Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维和基础设施只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

looker-studio-bigqueryLooker 工作室 bigquery

Agent Skill

looker-studio-bigquery 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,046

周安装

87

GitHub Stars

11

下载量

717
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:looker-studio-bigquery(Looker 工作室 bigquery)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills
仓库路径:skills/looker-studio-bigquery
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill looker-studio-bigquery
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill looker-studio-bigquery

简介

该技能用于基于 BigQuery 构建可信的利益相关方报告包,适用于 Looker Studio 的数据可视化与业务指标展示场景。

  • 适合在需要处理数据建模、报表刷新、成本监控或导出交接等运维和基础设施任务时使用。
  • 通过标准化数据包选择、主流程定义和路由输出,帮助快速定位合适的观察模式与中断机制。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,并注意是否涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • looker-studio-bigquery 属于运维和基础设施类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Looker Studio + BigQuery

Use this skill when the real deliverable is one trustworthy stakeholder-reporting packet on top of BigQuery.

looker-studio-bigquery owns the reporting layer for:

  • PM / ops KPI review boards
  • product funnel, retention, and rollout dashboards already modeled in BigQuery
  • marketing / GTM channel and revenue reporting
  • game / live-ops / business telemetry review boards
  • refresh, cost, audience, and export-handoff decisions for Looker Studio on curated data

Read these support docs first when needed:

When to use this skill

  • The user explicitly wants Looker Studio / Data Studio + BigQuery help.
  • The data already lives in BigQuery, or the dashboard clearly sits on curated BigQuery tables/views.
  • The main job is dashboard structure, refresh/cost shape, audience-specific delivery, or export-ready reporting.
  • The request is about KPI boards, PM/ops reviews, marketing/GTM reporting, product summary dashboards, or game/business telemetry dashboards.
  • The real risk is dashboard trust, refresh design, or mixed-audience sprawl rather than raw SQL interpretation alone.

When not to use this skill

  • The main job is explaining why a KPI moved or what the dataset means → use data-analysis
  • The main job is repeated anomaly hunting or reusable rule scans across metrics/events → use pattern-detection
  • The main job is telemetry reliability, alerting, or instrumentation coverage → use monitoring-observability
  • The main job is choosing a full BI / semantic platform → use survey
  • The main job is broad GCP/bootstrap/deploy work → route to the relevant infrastructure skill first

Instructions

Step 1: Pick one primary packet before talking about charts

Normalize the request into one packet.

looker_studio_bigquery_packet:
  primary_packet: dashboard-spec | slow-dashboard | refresh-shape | audience-split | exec-handoff
  audience: executive | pm-ops | product-analytics | marketing-gtm | game-liveops | mixed | unknown
  source_shape: curated-table | view | scheduled-query-output | materialized-view | mixed | unknown
  freshness_need: near-real-time | hourly | daily | weekly | unknown
  trust_risk: low | medium | high

Pick exactly one primary_packet:

  • dashboard-spec — build or redesign a stakeholder dashboard
  • slow-dashboard — fix a dashboard that is slow, expensive, or brittle
  • refresh-shape — decide live vs scheduled vs snapshot vs BI Engine
  • audience-split — separate one overloaded report into audience-specific artifacts
  • exec-handoff — produce a thin dashboard plus export/sheet/deck handoff for commentary and approvals

If two packets seem plausible, choose the one that removes the biggest delivery risk first.

Step 2: Keep the dashboard thin on purpose

Before designing sections, answer these:

  1. What review ritual or decision does this dashboard support?
  2. What table/view is the source of truth?
  3. Which metrics belong in BigQuery instead of report-level formulas?
  4. Who owns freshness, trust checks, and caveats?

If the request still depends on raw fact tables, unstable joins, or fuzzy metric definitions, say so and push modeling work upstream before polishing the dashboard.

Step 3: Shape the packet, not a generic BI essay

Use the packet guidance in references/intake-packets-and-route-outs.md.

Minimum packet expectations:

  • dashboard-spec → page structure, KPI set, chart-to-question mapping, and BigQuery contract
  • slow-dashboard → bottleneck order, upstream precompute options, and one shortest-path fix
  • refresh-shape → live vs scheduled vs snapshot choice tied to the real review cadence
  • audience-split → artifact split by stakeholder ritual, trust need, and detail depth
  • exec-handoff → thin dashboard plus Connected Sheets / export / slide handoff plan

Do not answer with a generic chart buffet.

Step 4: Return a delivery brief

Use this structure:

# Looker Studio Delivery Brief

## Primary packet
- Packet: ...
- Audience: ...
- Confidence: high | medium | low

## Review ritual and question
- Ritual: ...
- Decisions supported: ...

## BigQuery contract
- Source table/view: ...
- Grain: ...
- Core dimensions: ...
- Core metrics: ...
- Freshness / owner / caveats: ...

## Recommended dashboard shape
- Pages or sections: ...
- KPI and chart-to-question mapping: ...
- Filters / drilldowns / export needs: ...

## Refresh, cost, and trust plan
- Preferred refresh shape: ...
- Heavy logic to move upstream: ...
- Trust or caveat notes: ...

## Recommended next artifact
- Choose one: dashboard spec | SQL handoff list | refresh decision memo | audience split brief | export / Connected Sheets handoff

## Route-outs
- Upstream modeling / KPI interpretation / anomaly hunting / observability / platform comparison as needed

Step 5: Route out honestly

  • If the user needs dataset reasoning or KPI explanation, route to data-analysis.
  • If the user needs repeated anomaly detection or reusable metric rules, route to pattern-detection.
  • If the user needs telemetry coverage, alerting, or instrumentation trust, route to monitoring-observability.
  • If the user needs a heavier BI or semantic-platform decision, route to survey.

Examples

Example 1: PM / ops dashboard build

Input

Build a leadership-ready PM review dashboard in Looker Studio on top of BigQuery weekly KPIs.

Output sketch

  • Packet: dashboard-spec
  • Dashboard shape: KPI scorecards + main trend + one drilldown + owner/freshness notes
  • Next artifact: dashboard spec

Example 2: Slow marketing board

Input

Our marketing funnel dashboard is too slow and expensive whenever people touch filters.

Output sketch

  • Packet: slow-dashboard or refresh-shape
  • Primary recommendation: precompute the repeated funnel logic in BigQuery before styling changes
  • Next artifact: refresh decision memo or SQL handoff list

Example 3: Mixed audience dashboard

Input

One board is trying to serve executives, PMs, growth, and live-ops. Should we keep patching it?

Output sketch

  • Packet: audience-split
  • Recommendation: split the artifact by decision ritual and trust needs
  • Next artifact: audience split brief

Example 4: Commentary-friendly handoff

Input

Leadership wants a weekly board, but they still annotate numbers in Sheets before the review.

Output sketch

  • Packet: exec-handoff
  • Recommendation: keep the dashboard thin and define the export / Connected Sheets handoff explicitly
  • Next artifact: export / Connected Sheets handoff

Best practices

  1. Start from the current packet, not from chart types.
  2. Keep heavy logic in BigQuery whenever possible.
  3. Tie freshness to the real review ritual instead of pretending everything must be live.
  4. Split dashboards by audience when one artifact keeps absorbing incompatible needs.
  5. Name the owner, caveats, and trust contract in every serious dashboard handoff.
  6. Prefer route-outs over stuffing analysis, anomaly hunting, or observability into this skill.

References

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.43%
按下载量换算247

Claude

28.6%
按下载量换算205

Cursor

18.23%
按下载量换算131

Gemini CLI

9.31%
按下载量换算67

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills