Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

looker-studio-bigquery(Looker 工作室 bigquery)

looker-studio-bigquery 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

looker-studio-bigquery 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 686。

总安装 2,046周安装 87GitHub Stars 11下载 717核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:looker-studio-bigquery(Looker 工作室 bigquery)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills
仓库路径:skills/looker-studio-bigquery
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill looker-studio-bigquery
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill looker-studio-bigquery

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

该技能用于基于 BigQuery 构建可信的利益相关方报告包,适用于 Looker Studio 的数据可视化与业务指标展示场景。适合在需要处理数据建模、报表刷新、成本监控或导出交接等运维和基础设施任务时使用。通过标准化数据包选择、主流程定义和路由输出,帮助快速定位合适的观察模式与中断机制。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,并注意是否涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。looker-studio-bigquery 属于运维和基础设施类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/looker-studio-bigquery

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill looker-studio-b…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

looker-studio-bigquery 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill looker-studio-bigquery。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

looker-studio-bigquery 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

looker-studio-bigquery 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

looker-studio-bigquery 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

looker-studio-bigquery 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,046 次,近一周安装 87 次,下载 717 次,GitHub 11 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

looker-studio-bigquery 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
looker-studio-bigquery

Looker 工作室 bigquery · 本页

2,04611只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Looker Studio + BigQuery

Use this skill when the real deliverable is one trustworthy stakeholder-reporting packet on top of BigQuery.

looker-studio-bigquery owns the reporting layer for:

  • PM / ops KPI review boards
  • product funnel, retention, and rollout dashboards already modeled in BigQuery
  • marketing / GTM channel and revenue reporting
  • game / live-ops / business telemetry review boards
  • refresh, cost, audience, and export-handoff decisions for Looker Studio on curated data

Read these support docs first when needed:

When to use this skill

  • The user explicitly wants Looker Studio / Data Studio + BigQuery help.
  • The data already lives in BigQuery, or the dashboard clearly sits on curated BigQuery tables/views.
  • The main job is dashboard structure, refresh/cost shape, audience-specific delivery, or export-ready reporting.
  • The request is about KPI boards, PM/ops reviews, marketing/GTM reporting, product summary dashboards, or game/business telemetry dashboards.
  • The real risk is dashboard trust, refresh design, or mixed-audience sprawl rather than raw SQL interpretation alone.

When not to use this skill

  • The main job is explaining why a KPI moved or what the dataset means → use data-analysis
  • The main job is repeated anomaly hunting or reusable rule scans across metrics/events → use pattern-detection
  • The main job is telemetry reliability, alerting, or instrumentation coverage → use monitoring-observability
  • The main job is choosing a full BI / semantic platform → use survey
  • The main job is broad GCP/bootstrap/deploy work → route to the relevant infrastructure skill first

Instructions

Step 1: Pick one primary packet before talking about charts

Normalize the request into one packet.

looker_studio_bigquery_packet:
  primary_packet: dashboard-spec | slow-dashboard | refresh-shape | audience-split | exec-handoff
  audience: executive | pm-ops | product-analytics | marketing-gtm | game-liveops | mixed | unknown
  source_shape: curated-table | view | scheduled-query-output | materialized-view | mixed | unknown
  freshness_need: near-real-time | hourly | daily | weekly | unknown
  trust_risk: low | medium | high

Pick exactly one primary_packet:

  • dashboard-spec — build or redesign a stakeholder dashboard
  • slow-dashboard — fix a dashboard that is slow, expensive, or brittle
  • refresh-shape — decide live vs scheduled vs snapshot vs BI Engine
  • audience-split — separate one overloaded report into audience-specific artifacts
  • exec-handoff — produce a thin dashboard plus export/sheet/deck handoff for commentary and approvals

If two packets seem plausible, choose the one that removes the biggest delivery risk first.

Step 2: Keep the dashboard thin on purpose

Before designing sections, answer these:

  1. What review ritual or decision does this dashboard support?
  2. What table/view is the source of truth?
  3. Which metrics belong in BigQuery instead of report-level formulas?
  4. Who owns freshness, trust checks, and caveats?

If the request still depends on raw fact tables, unstable joins, or fuzzy metric definitions, say so and push modeling work upstream before polishing the dashboard.

Step 3: Shape the packet, not a generic BI essay

Use the packet guidance in references/intake-packets-and-route-outs.md.

Minimum packet expectations:

  • dashboard-spec → page structure, KPI set, chart-to-question mapping, and BigQuery contract
  • slow-dashboard → bottleneck order, upstream precompute options, and one shortest-path fix
  • refresh-shape → live vs scheduled vs snapshot choice tied to the real review cadence
  • audience-split → artifact split by stakeholder ritual, trust need, and detail depth
  • exec-handoff → thin dashboard plus Connected Sheets / export / slide handoff plan

Do not answer with a generic chart buffet.

Step 4: Return a delivery brief

Use this structure:

# Looker Studio Delivery Brief

## Primary packet
- Packet: ...
- Audience: ...
- Confidence: high | medium | low

## Review ritual and question
- Ritual: ...
- Decisions supported: ...

## BigQuery contract
- Source table/view: ...
- Grain: ...
- Core dimensions: ...
- Core metrics: ...
- Freshness / owner / caveats: ...

## Recommended dashboard shape
- Pages or sections: ...
- KPI and chart-to-question mapping: ...
- Filters / drilldowns / export needs: ...

## Refresh, cost, and trust plan
- Preferred refresh shape: ...
- Heavy logic to move upstream: ...
- Trust or caveat notes: ...

## Recommended next artifact
- Choose one: dashboard spec | SQL handoff list | refresh decision memo | audience split brief | export / Connected Sheets handoff

## Route-outs
- Upstream modeling / KPI interpretation / anomaly hunting / observability / platform comparison as needed

Step 5: Route out honestly

  • If the user needs dataset reasoning or KPI explanation, route to data-analysis.
  • If the user needs repeated anomaly detection or reusable metric rules, route to pattern-detection.
  • If the user needs telemetry coverage, alerting, or instrumentation trust, route to monitoring-observability.
  • If the user needs a heavier BI or semantic-platform decision, route to survey.

Examples

Example 1: PM / ops dashboard build

Input

Build a leadership-ready PM review dashboard in Looker Studio on top of BigQuery weekly KPIs.

Output sketch

  • Packet: dashboard-spec
  • Dashboard shape: KPI scorecards + main trend + one drilldown + owner/freshness notes
  • Next artifact: dashboard spec

Example 2: Slow marketing board

Input

Our marketing funnel dashboard is too slow and expensive whenever people touch filters.

Output sketch

  • Packet: slow-dashboard or refresh-shape
  • Primary recommendation: precompute the repeated funnel logic in BigQuery before styling changes
  • Next artifact: refresh decision memo or SQL handoff list

Example 3: Mixed audience dashboard

Input

One board is trying to serve executives, PMs, growth, and live-ops. Should we keep patching it?

Output sketch

  • Packet: audience-split
  • Recommendation: split the artifact by decision ritual and trust needs
  • Next artifact: audience split brief

Example 4: Commentary-friendly handoff

Input

Leadership wants a weekly board, but they still annotate numbers in Sheets before the review.

Output sketch

  • Packet: exec-handoff
  • Recommendation: keep the dashboard thin and define the export / Connected Sheets handoff explicitly
  • Next artifact: export / Connected Sheets handoff

Best practices

  1. Start from the current packet, not from chart types.
  2. Keep heavy logic in BigQuery whenever possible.
  3. Tie freshness to the real review ritual instead of pretending everything must be live.
  4. Split dashboards by audience when one artifact keeps absorbing incompatible needs.
  5. Name the owner, caveats, and trust contract in every serious dashboard handoff.
  6. Prefer route-outs over stuffing analysis, anomaly hunting, or observability into this skill.

References

平台分布

Codex

34.43%
按下载量换算247

Claude

28.6%
按下载量换算205

Cursor

18.23%
按下载量换算131

Gemini CLI

9.31%
按下载量换算67

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills