet:

  • Target class: raw HTML, normal web page, JS-rendered app, protected site, or many-page crawl
  • Desired output: CSS/XPath extraction, Markdown/text file, structured records, or long-running crawl output
  • Operational need: quick probe, repeated session reuse, agent/MCP access, or resumable crawling
  • Constraint: install budget, browser availability, auth/proxy limits, and whether direct API/JSON access may be better than DOM scraping

Use this rule set:

  1. If HTML is already available, start with Selector
  2. If a live page is needed, start with Fetcher
  3. If the content is rendered client-side, move to DynamicFetcher
  4. If the rendered path is still blocked or empty, move to StealthyFetcher
  5. If the job is now queueing, link following, retries, or checkpoints, move to spiders
  6. If the real need is browser automation, pre-navigation request interception, or a managed unblocker, route out instead of over-promising Scrapling

Detailed packet examples and route-outs live in references/intake-packets-and-route-outs.md.

Step 2: Install only the profile you need

Use a virtual environment unless the user explicitly wants a system install.

bash scripts/install.sh --profile parser
bash scripts/install.sh --profile fetchers
bash scripts/install.sh --profile shell
bash scripts/install.sh --profile ai
bash scripts/install.sh --profile all

Installation guidance:

  • parser — local HTML parsing only
  • fetchers — HTTP + browser-backed fetchers
  • shell — interactive CLI shell workflows
  • ai — MCP server workflows
  • all — only when the user truly needs the full surface

Browser-backed flows require scrapling install. Parser-only workflows do not.

Step 3: Choose the lightest extraction path that fits

A. Parser-only path

Use this when HTML is already available or the user mainly needs selector logic.

from scrapling import Selector

page = Selector(html_doc, url="https://example.com")
items = page.css("article h2::text").getall()

Use this path for:

  • local HTML fixtures
  • saved responses
  • quick selector authoring
  • low-cost extraction without network/browser concerns
B. HTTP fetch path

Use Fetcher or FetcherSession when plain HTTP is likely enough.

from scrapling.fetchers import Fetcher

page = Fetcher.get("https://example.com", impersonate="chrome")
title = page.css("title::text").get()

Prefer this path for:

  • docs, blogs, many marketing pages, search results, simple product pages
  • cheap repeated requests with session reuse
  • cases where the user only needs rendered HTML if evidence proves HTTP is insufficient
C. Dynamic browser path

Use DynamicFetcher or DynamicSession when the target is JS-rendered.

from scrapling.fetchers import DynamicFetcher

page = DynamicFetcher.fetch(
    "https://example.com/app",
    network_idle=True,
    wait_selector=".content"
)

Reach for this when:

  • the page is a SPA/dashboard
  • content appears only after client-side rendering
  • small interaction or wait controls are enough
D. Stealth path

Use StealthyFetcher or StealthySession only when the lighter paths fail because of protection.

from scrapling.fetchers import StealthyFetcher

page = StealthyFetcher.fetch(
    "https://example.com/protected",
    headless=True,
    solve_cloudflare=True
)

Important:

  • Treat anti-bot handling as a documented capability, not a guarantee
  • If a target still fails or requires stronger infra, route honestly to proxies or managed unblockers instead of pretending one more flag will always fix it

Fetcher/session details live in references/fetchers-and-sessions.md.

Step 4: Use adaptive scraping only when selector drift is the problem

Adaptive scraping is valuable when the DOM changes but the semantic target is still the same.

from scrapling.fetchers import Fetcher

Fetcher.configure(adaptive=True)
page = Fetcher.get("https://example.com")
saved = page.css(".product", auto_save=True)
relocated = page.css(".product", adaptive=True)

Remember:

  • adaptive=True is opt-in
  • auto_save=True stores fingerprints for later reuse
  • manual save(), retrieve(), and relocate() flows are available
  • this helps brittle selectors, not auth failures or full site redesign strategy

Parser/adaptive details live in references/parser-and-adaptive.md.

Step 5: Choose the right operator surface

CLI / shell

Use CLI when the user wants quick output files or a terminal-first probe.

bash scripts/run-extract.sh get "https://example.com" article.md --css-selector "article"
bash scripts/run-extract.sh fetch "https://app.example.com" content.md --network-idle
bash scripts/run-extract.sh stealth "https://protected.example.com" content.md --solve-cloudflare

Use scrapling shell when the user wants an interactive REPL rather than a standalone script.

MCP

Use MCP when the goal is agent-facing access instead of a bespoke scraper script.

bash scripts/run-mcp.sh
bash scripts/run-mcp.sh --http --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8000

Start with stdio for local agent integration; use HTTP only when the environment already expects streamable HTTP.

CLI/MCP details live in references/cli-and-mcp.md.

Step 6: Switch to spiders only when crawl state matters

Use spiders when the task needs:

  • multiple pages and link following
  • retries and blocked-response handling
  • concurrency and session routing
  • pause/resume checkpoints via crawldir

For one or two isolated pages, fetchers remain simpler.

from scrapling.spiders import Spider, Response

class QuotesSpider(Spider):
    name = "quotes"
    start_urls = ["https://quotes.toscrape.com/"]

    async def parse(self, response: Response):
        for quote in response.css(".quote"):
            yield {"text": quote.css(".text::text").get()}

Spider details live in references/spiders.md.

Examples

Example 1: I already have HTML and just need selectors

Use Selector, not a browser.

Example 2: A marketing page loads over plain HTTP

Start with Fetcher or scrapling extract get, then escalate only if evidence says the content is missing.

Example 3: A React dashboard is empty until JS runs

Move to DynamicFetcher and use network_idle or wait_selector.

Example 4: A protected target returns a challenge page

Try StealthyFetcher, but make it explicit that stronger proxy/unblocker infrastructure may still be required.

Example 5: An agent needs bounded web extraction

Expose Scrapling through MCP instead of forcing a handwritten scraper first.

Example 6: The task has become a real crawl

Route from repeated fetches into spiders with checkpointing and session control.

Best practices

  1. Start with the smallest viable mode and escalate only on evidence.
  2. Prefer direct API/JSON access when that is the real source of truth; do not force DOM scraping for browser-heavy apps.
  3. Reuse sessions for repeated requests instead of relaunching browsers on every page.
  4. Use adaptive scraping for selector drift, not as a blanket fix for every failure mode.
  5. Prefer CSS selectors plus .md or .txt outputs to keep model context smaller.
  6. Treat CLI, MCP, and spiders as operator surfaces layered on top of the same routing logic, not three unrelated features.
  7. Route honestly to Playwright/Crawlee-style automation, external unblockers, or another extraction service when Scrapling is no longer the best fit.

References

平台分布

Claude

32.6%
按下载量换算169

Codex

31.43%
按下载量换算163

Cursor

17%
按下载量换算88

Gemini CLI

9.64%
按下载量换算50

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills