Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

playwriter(playwriter 命令行)

playwriter 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

playwriter 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 35,149。

总安装 2,133周安装 88GitHub Stars 11下载 697核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:playwriter(playwriter 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills
仓库路径:skills/playwriter
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill playwriter
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill playwriter

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

playwriter 是连接已有 Chrome/Chromium 实例的浏览器自动化技能,适用于已登录或依赖扩展的场景。适合处理 SSO、MFA 认证流及长期会话上下文,但不如全新会话工具可复现。通过命令行调用,支持多标签页状态保持和复杂交互流程。使用时应注意安全边界,避免自动执行高风险操作或泄露敏感信息。

playwriter 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/playwriter

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill playwriter;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

playwriter 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill playwriter。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

playwriter 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

playwriter 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

playwriter 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

playwriter 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,133 次,近一周安装 88 次,下载 697 次,GitHub 11 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

playwriter 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
playwriter

playwriter 命令行 · 本页

2,13311操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

playwriter

Playwriter is the running-browser browser-automation skill. It connects an agent to Chrome/Chromium that is already part of the user’s real workflow instead of spawning a clean disposable browser. That makes it useful for authenticated flows, extension-dependent pages, and long-lived tab context — but less reproducible than a fresh-session browser tool.

When to use this skill

Use playwriter when the task needs one or more of these:

  • the browser the user already has open
  • existing logins, cookies, or trusted-device state
  • extension-dependent workflows
  • passkey / SSO / MFA-heavy flows where manual login handoff is realistic
  • live-tab continuity with a human and agent sharing the same browser
  • MCP-based browser control for Claude / Codex / Gemini using the running browser

Do not use playwriter by default for:

  • CI-style repeatable browser checks
  • fresh-session verification that should not touch the user’s real browser profile
  • simple scraping or deterministic form checks that fit agent-browser
  • tasks that need the strongest isolation or the least user-state coupling

Quick routing rule

If the job needs...Use
The browser the user already has openplaywriter
Existing logins / cookies / extensionsplaywriter
A clean, reproducible, disposable sessionagent-browser
Headless verification / screenshot diffs / isolated checksagent-browser
Hosted or cloud browser infrastructurea provider-specific or cloud-browser skill

Instructions

Step 1: Pick the right browser runtime

Use playwriter only when running-browser reuse is the requirement. If the task is really about a clean disposable browser or CI-style reproducibility, route to agent-browser instead.

Step 2: Follow the core workflow

Always follow the same loop:

  1. Prepare the running-browser bridge
  2. Create or select a session
  3. Observe first with snapshot({page})
  4. Act once
  5. Observe again before the next action

Step 1: Install the extension and CLI

# install the CLI
npm install -g playwriter
# or use it without global install
npx playwriter@latest --help

Install the Playwriter Chrome extension, then click the extension icon on the tab you want to control. The tab should show the connected/green state before you assume automation is available.

Step 2: Start browser support and create a session

Use the upstream browser/session flow, not a vague “extension auto-starts everything” assumption:

# start the managed browser/runtime if needed
playwriter browser start

# create a stateful sandbox session
playwriter session new

# inspect current sessions
playwriter session list

Notes:

  • playwriter browser start can launch Chrome for Testing / Chromium with the Playwriter extension available.
  • playwriter session new creates a stateful sandbox and returns a session id.
  • Browser tabs are shared, but session state is isolated.

Step 3: Observe → act → observe

# navigate
playwriter -s 1 -e 'await page.goto("https://example.com")'

# observe current page state
playwriter -s 1 -e 'console.log(await snapshot({ page }))'

# act using a fresh aria-ref from the snapshot
playwriter -s 1 -e 'await page.locator("aria-ref=e5").click()'

# observe again after the action
playwriter -s 1 -e 'console.log(await snapshot({ page }))'

Rules:

  • Never keep using old aria-ref values after navigation or major DOM changes.
  • Prefer snapshot({page}) over screenshots when text structure is enough.
  • Use screenshots or recordings only when visual evidence matters.

High-value command patterns

Navigation and state

playwriter browser start
playwriter session new
playwriter session list
playwriter session reset 1
playwriter session delete 1

Execute Playwright code in a session

# basic navigation
playwriter -s 1 -e 'await page.goto("https://github.com")'

# fill + submit
playwriter -s 1 -e 'await page.fill("#search", "playwriter"); await page.keyboard.press("Enter")'

# save reusable state between calls
playwriter -s 1 -e 'state.lastUrl = page.url(); state.heading = await page.textContent("h1")'
playwriter -s 1 -e 'console.log(state.lastUrl, state.heading)'

Multiline code safely

playwriter -s 1 -e "$(cat <<'EOF'
const title = await page.title();
state.title = title;
console.log(await snapshot({ page }));
EOF
)"

Use heredocs when the JavaScript would become fragile with quoting.

MCP integration

Use Playwriter when a model client needs browser tooling for the running browser, not when it simply needs any browser tool.

Example MCP config

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "playwriter": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "playwriter@latest"]
    }
  }
}

Common uses:

  • Claude / Codex / Gemini can call into Playwriter through MCP.
  • MCP gives the agent a transport layer; Playwriter still owns the browser/session behavior.
  • Session reuse, browser visibility, and tab consent remain Playwriter concerns, not MCP concerns.

Safety and expectations

  • playwriter is privileged mode because it can touch the user’s real browser session.
  • Prefer it only when session reuse is genuinely required.
  • Expect lower reproducibility than a clean isolated browser because tabs, extensions, and humans can mutate state.
  • Manual login / MFA / CAPTCHA handoff is normal in this lane; don’t pretend full autonomy is guaranteed.
  • Detach or reset cleanly; do not assume it is safe to kill the user’s browser.

Troubleshooting

IssueWhat to check
Nothing respondsConfirm the extension is installed and enabled on the target tab
Wrong tab/page stateRe-run snapshot({page}) and confirm you are on the expected tab before clicking
Stale / broken sessionplaywriter session reset <id>
Quoting breaks JavaScriptUse a heredoc for -e input
Need repeatable isolated automationRoute to agent-browser instead
Browser state is too messy / human interferenceStart a fresh session or use a fresh-session browser tool

Examples

Example 1: Logged-in SaaS workflow

  • Prompt: "Use my already logged-in Chrome to update a Jira ticket without re-authenticating."
  • Expected skill behavior: choose playwriter, mention running-browser reuse, create a session, observe first, then act.

Example 2: Clean browser verification

  • Prompt: "Run a repeatable headless checkout test in CI and compare screenshots."
  • Expected skill behavior: route away from playwriter to agent-browser or another fresh-session tool because isolation matters more than session reuse.

Example 3: MCP browser bridge

  • Prompt: "Connect Codex or Claude to the browser I already have open so it can use my current tabs and cookies."
  • Expected skill behavior: choose playwriter, explain MCP config, and make the running-browser assumption explicit.

Best practices

  1. Choose playwriter because the browser state matters, not because the word “browser” appears.
  2. Start with snapshot({page}) before any action that could hit the wrong tab or stale UI state.
  3. Re-snapshot after each meaningful action; live browser state drifts faster than isolated automation state.
  4. Use heredocs for non-trivial JavaScript to avoid shell-quoting bugs.
  5. Treat manual login / MFA / CAPTCHA handoff as normal in this lane.
  6. Report why a running browser was necessary and when a fresh-session tool would have been safer.

References

Deep-dive docs in this skill:

Primary sources:

Output expectations

When using this skill, report:

  • why playwriter was chosen instead of a fresh-session browser tool
  • session/runtime assumptions
  • key actions taken
  • evidence captured (snapshot, screenshot, recording, logs)
  • any manual handoff or auth-related limitation encountered

平台分布

Codex

32.36%
按下载量换算226

Claude

31.12%
按下载量换算217

Cursor

18.1%
按下载量换算126

Gemini CLI

8.9%
按下载量换算62

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills