Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

agentation(agentation 命令行)

agentation 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

agentation 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 2,744。

总安装 1,947周安装 78GitHub Stars 11下载 630核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agentation(agentation 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills
仓库路径:skills/agentation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill agentation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill agentation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合作为 UI 反馈桥梁,支持人类标注具体元素并传递结构化反馈。可将任务路由至其他技能或代理,实现精准修复闭环。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill agentation。使用前建议确认权限范围及是否会触发文件读写或网络请求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/agentation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill agentation;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

agentation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-skills --skill agentation。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

agentation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

agentation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

agentation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

agentation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,947 次,近一周安装 78 次,下载 630 次,GitHub 11 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

agentation 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
agentation

agentation 命令行 · 本页

1,94711操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

agentation

agentation is the rendered-UI feedback bridge in this repo.

Use it when a human needs to click the actual UI, attach feedback to the exact element or region they mean, and pass a structured packet to the coding agent. The main job is annotation routing: choose the right annotation mode, capture precise evidence, then hand the fix loop to the right adjacent skill or agent runtime.

When to use this skill

Use agentation when the task needs one or more of these:

  • a human reviewer pointing at a real UI element instead of describing it vaguely
  • structured feedback packets with selectors, element paths, bounding boxes, or copied markdown
  • a local copy-paste review loop between a browser and a coding agent
  • an MCP-backed sync/watch loop where new annotations flow into the agent context automatically
  • a self-driving critique/fix loop that still starts from rendered UI evidence
  • platform setup for passing pending UI annotations into Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode

Do not use agentation by default for:

  • fresh-session browser verification or deterministic regression checks → agent-browser
  • running-browser, logged-in, or extension-dependent browser reuse → playwriter
  • plan review, diff approval, or visual sign-off on a proposed artifact → plannotator
  • generic design-system, accessibility, or heuristic audits without a concrete rendered UI packet

Quick routing rule

If the job needs...Use
Human clicks the UI and leaves exact feedback for the agentagentation
Browser verification in a clean repeatable sessionagent-browser
The user's already-open browser, cookies, or logged-in tabsplaywriter
Review or approval of a plan/diff before executionplannotator

Instructions

Step 1: Choose the right annotation mode

Pick one mode before touching setup details:

ModeUse whenOutput
Copy-paste reviewOne reviewer wants to annotate UI and paste the packet into chata structured markdown packet
Synced watch loopNew annotations should appear in the agent workflow automaticallypending-annotation queue + loop
Self-driving critiqueAn agent/browser loop will generate or consume annotations repeatedlya review/fix loop packet
Platform setupThe core problem is wiring the annotation bridge into Claude/Codex/Gemini/OpenCodea setup checklist and config target

If the task is really “test the website” or “drive the logged-in browser,” route out first and only come back to agentation if exact human UI feedback is the missing piece.

Step 2: Keep the browser boundary explicit

agentation does not replace the browser runtime choice.

  • Use agent-browser when you want a clean disposable verification browser.
  • Use playwriter when you must reuse the user's real browser session.
  • Use agentation once there is a rendered page that a human or loop should annotate precisely.

Step 3: Follow the core loop

  1. Prepare the rendered UI

- Choose the correct browser/runtime skill first if needed.

  1. Add the Agentation toolbar to the app in development.
  2. Pick the annotation mode: copy-paste, watch loop, self-driving, or setup.
  3. Capture one concrete UI packet.
  4. Hand the packet to the coding agent.
  5. Re-verify after the fix using the same review lane.

Step 4: Use the fastest safe install path

For most setups, the practical order is:

# React toolbar
npm install agentation -D

# MCP bridge / auto-registration for supported agents
npx add-mcp "npx -y agentation-mcp server"

# verify the bridge
npx agentation-mcp doctor

Claude Code users can also install the upstream official skill when that is the simplest way to bootstrap the experience:

npx skills add benjitaylor/agentation -g
# then use /agentation in Claude Code

Step 5: Use a minimal toolbar integration first

Start with the smallest useful embed:

import { Agentation } from 'agentation';

function App() {
  return (
    <>
      <YourApp />
      {process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' && <Agentation />}
    </>
  )
}

Only add endpoint, callbacks, or webhook behavior when the chosen mode actually needs them.

Step 6: Choose the right handoff pattern

A. Copy-paste review

Use when a human is actively reviewing the page and pasting the packet into an agent chat.

Good for:

  • quick bug/UI polish rounds
  • one-off targeted fixes
  • low-setup collaboration
B. Synced watch loop

Use when the agent should poll or ingest pending annotations continuously.

Good for:

  • repeated QA/fix passes
  • designer ↔ agent loops
  • local review queues during active frontend work

Use the bundled verification script before trusting the loop:

bash .agent-skills/agentation/scripts/verify-loop.sh
C. Self-driving critique

Use when an agent/browser loop is reviewing UI repeatedly and agentation is the structured feedback packet, not the browser runtime itself.

Typical shape:

  • browser tool captures current state
  • agentation encodes concrete feedback targets
  • coding agent applies the fix
  • browser tool re-checks the result

Step 7: Keep platform setup narrow

When the request is really about platform wiring, answer only:

  • where the config lives
  • how agentation-mcp is registered
  • how pending annotations enter the agent loop
  • how to verify the setup

Push the platform-specific config blocks into the references instead of bloating the main workflow.

Scripts

Prefer the bundled scripts before retyping long commands:

ScriptPurpose
scripts/setup-agentation-mcp.shRegister the MCP bridge for supported agents
scripts/verify-loop.shValidate annotation queue / ACK → RESOLVE style watch-loop behavior

Examples

Example 1: Human reviewer wants exact UI feedback

  • Prompt: "I can point at the broken checkout button, but I don't want to describe selectors manually."
  • Expected behavior: choose agentation, recommend copy-paste review or sync mode, keep browser-runtime choice separate.

Example 2: Browser verification is the real job

  • Prompt: "Run a repeatable headless UI regression check and compare the results."
  • Expected behavior: route to agent-browser, not agentation, unless human annotation becomes a follow-up step.

Example 3: Logged-in browser reuse

  • Prompt: "Use the browser I'm already signed into and let me annotate a billing page issue."
  • Expected behavior: route the browser runtime to playwriter, then use agentation for the annotation packet.

Example 4: Planning review, not UI review

  • Prompt: "Open the generated plan in a browser so I can approve or reject steps before coding starts."
  • Expected behavior: route to plannotator, because the artifact is a plan/diff rather than a rendered UI issue.

Best practices

  1. Pick the browser/runtime lane first; agentation is the feedback bridge, not every browser tool.
  2. Prefer one annotation mode at a time instead of mixing copy-paste, watch loop, and platform setup in a single answer.
  3. Keep the first integration minimal; only add hooks, callbacks, or webhooks when the workflow needs them.
  4. Re-verify after fixes with the same review lane that produced the annotation.
  5. Treat exact UI feedback as the deliverable — not a giant dump of install permutations.
  6. Route out aggressively when the task is really plan review, fresh-browser verification, or running-browser reuse.

References

Deep-dive docs in this skill:

Primary sources:

Metadata

  • Version: 1.1.0
  • Last updated: 2026-04-15
  • Scope: exact rendered-UI feedback packets, watch loops, and platform handoff for coding agents

平台分布

Codex

33.31%
按下载量换算210

Claude

30.26%
按下载量换算191

Cursor

21.03%
按下载量换算132

Gemini CLI

9.73%
按下载量换算61

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills